The Experts below are selected from a list of 29817 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Charles M. Hansen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Physical and chemical properties of plasma treated ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene fibers
Surface & Coatings Technology, 2010Co-Authors: Yukihiro Kusano, Steluta Teodoru, Charles M. HansenAbstract:Abstract A uniform and smooth transfer of stresses across the polymer matrix/fiber interface is enhanced when Adhesion between the matrix and fiber surface is optimized. In the absence of covalent bonds matching the Hansen solubility (cohesion) parameters (HSP) of the fiber surface with the HSP of a matrix polymer assures maximum Physical Adhesion to transfer loads uniformly. Plasma treatment of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers is shown to significantly increase the amount of oxygen in the surface. There are two distinct types of surfaces in both the plasma treated and the untreated UHMWPE fibers. One type is typical of polyethylene (PE) polymers while the other is characteristic of the oxygenated surface at much higher values of HSP. The oxygenated surface of the plasma treated fibers has the HSP δD, δP, and δH equal to 16.5, 15.3, and 8.2, compared to the pure PE surface with HSP at 18.0, 1.2, and 1.4, all in MPa½. The dispersion parameter has been lowered somewhat by the plasma treatment, while the polar and hydrogen bonding parameters are much higher. The HSP methodology predicts enhanced Adhesion is possible by skillful use of anhydride and nitrile functional groups in matrix or tie polymers to promote compatibility in the system.
-
Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook - Hansen solubility parameters : a user's handbook
1999Co-Authors: Charles M. HansenAbstract:Solubility Parameters - An Introduction C.M. Hansen Hildebrand Parameters and Basic Polymer Solution Thermodynamics Hansen Solubility Parameters Methods and Problems in the Determination of Partial Solubility Parameters Calculation of the Dispersion Solubility Parameter deltad Calculation of the Polar Solubility Parameter deltap Calculation of the Hydrogen Bonding Solubility Parameter deltah Supplementary Calculations And Procedures Hansen Solubility Parameters for Water Theory - The Prigogine Corresponding States Theory, the c12 Interaction Parameter, and the Hansen Solubility Parameters C.M. Hansen Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSP) Resemblance Between Predictions of Hansen Solubility Parameters and Corresponding States Theories The c12Parameter and Hansen Solubility Parameters Comparison of Calculated and Experimental c12 Parameters General Discussion Postscript Statistical Thermodynamic Calculations of the Hydrogen Bonding, Dipolar, and Dispersion Solubility Parameters C. Panayiotou Theory Applications Discussion and Conclusions Appendix I: The Acid Dimerization Appendix II: An Alternative Form of the Polar Term Appendix III: A Group-Contribution Method for the Prediction of delta and deltaD Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSP) in Thermodynamic Models for Polymer Solutions G.M. Kontogeorgis Group Contribution Methods for Estimating Properties of Polymers Activity Coefficients Models Using the HSP Conclusions and Future Challenges Appendix I: An Expression of the FH Model for Multicomponent Mixture Methods of Characterization - Polymers C.M. Hansen Calculation of Polymer HSP Solubility - Examples Swelling - Examples Melting Point Determinations - Effect of Temperature Environmental Stress Cracking Intrinsic Viscosity Measurements Other Measurement Techniques Methods of Characterization - Surfaces C.M. Hansen Hansen Solubility Parameter Correlations with Surface Tension (Surface Free Energy) Method to Evaluate the Cohesion Energy Parameters for Surfaces A Critical View of the Critical Surface Tensions A Critical View of the Wetting Tension Additional Hansen Solubility Parameter Surface Characterizations and Comparisons Self-Stratifying Coatings Maximizing Physical Adhesion Methods of Characterization for Pigments, Fillers, and Fibers C.M. Hansen Methods to Characterize Pigment, Filler, and Fiber Surfaces Discussion - Pigments, Fillers, and Fibers Hansen Solubility Parameter Correlation of Zeta Potential for Blanc Fixe Carbon Fiber Surface Characterization Controlled Adsorption (Self-Assembly) Applications - Coatings and Other Filled Polymer Systems C.M. Hansen Solvents Techniques for Data Treatment Solvents and Surface Phenomena in Coatings (Self-Assembly) Polymer Compatibility Hansen Solubility Parameter Principles Applied to Understanding Other Filled Polymer Systems Hansen Solubility Parameters of Asphalt, Bitumen and Crude Oils P. Redelius Models of Bitumen Asphaltenes Molecular Weight Polarity Solubility Parameters of Bitumen Testing of Bitumen Solubility Hildebrand Solubility Parameters Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSP) The Solubility Sphere Computer Program for Calculation and Plotting of the Hansen 3D Pseudosphere Components of Bitumen Bitumen and Polymers Crude Oil Turbidimetric Titrations BISOM Test Determination of Hansen Solubility Parameter Values for Carbon Dioxide L.L. Williams Methodology One-Component Hildebrand Parameter as a Function of Temperature and Pressure Three-Component (Hansen) Solubility Parameters - Pure CO2 Temperature and Pressure Effects on HSPs: deltad Temperature and Pressure Effects on HSPs: deltap Temperature and Pressure Effects on HSPs: deltah Addendum Appendix I: Ideal Solubility of Gases in Liquids and Published CO2 Solubility Data Use of Hansen Solubility Parameters to Identify Cleaning Applications for "Designer" Solvents J. Durkee A Variety of Solvents Pathology of Soils HSP of Multiple-Component Soils Method for Calculating HSP of Composites (Soils or Solvents) More Realistic View About Evaluating HSP of Composite Soils Method for Choice of Suitable Solvents Reference Soils for Comparison Identification of Designer Solvents An Open Question - Answered Limiting RA Value For Expected Good Cleaning Performance Application of HSP Methodology to Cleaning Operations Analysis of Capability of Designer Solvents Applications - Chemical Resistance C.M. Hansen Chemical Resistance - Acceptable-or-Not Data Effects of Solvent Molecular Size Chemical Resistance - Examples Special Effects with Water Applications - Barrier Polymers C.M. Hansen Concentration-Dependent Diffusion Solubility Parameter Correlations Based on Permeation Phenomena Solubility Parameter Correlation of Polymer Swelling Solubility Parameter Correlation of Permeation Coefficients for Gases General Considerations Applications - Environmental Stress Cracking in Polymers C.M. Hansen ESC Interpreted Using HSP ESC With Nonabsorbing Stress Cracking Initiators Hansen Solubility Parameters - Biological Materials C.M. Hansen and T. Svenstrup Poulsen Hydrophobic Bonding and Hydrophilic Bonding (Self-Association) DNA Cholesterol Lard Human Skin Proteins - Blood Serum and Zein Chlorophyll and Lignin Wood Chemicals and Polymers Urea Water Surface Mobility Chiral Rotation, Hydrogen Bonding, and Nanoengineering Absorption and Diffusion in Polymers C.M. Hansen Steady State Permeation The Diffusion Equation Surface Resistance Side Effects Film Formation by Solvent Evaporation Anomalous Diffusion (Case II, Super Case II) Applications - Safety and Environment C.M. Hansen Substitution Alternative Systems Solvent Formulation And Personal Protection For Least Risk The Danish Mal System - The Fan Selection of Chemical Protective Clothing Uptake of Contents by a Plastic Container Skin Penetration Transport Phenomena The Future Hansen Solubility Parameter Data and Data Quality Group Contribution Methods Polymers as Points - Solvents as Spheres Characterizing Surfaces Materials and Processes Suggested for Further Attention Theoretical Problems Awaiting Future Resolution Appendices Hansen Solubility Parameters for Selected Solvents with the major contribution of Hanno Priebe Hansen Solubility Parameters for Selected Correlations Solubility Data for the Original 33 Polymers and 88 Solvents Index * Each Chapter contains an Abstract, an Introduction, and a Conclusion. Many chapters may also include Acknowledgements, Additional Discussions or General Comments/Considerations, and chapter-specific Key Words, Abbreviations, and Symbols
-
hansen solubility parameters a user s handbook
1999Co-Authors: Charles M. HansenAbstract:Solubility Parameters - An Introduction C.M. Hansen Hildebrand Parameters and Basic Polymer Solution Thermodynamics Hansen Solubility Parameters Methods and Problems in the Determination of Partial Solubility Parameters Calculation of the Dispersion Solubility Parameter deltad Calculation of the Polar Solubility Parameter deltap Calculation of the Hydrogen Bonding Solubility Parameter deltah Supplementary Calculations And Procedures Hansen Solubility Parameters for Water Theory - The Prigogine Corresponding States Theory, the c12 Interaction Parameter, and the Hansen Solubility Parameters C.M. Hansen Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSP) Resemblance Between Predictions of Hansen Solubility Parameters and Corresponding States Theories The c12Parameter and Hansen Solubility Parameters Comparison of Calculated and Experimental c12 Parameters General Discussion Postscript Statistical Thermodynamic Calculations of the Hydrogen Bonding, Dipolar, and Dispersion Solubility Parameters C. Panayiotou Theory Applications Discussion and Conclusions Appendix I: The Acid Dimerization Appendix II: An Alternative Form of the Polar Term Appendix III: A Group-Contribution Method for the Prediction of delta and deltaD Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSP) in Thermodynamic Models for Polymer Solutions G.M. Kontogeorgis Group Contribution Methods for Estimating Properties of Polymers Activity Coefficients Models Using the HSP Conclusions and Future Challenges Appendix I: An Expression of the FH Model for Multicomponent Mixture Methods of Characterization - Polymers C.M. Hansen Calculation of Polymer HSP Solubility - Examples Swelling - Examples Melting Point Determinations - Effect of Temperature Environmental Stress Cracking Intrinsic Viscosity Measurements Other Measurement Techniques Methods of Characterization - Surfaces C.M. Hansen Hansen Solubility Parameter Correlations with Surface Tension (Surface Free Energy) Method to Evaluate the Cohesion Energy Parameters for Surfaces A Critical View of the Critical Surface Tensions A Critical View of the Wetting Tension Additional Hansen Solubility Parameter Surface Characterizations and Comparisons Self-Stratifying Coatings Maximizing Physical Adhesion Methods of Characterization for Pigments, Fillers, and Fibers C.M. Hansen Methods to Characterize Pigment, Filler, and Fiber Surfaces Discussion - Pigments, Fillers, and Fibers Hansen Solubility Parameter Correlation of Zeta Potential for Blanc Fixe Carbon Fiber Surface Characterization Controlled Adsorption (Self-Assembly) Applications - Coatings and Other Filled Polymer Systems C.M. Hansen Solvents Techniques for Data Treatment Solvents and Surface Phenomena in Coatings (Self-Assembly) Polymer Compatibility Hansen Solubility Parameter Principles Applied to Understanding Other Filled Polymer Systems Hansen Solubility Parameters of Asphalt, Bitumen and Crude Oils P. Redelius Models of Bitumen Asphaltenes Molecular Weight Polarity Solubility Parameters of Bitumen Testing of Bitumen Solubility Hildebrand Solubility Parameters Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSP) The Solubility Sphere Computer Program for Calculation and Plotting of the Hansen 3D Pseudosphere Components of Bitumen Bitumen and Polymers Crude Oil Turbidimetric Titrations BISOM Test Determination of Hansen Solubility Parameter Values for Carbon Dioxide L.L. Williams Methodology One-Component Hildebrand Parameter as a Function of Temperature and Pressure Three-Component (Hansen) Solubility Parameters - Pure CO2 Temperature and Pressure Effects on HSPs: deltad Temperature and Pressure Effects on HSPs: deltap Temperature and Pressure Effects on HSPs: deltah Addendum Appendix I: Ideal Solubility of Gases in Liquids and Published CO2 Solubility Data Use of Hansen Solubility Parameters to Identify Cleaning Applications for "Designer" Solvents J. Durkee A Variety of Solvents Pathology of Soils HSP of Multiple-Component Soils Method for Calculating HSP of Composites (Soils or Solvents) More Realistic View About Evaluating HSP of Composite Soils Method for Choice of Suitable Solvents Reference Soils for Comparison Identification of Designer Solvents An Open Question - Answered Limiting RA Value For Expected Good Cleaning Performance Application of HSP Methodology to Cleaning Operations Analysis of Capability of Designer Solvents Applications - Chemical Resistance C.M. Hansen Chemical Resistance - Acceptable-or-Not Data Effects of Solvent Molecular Size Chemical Resistance - Examples Special Effects with Water Applications - Barrier Polymers C.M. Hansen Concentration-Dependent Diffusion Solubility Parameter Correlations Based on Permeation Phenomena Solubility Parameter Correlation of Polymer Swelling Solubility Parameter Correlation of Permeation Coefficients for Gases General Considerations Applications - Environmental Stress Cracking in Polymers C.M. Hansen ESC Interpreted Using HSP ESC With Nonabsorbing Stress Cracking Initiators Hansen Solubility Parameters - Biological Materials C.M. Hansen and T. Svenstrup Poulsen Hydrophobic Bonding and Hydrophilic Bonding (Self-Association) DNA Cholesterol Lard Human Skin Proteins - Blood Serum and Zein Chlorophyll and Lignin Wood Chemicals and Polymers Urea Water Surface Mobility Chiral Rotation, Hydrogen Bonding, and Nanoengineering Absorption and Diffusion in Polymers C.M. Hansen Steady State Permeation The Diffusion Equation Surface Resistance Side Effects Film Formation by Solvent Evaporation Anomalous Diffusion (Case II, Super Case II) Applications - Safety and Environment C.M. Hansen Substitution Alternative Systems Solvent Formulation And Personal Protection For Least Risk The Danish Mal System - The Fan Selection of Chemical Protective Clothing Uptake of Contents by a Plastic Container Skin Penetration Transport Phenomena The Future Hansen Solubility Parameter Data and Data Quality Group Contribution Methods Polymers as Points - Solvents as Spheres Characterizing Surfaces Materials and Processes Suggested for Further Attention Theoretical Problems Awaiting Future Resolution Appendices Hansen Solubility Parameters for Selected Solvents with the major contribution of Hanno Priebe Hansen Solubility Parameters for Selected Correlations Solubility Data for the Original 33 Polymers and 88 Solvents Index * Each Chapter contains an Abstract, an Introduction, and a Conclusion. Many chapters may also include Acknowledgements, Additional Discussions or General Comments/Considerations, and chapter-specific Key Words, Abbreviations, and Symbols
H.l. Gibbs - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Evaluation of HDPE water sample bottles and PVC sampler tubing used in herbicide dissipation studies.
2009Co-Authors: J.b. Fischer, Jerry L. Michael, H.l. GibbsAbstract:The recovery of six herbicides (triclopyr, triclopyr ester, sulfometuron methyl, metsulfuron methyl, imazapyr, and hexazinone) was evaluated in two stream water samples, one from Weogufka Creek in the Alabama Piedmont and one from a stagnant stream in the Escambia Experimental Forest near Florida. Simulated field study conditions were used to evaluate collection, ambient (pre-retrieval) field storage, and freezer storage phases of stream water sampling. Method detection levels were developed for each herbicide in each water matrix. None -of the herbicides degraded significantly in either stream water after 24 days at 22 0 C to 25 0 C or after 12 months of freezer storage below _15 0 C. None of the herbicides tested appeared to leach from the automatic sampler tubing into subsequently collected samples. However, slight carryover of about 0.8% of the spiking level was observed in the first post-spike blanks collected for all herbicides. This appeared to be the result of Physical Adhesion of water droplets on tubing walls; no detectable carryover was observed in subsequent blanks. These results support the use of HDPE sample containers and flexible PVC automatic sampler tubing in environmental fate studies of herbicides.
-
Technical Note: Evaluation of HDPE Water Sample Bottles and PVC Sampler Tubing Used in Herbicide Dissipation Studies
Transactions of the ASABE, 2008Co-Authors: J.b. Fischer, Jerry L. Michael, H.l. GibbsAbstract:The recovery of six herbicides (triclopyr, triclopyr ester, sulfometuron methyl, metsulfuron methyl, imazapyr, and hexazinone) was evaluated in two stream water samples, one from Weogufka Creek in the Alabama Piedmont and one from a stagnant stream in the Escambia Experimental Forest near Florida. Simulated field study conditions were used to evaluate collection, ambient (pre-retrieval) field storage, and freezer storage phases of stream water sampling. Method detection levels were developed for each herbicide in each water matrix. None of the herbicides degraded significantly in either stream water after 24 days at 22°C to 25°C or after 12 months of freezer storage below -15°C. None of the herbicides tested appeared to leach from the automatic sampler tubing into subsequently collected samples. However, slight carryover of about 0.8% of the spiking level was observed in the first post-spike blanks collected for all herbicides. This appeared to be the result of Physical Adhesion of water droplets on tubing walls; no detectable carryover was observed in subsequent blanks. These results support the use of HDPE sample containers and flexible PVC automatic sampler tubing in environmental fate studies of herbicides.
-
Evaluation of Water Sampling and Storage Procedures Used in Herbicide Dissipation Studies
Watershed Management to Meet Water Quality Standards and TMDLS (Total Maximum Daily Load) Proceedings of the 10-14 March 2007 San Antonio Texas, 2007Co-Authors: J.b. Fischer, Jerry L. Michael, H.l. GibbsAbstract:The recoveries of six herbicides (triclopyr, triclopyr ester, sulfometuron methyl, metsulfuron methyl, imazapyr, and hexazinone) from stream water samples containing two levels of dissolved organic matter were evaluated. Simulated field study conditions were used to evaluate collection, ambient (pre-retrieval) field storage, and freezer storage phases of stream water sampling. Herbicide residue levels were determined by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance detection. Method detection levels and stability curves were developed for each herbicide in each water matrix. None of the herbicides degraded significantly in either stream water at up to 24 days of dark storage at 22-25oC except for sulfometuron methyl, which declined 9-16% after 24 days in both samples. Triclopyr, triclopyr ester, metsulfuron methyl, imazapyr, and hexazinone did not degrade significantly in either stream water after 12 months’ storage below -15oC. Sulfometuron methyl recovery declined 15-20% after 12 months in both stream water samples. None of the herbicides tested appeared to leach from the automatic sampler tubing into subsequently-collected samples. However slight carryover of about 1.0% of the spiking level was observed in the first post-spike blanks collected for all herbicides due to Physical Adhesion of residual water droplets on the tubing walls. No detectable carryover was observed in the second or third post-spike blanks for any of the herbicide-stream water combinations tested.
Chengxiong Yang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
metal organic framework uio 66 coated stainless steel fiber for solid phase microextraction of phenols in water samples
Journal of Chromatography A, 2014Co-Authors: Haibo Shang, Chengxiong YangAbstract:Abstract Effective solid-phase microextraction (SPME) of polar phenols from water samples is usually difficult due to the strong interaction between polar phenols and aqueous matrix. Here, we report the fabrication of a metal–organic framework UiO-66 coated stainless steel fiber via Physical Adhesion for the SPME of polar phenols (phenol, o -cresol, p -cresol, 2,6-dimethylphenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol and 2,6-dichlorophenol) in water samples before gas chromatographic separation with flame ionic detection. Headspace SPME of 10 mL sample solution with the fabricated UiO-66 coated fiber gave the enhancement factors of 160 (phenol) – 3769 (2,4-dichlorophenol), and the linear ranges of 1–1000 μg L −1 (2,6-dimethylphenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol and 2,6-dichlorophenol), 1–500 μg L −1 ( o -cresol and p -cresol) and 5–500 μg L −1 (phenol). The detection limits ranged from 0.11 μg L −1 (2,6-dimethylphenol) to 1.23 μg L −1 (phenol). The precision (relative standard deviations, RSDs) for six replicate determinations of the analytes at 100 μg L −1 using a single UiO-66 coated fiber ranged from 2.8% to 6.2%. The fiber-to-fiber reproducibility (RSDs) for three parallel UiO-66 coated fibers varied from 5.9% to 10%. The recoveries obtained by spiking 5 μg L −1 of the phenols in the water samples ranged from 80% to 115%.
J.b. Fischer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Evaluation of HDPE water sample bottles and PVC sampler tubing used in herbicide dissipation studies.
2009Co-Authors: J.b. Fischer, Jerry L. Michael, H.l. GibbsAbstract:The recovery of six herbicides (triclopyr, triclopyr ester, sulfometuron methyl, metsulfuron methyl, imazapyr, and hexazinone) was evaluated in two stream water samples, one from Weogufka Creek in the Alabama Piedmont and one from a stagnant stream in the Escambia Experimental Forest near Florida. Simulated field study conditions were used to evaluate collection, ambient (pre-retrieval) field storage, and freezer storage phases of stream water sampling. Method detection levels were developed for each herbicide in each water matrix. None -of the herbicides degraded significantly in either stream water after 24 days at 22 0 C to 25 0 C or after 12 months of freezer storage below _15 0 C. None of the herbicides tested appeared to leach from the automatic sampler tubing into subsequently collected samples. However, slight carryover of about 0.8% of the spiking level was observed in the first post-spike blanks collected for all herbicides. This appeared to be the result of Physical Adhesion of water droplets on tubing walls; no detectable carryover was observed in subsequent blanks. These results support the use of HDPE sample containers and flexible PVC automatic sampler tubing in environmental fate studies of herbicides.
-
Technical Note: Evaluation of HDPE Water Sample Bottles and PVC Sampler Tubing Used in Herbicide Dissipation Studies
Transactions of the ASABE, 2008Co-Authors: J.b. Fischer, Jerry L. Michael, H.l. GibbsAbstract:The recovery of six herbicides (triclopyr, triclopyr ester, sulfometuron methyl, metsulfuron methyl, imazapyr, and hexazinone) was evaluated in two stream water samples, one from Weogufka Creek in the Alabama Piedmont and one from a stagnant stream in the Escambia Experimental Forest near Florida. Simulated field study conditions were used to evaluate collection, ambient (pre-retrieval) field storage, and freezer storage phases of stream water sampling. Method detection levels were developed for each herbicide in each water matrix. None of the herbicides degraded significantly in either stream water after 24 days at 22°C to 25°C or after 12 months of freezer storage below -15°C. None of the herbicides tested appeared to leach from the automatic sampler tubing into subsequently collected samples. However, slight carryover of about 0.8% of the spiking level was observed in the first post-spike blanks collected for all herbicides. This appeared to be the result of Physical Adhesion of water droplets on tubing walls; no detectable carryover was observed in subsequent blanks. These results support the use of HDPE sample containers and flexible PVC automatic sampler tubing in environmental fate studies of herbicides.
-
Evaluation of Water Sampling and Storage Procedures Used in Herbicide Dissipation Studies
Watershed Management to Meet Water Quality Standards and TMDLS (Total Maximum Daily Load) Proceedings of the 10-14 March 2007 San Antonio Texas, 2007Co-Authors: J.b. Fischer, Jerry L. Michael, H.l. GibbsAbstract:The recoveries of six herbicides (triclopyr, triclopyr ester, sulfometuron methyl, metsulfuron methyl, imazapyr, and hexazinone) from stream water samples containing two levels of dissolved organic matter were evaluated. Simulated field study conditions were used to evaluate collection, ambient (pre-retrieval) field storage, and freezer storage phases of stream water sampling. Herbicide residue levels were determined by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance detection. Method detection levels and stability curves were developed for each herbicide in each water matrix. None of the herbicides degraded significantly in either stream water at up to 24 days of dark storage at 22-25oC except for sulfometuron methyl, which declined 9-16% after 24 days in both samples. Triclopyr, triclopyr ester, metsulfuron methyl, imazapyr, and hexazinone did not degrade significantly in either stream water after 12 months’ storage below -15oC. Sulfometuron methyl recovery declined 15-20% after 12 months in both stream water samples. None of the herbicides tested appeared to leach from the automatic sampler tubing into subsequently-collected samples. However slight carryover of about 1.0% of the spiking level was observed in the first post-spike blanks collected for all herbicides due to Physical Adhesion of residual water droplets on the tubing walls. No detectable carryover was observed in the second or third post-spike blanks for any of the herbicide-stream water combinations tested.
Haibo Shang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
metal organic framework uio 66 coated stainless steel fiber for solid phase microextraction of phenols in water samples
Journal of Chromatography A, 2014Co-Authors: Haibo Shang, Chengxiong YangAbstract:Abstract Effective solid-phase microextraction (SPME) of polar phenols from water samples is usually difficult due to the strong interaction between polar phenols and aqueous matrix. Here, we report the fabrication of a metal–organic framework UiO-66 coated stainless steel fiber via Physical Adhesion for the SPME of polar phenols (phenol, o -cresol, p -cresol, 2,6-dimethylphenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol and 2,6-dichlorophenol) in water samples before gas chromatographic separation with flame ionic detection. Headspace SPME of 10 mL sample solution with the fabricated UiO-66 coated fiber gave the enhancement factors of 160 (phenol) – 3769 (2,4-dichlorophenol), and the linear ranges of 1–1000 μg L −1 (2,6-dimethylphenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol and 2,6-dichlorophenol), 1–500 μg L −1 ( o -cresol and p -cresol) and 5–500 μg L −1 (phenol). The detection limits ranged from 0.11 μg L −1 (2,6-dimethylphenol) to 1.23 μg L −1 (phenol). The precision (relative standard deviations, RSDs) for six replicate determinations of the analytes at 100 μg L −1 using a single UiO-66 coated fiber ranged from 2.8% to 6.2%. The fiber-to-fiber reproducibility (RSDs) for three parallel UiO-66 coated fibers varied from 5.9% to 10%. The recoveries obtained by spiking 5 μg L −1 of the phenols in the water samples ranged from 80% to 115%.