The Experts below are selected from a list of 199269 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Wolfgang Linden - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Physiological Stress reactivity and recovery conceptual siblings separated at birth
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1997Co-Authors: Wolfgang Linden, T L Earle, William Gerin, Nicholas ChristenfeldAbstract:This article discusses theoretical assumptions underlying Physiological Stress reactivity research. It examines early conceptualizations of activation and recovery and contrasts these with current practices in designing, analyzing, and reporting Stress reactivity studies. Study protocols from four major journals covering the last 2 years of publication were examined for current practices. Of the 105 studies which tested Physiological reactivity, 63% collected recovery data but only 23% reported the recovery data. We concluded that Stress recovery issues are neglected and a renewed case is made for their conceptual and ecological importance. The case for studying recovery is further supported by a selective review of studies using recovery protocols that revealed positive findings not apparent in reactivity comparisons only. Finally, options for sound design of recovery protocols, statistical processing of resulting data, and interpretation of findings are presented.
Judith K Sluiter - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
measuring short term and long term Physiological Stress effects by cortisol reactivity in saliva and hair
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2012Co-Authors: Berry J Van Holland, Monique H W Fringsdresen, Judith K SluiterAbstract:Purpose The aims of this study were to investigate (1) the concurrent relationship between short-term and long-term Stress reactivity measured by cortisol excretion and (2) the relationship of these Physiological Stress effects with self-reported Stress and need for recovery after work (NFR).
T L Earle - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Physiological Stress reactivity and recovery conceptual siblings separated at birth
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1997Co-Authors: Wolfgang Linden, T L Earle, William Gerin, Nicholas ChristenfeldAbstract:This article discusses theoretical assumptions underlying Physiological Stress reactivity research. It examines early conceptualizations of activation and recovery and contrasts these with current practices in designing, analyzing, and reporting Stress reactivity studies. Study protocols from four major journals covering the last 2 years of publication were examined for current practices. Of the 105 studies which tested Physiological reactivity, 63% collected recovery data but only 23% reported the recovery data. We concluded that Stress recovery issues are neglected and a renewed case is made for their conceptual and ecological importance. The case for studying recovery is further supported by a selective review of studies using recovery protocols that revealed positive findings not apparent in reactivity comparisons only. Finally, options for sound design of recovery protocols, statistical processing of resulting data, and interpretation of findings are presented.
William Gerin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Physiological Stress reactivity and recovery conceptual siblings separated at birth
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1997Co-Authors: Wolfgang Linden, T L Earle, William Gerin, Nicholas ChristenfeldAbstract:This article discusses theoretical assumptions underlying Physiological Stress reactivity research. It examines early conceptualizations of activation and recovery and contrasts these with current practices in designing, analyzing, and reporting Stress reactivity studies. Study protocols from four major journals covering the last 2 years of publication were examined for current practices. Of the 105 studies which tested Physiological reactivity, 63% collected recovery data but only 23% reported the recovery data. We concluded that Stress recovery issues are neglected and a renewed case is made for their conceptual and ecological importance. The case for studying recovery is further supported by a selective review of studies using recovery protocols that revealed positive findings not apparent in reactivity comparisons only. Finally, options for sound design of recovery protocols, statistical processing of resulting data, and interpretation of findings are presented.
Nicholas Christenfeld - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Physiological Stress reactivity and recovery conceptual siblings separated at birth
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1997Co-Authors: Wolfgang Linden, T L Earle, William Gerin, Nicholas ChristenfeldAbstract:This article discusses theoretical assumptions underlying Physiological Stress reactivity research. It examines early conceptualizations of activation and recovery and contrasts these with current practices in designing, analyzing, and reporting Stress reactivity studies. Study protocols from four major journals covering the last 2 years of publication were examined for current practices. Of the 105 studies which tested Physiological reactivity, 63% collected recovery data but only 23% reported the recovery data. We concluded that Stress recovery issues are neglected and a renewed case is made for their conceptual and ecological importance. The case for studying recovery is further supported by a selective review of studies using recovery protocols that revealed positive findings not apparent in reactivity comparisons only. Finally, options for sound design of recovery protocols, statistical processing of resulting data, and interpretation of findings are presented.
