The Experts below are selected from a list of 8208 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
M. Hamor-vido - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Classification of liptinite – ICCP System 1994
International Journal of Coal Geology, 2017Co-Authors: W. Pickel, J. Kus, D. Flores, S. Kalaitzidis, K. Christanis, B.j. Cardott, M. Misz-kennan, S. Rodrigues, A. Hentschel, M. Hamor-vidoAbstract:AbstractThe liptinite maceral group has been revised by ICCP in accordance with the ICCP System 1994. After the revision of the classifications of vitrinite (ICCP, 1998), inertinite, (ICCP, 2001) and huminite (Sykorova et al., 2005) this liptinite classification completes the revised ICCP maceral group classifications. These classifications are collectively referred to as the “ICCP System 1994”. In contrast to the previous ICCP Stopes Heerlen (ICCP, 1963, 1971, 1975, 1993) this new classification system is applicable to coal of all ranks and dispersed organic matter.The classification as presented here was accepted in the ICCP Plenary Session on September 11, 2015 at the ICCP Meeting in Potsdam. The decision to publish this classification in the recent form was accepted at the ICCP Plenary Session on September 23, 2016 in Houston
W. Pickel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Classification of liptinite – ICCP System 1994
International Journal of Coal Geology, 2017Co-Authors: W. Pickel, J. Kus, D. Flores, S. Kalaitzidis, K. Christanis, B.j. Cardott, M. Misz-kennan, S. Rodrigues, A. Hentschel, M. Hamor-vidoAbstract:AbstractThe liptinite maceral group has been revised by ICCP in accordance with the ICCP System 1994. After the revision of the classifications of vitrinite (ICCP, 1998), inertinite, (ICCP, 2001) and huminite (Sykorova et al., 2005) this liptinite classification completes the revised ICCP maceral group classifications. These classifications are collectively referred to as the “ICCP System 1994”. In contrast to the previous ICCP Stopes Heerlen (ICCP, 1963, 1971, 1975, 1993) this new classification system is applicable to coal of all ranks and dispersed organic matter.The classification as presented here was accepted in the ICCP Plenary Session on September 11, 2015 at the ICCP Meeting in Potsdam. The decision to publish this classification in the recent form was accepted at the ICCP Plenary Session on September 23, 2016 in Houston
Seiji Naito - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
pls Plenary Session
Annals of Oncology, 2012Co-Authors: Hirotsugu Uemura, H Y Lim, Yoshihiko Tomita, T Ueda, Hari Menon, J Chung, Jianping Guo, Jamal Tarazi, Sinil Kim, Seiji NaitoAbstract:ABSTRACT Background Axitinib is a potent and selective second-generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1–3. In the phase III AXIS study in second-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), axitinib demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared with sorafenib (median PFS, 6.7 versus 4.7 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.665; one-sided P Methods Eligible patients had clear-cell mRCC; progressive disease per RECIST after one prior systemic first-line therapy; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. Patients were stratified by PS and prior therapy, then randomized 1:1 to receive axitinib or sorafenib. Tumour imaging was assessed by an independent review committee. Results Of the 723 enrolled patients, 158 were Asian (axitinib arm: n = 77; sorafenib arm: n = 81). Of the Asian patients, 74% were male, median age was 61 years, and 59% had PS = 0; prior therapies were 54% cytokine-, 41% sunitinib-, 4% bevacizumab-, and 1% temsirolimus-based regimens. Median PFS in the Asian patients was 10.3 months in the axitinib arm and 4.7 months in the sorafenib arm (HR 0.578; 95% confidence interval, 0.362–0.924; one-sided P = 0.0096). The objective response rate (ORR) was 31.2% versus 7.4% (one-sided P = 0.0003) in the Asian patients receiving axitinib and sorafenib, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) in the Asian patients receiving axitinib were hypertension (53%), diarrhoea (53%), hand-foot syndrome (47%), fatigue (45%), decreased appetite (36%), dysphonia (36%), and hypothyroidism (31%). Common AEs in the Asian patients receiving sorafenib were hand-foot syndrome (70%), diarrhoea (46%), hypertension (34%), and alopecia (30%). Conclusions Axitinib is effective and well tolerated in the Asian patients with mRCC. Consistent with global phase III trial results, PFS and ORR were higher with axitinib versus sorafenib in the Asian patients.
D. Flores - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Classification of liptinite – ICCP System 1994
International Journal of Coal Geology, 2017Co-Authors: W. Pickel, J. Kus, D. Flores, S. Kalaitzidis, K. Christanis, B.j. Cardott, M. Misz-kennan, S. Rodrigues, A. Hentschel, M. Hamor-vidoAbstract:AbstractThe liptinite maceral group has been revised by ICCP in accordance with the ICCP System 1994. After the revision of the classifications of vitrinite (ICCP, 1998), inertinite, (ICCP, 2001) and huminite (Sykorova et al., 2005) this liptinite classification completes the revised ICCP maceral group classifications. These classifications are collectively referred to as the “ICCP System 1994”. In contrast to the previous ICCP Stopes Heerlen (ICCP, 1963, 1971, 1975, 1993) this new classification system is applicable to coal of all ranks and dispersed organic matter.The classification as presented here was accepted in the ICCP Plenary Session on September 11, 2015 at the ICCP Meeting in Potsdam. The decision to publish this classification in the recent form was accepted at the ICCP Plenary Session on September 23, 2016 in Houston
S. Kalaitzidis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Classification of liptinite – ICCP System 1994
International Journal of Coal Geology, 2017Co-Authors: W. Pickel, J. Kus, D. Flores, S. Kalaitzidis, K. Christanis, B.j. Cardott, M. Misz-kennan, S. Rodrigues, A. Hentschel, M. Hamor-vidoAbstract:AbstractThe liptinite maceral group has been revised by ICCP in accordance with the ICCP System 1994. After the revision of the classifications of vitrinite (ICCP, 1998), inertinite, (ICCP, 2001) and huminite (Sykorova et al., 2005) this liptinite classification completes the revised ICCP maceral group classifications. These classifications are collectively referred to as the “ICCP System 1994”. In contrast to the previous ICCP Stopes Heerlen (ICCP, 1963, 1971, 1975, 1993) this new classification system is applicable to coal of all ranks and dispersed organic matter.The classification as presented here was accepted in the ICCP Plenary Session on September 11, 2015 at the ICCP Meeting in Potsdam. The decision to publish this classification in the recent form was accepted at the ICCP Plenary Session on September 23, 2016 in Houston
