The Experts below are selected from a list of 378207 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Matthew W Kreuter - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Principles of Practice for academic/Practice/Community research partnerships.
    American journal of preventive medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, R Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner's "agendas"; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.

  • Principles of Practice for academic/ Practice/Community research partnerships
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Abstract Context: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. Objective: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. Conclusions: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner’s “agendas”; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.

  • Principles of Practice for academic/ Practice/Community research partnerships
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Context: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. Objective: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. Conclusions: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner’s “agendas”; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed. Medical Subject Headings: research(collaborative), Community participation, program evaluation. (Am J Prev Med 1999;16(3S):86 ‐93) © 1999 American Journal of Preventive Medicine

  • principles of Practice for academic Practice Community research partnerships
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, Sr Rita Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Abstract Context: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. Objective: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. Conclusions: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner’s “agendas”; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.

Kristine M Gebbie - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • transitions in state public health law comparative analysis of state public health law reform following the turning point model state public health act
    American Journal of Public Health, 2009
    Co-Authors: Benjamin Mason Meier, James G Hodge, Kristine M Gebbie
    Abstract:

    Given the public health importance of law modernization, we undertook a comparative analysis of policy efforts in 4 states (Alaska, South Carolina, Wisconsin, and Nebraska) that have considered public health law reform based on the Turning Point Model State Public Health Act. Through national legislative tracking and state case studies, we investigated how the Turning Point Act's model legal language has been considered for incorporation into state law and analyzed key facilitating and inhibiting factors for public health law reform. Our findings provide the Practice Community with a research base to facilitate further law reform and inform future scholarship on the role of law as a determinant of the public's health.

Elizabeth A. Baker - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Principles of Practice for academic/Practice/Community research partnerships.
    American journal of preventive medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, R Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner's "agendas"; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.

  • Principles of Practice for academic/ Practice/Community research partnerships
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Abstract Context: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. Objective: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. Conclusions: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner’s “agendas”; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.

  • Principles of Practice for academic/ Practice/Community research partnerships
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Context: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. Objective: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. Conclusions: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner’s “agendas”; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed. Medical Subject Headings: research(collaborative), Community participation, program evaluation. (Am J Prev Med 1999;16(3S):86 ‐93) © 1999 American Journal of Preventive Medicine

  • principles of Practice for academic Practice Community research partnerships
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, Sr Rita Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Abstract Context: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. Objective: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. Conclusions: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner’s “agendas”; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.

Benjamin Mason Meier - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • transitions in state public health law comparative analysis of state public health law reform following the turning point model state public health act
    American Journal of Public Health, 2009
    Co-Authors: Benjamin Mason Meier, James G Hodge, Kristine M Gebbie
    Abstract:

    Given the public health importance of law modernization, we undertook a comparative analysis of policy efforts in 4 states (Alaska, South Carolina, Wisconsin, and Nebraska) that have considered public health law reform based on the Turning Point Model State Public Health Act. Through national legislative tracking and state case studies, we investigated how the Turning Point Act's model legal language has been considered for incorporation into state law and analyzed key facilitating and inhibiting factors for public health law reform. Our findings provide the Practice Community with a research base to facilitate further law reform and inform future scholarship on the role of law as a determinant of the public's health.

Sharon M Homan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Principles of Practice for academic/Practice/Community research partnerships.
    American journal of preventive medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, R Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner's "agendas"; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.

  • Principles of Practice for academic/ Practice/Community research partnerships
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Abstract Context: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. Objective: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. Conclusions: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner’s “agendas”; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.

  • Principles of Practice for academic/ Practice/Community research partnerships
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Context: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. Objective: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. Conclusions: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner’s “agendas”; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed. Medical Subject Headings: research(collaborative), Community participation, program evaluation. (Am J Prev Med 1999;16(3S):86 ‐93) © 1999 American Journal of Preventive Medicine

  • principles of Practice for academic Practice Community research partnerships
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999
    Co-Authors: Elizabeth A. Baker, Sharon M Homan, Sr Rita Schonhoff, Matthew W Kreuter
    Abstract:

    Abstract Context: Researchers and practitioners are increasingly realizing that improvements in public health require changes in individual, social, and economic factors. Concurrent with this renewed awareness there has been a growing interest in working with communities to create healthful changes through academic/Practice/Community research partnerships. However, this type of research presents different challenges and requires different skills than traditional research projects. The development of a set of principles of Practice for these types of research projects can assist researchers in developing, implementing, and evaluating their partnerships and their project activities. Objective: This paper describes the different ways in which academics and Community groups may work together, including academic/Practice/Community partnerships. Several principles of Practice for engaging in these research partnerships are presented followed by a description of how these principles have been put into operation in a family violence prevention program. Conclusions: The principles presented are: (1) identify the best processes/model to be used based on the nature of the issue and the intended outcome; (2) acknowledge the difference between Community input and active Community involvement; (3) develop relationships based on mutual trust and respect; (4) acknowledge and honor different partner’s “agendas”; (5) consider multi-disciplinary approaches; (6) use evaluation strategies that are consistent with the overall approach taken in the academic/Practice/Community partnership; and (7) be aware of partnership maturation and associated transition periods. The limitations of these principles and their application in various settings are discussed.