The Experts below are selected from a list of 360 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Marc L Schermerhorn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Predictive Ability of the society for vascular surgery wound ischemia and foot infection wifi classification system after first time lower extremity revascularizations
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2017Co-Authors: Jeremy D Darling, John Mccallum, Peter A Soden, Mark C Wyers, Allen D Hamdan, Hence J M Verhagen, Raul J Guzman, Marc L SchermerhornAbstract:Abstract Objective The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Wound, Ischemia and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system was proposed to predict 1-year amputation risk and potential benefit from revascularization. Our goal was to evaluate the Predictive Ability of this scale in a real-world selection of patients undergoing a first-time lower extremity revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Methods From 2005 to 2014, 1336 limbs underwent a first-time lower extremity revascularization for CLTI, of which 992 had sufficient data to classify all three WIfI components (wound, ischemia, and foot infection). Limbs were stratified into the SVS WIfI clinical stages (from 1 to 4) for 1-year amputation risk estimation, a novel WIfI composite score from 0 to 9 (that weighs all WIfI variables equally), and a novel WIfI mean score from 0 to 3 (that can incorporate limbs missing any of the three WIfI components). Outcomes included major amputation; revascularization, major amputation, or stenosis (>3.5× step-up by duplex; RAS) events; and death. Predictors were identified using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Results Of the 1336 first-time procedures performed, 992 limbs were classified in all three WIfI components (524 endovascular and 468 bypass; 26% rest pain and 74% tissue loss). Cox regression demonstrated that a one-unit increase in the WIfI clinical stage increases the risk of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-3.2) and RAS events in all limbs (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3). Separate models of the entire cohort, a bypass-only cohort, and an endovascular-only cohort showed that a one-unit increase in the WIfI mean score is associated with an increase in the risk of major amputation (all three cohorts: HR, 5.3 [95% CI, 3.6-6.8], 4.1 [2.4-6.9], and 6.6 [3.8-11.6], respectively) and RAS events (all three cohorts: HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4-2.0], 1.9 [1.4-2.6], and 1.4 [1.1-1.9], respectively). The novel WIfI composite and WIfI mean scores were the only consistent predictors of death among the three cohorts, with the WIfI mean score proving most strongly Predictive in the entire cohort (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), the bypass-only cohort (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9), and the endovascular-only cohort (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8). Although the individual WIfI wound component was able to predict mortality among all patients (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) and bypass-only patients (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3), neither the additional individual WIfI components nor the WIfI clinical stage were able to significantly predict mortality among any cohort. Conclusions This study supports the Ability of the SVS WIfI classification system to predict major amputation; however, the novel WIfI mean and WIfI composite scores predict amputation, RAS events, and mortality more consistently than any other current WIfI scoring system. The WIfI mean score allows inclusion of all limbs, and both novel scoring systems are easier to conceptualize, give equal weight to each WIfI component, and may provide clinicians more effective comparisons in outcomes between patients.
-
Predictive Ability of the society for vascular surgery wound ischemia and foot infection wifi classification system following infrapopliteal endovascular interventions for critical limb ischemia
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2016Co-Authors: Jeremy D Darling, John Mccallum, Peter A Soden, Yifan Meng, Mark C Wyers, Allen D Hamdan, Hence J M Verhagen, Marc L SchermerhornAbstract:Objective The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Lower Extremity Guidelines Committee has composed a new threatened lower extremity classification system that reflects the three major factors that impact amputation risk and clinical management: Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI). Our goal was to evaluate the Predictive Ability of this scale following any infrapopliteal endovascular intervention for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Methods From 2004 to 2014, a single institution, retrospective chart review was performed at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for all patients undergoing an infrapopliteal angioplasty for CLI. Throughout these years, 673 limbs underwent an infrapopliteal endovascular intervention for tissue loss (77%), rest pain (13%), stenosis of a previously treated vessel (5%), acute limb ischemia (3%), or claudication (2%). Limbs missing a grade in any WIfI component were excluded. Limbs were stratified into clinical stages 1 to 4 based on the SVS WIfI classification for 1-year amputation risk, as well as a novel WIfI composite score from 0 to 9. Outcomes included patient functional capacity, living status, wound healing, major amputation, major adverse limb events, reintervention, major amputation, or stenosis (RAS) events (> ×3.5 step-up by duplex), amputation-free survival, and mortality. Predictors were identified using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression models. Results Of the 596 limbs with CLI, 551 were classified in all three WIfI domains on a scale of 0 (least severe) to 3 (most severe). Of these 551, 84% were treated for tissue loss and 16% for rest pain. A Cox regression model illustrated that an increase in clinical stage increases the rate of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.3). Separate regression models showed that a one-unit increase in the WIfI composite score is associated with a decrease in wound healing (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4) and an increase in the rate of RAS events (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4) and major amputations (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8). Conclusions This study supports the Ability of the SVS WIfI classification system to predict 1-year amputation, RAS events, and wound healing in patients with CLI undergoing endovascular infrapopliteal revascularization procedures.
Patricia L Haynes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Predictive Ability of the international classification of sleep disorders 3 in identifying risk of obstructive sleep apnea among recently unemployed adults
Sleep and Breathing, 2021Co-Authors: Graciela E Silva, Darlynn M Rojowissar, Stuart F Quan, Patricia L HaynesAbstract:The International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD)-3 was developed to aid in the identification of these disorders. The core criterion A (ICSD-3A) to identify obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) requires the presentence of specific signs and symptoms. This study explores the Predictive Ability of the ICSD-3A for OSA as compared with objective measures of respiratory event index (REI). A total of 291 participants who completed a home sleep apnea test (HSAT) during the screening evaluation of the Assessing Daily Activity Patterns through occupational Transitions (ADAPT) study were included. Participants were classified as having mild OSA (REI ≥ 5 and 30). Predictive parameters identifying participants as having OSA by the ICSD-3A criteria were assessed using REI classifications as the reference standard and further compared with a subsample using the STOP-Bang questionnaire. The ICSD-3A had a sensitivity of 19.2% for identifying participants as having moderate to severe OSA and specificity of 84.4%. The ICSD-3A had a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) = 0.53. On the subsample of participants, the STOP-Bang questionnaire’s ROC is 0.61. Results were similar when examining the classification of participants with mild compared with no OSA. In this population, the Ability of the ICSD-3A in detecting moderate to severe OSA as well as mild OSA was low. The ROC for the ICSD-3 did not differ significantly from the STOP-Bang questionnaire’s ROC in this research population.
-
Predictive Ability of the international classification of sleep disorders 3 in identifying risk of obstructive sleep apnea among recently unemployed adults
Sleep and Breathing, 2020Co-Authors: Graciela E Silva, Darlynn M Rojowissar, Stuart F Quan, Patricia L HaynesAbstract:BACKGROUND The International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD)-3 was developed to aid in the identification of these disorders. The core criterion A (ICSD-3A) to identify obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) requires the presentence of specific signs and symptoms. This study explores the Predictive Ability of the ICSD-3A for OSA as compared with objective measures of respiratory event index (REI). PARTICIPANTS A total of 291 participants who completed a home sleep apnea test (HSAT) during the screening evaluation of the Assessing Daily Activity Patterns through occupational Transitions (ADAPT) study were included. METHODS Participants were classified as having mild OSA (REI ≥ 5 and 30). Predictive parameters identifying participants as having OSA by the ICSD-3A criteria were assessed using REI classifications as the reference standard and further compared with a subsample using the STOP-Bang questionnaire. RESULTS The ICSD-3A had a sensitivity of 19.2% for identifying participants as having moderate to severe OSA and specificity of 84.4%. The ICSD-3A had a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) = 0.53. On the subsample of participants, the STOP-Bang questionnaire's ROC is 0.61. Results were similar when examining the classification of participants with mild compared with no OSA. CONCLUSION In this population, the Ability of the ICSD-3A in detecting moderate to severe OSA as well as mild OSA was low. The ROC for the ICSD-3 did not differ significantly from the STOP-Bang questionnaire's ROC in this research population.
Jeremy D Darling - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Predictive Ability of the society for vascular surgery wound ischemia and foot infection wifi classification system after first time lower extremity revascularizations
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2017Co-Authors: Jeremy D Darling, John Mccallum, Peter A Soden, Mark C Wyers, Allen D Hamdan, Hence J M Verhagen, Raul J Guzman, Marc L SchermerhornAbstract:Abstract Objective The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Wound, Ischemia and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system was proposed to predict 1-year amputation risk and potential benefit from revascularization. Our goal was to evaluate the Predictive Ability of this scale in a real-world selection of patients undergoing a first-time lower extremity revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Methods From 2005 to 2014, 1336 limbs underwent a first-time lower extremity revascularization for CLTI, of which 992 had sufficient data to classify all three WIfI components (wound, ischemia, and foot infection). Limbs were stratified into the SVS WIfI clinical stages (from 1 to 4) for 1-year amputation risk estimation, a novel WIfI composite score from 0 to 9 (that weighs all WIfI variables equally), and a novel WIfI mean score from 0 to 3 (that can incorporate limbs missing any of the three WIfI components). Outcomes included major amputation; revascularization, major amputation, or stenosis (>3.5× step-up by duplex; RAS) events; and death. Predictors were identified using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Results Of the 1336 first-time procedures performed, 992 limbs were classified in all three WIfI components (524 endovascular and 468 bypass; 26% rest pain and 74% tissue loss). Cox regression demonstrated that a one-unit increase in the WIfI clinical stage increases the risk of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-3.2) and RAS events in all limbs (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3). Separate models of the entire cohort, a bypass-only cohort, and an endovascular-only cohort showed that a one-unit increase in the WIfI mean score is associated with an increase in the risk of major amputation (all three cohorts: HR, 5.3 [95% CI, 3.6-6.8], 4.1 [2.4-6.9], and 6.6 [3.8-11.6], respectively) and RAS events (all three cohorts: HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4-2.0], 1.9 [1.4-2.6], and 1.4 [1.1-1.9], respectively). The novel WIfI composite and WIfI mean scores were the only consistent predictors of death among the three cohorts, with the WIfI mean score proving most strongly Predictive in the entire cohort (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), the bypass-only cohort (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9), and the endovascular-only cohort (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8). Although the individual WIfI wound component was able to predict mortality among all patients (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) and bypass-only patients (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3), neither the additional individual WIfI components nor the WIfI clinical stage were able to significantly predict mortality among any cohort. Conclusions This study supports the Ability of the SVS WIfI classification system to predict major amputation; however, the novel WIfI mean and WIfI composite scores predict amputation, RAS events, and mortality more consistently than any other current WIfI scoring system. The WIfI mean score allows inclusion of all limbs, and both novel scoring systems are easier to conceptualize, give equal weight to each WIfI component, and may provide clinicians more effective comparisons in outcomes between patients.
-
Predictive Ability of the society for vascular surgery wound ischemia and foot infection wifi classification system following infrapopliteal endovascular interventions for critical limb ischemia
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2016Co-Authors: Jeremy D Darling, John Mccallum, Peter A Soden, Yifan Meng, Mark C Wyers, Allen D Hamdan, Hence J M Verhagen, Marc L SchermerhornAbstract:Objective The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Lower Extremity Guidelines Committee has composed a new threatened lower extremity classification system that reflects the three major factors that impact amputation risk and clinical management: Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI). Our goal was to evaluate the Predictive Ability of this scale following any infrapopliteal endovascular intervention for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Methods From 2004 to 2014, a single institution, retrospective chart review was performed at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for all patients undergoing an infrapopliteal angioplasty for CLI. Throughout these years, 673 limbs underwent an infrapopliteal endovascular intervention for tissue loss (77%), rest pain (13%), stenosis of a previously treated vessel (5%), acute limb ischemia (3%), or claudication (2%). Limbs missing a grade in any WIfI component were excluded. Limbs were stratified into clinical stages 1 to 4 based on the SVS WIfI classification for 1-year amputation risk, as well as a novel WIfI composite score from 0 to 9. Outcomes included patient functional capacity, living status, wound healing, major amputation, major adverse limb events, reintervention, major amputation, or stenosis (RAS) events (> ×3.5 step-up by duplex), amputation-free survival, and mortality. Predictors were identified using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression models. Results Of the 596 limbs with CLI, 551 were classified in all three WIfI domains on a scale of 0 (least severe) to 3 (most severe). Of these 551, 84% were treated for tissue loss and 16% for rest pain. A Cox regression model illustrated that an increase in clinical stage increases the rate of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.3). Separate regression models showed that a one-unit increase in the WIfI composite score is associated with a decrease in wound healing (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4) and an increase in the rate of RAS events (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4) and major amputations (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8). Conclusions This study supports the Ability of the SVS WIfI classification system to predict 1-year amputation, RAS events, and wound healing in patients with CLI undergoing endovascular infrapopliteal revascularization procedures.
Darlynn M Rojowissar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Predictive Ability of the international classification of sleep disorders 3 in identifying risk of obstructive sleep apnea among recently unemployed adults
Sleep and Breathing, 2021Co-Authors: Graciela E Silva, Darlynn M Rojowissar, Stuart F Quan, Patricia L HaynesAbstract:The International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD)-3 was developed to aid in the identification of these disorders. The core criterion A (ICSD-3A) to identify obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) requires the presentence of specific signs and symptoms. This study explores the Predictive Ability of the ICSD-3A for OSA as compared with objective measures of respiratory event index (REI). A total of 291 participants who completed a home sleep apnea test (HSAT) during the screening evaluation of the Assessing Daily Activity Patterns through occupational Transitions (ADAPT) study were included. Participants were classified as having mild OSA (REI ≥ 5 and 30). Predictive parameters identifying participants as having OSA by the ICSD-3A criteria were assessed using REI classifications as the reference standard and further compared with a subsample using the STOP-Bang questionnaire. The ICSD-3A had a sensitivity of 19.2% for identifying participants as having moderate to severe OSA and specificity of 84.4%. The ICSD-3A had a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) = 0.53. On the subsample of participants, the STOP-Bang questionnaire’s ROC is 0.61. Results were similar when examining the classification of participants with mild compared with no OSA. In this population, the Ability of the ICSD-3A in detecting moderate to severe OSA as well as mild OSA was low. The ROC for the ICSD-3 did not differ significantly from the STOP-Bang questionnaire’s ROC in this research population.
-
Predictive Ability of the international classification of sleep disorders 3 in identifying risk of obstructive sleep apnea among recently unemployed adults
Sleep and Breathing, 2020Co-Authors: Graciela E Silva, Darlynn M Rojowissar, Stuart F Quan, Patricia L HaynesAbstract:BACKGROUND The International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD)-3 was developed to aid in the identification of these disorders. The core criterion A (ICSD-3A) to identify obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) requires the presentence of specific signs and symptoms. This study explores the Predictive Ability of the ICSD-3A for OSA as compared with objective measures of respiratory event index (REI). PARTICIPANTS A total of 291 participants who completed a home sleep apnea test (HSAT) during the screening evaluation of the Assessing Daily Activity Patterns through occupational Transitions (ADAPT) study were included. METHODS Participants were classified as having mild OSA (REI ≥ 5 and 30). Predictive parameters identifying participants as having OSA by the ICSD-3A criteria were assessed using REI classifications as the reference standard and further compared with a subsample using the STOP-Bang questionnaire. RESULTS The ICSD-3A had a sensitivity of 19.2% for identifying participants as having moderate to severe OSA and specificity of 84.4%. The ICSD-3A had a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) = 0.53. On the subsample of participants, the STOP-Bang questionnaire's ROC is 0.61. Results were similar when examining the classification of participants with mild compared with no OSA. CONCLUSION In this population, the Ability of the ICSD-3A in detecting moderate to severe OSA as well as mild OSA was low. The ROC for the ICSD-3 did not differ significantly from the STOP-Bang questionnaire's ROC in this research population.
John Mccallum - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Predictive Ability of the society for vascular surgery wound ischemia and foot infection wifi classification system after first time lower extremity revascularizations
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2017Co-Authors: Jeremy D Darling, John Mccallum, Peter A Soden, Mark C Wyers, Allen D Hamdan, Hence J M Verhagen, Raul J Guzman, Marc L SchermerhornAbstract:Abstract Objective The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Wound, Ischemia and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system was proposed to predict 1-year amputation risk and potential benefit from revascularization. Our goal was to evaluate the Predictive Ability of this scale in a real-world selection of patients undergoing a first-time lower extremity revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Methods From 2005 to 2014, 1336 limbs underwent a first-time lower extremity revascularization for CLTI, of which 992 had sufficient data to classify all three WIfI components (wound, ischemia, and foot infection). Limbs were stratified into the SVS WIfI clinical stages (from 1 to 4) for 1-year amputation risk estimation, a novel WIfI composite score from 0 to 9 (that weighs all WIfI variables equally), and a novel WIfI mean score from 0 to 3 (that can incorporate limbs missing any of the three WIfI components). Outcomes included major amputation; revascularization, major amputation, or stenosis (>3.5× step-up by duplex; RAS) events; and death. Predictors were identified using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Results Of the 1336 first-time procedures performed, 992 limbs were classified in all three WIfI components (524 endovascular and 468 bypass; 26% rest pain and 74% tissue loss). Cox regression demonstrated that a one-unit increase in the WIfI clinical stage increases the risk of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-3.2) and RAS events in all limbs (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3). Separate models of the entire cohort, a bypass-only cohort, and an endovascular-only cohort showed that a one-unit increase in the WIfI mean score is associated with an increase in the risk of major amputation (all three cohorts: HR, 5.3 [95% CI, 3.6-6.8], 4.1 [2.4-6.9], and 6.6 [3.8-11.6], respectively) and RAS events (all three cohorts: HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4-2.0], 1.9 [1.4-2.6], and 1.4 [1.1-1.9], respectively). The novel WIfI composite and WIfI mean scores were the only consistent predictors of death among the three cohorts, with the WIfI mean score proving most strongly Predictive in the entire cohort (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), the bypass-only cohort (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9), and the endovascular-only cohort (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8). Although the individual WIfI wound component was able to predict mortality among all patients (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) and bypass-only patients (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3), neither the additional individual WIfI components nor the WIfI clinical stage were able to significantly predict mortality among any cohort. Conclusions This study supports the Ability of the SVS WIfI classification system to predict major amputation; however, the novel WIfI mean and WIfI composite scores predict amputation, RAS events, and mortality more consistently than any other current WIfI scoring system. The WIfI mean score allows inclusion of all limbs, and both novel scoring systems are easier to conceptualize, give equal weight to each WIfI component, and may provide clinicians more effective comparisons in outcomes between patients.
-
Predictive Ability of the society for vascular surgery wound ischemia and foot infection wifi classification system following infrapopliteal endovascular interventions for critical limb ischemia
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2016Co-Authors: Jeremy D Darling, John Mccallum, Peter A Soden, Yifan Meng, Mark C Wyers, Allen D Hamdan, Hence J M Verhagen, Marc L SchermerhornAbstract:Objective The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Lower Extremity Guidelines Committee has composed a new threatened lower extremity classification system that reflects the three major factors that impact amputation risk and clinical management: Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI). Our goal was to evaluate the Predictive Ability of this scale following any infrapopliteal endovascular intervention for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Methods From 2004 to 2014, a single institution, retrospective chart review was performed at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for all patients undergoing an infrapopliteal angioplasty for CLI. Throughout these years, 673 limbs underwent an infrapopliteal endovascular intervention for tissue loss (77%), rest pain (13%), stenosis of a previously treated vessel (5%), acute limb ischemia (3%), or claudication (2%). Limbs missing a grade in any WIfI component were excluded. Limbs were stratified into clinical stages 1 to 4 based on the SVS WIfI classification for 1-year amputation risk, as well as a novel WIfI composite score from 0 to 9. Outcomes included patient functional capacity, living status, wound healing, major amputation, major adverse limb events, reintervention, major amputation, or stenosis (RAS) events (> ×3.5 step-up by duplex), amputation-free survival, and mortality. Predictors were identified using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression models. Results Of the 596 limbs with CLI, 551 were classified in all three WIfI domains on a scale of 0 (least severe) to 3 (most severe). Of these 551, 84% were treated for tissue loss and 16% for rest pain. A Cox regression model illustrated that an increase in clinical stage increases the rate of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.3). Separate regression models showed that a one-unit increase in the WIfI composite score is associated with a decrease in wound healing (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4) and an increase in the rate of RAS events (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4) and major amputations (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8). Conclusions This study supports the Ability of the SVS WIfI classification system to predict 1-year amputation, RAS events, and wound healing in patients with CLI undergoing endovascular infrapopliteal revascularization procedures.
