The Experts below are selected from a list of 114 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Norlaila Azura Kosni - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison of Psychological Readiness Factors among the Collegiate Armed Uniform
The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2018Co-Authors: Norlaila Azura Kosni, Rabiu Muazu Musa, Ahmad Bisyri Husin Musawi Maliki, Mohammad Razali Abdullah, S. N. W. Azman, A Adnan, S.m. Mat-rasid, Hafizan JuahirAbstract:Psychological readiness to endure the difficulty during training and battlefield is essential to develop a mentally strong armed uniform recruit. In order to assess their current psychological enthusiasm of armed uniform recruit. The aim of this study was to identify the differences in psychological readiness among three armed uniform package unit based on the seven readiness factors. A total of 278 respondents consist of 131 respondents from Suksis, 78 respondents from Palapes and 69 respondents from Wataniah participated in this study. They were asked to complete a Psychological Skills Inventory for Sport (PSIS-R-5) questionnaire in this study. The questionnaire contained with seven factors, which are motivation, confidence, anxiety control, mental Preparation, Team emphasis, concentration, and cognition. The questionnaire used 5 scales likert from scale 1 for ‘Strongly Disagree’ to scale 5 for ‘Strongly Disagree’. The result shows that there are significant different of psychological readiness between these armed uniform package units. Wataniah unit has the greatest psychological readiness by manipulated six from seven factors compared to the Suksis and Palapes. Among seven factors of psychological readiness, six of them shows that there are significant different between Suksis, Palapes and Wataniah which are motivation, confidence, anxiety control, Team emphasis, concentration, and cognition except mental Preparation that not show any significant different among the threearmed uniform package unit. In conclusion, although the armed uniform unit has a similar role and practice, however, psychological readiness among the show a significant different except mental Preparation. This indicates that the participant has no idea about why they choose to participant in armed uniform package unit.
-
Role of Psychological Factors on the Performance of Elite Soccer Players
Journal of physical education and sport, 2016Co-Authors: Pathmanathan K. Suppiah, Mohamad Razali Abdullah, Rabiu Muazu Musa, Ahmad Bisyri Husin Musawi Maliki, Norlaila Azura KosniAbstract:The application of psychological strategies to improve performance in sports has developed significantly over the past few decades. Nowadays, coaches are beginning to realize the significance of psychological factors in enhancing player’s performance. However, determining the magnitude of the impact of psychological factors in a soccer game may assist in developing player’s capacity to perform. This study aims to determine the role of psychological factors on the performance of elite soccer players. We enrolled elite players competing in the Malaysian Super League with a mean age of ± 25 years. Psychological constructs questionnaire proposed by PSIS-R-5 was administered to the players, and the scores of each player were recorded. We analyzed the performances of the players for eight weeks. A standard multiple regression was performed at p = 0.05 alpha levels with the motivation, confidence, anxiety control, mental Preparation, Team emphasis, concentration and cognition as (IVs) to predict performance (DV). A Noteworthy regression equation was found (F (7, 12) = 15.109, P < .001) with R² of .90 indicating that the model has approximately accounted for the total of 90% variability. Although correlations were found.57, .14, .88, .71, .65, .76 and .42 respectively between the (IVs) and the (DV), none of the (IVs) is a predictor of the (DV) (P > 0.05). Based on the results of this analysis, it is tempting to conclude that, despite the correlation between psychological factors and performance, psychological factors alone could not determine the performance of elite soccer players.
Randall Taylor - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Reducing NPR 7120.5D to Practice: Preparing for a remote site Life-cycle Review
2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2010Co-Authors: Randall TaylorAbstract:The Gravity Recovery And Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission was the first Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) project initiated under NASA's revised rules for space flight project management, NPR 7120.5D, "NASA Space Flight Program and Project Management Requirements." NASA selected GRAIL through a competitive Announcement of Opportunity (AO) process and funded its Phase B Preliminary Design effort. The first major milestone was institutional, the JPL Project Mission System Review (PMSR), which proved an excellent tune-up for the end-of-Phase B NASA life-cycle review, the Preliminary Design Review (PDR). Building on JPL experience with the Prometheus and Juno projects, the Team successfully organized for and conducted these reviews on an aggressive schedule. The results were summarized in last year's IEEE paper, "Reducing NPR 7120.5D to Practice: Preparing for a Life-cycle Review." GRAIL successfully passed its KDP-C Confirmation Review and initiated Phase C in March 2009. For the Project Critical Design Review (CDR), lessons learned from the PDR and updated Standing Review Board (SRB) practices from the Agency were factored into the review Preparation effort. Additionally, the review would be held at the Principal Investigator's institution, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), rather than at the project management center (JPL), necessitating additional cross-country coordination. A review Preparation Team was established, including a Review Captain and leads for documentation, information systems, logistics, and site coordination, and their roles, responsibilities and task assignments were identified. Aids were produced, including a detailed review Preparation schedule and a comprehensive gate products production table. Institutional support was leveraged early and often. Implementation strategy reflected the needs of a nationally distributed Team, as well as applicable export control and IT security requirements. Key actions were taken to interact proactively with the SRB, mature project requirements, conduct a battery of pre-CDR reviews, produce high-quality gate products, generate review presentation materials, and handle a myriad of supporting logistical functions. This paper provides a detailed description of project CDR Preparation and execution activities, including positive and negative lessons learned, and identifies recommendations for future NASA (and non-NASA) project Teams.
A.t. Hayes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The RoboFlag SURF competition: results, analysis, and future work
Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference 2003., 2003Co-Authors: J.a. Adams, A.t. HayesAbstract:The culmination of the 2002 RoboFlag Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship program, jointly operated between California Institute of Technology and Cornell University, was a final competition between two Teams of three undergraduate researchers. After ten weeks of Preparation, Team Pasadena defeated Team Ithaca in two of the three final games. This paper provides the detailed results of the competition, an analysis of the competition, and reviews the future work.
Randall L. Taylor - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Reducing NPR 7120.5D to practice: Preparing for a life-cycle review
2009 IEEE Aerospace conference, 2009Co-Authors: Randall L. TaylorAbstract:In March 2007, NASA issued revised rules for space flight project management, NPR 7120.5D, ldquoNASA space flight program and project management requirements.rdquo Central to the new rules was the construct of key decision points, maturity gates that the project Team must pass in order to continue development. In order that the KDP decision be fully informed, the NPR required, as entrance criteria for the gate, the generation and delivery of specified planning, technical, and cost/schedule documents (gate products) and a life-cycle review by an independent standing review board. gravity recovery and interior laboratory was the first jet propulsion laboratory project initiated under these new rules. NASA selected GRAIL through a competitive announcement of opportunity process and funded its phase B preliminary design effort. The Team's first major milestone was a JPL institutional milestone, the project mission system review, which proved an excellent tune-up for the end-of-phase B NASA life-cycle review, the preliminary design review. Building on JPL experience on the Prometheus and Juno projects, the Team successfully organized for and conducted these reviews on an aggressive schedule. Key actions were taken to proactively interact with the SRB, produce high- quality gate products with stakeholder review, generate review presentation materials, and handle a myriad of supporting logistical functions. A review Preparation Team was established, including a review captain and leads for documentation, information systems, and logistics, and their roles, responsibilities and task assignments were identified. Aids were produced, including a detailed review Preparation schedule and a comprehensive gate products production table. Institutional support was leveraged early and often. Implementation strategy reflected the needs of a nationally-distributed Team, as well as applicable export control and IT security requirements. This paper gives a brief overview of the GRAIL mission and its project management challenges, provides a detailed description of project PMSR and PDR Preparation and execution activities, including positive and negative lessons learned, and identifies recommendations for future NASA (and non-NASA) project Teams.
Ahmad Bisyri Husin Musawi Maliki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison of Psychological Readiness Factors among the Collegiate Armed Uniform
The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2018Co-Authors: Norlaila Azura Kosni, Rabiu Muazu Musa, Ahmad Bisyri Husin Musawi Maliki, Mohammad Razali Abdullah, S. N. W. Azman, A Adnan, S.m. Mat-rasid, Hafizan JuahirAbstract:Psychological readiness to endure the difficulty during training and battlefield is essential to develop a mentally strong armed uniform recruit. In order to assess their current psychological enthusiasm of armed uniform recruit. The aim of this study was to identify the differences in psychological readiness among three armed uniform package unit based on the seven readiness factors. A total of 278 respondents consist of 131 respondents from Suksis, 78 respondents from Palapes and 69 respondents from Wataniah participated in this study. They were asked to complete a Psychological Skills Inventory for Sport (PSIS-R-5) questionnaire in this study. The questionnaire contained with seven factors, which are motivation, confidence, anxiety control, mental Preparation, Team emphasis, concentration, and cognition. The questionnaire used 5 scales likert from scale 1 for ‘Strongly Disagree’ to scale 5 for ‘Strongly Disagree’. The result shows that there are significant different of psychological readiness between these armed uniform package units. Wataniah unit has the greatest psychological readiness by manipulated six from seven factors compared to the Suksis and Palapes. Among seven factors of psychological readiness, six of them shows that there are significant different between Suksis, Palapes and Wataniah which are motivation, confidence, anxiety control, Team emphasis, concentration, and cognition except mental Preparation that not show any significant different among the threearmed uniform package unit. In conclusion, although the armed uniform unit has a similar role and practice, however, psychological readiness among the show a significant different except mental Preparation. This indicates that the participant has no idea about why they choose to participant in armed uniform package unit.
-
Role of Psychological Factors on the Performance of Elite Soccer Players
Journal of physical education and sport, 2016Co-Authors: Pathmanathan K. Suppiah, Mohamad Razali Abdullah, Rabiu Muazu Musa, Ahmad Bisyri Husin Musawi Maliki, Norlaila Azura KosniAbstract:The application of psychological strategies to improve performance in sports has developed significantly over the past few decades. Nowadays, coaches are beginning to realize the significance of psychological factors in enhancing player’s performance. However, determining the magnitude of the impact of psychological factors in a soccer game may assist in developing player’s capacity to perform. This study aims to determine the role of psychological factors on the performance of elite soccer players. We enrolled elite players competing in the Malaysian Super League with a mean age of ± 25 years. Psychological constructs questionnaire proposed by PSIS-R-5 was administered to the players, and the scores of each player were recorded. We analyzed the performances of the players for eight weeks. A standard multiple regression was performed at p = 0.05 alpha levels with the motivation, confidence, anxiety control, mental Preparation, Team emphasis, concentration and cognition as (IVs) to predict performance (DV). A Noteworthy regression equation was found (F (7, 12) = 15.109, P < .001) with R² of .90 indicating that the model has approximately accounted for the total of 90% variability. Although correlations were found.57, .14, .88, .71, .65, .76 and .42 respectively between the (IVs) and the (DV), none of the (IVs) is a predictor of the (DV) (P > 0.05). Based on the results of this analysis, it is tempting to conclude that, despite the correlation between psychological factors and performance, psychological factors alone could not determine the performance of elite soccer players.