The Experts below are selected from a list of 327 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Robert W Livingston - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas behavioral antecedents and consequences of Prestige and dominance
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012Co-Authors: Nir Halevy, Eileen Y Chou, Taya R Cohen, Robert W LivingstonAbstract:Bridging the literatures on social dilemmas, intergroup conflict, and social hierarchy, the authors systematically varied the intergroup context in which social dilemmas were embedded to investigate how costly contributions to public goods influence status conferral. They predicted that contribution behavior would have opposite effects on 2 forms of status—Prestige and dominance—depending on its consequences for the self, in-group and out-group members. When the only way to benefit in-group members was by harming out-group members (Study 1), contributions increased Prestige and decreased dominance, compared with free-riding. Adding the option of benefitting in-group members without harming out-group members (Study 2) decreased the Prestige and increased the dominance of those who chose to benefit in-group members via intergroup competition. Finally, sharing resources with both in-group and out-group members decreased perceptions of both Prestige and dominance, compared with sharing them with in-group members only (Study 3). Prestige and dominance differentially mediated the effects of contribution behavior on leader election, exclusion from the group, and choices of a group representative for an intergroup competition. Taken together, these findings show that the well-established relationship between contribution and status is moderated by both the intergroup context and the conceptualization of status.
-
status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas behavioral antecedents and consequences of Prestige and dominance
Social Science Research Network, 2012Co-Authors: Nir Halevy, Eileen Y Chou, Taya R Cohen, Robert W LivingstonAbstract:Bridging the literatures on social dilemmas, intergroup conflict, and social hierarchy, we systematically varied the intergroup context in which social dilemmas were embedded to investigate how costly contributions to public goods influence status conferral. We predicted that contribution behavior would have opposite effects on two forms of status – Prestige and dominance – depending on its consequences for the self, in-group and out-group members. When the only way to benefit in-group members was by harming out-group members (Study 1), contributions increased Prestige and decreased dominance compared to free-riding. Adding the option to benefit in-group members without harming out-group members (Study 2) decreased the Prestige and increased the perceived dominance of those who chose to benefit in-group members via intergroup competition. Finally, sharing resources with both in-group and out-group members decreased perceptions of both Prestige and dominance compared to sharing them with in-group members only (Study 3). Prestige and dominance differentially mediated the effects of contribution behavior on leader election, exclusion from the group, and choices of a group representative for an intergroup competition. Taken together, these findings show that the well-established relationship between contribution and status is moderated by both the intergroup context and the conceptualization of status.
Nir Halevy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas behavioral antecedents and consequences of Prestige and dominance
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012Co-Authors: Nir Halevy, Eileen Y Chou, Taya R Cohen, Robert W LivingstonAbstract:Bridging the literatures on social dilemmas, intergroup conflict, and social hierarchy, the authors systematically varied the intergroup context in which social dilemmas were embedded to investigate how costly contributions to public goods influence status conferral. They predicted that contribution behavior would have opposite effects on 2 forms of status—Prestige and dominance—depending on its consequences for the self, in-group and out-group members. When the only way to benefit in-group members was by harming out-group members (Study 1), contributions increased Prestige and decreased dominance, compared with free-riding. Adding the option of benefitting in-group members without harming out-group members (Study 2) decreased the Prestige and increased the dominance of those who chose to benefit in-group members via intergroup competition. Finally, sharing resources with both in-group and out-group members decreased perceptions of both Prestige and dominance, compared with sharing them with in-group members only (Study 3). Prestige and dominance differentially mediated the effects of contribution behavior on leader election, exclusion from the group, and choices of a group representative for an intergroup competition. Taken together, these findings show that the well-established relationship between contribution and status is moderated by both the intergroup context and the conceptualization of status.
-
status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas behavioral antecedents and consequences of Prestige and dominance
Social Science Research Network, 2012Co-Authors: Nir Halevy, Eileen Y Chou, Taya R Cohen, Robert W LivingstonAbstract:Bridging the literatures on social dilemmas, intergroup conflict, and social hierarchy, we systematically varied the intergroup context in which social dilemmas were embedded to investigate how costly contributions to public goods influence status conferral. We predicted that contribution behavior would have opposite effects on two forms of status – Prestige and dominance – depending on its consequences for the self, in-group and out-group members. When the only way to benefit in-group members was by harming out-group members (Study 1), contributions increased Prestige and decreased dominance compared to free-riding. Adding the option to benefit in-group members without harming out-group members (Study 2) decreased the Prestige and increased the perceived dominance of those who chose to benefit in-group members via intergroup competition. Finally, sharing resources with both in-group and out-group members decreased perceptions of both Prestige and dominance compared to sharing them with in-group members only (Study 3). Prestige and dominance differentially mediated the effects of contribution behavior on leader election, exclusion from the group, and choices of a group representative for an intergroup competition. Taken together, these findings show that the well-established relationship between contribution and status is moderated by both the intergroup context and the conceptualization of status.
Ying Ding - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
p rank an indicator measuring Prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2011Co-Authors: Erjia Yan, Ying Ding, Cassidy R SugimotoAbstract:Ranking scientific productivity and Prestige are often limited to homogeneous networks. These networks are unable to account for the multiple factors that constitute the scholarly communication and reward system. This study proposes a new informetric indicator, P-Rank, for measuring Prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks containing articles, authors, and journals. P-Rank differentiates the weight of each citation based on its citing papers, citing journals, and citing authors. Articles from 16 representative library and information science journals are selected as the dataset. Principle Component Analysis is conducted to examine the relationship between P-Rank and other bibliometric indicators. We also compare the correlation and rank variances between citation counts and P-Rank scores. This work provides a new approach to examining Prestige in scholarly communication networks in a more comprehensive and nuanced way. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
-
weighted citation an indicator of an article s Prestige
arXiv: Digital Libraries, 2010Co-Authors: Erjia Yan, Ying DingAbstract:We propose using the technique of weighted citation to measure an article's Prestige. The technique allocates a different weight to each reference by taking into account the impact of citing journals and citation time intervals. Weighted citation captures Prestige, whereas citation counts capture popularity. We compare the value variances for popularity and Prestige for articles published in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology from 1998 to 2007, and find that the majority have comparable status.
-
weighted citation an indicator of an article s Prestige
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2010Co-Authors: Erjia Yan, Ying DingAbstract:The authors propose using the technique of weighted citation to measure an article's Prestige. The technique allocates a different weight to each reference by taking into account the impact of citing journals and citation time intervals. Weightedcitation captures Prestige, whereas citation counts capture popularity. They compare the value variances for popularity and Prestige for articles published in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology from 1998 to 2007, and find that the majority have comparable status. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Erjia Yan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
p rank an indicator measuring Prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2011Co-Authors: Erjia Yan, Ying Ding, Cassidy R SugimotoAbstract:Ranking scientific productivity and Prestige are often limited to homogeneous networks. These networks are unable to account for the multiple factors that constitute the scholarly communication and reward system. This study proposes a new informetric indicator, P-Rank, for measuring Prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks containing articles, authors, and journals. P-Rank differentiates the weight of each citation based on its citing papers, citing journals, and citing authors. Articles from 16 representative library and information science journals are selected as the dataset. Principle Component Analysis is conducted to examine the relationship between P-Rank and other bibliometric indicators. We also compare the correlation and rank variances between citation counts and P-Rank scores. This work provides a new approach to examining Prestige in scholarly communication networks in a more comprehensive and nuanced way. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
-
weighted citation an indicator of an article s Prestige
arXiv: Digital Libraries, 2010Co-Authors: Erjia Yan, Ying DingAbstract:We propose using the technique of weighted citation to measure an article's Prestige. The technique allocates a different weight to each reference by taking into account the impact of citing journals and citation time intervals. Weighted citation captures Prestige, whereas citation counts capture popularity. We compare the value variances for popularity and Prestige for articles published in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology from 1998 to 2007, and find that the majority have comparable status.
-
weighted citation an indicator of an article s Prestige
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2010Co-Authors: Erjia Yan, Ying DingAbstract:The authors propose using the technique of weighted citation to measure an article's Prestige. The technique allocates a different weight to each reference by taking into account the impact of citing journals and citation time intervals. Weightedcitation captures Prestige, whereas citation counts capture popularity. They compare the value variances for popularity and Prestige for articles published in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology from 1998 to 2007, and find that the majority have comparable status. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Eileen Y Chou - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas behavioral antecedents and consequences of Prestige and dominance
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012Co-Authors: Nir Halevy, Eileen Y Chou, Taya R Cohen, Robert W LivingstonAbstract:Bridging the literatures on social dilemmas, intergroup conflict, and social hierarchy, the authors systematically varied the intergroup context in which social dilemmas were embedded to investigate how costly contributions to public goods influence status conferral. They predicted that contribution behavior would have opposite effects on 2 forms of status—Prestige and dominance—depending on its consequences for the self, in-group and out-group members. When the only way to benefit in-group members was by harming out-group members (Study 1), contributions increased Prestige and decreased dominance, compared with free-riding. Adding the option of benefitting in-group members without harming out-group members (Study 2) decreased the Prestige and increased the dominance of those who chose to benefit in-group members via intergroup competition. Finally, sharing resources with both in-group and out-group members decreased perceptions of both Prestige and dominance, compared with sharing them with in-group members only (Study 3). Prestige and dominance differentially mediated the effects of contribution behavior on leader election, exclusion from the group, and choices of a group representative for an intergroup competition. Taken together, these findings show that the well-established relationship between contribution and status is moderated by both the intergroup context and the conceptualization of status.
-
status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas behavioral antecedents and consequences of Prestige and dominance
Social Science Research Network, 2012Co-Authors: Nir Halevy, Eileen Y Chou, Taya R Cohen, Robert W LivingstonAbstract:Bridging the literatures on social dilemmas, intergroup conflict, and social hierarchy, we systematically varied the intergroup context in which social dilemmas were embedded to investigate how costly contributions to public goods influence status conferral. We predicted that contribution behavior would have opposite effects on two forms of status – Prestige and dominance – depending on its consequences for the self, in-group and out-group members. When the only way to benefit in-group members was by harming out-group members (Study 1), contributions increased Prestige and decreased dominance compared to free-riding. Adding the option to benefit in-group members without harming out-group members (Study 2) decreased the Prestige and increased the perceived dominance of those who chose to benefit in-group members via intergroup competition. Finally, sharing resources with both in-group and out-group members decreased perceptions of both Prestige and dominance compared to sharing them with in-group members only (Study 3). Prestige and dominance differentially mediated the effects of contribution behavior on leader election, exclusion from the group, and choices of a group representative for an intergroup competition. Taken together, these findings show that the well-established relationship between contribution and status is moderated by both the intergroup context and the conceptualization of status.
