Prima Facie Case

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 4332 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Weidong Chen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • BURDEN OF PROOF AND Prima Facie Case IN WTO DISPUTES SETTLEMENT — A PERSPECTIVE OF CHINESE LAW
    Frontiers of Law in China, 2013
    Co-Authors: Heng Liu, Weidong Chen
    Abstract:

    分别地,这份报纸在中国法律在举证责任上基于法律教义在 WTO 争论解决讨论举证责任和第一的 Facie 大小写的概念。从中国法律的观点,举证责任在二个层次上有三个含意,也就是,生产的行为负担和在程序的意义的说服的行为负担,和结果在它的真实意义忍受相反的后果麻烦。一个第一的 Facie 盒子也包括更弱的说明和更严格的说明。他们不在不同上下文意味着一样,但是是在给定的上下文它的准确意思的,是清楚的。在 WTO 争论解决的举证责任的真实混乱是在实践,到某程度,在 Case-to-Case 基础上由面板依靠决心的第一的 Facie 标准。

  • burden of proof and Prima Facie Case in wto disputes settlement a perspective of chinese law
    Frontiers of Law in China, 2013
    Co-Authors: Heng Liu, Weidong Chen
    Abstract:

    分别地,这份报纸在中国法律在举证责任上基于法律教义在 WTO 争论解决讨论举证责任和第一的 Facie 大小写的概念。从中国法律的观点,举证责任在二个层次上有三个含意,也就是,生产的行为负担和在程序的意义的说服的行为负担,和结果在它的真实意义忍受相反的后果麻烦。一个第一的 Facie 盒子也包括更弱的说明和更严格的说明。他们不在不同上下文意味着一样,但是是在给定的上下文它的准确意思的,是清楚的。在 WTO 争论解决的举证责任的真实混乱是在实践,到某程度,在 Case-to-Case 基础上由面板依靠决心的第一的 Facie 标准。

David Gibbs - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Brendan S. Gillon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Heng Liu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • BURDEN OF PROOF AND Prima Facie Case IN WTO DISPUTES SETTLEMENT — A PERSPECTIVE OF CHINESE LAW
    Frontiers of Law in China, 2013
    Co-Authors: Heng Liu, Weidong Chen
    Abstract:

    分别地,这份报纸在中国法律在举证责任上基于法律教义在 WTO 争论解决讨论举证责任和第一的 Facie 大小写的概念。从中国法律的观点,举证责任在二个层次上有三个含意,也就是,生产的行为负担和在程序的意义的说服的行为负担,和结果在它的真实意义忍受相反的后果麻烦。一个第一的 Facie 盒子也包括更弱的说明和更严格的说明。他们不在不同上下文意味着一样,但是是在给定的上下文它的准确意思的,是清楚的。在 WTO 争论解决的举证责任的真实混乱是在实践,到某程度,在 Case-to-Case 基础上由面板依靠决心的第一的 Facie 标准。

  • burden of proof and Prima Facie Case in wto disputes settlement a perspective of chinese law
    Frontiers of Law in China, 2013
    Co-Authors: Heng Liu, Weidong Chen
    Abstract:

    分别地,这份报纸在中国法律在举证责任上基于法律教义在 WTO 争论解决讨论举证责任和第一的 Facie 大小写的概念。从中国法律的观点,举证责任在二个层次上有三个含意,也就是,生产的行为负担和在程序的意义的说服的行为负担,和结果在它的真实意义忍受相反的后果麻烦。一个第一的 Facie 盒子也包括更弱的说明和更严格的说明。他们不在不同上下文意味着一样,但是是在给定的上下文它的准确意思的,是清楚的。在 WTO 争论解决的举证责任的真实混乱是在实践,到某程度,在 Case-to-Case 基础上由面板依靠决心的第一的 Facie 标准。

David Moore - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • ICALT - Collaborative virtual environment technology for people with autism
    Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05), 2005
    Co-Authors: Yufang Cheng, David Moore, Paul Mcgrath, Yulei Fan
    Abstract:

    This paper focuses on an investigation of collaborative virtual environment (CVE) technology for people with autism, paying particular attention to the use of avatar representations of emotions. A Prima Facie Case for a CVE technological approach is developed, which argues that CVE offers great potential benefits for people with autism. An empirical study of people with autism using a simulated CVE system has been carried out. Results suggest that, on the whole, the participants were able to recognise and operate the avatar representations when communicating via the CVE system.

  • Computational Uses of PhilosophicalDialogue Theories
    Informal Logic, 1996
    Co-Authors: David Moore, Dave Hobbes
    Abstract:

    The research discussed in this paper concerns an investigation of logical dialogue games as a vehicle for enhanced human-computer communication. The need for a dialogue capability in computer systems is argued, and a Prima Facie Case made for dialogue games, in particular Mackenzie's "DC", as a suitable dialogue model. Empirical work concerning DC is outlined, and strategies for adoption by the computer are presented. A user interface, software architecture and conceptualised example are discussed. The hope is that the paper will help bring together two groups of workers-philosophers of dialogue and designers of computer systems-to the mutual benefit of each.