The Experts below are selected from a list of 33 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Peter Langendorfer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • WEBIST (Selected Papers) - The Privacy Advocate: Assertion of Privacy by Personalised Contracts
    Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 2008
    Co-Authors: Michael Maaser, Steffen Ortmann, Peter Langendorfer
    Abstract:

    Privacy has been a hot topic in research for several years. A lot of different approaches to protect Privacy have been proposed recently. Among these there are several tools for negotiation of Privacy contracts. In this paper we present our Privacy negotiation framework called “The Privacy Advocate”. It consists of three main parts: the policy evaluation unit, the signature unit and the preferences. In addition, our framework supports an interface for negotiation strategies, so that they are independent of the framework. The preferences can be expressed with a combination of P3P and APPEL. The tests we executed using a state of the art PDA clearly indicate that our framework can be used on mobile devices. The completion of a successful negotiation usually takes about 2 sec. including message transfer via an 802.11b wireless link. This involves multiple evaluations of proposals. Each of them is done in less than 250 msec.

  • the Privacy Advocate assertion of Privacy by personalised contracts
    International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, 2007
    Co-Authors: Michael Maaser, Steffen Ortmann, Peter Langendorfer
    Abstract:

    Privacy has been a hot topic in research for several years. A lot of different approaches to protect Privacy have been proposed recently. Among these there are several tools for negotiation of Privacy contracts. In this paper we present our Privacy negotiation framework called “The Privacy Advocate”. It consists of three main parts: the policy evaluation unit, the signature unit and the preferences. In addition, our framework supports an interface for negotiation strategies, so that they are independent of the framework. The preferences can be expressed with a combination of P3P and APPEL. The tests we executed using a state of the art PDA clearly indicate that our framework can be used on mobile devices. The completion of a successful negotiation usually takes about 2 sec. including message transfer via an 802.11b wireless link. This involves multiple evaluations of proposals. Each of them is done in less than 250 msec.

Richard Warner - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Undermined Norms: The Corrosive Effect of Information Processing Technology on Informational Privacy
    Saint Louis University law journal, 2010
    Co-Authors: Richard Warner
    Abstract:

    Informational Privacy is a matter of control; it consists in the ability to control when one’s personal information is collected, how it is used, and to whom it is distributed. The degree of control we once enjoyed has vanished. Advances in information processing technology now give others considerable power to determine when personal information is collected, how it is used, and to it is whom distributed. Privacy Advocates sound the alarm in regard to both the governmental and private sectors. I focus exclusively on the later. Relying on the extensive Privacy Advocate literature, I assume we should try to regain control over private sector information process. The question is how. I reject the claim that we can do so by requiring businesses to obtain consent – or more accurately to go through the motions of obtaining consent – prior to collecting personal information. I contend that adequate informational Privacy requires a rich background of informational norms.Informational norms are social norms that constrain the collection, use, and distribution of personal information. Under ideal conditions, norm-governed exchanges not only implement acceptable tradeoffs between informational Privacy and competing goals, they also ensure consumers give free and informed consent to those tradeoffs. The restriction to ideal conditions does not deprive the point of interest; rather, it shows that the interest is normative, not empirical. The ideal conditions are a goal we should strive to approximate in practice. Unfortunately current practice fails to adequately approximate this ideal in significant cases. Lack of norms is one important reason. The rapid advance in information processing technology has outstripped the relatively slow evolution of social norms in a wide range of important cases.

Michael Maaser - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • WEBIST (Selected Papers) - The Privacy Advocate: Assertion of Privacy by Personalised Contracts
    Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 2008
    Co-Authors: Michael Maaser, Steffen Ortmann, Peter Langendorfer
    Abstract:

    Privacy has been a hot topic in research for several years. A lot of different approaches to protect Privacy have been proposed recently. Among these there are several tools for negotiation of Privacy contracts. In this paper we present our Privacy negotiation framework called “The Privacy Advocate”. It consists of three main parts: the policy evaluation unit, the signature unit and the preferences. In addition, our framework supports an interface for negotiation strategies, so that they are independent of the framework. The preferences can be expressed with a combination of P3P and APPEL. The tests we executed using a state of the art PDA clearly indicate that our framework can be used on mobile devices. The completion of a successful negotiation usually takes about 2 sec. including message transfer via an 802.11b wireless link. This involves multiple evaluations of proposals. Each of them is done in less than 250 msec.

  • the Privacy Advocate assertion of Privacy by personalised contracts
    International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, 2007
    Co-Authors: Michael Maaser, Steffen Ortmann, Peter Langendorfer
    Abstract:

    Privacy has been a hot topic in research for several years. A lot of different approaches to protect Privacy have been proposed recently. Among these there are several tools for negotiation of Privacy contracts. In this paper we present our Privacy negotiation framework called “The Privacy Advocate”. It consists of three main parts: the policy evaluation unit, the signature unit and the preferences. In addition, our framework supports an interface for negotiation strategies, so that they are independent of the framework. The preferences can be expressed with a combination of P3P and APPEL. The tests we executed using a state of the art PDA clearly indicate that our framework can be used on mobile devices. The completion of a successful negotiation usually takes about 2 sec. including message transfer via an 802.11b wireless link. This involves multiple evaluations of proposals. Each of them is done in less than 250 msec.

Steffen Ortmann - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • WEBIST (Selected Papers) - The Privacy Advocate: Assertion of Privacy by Personalised Contracts
    Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 2008
    Co-Authors: Michael Maaser, Steffen Ortmann, Peter Langendorfer
    Abstract:

    Privacy has been a hot topic in research for several years. A lot of different approaches to protect Privacy have been proposed recently. Among these there are several tools for negotiation of Privacy contracts. In this paper we present our Privacy negotiation framework called “The Privacy Advocate”. It consists of three main parts: the policy evaluation unit, the signature unit and the preferences. In addition, our framework supports an interface for negotiation strategies, so that they are independent of the framework. The preferences can be expressed with a combination of P3P and APPEL. The tests we executed using a state of the art PDA clearly indicate that our framework can be used on mobile devices. The completion of a successful negotiation usually takes about 2 sec. including message transfer via an 802.11b wireless link. This involves multiple evaluations of proposals. Each of them is done in less than 250 msec.

  • the Privacy Advocate assertion of Privacy by personalised contracts
    International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, 2007
    Co-Authors: Michael Maaser, Steffen Ortmann, Peter Langendorfer
    Abstract:

    Privacy has been a hot topic in research for several years. A lot of different approaches to protect Privacy have been proposed recently. Among these there are several tools for negotiation of Privacy contracts. In this paper we present our Privacy negotiation framework called “The Privacy Advocate”. It consists of three main parts: the policy evaluation unit, the signature unit and the preferences. In addition, our framework supports an interface for negotiation strategies, so that they are independent of the framework. The preferences can be expressed with a combination of P3P and APPEL. The tests we executed using a state of the art PDA clearly indicate that our framework can be used on mobile devices. The completion of a successful negotiation usually takes about 2 sec. including message transfer via an 802.11b wireless link. This involves multiple evaluations of proposals. Each of them is done in less than 250 msec.

A. Arnbak - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • What the European Commission Owes 500 Million Europeans
    2010
    Co-Authors: A. Arnbak
    Abstract:

    Speech delivered on 3 December 2010 at the conference "Taking on the Data Retention Directive", organised by the European Commission, as part of the evaluation of the Data Retention Directive (2006/24/EC). The speech was delivered when the author was still a Privacy Advocate at European Digital Rights (EDRi) and Dutch digital rights organisation Bits of Freedom. It is based upon research conducted as part of the author's master's thesis, that won the Dutch national Internet Thesis Award in 2010 and the general University of Amsterdam Thesis Award in 2011.