The Experts below are selected from a list of 64539 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Ma Huaide - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The values of administrative Procedural Law and the meaning of its codification in China
    Frontiers of Law in China, 2006
    Co-Authors: Ma Huaide
    Abstract:

    Administrative Procedural Law has the value of justice, efficiency and order. Codifying administrative Procedural Law in China means promoting the development of democratic politics, protecting basic civil rights, curbing and eliminating corruption, building a clean and honest government, overcoming bureaucracy and enhancing administrative efficiency. Establishing an administrative procedure code that unifies administrative legislation, enforcement and judicial procedures is a goal that must be realized in the future.

Xandra E. Kramer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • A Major Step in the Harmonization of Procedural Law in Europe: The European Small Claims Procedure
    2008
    Co-Authors: Xandra E. Kramer
    Abstract:

    European civil Procedural Law has been in a constant state of flux since the coming into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1999. The introduction of Article 65 EC Treaty was followed by numerous Community instruments in the field of civil procedure, mostly regulations that have direct binding force in the Member States. These have changed the face of litigation in the European Union.This paper focuses on the recent developments in European Procedural Law, and more in particular the establishment of the first two harmonized European procedures. The emphasis is on the European Small Claims Procedure, which as a full, adversarial procedure is more substantial than the primarily administrative European Order for Payment Procedure for uncontested claims. First on overview of harmonization of Procedural Law in Europe after the Treaty of Amsterdam is provided, then the European Small Claims Procedure is analyzed. The final section contains some thoughts on the harmonization of Procedural Law in Europe. First, the accomplishments and innovative features are discussed. Second, some difficulties and fundamental issues of the harmonization of Procedural Law in Europe are presented.

  • A Major Step in the Harmonization of Procedural Law in Europe: The European Small Claims Procedure: Accomplishments, New Features and Some Fundamental Questions of European Harmonization
    SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
    Co-Authors: Xandra E. Kramer
    Abstract:

    European civil Procedural Law has been in a constant state of flux since the coming into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1999. The introduction of Article 65 EC Treaty was followed by numerous Community instruments in the field of civil procedure, mostly regulations that have direct binding force in the Member States. These have changed the face of litigation in the European Union.This paper focuses on the recent developments in European Procedural Law, and more in particular the establishment of the first two harmonized European procedures. The emphasis is on the European Small Claims Procedure, which as a full, adversarial procedure is more substantial than the primarily administrative European Order for Payment Procedure for uncontested claims. First on overview of harmonization of Procedural Law in Europe after the Treaty of Amsterdam is provided, then the European Small Claims Procedure is analyzed. The final section contains some thoughts on the harmonization of Procedural Law in Europe. First, the accomplishments and innovative features are discussed. Second, some difficulties and fundamental issues of the harmonization of Procedural Law in Europe are presented.

R. Barents - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • EU Procedural Law and effective legal protection
    Common Market Law Review, 2014
    Co-Authors: R. Barents
    Abstract:

    The procedures in direct actions before the three courts of the European Union are governed by strict rules, laid down in the Statute of the CJEU and the Rules of Procedure of the CJ, the GC and the CST, on the subject-matter of the dispute, the forms of order sought and the pleas supporting the action. In this article the system of pleas and its consequences for the function of the Union judicature and the position of the parties in the proceedings before the Union Courts are examined. Due to this system, EU Procedural Law is featured by a rather strong orientation towards objective legality review. The central question is this contribution is whether the proceedings in direct actions are still fully appropriate in the light of the fundamental right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial as required by Article 47 Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Per Henrik Lindblom - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Sun Yong-mei - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.