The Experts below are selected from a list of 303468 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Heekyeong Park - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-Process account
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2006Co-Authors: Rachel A. Diana, Jason Arndt, Lynne M. Reder, Heekyeong ParkAbstract:The majority of computationally specified models of recognition memory have been based on a single-Process Interpretation, claiming that familiarity is the only influence on recognition. There is increasing evidence that recognition is, in fact, based on two Processes: recollection and familiarity. This article reviews the current state of the evidence for dual-Process models, including the usefulness of the remember/know paradigm, and interprets the relevant results in terms of the source of activation confusion (SAC) model of memory. We argue that the evidence from each of the areas we discuss, when combined, presents a strong case that inclusion of a recollection Process is necessary. Given this conclusion, we also argue that the dual-Process claim that the recollection Process is always available is, in fact, more parsimonious than the single-Process claim that the recollection Process is used only in certain paradigms. The value of a well-specified Process model such as the SAC model is discussed with regard to other types of dual-Process models.
Carter T Butts - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a dynamic Process Interpretation of the sparse ergm reference model
Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2019Co-Authors: Carter T ButtsAbstract:ABSTRACTExponential family random graph models (ERGMs) can be understood in terms of a set of structural biases that act on an underlying reference distribution. This distribution determines many aspects of the behavior and Interpretation of the ERGM families incorporating it. One important innovation in this area has been the development of an ERGM reference model that produces realistic behavior when generalized to sparse networks of varying sizes. Here, we show that this model can be derived from a latent dynamic Process in which tie formation takes place within small local settings between which individuals move. This derivation provides one possible micro-Process Interpretation of the sparse ERGM reference model and sheds light on the conditions under which constant mean degree scaling can emerge.
-
A dynamic Process Interpretation of the sparse ERGM reference model
The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2018Co-Authors: Carter T ButtsAbstract:Exponential family random graph models (ERGMs) can be understood in terms of a set of structural biases that act on an underlying reference distribution. This distribution determines many aspects o...
Vladimir S. Jotsov - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Discrete Markov Process Interpretation of propositional logic
2010 5th IEEE International Conference Intelligent Systems, 2010Co-Authors: Vassil S. Sgurev, Vladimir S. JotsovAbstract:A stochastic Interpretation of propositional logic formulas is introduced that uses a specific discrete Markov Process with two states. The requirements for this Interpretation are formulated. It is shown that the obtained from it stochastic distributions are compatible on a qualitative (probabilistic) level with the respective results of the propositional logic. Examples are presented for usage of this class of Markov Processes and the ways for applying it in artificial intelligence, intelligent systems, expert systems are marked.
-
IEEE Conf. of Intelligent Systems - Discrete Markov Process Interpretation of propositional logic
2010 5th IEEE International Conference Intelligent Systems, 2010Co-Authors: Vassil S. Sgurev, Vladimir S. JotsovAbstract:A stochastic Interpretation of propositional logic formulas is introduced that uses a specific discrete Markov Process with two states. The requirements for this Interpretation are formulated. It is shown that the obtained from it stochastic distributions are compatible on a qualitative (probabilistic) level with the respective results of the propositional logic. Examples are presented for usage of this class of Markov Processes and the ways for applying it in artificial intelligence, intelligent systems, expert systems are marked.
Rachel A. Diana - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-Process account
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2006Co-Authors: Rachel A. Diana, Jason Arndt, Lynne M. Reder, Heekyeong ParkAbstract:The majority of computationally specified models of recognition memory have been based on a single-Process Interpretation, claiming that familiarity is the only influence on recognition. There is increasing evidence that recognition is, in fact, based on two Processes: recollection and familiarity. This article reviews the current state of the evidence for dual-Process models, including the usefulness of the remember/know paradigm, and interprets the relevant results in terms of the source of activation confusion (SAC) model of memory. We argue that the evidence from each of the areas we discuss, when combined, presents a strong case that inclusion of a recollection Process is necessary. Given this conclusion, we also argue that the dual-Process claim that the recollection Process is always available is, in fact, more parsimonious than the single-Process claim that the recollection Process is used only in certain paradigms. The value of a well-specified Process model such as the SAC model is discussed with regard to other types of dual-Process models.
Dorrik A. V. Stow - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Recognition and Interpretation of deep-water sediment waves: Implications for palaeoceanography, hydrocarbon exploration and flow Process Interpretation
Marine Geology, 2002Co-Authors: Russell B Wynn, Dorrik A. V. StowAbstract:Article Outline\n\n• Introduction to the special issue\n\n• Introduction paper\n\n• Papers on turbidity current sediment waves\n\n• Papers on bottom current sediment waves