The Experts below are selected from a list of 196197 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
C. Forza - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions
Journal of Operations Management, 2004Co-Authors: M. Rungtusanatham, C. ForzaAbstract:Despite the undeniable appeal and importance of coordinating decisions across Products Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design to both science and practice, we know very little about how to do so to maximize operational, supply chain, and firm performance. This special issue on Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and Supply Chain Design Decisions was conceived early 2003 to bring awareness to and to spur scholarly research into this topic. In doing so, we cast a wide net from both content and methodological perspectives, encouraging interdisciplinary papers that were theory-building and/or theory-testing in purpose using either empirical-based (e.g., case research, survey research, historical research, etc.) and/or modeling (i.e., optimization or simulation) methodologies. The resulting seven papers represent the fruits of this harvest and are being presented in two consecutive parts. Whereas Part A introduces the three papers that speak to the performance implications of coordinating Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions, Part B introduces the remaining four papers that address how and why these three decision areas can be coordinated. Included in Part A of this special issue, we also make the review Process transparent for third-party evaluation and, more importantly, formally recognize and thank the numerous colleagues from across multiple disciplines and academic institutions around the world for their efforts in helping us produce this two-part special issue
-
Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions: Part A: Topic motivation, performance implications, and article review Process
Journal of Operations Management, 2004Co-Authors: M. Rungtusanatham, C. ForzaAbstract:Despite the undeniable appeal and importance of coordinating decisions across Products Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design to both science and practice, we know very little about how to do so to maximize operational, supply chain, and firm performance. This special issue on Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and Supply Chain Design Decisions was conceived early 2003 to bring awareness to and to spur scholarly research into this topic. In doing so, we cast a wide net from both content and methodological perspectives, encouraging interdisciplinary papers that were theory-building and/or theory-testing in purpose using either empirical-based (e.g., case research, survey research, historical research, etc.) and/or modeling (i.e., optimization or simulation) methodologies. The resulting seven papers represent the fruits of this harvest and are being presented in two consecutive parts. Whereas Part A introduces the three papers that speak to the performance implications of coordinating Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions, Part B introduces the remaining four papers that address how and why these three decision areas can be coordinated. Included in Part A of this special issue, we also make the review Process transparent for third-party evaluation and, more importantly, formally recognize and thank the numerous colleagues from across multiple disciplines and academic institutions around the world for their efforts in helping us produce this two-part special issue.
-
Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions
Journal of Operations Management, 2004Co-Authors: C. Forza, F. Salvador, M. RungtusanathamAbstract:Complementing Part A which appeared in an earlier issue, Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions. Part B. coordinating approaches, tradeoffs, and future research directions introduces four additional papers that belong to this special issue. These four papers seek to provide answers to the following two questions: "What mechanisms allow Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions to be coordinated?" and "Why should decisions with respect to Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design be coordinated?" Each of the four papers compiled in Part B provides, foremost, an approach to coordinate decisions across the domains of Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design. The proposed coordinating mechanisms range from a network-based modeling approach to an assessment procedure for evaluating Product architectures to the integration of relevant suppliers into the new Product development (NPD) Process to a goal programming modeling approach. The fourth paper in Part B, in fact, deploys the proposed goal programming modeling approach to identify and formalize the potential tradeoffs among decisions across the three domains. Part B completes the special issue by identifying future research opportunities, beyond those highlighted within the seven papers that form Part A and Part B of this special issue on Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions
-
Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions: Part B. Coordinating approaches, tradeoffs, and future research directions
Journal of Operations Management, 2004Co-Authors: C. Forza, F. Salvador, M. RungtusanathamAbstract:Abstract Complementing Part A which appeared in an earlier issue, Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions. Part B. coordinating approaches, tradeoffs, and future research directions introduces four additional papers that belong to this special issue. These four papers seek to provide answers to the following two questions: “What mechanisms allow Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions to be coordinated?” and “Why should decisions with respect to Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design be coordinated?” Each of the four papers compiled in Part B provides, foremost, an approach to coordinate decisions across the domains of Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design. The proposed coordinating mechanisms range from a network-based modeling approach to an assessment procedure for evaluating Product architectures to the integration of relevant suppliers into the new Product development (NPD) Process to a goal programming modeling approach. The fourth paper in Part B, in fact, deploys the proposed goal programming modeling approach to identify and formalize the potential tradeoffs among decisions across the three domains. Part B completes the special issue by identifying future research opportunities, beyond those highlighted within the seven papers that form Part A and Part B of this special issue on Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions .
M. Rungtusanatham - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions
Journal of Operations Management, 2004Co-Authors: M. Rungtusanatham, C. ForzaAbstract:Despite the undeniable appeal and importance of coordinating decisions across Products Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design to both science and practice, we know very little about how to do so to maximize operational, supply chain, and firm performance. This special issue on Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and Supply Chain Design Decisions was conceived early 2003 to bring awareness to and to spur scholarly research into this topic. In doing so, we cast a wide net from both content and methodological perspectives, encouraging interdisciplinary papers that were theory-building and/or theory-testing in purpose using either empirical-based (e.g., case research, survey research, historical research, etc.) and/or modeling (i.e., optimization or simulation) methodologies. The resulting seven papers represent the fruits of this harvest and are being presented in two consecutive parts. Whereas Part A introduces the three papers that speak to the performance implications of coordinating Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions, Part B introduces the remaining four papers that address how and why these three decision areas can be coordinated. Included in Part A of this special issue, we also make the review Process transparent for third-party evaluation and, more importantly, formally recognize and thank the numerous colleagues from across multiple disciplines and academic institutions around the world for their efforts in helping us produce this two-part special issue
-
Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions: Part A: Topic motivation, performance implications, and article review Process
Journal of Operations Management, 2004Co-Authors: M. Rungtusanatham, C. ForzaAbstract:Despite the undeniable appeal and importance of coordinating decisions across Products Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design to both science and practice, we know very little about how to do so to maximize operational, supply chain, and firm performance. This special issue on Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and Supply Chain Design Decisions was conceived early 2003 to bring awareness to and to spur scholarly research into this topic. In doing so, we cast a wide net from both content and methodological perspectives, encouraging interdisciplinary papers that were theory-building and/or theory-testing in purpose using either empirical-based (e.g., case research, survey research, historical research, etc.) and/or modeling (i.e., optimization or simulation) methodologies. The resulting seven papers represent the fruits of this harvest and are being presented in two consecutive parts. Whereas Part A introduces the three papers that speak to the performance implications of coordinating Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions, Part B introduces the remaining four papers that address how and why these three decision areas can be coordinated. Included in Part A of this special issue, we also make the review Process transparent for third-party evaluation and, more importantly, formally recognize and thank the numerous colleagues from across multiple disciplines and academic institutions around the world for their efforts in helping us produce this two-part special issue.
-
Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions
Journal of Operations Management, 2004Co-Authors: C. Forza, F. Salvador, M. RungtusanathamAbstract:Complementing Part A which appeared in an earlier issue, Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions. Part B. coordinating approaches, tradeoffs, and future research directions introduces four additional papers that belong to this special issue. These four papers seek to provide answers to the following two questions: "What mechanisms allow Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions to be coordinated?" and "Why should decisions with respect to Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design be coordinated?" Each of the four papers compiled in Part B provides, foremost, an approach to coordinate decisions across the domains of Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design. The proposed coordinating mechanisms range from a network-based modeling approach to an assessment procedure for evaluating Product architectures to the integration of relevant suppliers into the new Product development (NPD) Process to a goal programming modeling approach. The fourth paper in Part B, in fact, deploys the proposed goal programming modeling approach to identify and formalize the potential tradeoffs among decisions across the three domains. Part B completes the special issue by identifying future research opportunities, beyond those highlighted within the seven papers that form Part A and Part B of this special issue on Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions
-
Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions: Part B. Coordinating approaches, tradeoffs, and future research directions
Journal of Operations Management, 2004Co-Authors: C. Forza, F. Salvador, M. RungtusanathamAbstract:Abstract Complementing Part A which appeared in an earlier issue, Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions. Part B. coordinating approaches, tradeoffs, and future research directions introduces four additional papers that belong to this special issue. These four papers seek to provide answers to the following two questions: “What mechanisms allow Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions to be coordinated?” and “Why should decisions with respect to Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design be coordinated?” Each of the four papers compiled in Part B provides, foremost, an approach to coordinate decisions across the domains of Product Design, manufacturing Process Design, and supply chain Design. The proposed coordinating mechanisms range from a network-based modeling approach to an assessment procedure for evaluating Product architectures to the integration of relevant suppliers into the new Product development (NPD) Process to a goal programming modeling approach. The fourth paper in Part B, in fact, deploys the proposed goal programming modeling approach to identify and formalize the potential tradeoffs among decisions across the three domains. Part B completes the special issue by identifying future research opportunities, beyond those highlighted within the seven papers that form Part A and Part B of this special issue on Coordinating Product Design, Process Design, and supply chain Design decisions .
Wang Yao-wu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Workflow Model Based on Extended Petri Net for Building Product Design Process
Journal of systems management, 2009Co-Authors: Wang Yao-wuAbstract:To manage and control the dynamics and uncertainty of workflow for building Product Design Process,the workflow model of building Product Design Process based on extended Petri net was presented.The model was established in the scenario of building services Design Process of an official building.The CPN Tools software was used for simulation analysis and Process optimization.The simulation results show that the workflow model has significant effect on Design Process management and optimization for a building Product.
-
Workflow Structured Modeling and Simulation Based on Petri Net for Product Design Process
Computer Simulation, 2009Co-Authors: Wang Yao-wuAbstract:Workflow management for Product Design Process is the core management Process which influences the project development cycle and total benefit.Workflow structured modeling methodology based on Petri net for Product Design Process was proposed in order to manage and control workflow dynamics and uncertainty.Seven basic structured modules for structured modeling based on Petri net were defined.The core patterns for workflow structured modeling were identified as sequence,overlap,iteration,couple,split and join.A building services detailed Design Process was used for workflow structured modeling and simulation analysis.The correctness and validity of the methodology was demonstrated through the case.
Kazuhiro Aoyama - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Design orchestration composer - A model base enabling holistic management of Product, Design Process, and organization
2013Co-Authors: Kazuya Oizumi, Kazuhiro AoyamaAbstract:As the industries develop, Product enlarges its scale and increases its complexity. To defeat past Products, more functions and mechanisms have been installed. It requires more and more people involved, disciplines needed, which have to orchestrate toward the achivement of a better Product. However, due to complexity of Design, management of the Design Process and the organization becomes huge challenge. Considerable time and efforts are required for the better management. Failures of management appear as delays, over-budgets, inferior functionalities or defects. Literally, scale and complexity of a Product are exceeding the limit that mankind can manually deal with. The aim of this study is to establish the model base that enables model based management of Product, Design Process, and organization. The major function of the model base application is realized by the domain specific calculations and analyses. By considering the domain specific rationales, it is possible to describe detailed relationships and give insightful translation of the analysed results. The case study on a solar boat Design project demonstrates the use of the model base and its applications.
-
coordination of Product Design Process in view of Product and organizational structures
Design Automation Conference, 2012Co-Authors: Kazuya Oizumi, Kazuhiro AoyamaAbstract:Management of Product Design projects becomes increasingly difficult as the complexity of Products increases. For better management of such projects, well-considered preliminary coordination of Design Processes is essential. This paper proposes a method for coordination in the Design Process, which comprises two phases: 1) division of the Design work into smaller tasks and sequencing them and 2) establishment of management activities. To facilitate this coordination, an integrated model of a Product, Process, and organization is proposed.The division and sequencing of Design tasks is based upon analysis of the Product model. The method utilizes rational prioritization of Design parameters, which means identification of parameters that must be first considered for changes.The resulting Design Processes can show where coordination among Design tasks is needed. This, in turn, implies the necessity of management. It is preferable for a different style of management to be adopted for each part. Here, the importance of management and organizational structure prescribe the style of management that should be adopted. In this paper, two approaches to management are discussed: 1) the formation of a pre-agreement, and 2) integration and after-approval.Throughout the paper, the example of a solar boat Design is used to explain how the proposed method works and to demonstrate its feasibility.Copyright © 2012 by ASME
James Jungbae Roh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
connecting Product Design Process and supply chain decisions to strengthen global supply chain capabilities
International Journal of Production Economics, 2014Co-Authors: Erika Marsillac, James Jungbae RohAbstract:Abstract The importance of Product Design as a main determinant of Process Design has been emphasized in operations management literature for decades, but the direct and indirect impacts of Product Design on Process and supply chain activities is a research area that has received less attention to date. This multiple case study addresses this research gap by assessing how and why changes in Product Design shape Process and supply chain practices and in particular, how these changes influence global supply chain behavior and capabilities. Utilizing a 3DCE theory base, multiple manufacturing case studies are compared and contrasted to examine the interrelationships and dependencies among Product, Process and supply chain behaviors and capabilities. Product Design changes were found to alter the scope and scale of Process and supply chain modifications in specific ways that alter firms' competitive Product Design customization capabilities and competencies; flexible, advanced Process technologies; and collaborative supplier practices. This study contributes to operations management literature by providing a rich empirical analysis of operations system interplay. The study develops substantive research propositions and a 3DCE theoretical framework that may be used to drive future operations management research and in addition, provides managerial insights that can be used to strengthen supply chain capabilities in a global and dynamic context.