The Experts below are selected from a list of 126300 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Rana Pant - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
allocation solutions for secondary material Production and end of life recovery proposals for Product Policy initiatives
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2014Co-Authors: Karen Allacker, Fabrice Mathieux, Simone Manfredi, Nathan Pelletier, C De Camillis, Fulvio Ardente, Rana PantAbstract:Abstract This paper aims at analysing how secondary materials Production and end of life recovery processes are modelled in life cycle-based environmental assessment methods in order to discuss their suitability in Product Policy-support contexts, with a focus on Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policies. The equations prescribed in three published, widely recognised standards are evaluated. In addition, more recent modelling approaches that have been adopted in the context of two EU Product Policy initiatives (the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and the Resource Efficiency Assessment of Products (REAPro)) are similarly analysed. All of the methods are scrutinised against eight criteria which we deem to be important in Product Policy-support contexts, including comprehensiveness, accommodation of open-loop and closed-loop Product systems, and consideration of recyclability/recoverability rates, to name a few. Based on this analysis, it is suggested that the PEF and REAPro modelling approaches appear to be better suited for use in Product Policy-support contexts than do the currently widely endorsed methods that we considered.
-
Allocation solutions for secondary material Production and end of life recovery: Proposals for Product Policy initiatives
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2014Co-Authors: Karen Allacker, Fabrice Mathieux, Simone Manfredi, Nathan Pelletier, C De Camillis, Fulvio Ardente, Rana PantAbstract:Abstract This paper aims at analysing how secondary materials Production and end of life recovery processes are modelled in life cycle-based environmental assessment methods in order to discuss their suitability in Product Policy-support contexts, with a focus on Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policies. The equations prescribed in three published, widely recognised standards are evaluated. In addition, more recent modelling approaches that have been adopted in the context of two EU Product Policy initiatives (the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and the Resource Efficiency Assessment of Products (REAPro)) are similarly analysed. All of the methods are scrutinised against eight criteria which we deem to be important in Product Policy-support contexts, including comprehensiveness, accommodation of open-loop and closed-loop Product systems, and consideration of recyclability/recoverability rates, to name a few. Based on this analysis, it is suggested that the PEF and REAPro modelling approaches appear to be better suited for use in Product Policy-support contexts than do the currently widely endorsed methods that we considered.
Karen Allacker - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
allocation solutions for secondary material Production and end of life recovery proposals for Product Policy initiatives
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2014Co-Authors: Karen Allacker, Fabrice Mathieux, Simone Manfredi, Nathan Pelletier, C De Camillis, Fulvio Ardente, Rana PantAbstract:Abstract This paper aims at analysing how secondary materials Production and end of life recovery processes are modelled in life cycle-based environmental assessment methods in order to discuss their suitability in Product Policy-support contexts, with a focus on Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policies. The equations prescribed in three published, widely recognised standards are evaluated. In addition, more recent modelling approaches that have been adopted in the context of two EU Product Policy initiatives (the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and the Resource Efficiency Assessment of Products (REAPro)) are similarly analysed. All of the methods are scrutinised against eight criteria which we deem to be important in Product Policy-support contexts, including comprehensiveness, accommodation of open-loop and closed-loop Product systems, and consideration of recyclability/recoverability rates, to name a few. Based on this analysis, it is suggested that the PEF and REAPro modelling approaches appear to be better suited for use in Product Policy-support contexts than do the currently widely endorsed methods that we considered.
-
Allocation solutions for secondary material Production and end of life recovery: Proposals for Product Policy initiatives
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2014Co-Authors: Karen Allacker, Fabrice Mathieux, Simone Manfredi, Nathan Pelletier, C De Camillis, Fulvio Ardente, Rana PantAbstract:Abstract This paper aims at analysing how secondary materials Production and end of life recovery processes are modelled in life cycle-based environmental assessment methods in order to discuss their suitability in Product Policy-support contexts, with a focus on Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policies. The equations prescribed in three published, widely recognised standards are evaluated. In addition, more recent modelling approaches that have been adopted in the context of two EU Product Policy initiatives (the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and the Resource Efficiency Assessment of Products (REAPro)) are similarly analysed. All of the methods are scrutinised against eight criteria which we deem to be important in Product Policy-support contexts, including comprehensiveness, accommodation of open-loop and closed-loop Product systems, and consideration of recyclability/recoverability rates, to name a few. Based on this analysis, it is suggested that the PEF and REAPro modelling approaches appear to be better suited for use in Product Policy-support contexts than do the currently widely endorsed methods that we considered.
Ken Geiser - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Environmentally responsible public procurement (ERPP) and its implications for integrated Product Policy (IPP)
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2005Co-Authors: Ken GeiserAbstract:Abstract This article presents the development of some Product-related environmental Policy instruments such as ecolabeling, extended producer responsibility, and environmentally responsible public procurement. An effort of incorporating these Policy tools taking an integrated life-cycle approach is introduced. This research studied governmental computer purchasing at state level in the United States, in order to explore the potential of using ERPP to integrate other Product-related Policy instruments in practice. This research concludes that environmentally responsible public procurement is a driving force in the integration of environmental Product Policy instruments.
Fabrice Mathieux - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
allocation solutions for secondary material Production and end of life recovery proposals for Product Policy initiatives
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2014Co-Authors: Karen Allacker, Fabrice Mathieux, Simone Manfredi, Nathan Pelletier, C De Camillis, Fulvio Ardente, Rana PantAbstract:Abstract This paper aims at analysing how secondary materials Production and end of life recovery processes are modelled in life cycle-based environmental assessment methods in order to discuss their suitability in Product Policy-support contexts, with a focus on Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policies. The equations prescribed in three published, widely recognised standards are evaluated. In addition, more recent modelling approaches that have been adopted in the context of two EU Product Policy initiatives (the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and the Resource Efficiency Assessment of Products (REAPro)) are similarly analysed. All of the methods are scrutinised against eight criteria which we deem to be important in Product Policy-support contexts, including comprehensiveness, accommodation of open-loop and closed-loop Product systems, and consideration of recyclability/recoverability rates, to name a few. Based on this analysis, it is suggested that the PEF and REAPro modelling approaches appear to be better suited for use in Product Policy-support contexts than do the currently widely endorsed methods that we considered.
-
Allocation solutions for secondary material Production and end of life recovery: Proposals for Product Policy initiatives
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2014Co-Authors: Karen Allacker, Fabrice Mathieux, Simone Manfredi, Nathan Pelletier, C De Camillis, Fulvio Ardente, Rana PantAbstract:Abstract This paper aims at analysing how secondary materials Production and end of life recovery processes are modelled in life cycle-based environmental assessment methods in order to discuss their suitability in Product Policy-support contexts, with a focus on Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policies. The equations prescribed in three published, widely recognised standards are evaluated. In addition, more recent modelling approaches that have been adopted in the context of two EU Product Policy initiatives (the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and the Resource Efficiency Assessment of Products (REAPro)) are similarly analysed. All of the methods are scrutinised against eight criteria which we deem to be important in Product Policy-support contexts, including comprehensiveness, accommodation of open-loop and closed-loop Product systems, and consideration of recyclability/recoverability rates, to name a few. Based on this analysis, it is suggested that the PEF and REAPro modelling approaches appear to be better suited for use in Product Policy-support contexts than do the currently widely endorsed methods that we considered.
Simone Manfredi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
allocation solutions for secondary material Production and end of life recovery proposals for Product Policy initiatives
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2014Co-Authors: Karen Allacker, Fabrice Mathieux, Simone Manfredi, Nathan Pelletier, C De Camillis, Fulvio Ardente, Rana PantAbstract:Abstract This paper aims at analysing how secondary materials Production and end of life recovery processes are modelled in life cycle-based environmental assessment methods in order to discuss their suitability in Product Policy-support contexts, with a focus on Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policies. The equations prescribed in three published, widely recognised standards are evaluated. In addition, more recent modelling approaches that have been adopted in the context of two EU Product Policy initiatives (the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and the Resource Efficiency Assessment of Products (REAPro)) are similarly analysed. All of the methods are scrutinised against eight criteria which we deem to be important in Product Policy-support contexts, including comprehensiveness, accommodation of open-loop and closed-loop Product systems, and consideration of recyclability/recoverability rates, to name a few. Based on this analysis, it is suggested that the PEF and REAPro modelling approaches appear to be better suited for use in Product Policy-support contexts than do the currently widely endorsed methods that we considered.
-
Allocation solutions for secondary material Production and end of life recovery: Proposals for Product Policy initiatives
Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2014Co-Authors: Karen Allacker, Fabrice Mathieux, Simone Manfredi, Nathan Pelletier, C De Camillis, Fulvio Ardente, Rana PantAbstract:Abstract This paper aims at analysing how secondary materials Production and end of life recovery processes are modelled in life cycle-based environmental assessment methods in order to discuss their suitability in Product Policy-support contexts, with a focus on Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policies. The equations prescribed in three published, widely recognised standards are evaluated. In addition, more recent modelling approaches that have been adopted in the context of two EU Product Policy initiatives (the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and the Resource Efficiency Assessment of Products (REAPro)) are similarly analysed. All of the methods are scrutinised against eight criteria which we deem to be important in Product Policy-support contexts, including comprehensiveness, accommodation of open-loop and closed-loop Product systems, and consideration of recyclability/recoverability rates, to name a few. Based on this analysis, it is suggested that the PEF and REAPro modelling approaches appear to be better suited for use in Product Policy-support contexts than do the currently widely endorsed methods that we considered.