The Experts below are selected from a list of 318 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
J. R. Thomas - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
On preparatory texts and Proprietary technologies: The place of prosecution histories in patient claim interpretation
Ucla Law Review, 1999Co-Authors: J. R. ThomasAbstract:Courts have increasingly relied upon so-called prosecution histories when construing patents. An episodic compilation of correspondence, affidavits, technical references, and other documents associated with the patent acquisition process, the prosecution history records the dialogue between the inventor and the Patent Office examiner. In this Article, Professor Jay Thomas analyzes and! finds wanting the traditional rationales justifying the use of these preliminary writings to guide the interpretation of patent claims. Concluding that recourse to prosecution histories is overly burdensome to the technological community, detrimental to Patent Office procedures, and repetitive of objective mechanisms fbr cracking the prior art, Thomas instead proposes that the patent system abandon the use of prosecution histories. He further calls for amendments to the patent instrument and to Patent Office proceedings so that the courts may cease their intense scrutiny of the administrative at-ogress of patent applications. The Article closes by urging the patent bar to renew its focus upon the text of patent instruments themselves, rather than upon preparatory texts of uncertain relationship to the Proprietary Right ultimately granted.
Akihiko Yamaguchi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
« Waqf and Proprietary Right: the Chahārdah Ma‘ṣūm Waqf in Tehran ». Asian Economies, 48-6, 2007, pp. 9-28. [in Japanese]
2010Co-Authors: Akihiko YamaguchiAbstract:This well-documented article revisits the issue of the inalienability and perpetuity of the waqf properties. The author demonstrates how the perpetuity of the waqf continues to have effect on the Rights to endowed properties down to posterity, even after they lost their original form as waqf. Chahārdah Ma‘ṣūm Waqf in Teheran is a case in point. It is the Safavid royal family that created this large endowment and laid it down that the ruler of the time should be its administrator. In fact, the...
-
waqf and Proprietary Right the chahārdah ma ṣūm waqf in tehran asian economies 48 6 2007 pp 9 28 in japanese
Abstracta Iranica. Revue bibliographique pour le domaine irano-aryen, 2010Co-Authors: Akihiko YamaguchiAbstract:This well-documented article revisits the issue of the inalienability and perpetuity of the waqf properties. The author demonstrates how the perpetuity of the waqf continues to have effect on the Rights to endowed properties down to posterity, even after they lost their original form as waqf. Chahārdah Ma‘ṣūm Waqf in Teheran is a case in point. It is the Safavid royal family that created this large endowment and laid it down that the ruler of the time should be its administrator. In fact, the...
H U Guangzh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
separating the Right and the power on the trust property Proprietary Rights in our country s
Journal of Zhengzhou University, 2006Co-Authors: H U GuangzhAbstract:The conflict between the "double Proprietary Right" of the trust property in the laws of United Kingdom and the United States and the property Right system of the continent law causes the dispute about the ownership of the Proprietary Right of the trust property.In our country's Law of Trust,the Right and the obligation relation essence among the truster,the trustee,and the benefited people in fact is the separation of the ownership Right and the ownership power with regard to the trust property and is the explanation and innovation of the trust system on the foundation of borrowing the concerned theories of England and the United States.
Shao Yanmin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
subject fictitiousness and Right vacancy a research on chinese rural Proprietary Right of land
Jilin University Journal, 2007Co-Authors: Shao YanminAbstract:The cause of a serious of problems on rural is the rural collective Proprietary Right of land dos- en't match the reality,and the deep cause of collective Proprietary Right of land fictitiousness is the basi- cal contradictory of collective Proprietary Right of land—both peasant personal are land ower and are not land ower,that is to say,collective"subject"is fictitious.The legal provitions of multilevel collective Right subject,the collective action is controlled by"agent"will,erosion that collective Proprietary Right of land was made by contractual operation Right and state executive leads to collective Proprietary Right of land vacancy.The choice of ascertain rural collective Proprietary Right of land is establish peasant collec- tive congress,recreate the rural collective subject of land.
Dmitriy Formakidov - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Proprietary Right of residence - Proprietary Right of residence
2017Co-Authors: Дмитрий Формакидов, Dmitriy FormakidovAbstract:The book is devoted to complex study of limited real Rights of citizens to residential premises in Roman private, pre-revolutionary Russian, Soviet, and current Russian legislation. The author considers peculiarities of the emergence, implementation, termination and protection of Rights of citizens on other people's premises. The book contains a number of new theoretical insights concerning the limited real Rights of citizens to residential premises, as well as practical recommendations to improve the existing Russian legislation. The book is addressed to a wide circle of readers – specialists in the field of Roman private, Russian civil and housing Rights, research workers, teachers, students, graduate students, legal practitioners, and all readers interested in the problems of civil and housing law.
