The Experts below are selected from a list of 19878 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Danilo Silva - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Liu Zhong-liang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Intervention Strategy of University Students′ Psychological Crisis
    Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 2006
    Co-Authors: Liu Zhong-liang
    Abstract:

    The Psychological health status of university students in China calls for concern and apprehension.Many Psychological diseases and hindrances originate from a lack of prompt intervention after the occurrence of individual Psychological crisis.The intervention strategy of university students′ Psychological crisis is a short-term Psychological assistance process which aims at offering support and assistance to those students who are experiencing personal(Psychological) crisis,or undergoing frustration to resume their Psychological Balance and avoid the occurrence of(conflicts).

Takeshi Hagiwara - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • COMMA - Balanced Semantics for Argumentation based on Heider's Socio-Psychological Balance Theory.
    2014
    Co-Authors: Hajime Sawamura, Jacques Riche, Yutaka Oomidou, Takeshi Hagiwara
    Abstract:

    Argumentation, whether philosophical or formal and mathematical, is a discipline of interdisciplinary nature, per se. The recent works on the computational argumentation formalism and their foundations, however, have rested only on logic or logical account. In this paper, we reconsider Dung’s seminal argument acceptability notion in the context of Heider’s socio-Psychological Balance theory, where there can be 4 Balanced (stable) interaction rules of the form of a triad: (1) the friend of my friend is my friend, (2) the friend of my enemy is my enemy, (3) the enemy of my enemy is my friend, and (4) the enemy of my friend is my enemy. The third one may be a counterpart of Dung’s argument acceptability. We propose an innovative argumentation semantics named Balanced semantics, taking into account all of the four Balanced triads. It naturally leads to an argumentation framework with both attack and support incorporated from the start.

  • Balanced semantics for argumentation based on heider s socio Psychological Balance theory
    Computational Models of Argument, 2014
    Co-Authors: Hajime Sawamura, Jacques Riche, Yutaka Oomidou, Takeshi Hagiwara
    Abstract:

    Argumentation, whether philosophical or formal and mathematical, is a discipline of interdisciplinary nature, per se. The recent works on the computational argumentation formalism and their foundations, however, have rested only on logic or logical account. In this paper, we reconsider Dung’s seminal argument acceptability notion in the context of Heider’s socio-Psychological Balance theory, where there can be 4 Balanced (stable) interaction rules of the form of a triad: (1) the friend of my friend is my friend, (2) the friend of my enemy is my enemy, (3) the enemy of my enemy is my friend, and (4) the enemy of my friend is my enemy. The third one may be a counterpart of Dung’s argument acceptability. We propose an innovative argumentation semantics named Balanced semantics, taking into account all of the four Balanced triads. It naturally leads to an argumentation framework with both attack and support incorporated from the start.

O. C. Junior - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

M. A. De Souza - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.