The Experts below are selected from a list of 132 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Amy M Neeren - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • role of parenting and maltreatment histories in unipolar and bipolar mood disorders mediation by cognitive vulnerability to depression
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2006
    Co-Authors: Lauren B Alloy, Lyn Y Abramson, Jeannette M Smith, Brandon E Gibb, Amy M Neeren
    Abstract:

    Published online: 23 May 2006 In this article, we review empirical research on the role of individuals’ parenting and maltreatment histories as developmental antecedents for symptoms and diagnosable episodes of unipolar and bipolar spectrum disorders. Our review is focused on the following three overarching questions: (1) Do negative parenting and a history of maltreatment contribute Risk to symptoms or diagnosable episodes of unipolar and bipolar disorders? (2) Are the associations of negative parenting and maltreatment histories with bipolar disorders similar to those for unipolar depression? and (3) Are the associations between negative parenting and maltreatment histories and unipolar and bipolar symptoms or disorders mediated by cognitive vulnerability to depression? We begin by discussing the methodological requirements for demonstrating a Psychosocial Risk Factor and the methodological issues that plague the parenting and maltreatment literatures. Next, we review the extant studies on the role of parenting histories in unipolar and bipolar disorders. We consider the specificity and possible moderators of the parenting–mood disorder relationship, as well as cognitive vulnerability to depression as a mediator of this relationship. Then, we review studies on the association of maltreatment histories with unipolar and bipolar disorders and the role of cognitive vulnerability to depression as a mediator of this association. We conclude with an assessment of the state of the parenting and maltreatment literatures in unipolar and bipolar disorder with regard to our guiding questions.

  • Role of Parenting and Maltreatment Histories in Unipolar and Bipolar Mood Disorders: Mediation by Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2006
    Co-Authors: Lauren B Alloy, Lyn Y Abramson, Jeannette M Smith, Brandon E Gibb, Amy M Neeren
    Abstract:

    In this article, we review empirical research on the role of individuals’ parenting and maltreatment histories as developmental antecedents for symptoms and diagnosable episodes of unipolar and bipolar spectrum disorders. Our review is focused on the following three overarching questions: (1) Do negative parenting and a history of maltreatment contribute Risk to symptoms or diagnosable episodes of unipolar and bipolar disorders? (2) Are the associations of negative parenting and maltreatment histories with bipolar disorders similar to those for unipolar depression? and (3) Are the associations between negative parenting and maltreatment histories and unipolar and bipolar symptoms or disorders mediated by cognitive vulnerability to depression? We begin by discussing the methodological requirements for demonstrating a Psychosocial Risk Factor and the methodological issues that plague the parenting and maltreatment literatures. Next, we review the extant studies on the role of parenting histories in unipolar and bipolar disorders. We consider the specificity and possible moderators of the parenting–mood disorder relationship, as well as cognitive vulnerability to depression as a mediator of this relationship. Then, we review studies on the association of maltreatment histories with unipolar and bipolar disorders and the role of cognitive vulnerability to depression as a mediator of this association. We conclude with an assessment of the state of the parenting and maltreatment literatures in unipolar and bipolar disorder with regard to our guiding questions.

  • the Psychosocial context of bipolar disorder environmental cognitive and developmental Risk Factors
    Clinical Psychology Review, 2005
    Co-Authors: Lauren B Alloy, Lyn Y Abramson, Snezana Urosevic, Patricia D Walshaw, Robin Nusslock, Amy M Neeren
    Abstract:

    Abstract In this article, we review empirical research on the role of individuals' current environmental contexts, cognitive styles, and developmental histories as Risk Factors for the onset, course, and expression of bipolar spectrum disorders. Our review is focused on the following overarching question: Do Psychosocial Factors truly contribute Risk to the onset, course, or expression of bipolar disorders? As a secondary issue, we also address whether the Psychosocial Risks for bipolar disorders are similar to those for unipolar depression. We begin by discussing the methodological requirements for demonstrating a Psychosocial Risk Factor and the challenges posed by bipolar spectrum disorders for Psychosocial Risk research. Next, we review the extant studies on the role of recent life events and supportive and nonsupportive social interactions (current environment) in bipolar disorders, as well as Psychosocial treatments designed to remediate these current environmental Factors. We then review the role of cognitive styles featured as vulnerabilities in theories of unipolar depression as Risk Factors for bipolar disorder alone and in combination with life events, including studies of cognitive-behavioral therapies for bipolar disorder. Finally, we review studies of parenting and maltreatment histories in bipolar disorders. We conclude with an assessment of the state of the Psychosocial Risk Factors literature in bipolar disorder with regard to our guiding questions.

Mieke J. Van Veen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Patient Versus Professional Based Psychosocial Risk Factor Screening for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
    Maternal and child health journal, 2014
    Co-Authors: Chantal Quispel, Mieke J. Van Veen, Christianne Zuijderhoudt, Eric A.p. Steegers, Witte J.g. Hoogendijk, Erwin Birnie, Gouke J. Bonsel, Mijke P. Lambregtse-van Den Berg
    Abstract:

    To identify Psychopathology, Psychosocial problems and substance use (PPS) as predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes, two screen-and-advice instruments were developed: Mind2Care (M2C, self-report) and Rotterdam Reproductive Risk Reduction (R4U, professional’s checklist). To decide on the best clinical approach of these Risks, the performance of both instruments was compared. Observational study of 164 pregnant women who booked at two midwifery practices in Rotterdam. Women were consecutively screened with M2C and R4U. For referral to tailored care based on specific PPS Risks, inter-test agreement of single Risks was performed in terms of overall accuracy and positive accuracy (Risk present according to both instruments). With univariate regression analysis we explored determinants of poor agreement (

  • patient versus professional based Psychosocial Risk Factor screening for adverse pregnancy outcomes
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2014
    Co-Authors: Chantal Quispel, Mieke J. Van Veen, Christianne Zuijderhoudt, Eric A.p. Steegers, Witte J.g. Hoogendijk, Erwin Birnie, Gouke J. Bonsel, Mijke Lambregtsevan Den P Berg
    Abstract:

    To identify Psychopathology, Psychosocial problems and substance use (PPS) as predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes, two screen-and-advice instruments were developed: Mind2Care (M2C, self-report) and Rotterdam Reproductive Risk Reduction (R4U, professional’s checklist). To decide on the best clinical approach of these Risks, the performance of both instruments was compared. Observational study of 164 pregnant women who booked at two midwifery practices in Rotterdam. Women were consecutively screened with M2C and R4U. For referral to tailored care based on specific PPS Risks, inter-test agreement of single Risks was performed in terms of overall accuracy and positive accuracy (Risk present according to both instruments). With univariate regression analysis we explored determinants of poor agreement (<90 %). For triage based on Risk accumulation and for detecting women-at-Risk for adverse birth outcomes, M2C and R4U sum scores were compared. Overall accuracy of single Risks was high (mean 93 %). Positive accuracy was lower (mean 46 %) with poorest accuracy for current psychiatric symptoms. Educational level and ethnicity partly explained poor accuracy (p < 0.05). Overall low PPS prevalence decreased the statistical power. For triage, M2C and R4U sum scores were interchangeable from sum scores of five or more (difference <1 %). The probability of adverse birth outcomes similarly increased with Risk accumulation for both instruments, identifying 55–75 % of women-at-Risk. The self-report M2C and the professional’s R4U checklist seem interchangeable for triage of women-at-Risk for PPS or adverse birth outcomes. However, the instruments seem to provide complementary information if used as a guidance to tailored Risk-specific care.

Lauren B Alloy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • role of parenting and maltreatment histories in unipolar and bipolar mood disorders mediation by cognitive vulnerability to depression
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2006
    Co-Authors: Lauren B Alloy, Lyn Y Abramson, Jeannette M Smith, Brandon E Gibb, Amy M Neeren
    Abstract:

    Published online: 23 May 2006 In this article, we review empirical research on the role of individuals’ parenting and maltreatment histories as developmental antecedents for symptoms and diagnosable episodes of unipolar and bipolar spectrum disorders. Our review is focused on the following three overarching questions: (1) Do negative parenting and a history of maltreatment contribute Risk to symptoms or diagnosable episodes of unipolar and bipolar disorders? (2) Are the associations of negative parenting and maltreatment histories with bipolar disorders similar to those for unipolar depression? and (3) Are the associations between negative parenting and maltreatment histories and unipolar and bipolar symptoms or disorders mediated by cognitive vulnerability to depression? We begin by discussing the methodological requirements for demonstrating a Psychosocial Risk Factor and the methodological issues that plague the parenting and maltreatment literatures. Next, we review the extant studies on the role of parenting histories in unipolar and bipolar disorders. We consider the specificity and possible moderators of the parenting–mood disorder relationship, as well as cognitive vulnerability to depression as a mediator of this relationship. Then, we review studies on the association of maltreatment histories with unipolar and bipolar disorders and the role of cognitive vulnerability to depression as a mediator of this association. We conclude with an assessment of the state of the parenting and maltreatment literatures in unipolar and bipolar disorder with regard to our guiding questions.

  • Role of Parenting and Maltreatment Histories in Unipolar and Bipolar Mood Disorders: Mediation by Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2006
    Co-Authors: Lauren B Alloy, Lyn Y Abramson, Jeannette M Smith, Brandon E Gibb, Amy M Neeren
    Abstract:

    In this article, we review empirical research on the role of individuals’ parenting and maltreatment histories as developmental antecedents for symptoms and diagnosable episodes of unipolar and bipolar spectrum disorders. Our review is focused on the following three overarching questions: (1) Do negative parenting and a history of maltreatment contribute Risk to symptoms or diagnosable episodes of unipolar and bipolar disorders? (2) Are the associations of negative parenting and maltreatment histories with bipolar disorders similar to those for unipolar depression? and (3) Are the associations between negative parenting and maltreatment histories and unipolar and bipolar symptoms or disorders mediated by cognitive vulnerability to depression? We begin by discussing the methodological requirements for demonstrating a Psychosocial Risk Factor and the methodological issues that plague the parenting and maltreatment literatures. Next, we review the extant studies on the role of parenting histories in unipolar and bipolar disorders. We consider the specificity and possible moderators of the parenting–mood disorder relationship, as well as cognitive vulnerability to depression as a mediator of this relationship. Then, we review studies on the association of maltreatment histories with unipolar and bipolar disorders and the role of cognitive vulnerability to depression as a mediator of this association. We conclude with an assessment of the state of the parenting and maltreatment literatures in unipolar and bipolar disorder with regard to our guiding questions.

  • the Psychosocial context of bipolar disorder environmental cognitive and developmental Risk Factors
    Clinical Psychology Review, 2005
    Co-Authors: Lauren B Alloy, Lyn Y Abramson, Snezana Urosevic, Patricia D Walshaw, Robin Nusslock, Amy M Neeren
    Abstract:

    Abstract In this article, we review empirical research on the role of individuals' current environmental contexts, cognitive styles, and developmental histories as Risk Factors for the onset, course, and expression of bipolar spectrum disorders. Our review is focused on the following overarching question: Do Psychosocial Factors truly contribute Risk to the onset, course, or expression of bipolar disorders? As a secondary issue, we also address whether the Psychosocial Risks for bipolar disorders are similar to those for unipolar depression. We begin by discussing the methodological requirements for demonstrating a Psychosocial Risk Factor and the challenges posed by bipolar spectrum disorders for Psychosocial Risk research. Next, we review the extant studies on the role of recent life events and supportive and nonsupportive social interactions (current environment) in bipolar disorders, as well as Psychosocial treatments designed to remediate these current environmental Factors. We then review the role of cognitive styles featured as vulnerabilities in theories of unipolar depression as Risk Factors for bipolar disorder alone and in combination with life events, including studies of cognitive-behavioral therapies for bipolar disorder. Finally, we review studies of parenting and maltreatment histories in bipolar disorders. We conclude with an assessment of the state of the Psychosocial Risk Factors literature in bipolar disorder with regard to our guiding questions.

Chantal Quispel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Patient Versus Professional Based Psychosocial Risk Factor Screening for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
    Maternal and child health journal, 2014
    Co-Authors: Chantal Quispel, Mieke J. Van Veen, Christianne Zuijderhoudt, Eric A.p. Steegers, Witte J.g. Hoogendijk, Erwin Birnie, Gouke J. Bonsel, Mijke P. Lambregtse-van Den Berg
    Abstract:

    To identify Psychopathology, Psychosocial problems and substance use (PPS) as predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes, two screen-and-advice instruments were developed: Mind2Care (M2C, self-report) and Rotterdam Reproductive Risk Reduction (R4U, professional’s checklist). To decide on the best clinical approach of these Risks, the performance of both instruments was compared. Observational study of 164 pregnant women who booked at two midwifery practices in Rotterdam. Women were consecutively screened with M2C and R4U. For referral to tailored care based on specific PPS Risks, inter-test agreement of single Risks was performed in terms of overall accuracy and positive accuracy (Risk present according to both instruments). With univariate regression analysis we explored determinants of poor agreement (

  • patient versus professional based Psychosocial Risk Factor screening for adverse pregnancy outcomes
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2014
    Co-Authors: Chantal Quispel, Mieke J. Van Veen, Christianne Zuijderhoudt, Eric A.p. Steegers, Witte J.g. Hoogendijk, Erwin Birnie, Gouke J. Bonsel, Mijke Lambregtsevan Den P Berg
    Abstract:

    To identify Psychopathology, Psychosocial problems and substance use (PPS) as predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes, two screen-and-advice instruments were developed: Mind2Care (M2C, self-report) and Rotterdam Reproductive Risk Reduction (R4U, professional’s checklist). To decide on the best clinical approach of these Risks, the performance of both instruments was compared. Observational study of 164 pregnant women who booked at two midwifery practices in Rotterdam. Women were consecutively screened with M2C and R4U. For referral to tailored care based on specific PPS Risks, inter-test agreement of single Risks was performed in terms of overall accuracy and positive accuracy (Risk present according to both instruments). With univariate regression analysis we explored determinants of poor agreement (<90 %). For triage based on Risk accumulation and for detecting women-at-Risk for adverse birth outcomes, M2C and R4U sum scores were compared. Overall accuracy of single Risks was high (mean 93 %). Positive accuracy was lower (mean 46 %) with poorest accuracy for current psychiatric symptoms. Educational level and ethnicity partly explained poor accuracy (p < 0.05). Overall low PPS prevalence decreased the statistical power. For triage, M2C and R4U sum scores were interchangeable from sum scores of five or more (difference <1 %). The probability of adverse birth outcomes similarly increased with Risk accumulation for both instruments, identifying 55–75 % of women-at-Risk. The self-report M2C and the professional’s R4U checklist seem interchangeable for triage of women-at-Risk for PPS or adverse birth outcomes. However, the instruments seem to provide complementary information if used as a guidance to tailored Risk-specific care.

Mazrura Sahani - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • personal and Psychosocial Risk Factor for low back pain among automotive manual handling workers in selangor malaysia
    International journal of public health research, 2014
    Co-Authors: Mazrura Sahani
    Abstract:

    IntroductionIt is well known that low back pain among working population is a global problem throughout the world. However, the current situation of occupational low back pain in Malaysia is still vague due to limited number of studies conducted locally.ObjectiveA cross sectional study was conducted among three automotive industry workers in Selangor, Malaysia from October 2010 to April 2011.Methods This study aims to determine the prevalence and Risk Factors of low back pain among automotive industry workers performing manual material handling tasks using self-administered questionnaire survey.ResultsA modified Standardised Nordic Questionnaire was used to assess low back pain problem, to obtain personal and Psychosocial Risk Factors information. The prevalence of low back pain showed increment in the point prevalence of 57.9%, 49.5%, and 35.1 % for 12 months, one month, and of 7 days respectively. Working hour, frequency of overtime, stress at work, work pace, and faster movement were found to be significantly associated with the 12 months prevalence for low back pain.ConclusionsThis finding indicates that Psychosocial Risk Factors are associated to the occurrence of low back pain.