The Experts below are selected from a list of 4794 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Abraham Weizman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive Psychotic Behavior
    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
    Co-Authors: Abraham Dorevitch, Nachum Katz, Zvi Zemishlany, Dov Aizenberg, Abraham Weizman
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the efficacy of intramuscular flunitrazepam compared with intramuscular haloperidol for the immediate control of agitated or aggressive Behavior in acutely Psychotic patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight actively Psychotic inpatients, aged 20–60 years, who were under treatment with neuroleptic agents were selected for the study. Each was randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive either 5 mg i.m. of haloperidol (N=13) or 1 mg i.m. of flunitrazepam (N=15) during an aggressive event. Verbal and physical aggression was measured over time with the Overt Aggression Scale. Patients were also rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale. RESULTS: Both flunitrazepam and haloperidol exhibited acute antiaggressive activity. This beneficial effect, as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale, was obtained within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular flunitrazepam may serve as a convenient, rapid, safe, and effective adjunct to neuroleptics i...

  • intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive Psychotic Behavior
    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
    Co-Authors: Abraham Dorevitch, Nachum Katz, Zvi Zemishlany, Dov Aizenberg, Abraham Weizman
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the efficacy of intramuscular flunitrazepam compared with intramuscular haloperidol for the immediate control of agitated or aggressive Behavior in acutely Psychotic patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight actively Psychotic inpatients, aged 20–60 years, who were under treatment with neuroleptic agents were selected for the study. Each was randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive either 5 mg i.m. of haloperidol (N=13) or 1 mg i.m. of flunitrazepam (N=15) during an aggressive event. Verbal and physical aggression was measured over time with the Overt Aggression Scale. Patients were also rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale. RESULTS: Both flunitrazepam and haloperidol exhibited acute antiaggressive activity. This beneficial effect, as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale, was obtained within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular flunitrazepam may serve as a convenient, rapid, safe, and effective adjunct to neuroleptics i...

Abraham Dorevitch - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive Psychotic Behavior
    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
    Co-Authors: Abraham Dorevitch, Nachum Katz, Zvi Zemishlany, Dov Aizenberg, Abraham Weizman
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the efficacy of intramuscular flunitrazepam compared with intramuscular haloperidol for the immediate control of agitated or aggressive Behavior in acutely Psychotic patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight actively Psychotic inpatients, aged 20–60 years, who were under treatment with neuroleptic agents were selected for the study. Each was randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive either 5 mg i.m. of haloperidol (N=13) or 1 mg i.m. of flunitrazepam (N=15) during an aggressive event. Verbal and physical aggression was measured over time with the Overt Aggression Scale. Patients were also rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale. RESULTS: Both flunitrazepam and haloperidol exhibited acute antiaggressive activity. This beneficial effect, as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale, was obtained within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular flunitrazepam may serve as a convenient, rapid, safe, and effective adjunct to neuroleptics i...

  • intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive Psychotic Behavior
    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
    Co-Authors: Abraham Dorevitch, Nachum Katz, Zvi Zemishlany, Dov Aizenberg, Abraham Weizman
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the efficacy of intramuscular flunitrazepam compared with intramuscular haloperidol for the immediate control of agitated or aggressive Behavior in acutely Psychotic patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight actively Psychotic inpatients, aged 20–60 years, who were under treatment with neuroleptic agents were selected for the study. Each was randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive either 5 mg i.m. of haloperidol (N=13) or 1 mg i.m. of flunitrazepam (N=15) during an aggressive event. Verbal and physical aggression was measured over time with the Overt Aggression Scale. Patients were also rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale. RESULTS: Both flunitrazepam and haloperidol exhibited acute antiaggressive activity. This beneficial effect, as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale, was obtained within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular flunitrazepam may serve as a convenient, rapid, safe, and effective adjunct to neuroleptics i...

Nachum Katz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive Psychotic Behavior
    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
    Co-Authors: Abraham Dorevitch, Nachum Katz, Zvi Zemishlany, Dov Aizenberg, Abraham Weizman
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the efficacy of intramuscular flunitrazepam compared with intramuscular haloperidol for the immediate control of agitated or aggressive Behavior in acutely Psychotic patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight actively Psychotic inpatients, aged 20–60 years, who were under treatment with neuroleptic agents were selected for the study. Each was randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive either 5 mg i.m. of haloperidol (N=13) or 1 mg i.m. of flunitrazepam (N=15) during an aggressive event. Verbal and physical aggression was measured over time with the Overt Aggression Scale. Patients were also rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale. RESULTS: Both flunitrazepam and haloperidol exhibited acute antiaggressive activity. This beneficial effect, as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale, was obtained within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular flunitrazepam may serve as a convenient, rapid, safe, and effective adjunct to neuroleptics i...

  • intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive Psychotic Behavior
    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
    Co-Authors: Abraham Dorevitch, Nachum Katz, Zvi Zemishlany, Dov Aizenberg, Abraham Weizman
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the efficacy of intramuscular flunitrazepam compared with intramuscular haloperidol for the immediate control of agitated or aggressive Behavior in acutely Psychotic patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight actively Psychotic inpatients, aged 20–60 years, who were under treatment with neuroleptic agents were selected for the study. Each was randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive either 5 mg i.m. of haloperidol (N=13) or 1 mg i.m. of flunitrazepam (N=15) during an aggressive event. Verbal and physical aggression was measured over time with the Overt Aggression Scale. Patients were also rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale. RESULTS: Both flunitrazepam and haloperidol exhibited acute antiaggressive activity. This beneficial effect, as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale, was obtained within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular flunitrazepam may serve as a convenient, rapid, safe, and effective adjunct to neuroleptics i...

Zvi Zemishlany - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive Psychotic Behavior
    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
    Co-Authors: Abraham Dorevitch, Nachum Katz, Zvi Zemishlany, Dov Aizenberg, Abraham Weizman
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the efficacy of intramuscular flunitrazepam compared with intramuscular haloperidol for the immediate control of agitated or aggressive Behavior in acutely Psychotic patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight actively Psychotic inpatients, aged 20–60 years, who were under treatment with neuroleptic agents were selected for the study. Each was randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive either 5 mg i.m. of haloperidol (N=13) or 1 mg i.m. of flunitrazepam (N=15) during an aggressive event. Verbal and physical aggression was measured over time with the Overt Aggression Scale. Patients were also rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale. RESULTS: Both flunitrazepam and haloperidol exhibited acute antiaggressive activity. This beneficial effect, as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale, was obtained within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular flunitrazepam may serve as a convenient, rapid, safe, and effective adjunct to neuroleptics i...

  • intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive Psychotic Behavior
    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
    Co-Authors: Abraham Dorevitch, Nachum Katz, Zvi Zemishlany, Dov Aizenberg, Abraham Weizman
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the efficacy of intramuscular flunitrazepam compared with intramuscular haloperidol for the immediate control of agitated or aggressive Behavior in acutely Psychotic patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight actively Psychotic inpatients, aged 20–60 years, who were under treatment with neuroleptic agents were selected for the study. Each was randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive either 5 mg i.m. of haloperidol (N=13) or 1 mg i.m. of flunitrazepam (N=15) during an aggressive event. Verbal and physical aggression was measured over time with the Overt Aggression Scale. Patients were also rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale. RESULTS: Both flunitrazepam and haloperidol exhibited acute antiaggressive activity. This beneficial effect, as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale, was obtained within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular flunitrazepam may serve as a convenient, rapid, safe, and effective adjunct to neuroleptics i...

Dov Aizenberg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive Psychotic Behavior
    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
    Co-Authors: Abraham Dorevitch, Nachum Katz, Zvi Zemishlany, Dov Aizenberg, Abraham Weizman
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the efficacy of intramuscular flunitrazepam compared with intramuscular haloperidol for the immediate control of agitated or aggressive Behavior in acutely Psychotic patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight actively Psychotic inpatients, aged 20–60 years, who were under treatment with neuroleptic agents were selected for the study. Each was randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive either 5 mg i.m. of haloperidol (N=13) or 1 mg i.m. of flunitrazepam (N=15) during an aggressive event. Verbal and physical aggression was measured over time with the Overt Aggression Scale. Patients were also rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale. RESULTS: Both flunitrazepam and haloperidol exhibited acute antiaggressive activity. This beneficial effect, as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale, was obtained within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular flunitrazepam may serve as a convenient, rapid, safe, and effective adjunct to neuroleptics i...

  • intramuscular flunitrazepam versus intramuscular haloperidol in the emergency treatment of aggressive Psychotic Behavior
    American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
    Co-Authors: Abraham Dorevitch, Nachum Katz, Zvi Zemishlany, Dov Aizenberg, Abraham Weizman
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the efficacy of intramuscular flunitrazepam compared with intramuscular haloperidol for the immediate control of agitated or aggressive Behavior in acutely Psychotic patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight actively Psychotic inpatients, aged 20–60 years, who were under treatment with neuroleptic agents were selected for the study. Each was randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive either 5 mg i.m. of haloperidol (N=13) or 1 mg i.m. of flunitrazepam (N=15) during an aggressive event. Verbal and physical aggression was measured over time with the Overt Aggression Scale. Patients were also rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale. RESULTS: Both flunitrazepam and haloperidol exhibited acute antiaggressive activity. This beneficial effect, as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale, was obtained within 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular flunitrazepam may serve as a convenient, rapid, safe, and effective adjunct to neuroleptics i...