The Experts below are selected from a list of 129201 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Zubaidah Vp Hamzah - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
perebutan wilayah dalam perang balkan kedua 1913 dan campur tangan kuasa kuasa besar eropah territorial dispute in the second balkan war 1913 and the intervention of the great powers
Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History Politics & Strategic Studies, 2020Co-Authors: Azlizan Mat Enh, Rohani Abdul Ghani, Zubaidah Vp HamzahAbstract:Problems among the Balkan powers in 1912 could not be resolved through the London Treaty 1913. This was due to the reluctance of the members of the Balkans League, Serbia and Bulgaria, who did not want to accept the terms in the treaty. They felt, they were forced to sign the treaty by the Great Powers. Bulgaria saw the treaty as bringing many benefits and advantages to Serbia in the Balkans. Bulgaria’s dissatisfaction sparked another conflict in the Balkans known as Second Balkan War in 1913. In the First Balkan War, the Balkan League alliance consisted of Serbia, Bulgaria and Montenegro who went against the Ottoman government, however, in the Second Balkan War, the war was between Serbia and Bulgaria. Therefore, the objectives of this article are to analyze the issues that led to the conflict in the Serbian-Bulgarian relations and to analyze the intervention of the Great Powers in the crisis. This study employed a qualitative methodology which involved primary sources such as British Records obtained at the Public Record Office, Kew, London. This article found that the main cause of the conflict in the 1913 Serbia-Bulgaria relationship was due to the conflict over Macedonia and the intervention of European powers.
-
Perebutan wilayah dalam Perang Balkan Kedua (1913) dan campur tangan kuasa-kuasa besar Eropah
'Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press)', 2020Co-Authors: Azlizan Mat Enh, Rohani Abdul Ghani, Zubaidah Vp HamzahAbstract:Masalah dalam kalangan kuasa-kuasa kecil di Balkan pada 1912 tidak dapat diselesaikan menerusi Perjanjian London 1913. Ini kerana ahli-ahli Liga Balkan yang terdiri daripada Serbia dan Bulgaria tidak mahu menerima keputusan perjanjian London. Kedua-duanya berpendapat mereka dipaksa untuk menandatangani perjanjian tersebut oleh kuasa besar Eropah. Perjanjian tersebut dilihat oleh Bulgaria sebagai membawa banyak kebaikan dan kelebihan kepada Serbia di Balkan. Ketidakpuasan Bulgaria telah mencetuskan satu lagi konflik di Balkan yang dikenali sebagai Perang Balkan Kedua pada tahun 1913. Sekiranya dalam Perang Balkan Pertama, Pakatan Liga Balkan terdiri daripada Serbia, Bulgaria dan Montenegro menentang kerajaan Bani Uthmaniah, tetapi dalam Perang Balkan Kedua, menyaksikan peperangan antara Serbia dan Bulgaria. Justeru, objektif artikel ini ialah untuk menganalisis masalah-masalah yang menyebabkan konflik dalam hubungan Serbia-Bulgaria dan menganalisis campur tangan kuasa-kuasa Besar Eropah menangani kemelut tersebut. Metodologi yang digunakan untuk mendapatkan data adalah berdasarkan kaedah kualitatif iaitu kajian ke atas sumber primer yang berasaskan rujukan rekod-rekod British yang diperolehi di Public Record Office, Kew, London. Artikel ini mendapati bahawa punca utama yang mencetuskan konflik dalam hubungan Serbia-Bulgaria 1913 adalah disebabkan isu perebutan ke atas Macedonia dan campur tangan kuasa besar Eropah
Azlizan Mat Enh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
perebutan wilayah dalam perang balkan kedua 1913 dan campur tangan kuasa kuasa besar eropah territorial dispute in the second balkan war 1913 and the intervention of the great powers
Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History Politics & Strategic Studies, 2020Co-Authors: Azlizan Mat Enh, Rohani Abdul Ghani, Zubaidah Vp HamzahAbstract:Problems among the Balkan powers in 1912 could not be resolved through the London Treaty 1913. This was due to the reluctance of the members of the Balkans League, Serbia and Bulgaria, who did not want to accept the terms in the treaty. They felt, they were forced to sign the treaty by the Great Powers. Bulgaria saw the treaty as bringing many benefits and advantages to Serbia in the Balkans. Bulgaria’s dissatisfaction sparked another conflict in the Balkans known as Second Balkan War in 1913. In the First Balkan War, the Balkan League alliance consisted of Serbia, Bulgaria and Montenegro who went against the Ottoman government, however, in the Second Balkan War, the war was between Serbia and Bulgaria. Therefore, the objectives of this article are to analyze the issues that led to the conflict in the Serbian-Bulgarian relations and to analyze the intervention of the Great Powers in the crisis. This study employed a qualitative methodology which involved primary sources such as British Records obtained at the Public Record Office, Kew, London. This article found that the main cause of the conflict in the 1913 Serbia-Bulgaria relationship was due to the conflict over Macedonia and the intervention of European powers.
-
Perebutan wilayah dalam Perang Balkan Kedua (1913) dan campur tangan kuasa-kuasa besar Eropah
'Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press)', 2020Co-Authors: Azlizan Mat Enh, Rohani Abdul Ghani, Zubaidah Vp HamzahAbstract:Masalah dalam kalangan kuasa-kuasa kecil di Balkan pada 1912 tidak dapat diselesaikan menerusi Perjanjian London 1913. Ini kerana ahli-ahli Liga Balkan yang terdiri daripada Serbia dan Bulgaria tidak mahu menerima keputusan perjanjian London. Kedua-duanya berpendapat mereka dipaksa untuk menandatangani perjanjian tersebut oleh kuasa besar Eropah. Perjanjian tersebut dilihat oleh Bulgaria sebagai membawa banyak kebaikan dan kelebihan kepada Serbia di Balkan. Ketidakpuasan Bulgaria telah mencetuskan satu lagi konflik di Balkan yang dikenali sebagai Perang Balkan Kedua pada tahun 1913. Sekiranya dalam Perang Balkan Pertama, Pakatan Liga Balkan terdiri daripada Serbia, Bulgaria dan Montenegro menentang kerajaan Bani Uthmaniah, tetapi dalam Perang Balkan Kedua, menyaksikan peperangan antara Serbia dan Bulgaria. Justeru, objektif artikel ini ialah untuk menganalisis masalah-masalah yang menyebabkan konflik dalam hubungan Serbia-Bulgaria dan menganalisis campur tangan kuasa-kuasa Besar Eropah menangani kemelut tersebut. Metodologi yang digunakan untuk mendapatkan data adalah berdasarkan kaedah kualitatif iaitu kajian ke atas sumber primer yang berasaskan rujukan rekod-rekod British yang diperolehi di Public Record Office, Kew, London. Artikel ini mendapati bahawa punca utama yang mencetuskan konflik dalam hubungan Serbia-Bulgaria 1913 adalah disebabkan isu perebutan ke atas Macedonia dan campur tangan kuasa besar Eropah
Rohani Abdul Ghani - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
perebutan wilayah dalam perang balkan kedua 1913 dan campur tangan kuasa kuasa besar eropah territorial dispute in the second balkan war 1913 and the intervention of the great powers
Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History Politics & Strategic Studies, 2020Co-Authors: Azlizan Mat Enh, Rohani Abdul Ghani, Zubaidah Vp HamzahAbstract:Problems among the Balkan powers in 1912 could not be resolved through the London Treaty 1913. This was due to the reluctance of the members of the Balkans League, Serbia and Bulgaria, who did not want to accept the terms in the treaty. They felt, they were forced to sign the treaty by the Great Powers. Bulgaria saw the treaty as bringing many benefits and advantages to Serbia in the Balkans. Bulgaria’s dissatisfaction sparked another conflict in the Balkans known as Second Balkan War in 1913. In the First Balkan War, the Balkan League alliance consisted of Serbia, Bulgaria and Montenegro who went against the Ottoman government, however, in the Second Balkan War, the war was between Serbia and Bulgaria. Therefore, the objectives of this article are to analyze the issues that led to the conflict in the Serbian-Bulgarian relations and to analyze the intervention of the Great Powers in the crisis. This study employed a qualitative methodology which involved primary sources such as British Records obtained at the Public Record Office, Kew, London. This article found that the main cause of the conflict in the 1913 Serbia-Bulgaria relationship was due to the conflict over Macedonia and the intervention of European powers.
-
Perebutan wilayah dalam Perang Balkan Kedua (1913) dan campur tangan kuasa-kuasa besar Eropah
'Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press)', 2020Co-Authors: Azlizan Mat Enh, Rohani Abdul Ghani, Zubaidah Vp HamzahAbstract:Masalah dalam kalangan kuasa-kuasa kecil di Balkan pada 1912 tidak dapat diselesaikan menerusi Perjanjian London 1913. Ini kerana ahli-ahli Liga Balkan yang terdiri daripada Serbia dan Bulgaria tidak mahu menerima keputusan perjanjian London. Kedua-duanya berpendapat mereka dipaksa untuk menandatangani perjanjian tersebut oleh kuasa besar Eropah. Perjanjian tersebut dilihat oleh Bulgaria sebagai membawa banyak kebaikan dan kelebihan kepada Serbia di Balkan. Ketidakpuasan Bulgaria telah mencetuskan satu lagi konflik di Balkan yang dikenali sebagai Perang Balkan Kedua pada tahun 1913. Sekiranya dalam Perang Balkan Pertama, Pakatan Liga Balkan terdiri daripada Serbia, Bulgaria dan Montenegro menentang kerajaan Bani Uthmaniah, tetapi dalam Perang Balkan Kedua, menyaksikan peperangan antara Serbia dan Bulgaria. Justeru, objektif artikel ini ialah untuk menganalisis masalah-masalah yang menyebabkan konflik dalam hubungan Serbia-Bulgaria dan menganalisis campur tangan kuasa-kuasa Besar Eropah menangani kemelut tersebut. Metodologi yang digunakan untuk mendapatkan data adalah berdasarkan kaedah kualitatif iaitu kajian ke atas sumber primer yang berasaskan rujukan rekod-rekod British yang diperolehi di Public Record Office, Kew, London. Artikel ini mendapati bahawa punca utama yang mencetuskan konflik dalam hubungan Serbia-Bulgaria 1913 adalah disebabkan isu perebutan ke atas Macedonia dan campur tangan kuasa besar Eropah
Faith W Mcelroy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
closing the financial privacy loophole defining access in the right to financial privacy act
Social Science Research Network, 2017Co-Authors: Faith W McelroyAbstract:The privacy of financial Records is under siege: First, financial Records are excluded from Fourth Amendment protection because of the third-party doctrine, created by the Miller opinion and its progeny. Second, a case making its way through the federal judiciary is asserting a cramped interpretation of the RFPA, which, if upheld, would allow banks to circumvent statutory privacy protections by simply releasing customer information into the Public Record. Third, in deciding Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, the Supreme Court left open the possibility of lower courts deciding that statutory violations are not injuries at all — an outcome that would strip a customer of his ability to sue under the RFPA if a bank releases his information. Thus, despite Congress’s attempt to safeguard financial Records from unwarranted government intrusion, the financial privacy of Americans is being threatened in all levels of the judiciary system. Consequently, privacy protection of financial Records in the hands of trusted third parties is scant. The solution is this: the Supreme Court’s reversal of Miller. The Supreme Court created a hole in Fourth Amendment protection in Miller, and the remedy offered by Congress is proving ineffective in light of the judiciary’s restricted interpretation of it. Now, it is up to the Supreme Court to reverse Miller and put an end to the third-party doctrine and the erosion of financial privacy.
Хорхордина Татьяна Иннокентьевна - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Государственный архив Великобритании (Public Record Office): история создания и деятельности в 1838-1958 гг.
2020Co-Authors: Хорхордина Татьяна ИннокентьевнаAbstract:Хорхордина Татьяна Иннокентьевна. Государственный архив Великобритании (Public Record Office): история создания и деятельности в 1838-1958 гг. [Электронный ресурс] / Т. И. Хорхордина, Л. А. Халилова// Вестник РГГУ. Серия "Документоведение и архивоведение. Информатика. Защита информации и информационная безопасность". - 2016. - № 2 (4). - С. 90-104
