The Experts below are selected from a list of 87 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Gian Franco Camuzzini - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid using chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1995Co-Authors: Alberto Biggi, A. L. Viglietti, Maria Chiara Farinelli, Claudio Bonada, Gian Franco CamuzziniAbstract:Simultaneous measurements of the clearance rate of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in 54 patients with a Range of Function between 9 and 176 ml/min. Using multiple blood samples the two clearance values correlated well (r = 0.97, SEE 8.6 ml/min) and DTPA clearance was higher by 2.9%. For each radiopharmaceutical the plasma clearance rates obtained using multiple blood samples were compared with those obtained with simplified methods, i.e., the 60–180 min two-sample method of Russell and the mono-exponential method with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. For both radiopharmaceuticals the clearance values correlated well with the Russell method (r = 0.99, SEE = 4.1 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 4.9 ml/min for DTPA) and the mono-exponential method (r = 0.99, SEE 3.6 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 3.9 ml/min for DTPA). The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples did not differ significantly from that obtained with the Russell method, either in patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
-
estimation of glomerular filtration rate and technetium 99m diethylene triamine penta acetic acid using chromium 51 ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1995Co-Authors: Alberto Biggi, A. L. Viglietti, Maria Chiara Farinelli, Claudio Bonada, Gian Franco CamuzziniAbstract:Simultaneous measurements of the clearance rate of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in 54 patients with a Range of Function between 9 and 176 ml/min. Using multiple blood samples the two clearance values correlated well (r = 0.97, SEE 8.6 ml/min) and DTPA clearance was higher by 2.9%. For each radiopharmaceutical the plasma clearance rates obtained using multiple blood samples were compared with those obtained with simplified methods, i.e., the 60–180 min two-sample method of Russell and the mono-exponential method with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. For both radiopharmaceuticals the clearance values correlated well with the Russell method (r = 0.99, SEE = 4.1 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 4.9 ml/min for DTPA) and the mono-exponential method (r = 0.99, SEE 3.6 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 3.9 ml/min for DTPA). The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples did not differ significantly from that obtained with the Russell method, either in patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)<30 ml/min or in patients with GFR≥30 ml/min. The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples differed significantly from that obtained with the mono-exponential method because of the great difference observed in patients with GFR≥30 ml/min. It is concluded that the Russell two-sample method after injection of99mTc-DTPA is accurate enough for routine clinical use.
Alberto Biggi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid using chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1995Co-Authors: Alberto Biggi, A. L. Viglietti, Maria Chiara Farinelli, Claudio Bonada, Gian Franco CamuzziniAbstract:Simultaneous measurements of the clearance rate of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in 54 patients with a Range of Function between 9 and 176 ml/min. Using multiple blood samples the two clearance values correlated well (r = 0.97, SEE 8.6 ml/min) and DTPA clearance was higher by 2.9%. For each radiopharmaceutical the plasma clearance rates obtained using multiple blood samples were compared with those obtained with simplified methods, i.e., the 60–180 min two-sample method of Russell and the mono-exponential method with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. For both radiopharmaceuticals the clearance values correlated well with the Russell method (r = 0.99, SEE = 4.1 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 4.9 ml/min for DTPA) and the mono-exponential method (r = 0.99, SEE 3.6 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 3.9 ml/min for DTPA). The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples did not differ significantly from that obtained with the Russell method, either in patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
-
estimation of glomerular filtration rate and technetium 99m diethylene triamine penta acetic acid using chromium 51 ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1995Co-Authors: Alberto Biggi, A. L. Viglietti, Maria Chiara Farinelli, Claudio Bonada, Gian Franco CamuzziniAbstract:Simultaneous measurements of the clearance rate of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in 54 patients with a Range of Function between 9 and 176 ml/min. Using multiple blood samples the two clearance values correlated well (r = 0.97, SEE 8.6 ml/min) and DTPA clearance was higher by 2.9%. For each radiopharmaceutical the plasma clearance rates obtained using multiple blood samples were compared with those obtained with simplified methods, i.e., the 60–180 min two-sample method of Russell and the mono-exponential method with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. For both radiopharmaceuticals the clearance values correlated well with the Russell method (r = 0.99, SEE = 4.1 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 4.9 ml/min for DTPA) and the mono-exponential method (r = 0.99, SEE 3.6 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 3.9 ml/min for DTPA). The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples did not differ significantly from that obtained with the Russell method, either in patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)<30 ml/min or in patients with GFR≥30 ml/min. The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples differed significantly from that obtained with the mono-exponential method because of the great difference observed in patients with GFR≥30 ml/min. It is concluded that the Russell two-sample method after injection of99mTc-DTPA is accurate enough for routine clinical use.
A. L. Viglietti - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid using chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1995Co-Authors: Alberto Biggi, A. L. Viglietti, Maria Chiara Farinelli, Claudio Bonada, Gian Franco CamuzziniAbstract:Simultaneous measurements of the clearance rate of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in 54 patients with a Range of Function between 9 and 176 ml/min. Using multiple blood samples the two clearance values correlated well (r = 0.97, SEE 8.6 ml/min) and DTPA clearance was higher by 2.9%. For each radiopharmaceutical the plasma clearance rates obtained using multiple blood samples were compared with those obtained with simplified methods, i.e., the 60–180 min two-sample method of Russell and the mono-exponential method with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. For both radiopharmaceuticals the clearance values correlated well with the Russell method (r = 0.99, SEE = 4.1 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 4.9 ml/min for DTPA) and the mono-exponential method (r = 0.99, SEE 3.6 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 3.9 ml/min for DTPA). The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples did not differ significantly from that obtained with the Russell method, either in patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
-
estimation of glomerular filtration rate and technetium 99m diethylene triamine penta acetic acid using chromium 51 ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1995Co-Authors: Alberto Biggi, A. L. Viglietti, Maria Chiara Farinelli, Claudio Bonada, Gian Franco CamuzziniAbstract:Simultaneous measurements of the clearance rate of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in 54 patients with a Range of Function between 9 and 176 ml/min. Using multiple blood samples the two clearance values correlated well (r = 0.97, SEE 8.6 ml/min) and DTPA clearance was higher by 2.9%. For each radiopharmaceutical the plasma clearance rates obtained using multiple blood samples were compared with those obtained with simplified methods, i.e., the 60–180 min two-sample method of Russell and the mono-exponential method with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. For both radiopharmaceuticals the clearance values correlated well with the Russell method (r = 0.99, SEE = 4.1 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 4.9 ml/min for DTPA) and the mono-exponential method (r = 0.99, SEE 3.6 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 3.9 ml/min for DTPA). The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples did not differ significantly from that obtained with the Russell method, either in patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)<30 ml/min or in patients with GFR≥30 ml/min. The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples differed significantly from that obtained with the mono-exponential method because of the great difference observed in patients with GFR≥30 ml/min. It is concluded that the Russell two-sample method after injection of99mTc-DTPA is accurate enough for routine clinical use.
Maria Chiara Farinelli - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid using chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1995Co-Authors: Alberto Biggi, A. L. Viglietti, Maria Chiara Farinelli, Claudio Bonada, Gian Franco CamuzziniAbstract:Simultaneous measurements of the clearance rate of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in 54 patients with a Range of Function between 9 and 176 ml/min. Using multiple blood samples the two clearance values correlated well (r = 0.97, SEE 8.6 ml/min) and DTPA clearance was higher by 2.9%. For each radiopharmaceutical the plasma clearance rates obtained using multiple blood samples were compared with those obtained with simplified methods, i.e., the 60–180 min two-sample method of Russell and the mono-exponential method with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. For both radiopharmaceuticals the clearance values correlated well with the Russell method (r = 0.99, SEE = 4.1 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 4.9 ml/min for DTPA) and the mono-exponential method (r = 0.99, SEE 3.6 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 3.9 ml/min for DTPA). The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples did not differ significantly from that obtained with the Russell method, either in patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
-
estimation of glomerular filtration rate and technetium 99m diethylene triamine penta acetic acid using chromium 51 ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1995Co-Authors: Alberto Biggi, A. L. Viglietti, Maria Chiara Farinelli, Claudio Bonada, Gian Franco CamuzziniAbstract:Simultaneous measurements of the clearance rate of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in 54 patients with a Range of Function between 9 and 176 ml/min. Using multiple blood samples the two clearance values correlated well (r = 0.97, SEE 8.6 ml/min) and DTPA clearance was higher by 2.9%. For each radiopharmaceutical the plasma clearance rates obtained using multiple blood samples were compared with those obtained with simplified methods, i.e., the 60–180 min two-sample method of Russell and the mono-exponential method with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. For both radiopharmaceuticals the clearance values correlated well with the Russell method (r = 0.99, SEE = 4.1 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 4.9 ml/min for DTPA) and the mono-exponential method (r = 0.99, SEE 3.6 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 3.9 ml/min for DTPA). The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples did not differ significantly from that obtained with the Russell method, either in patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)<30 ml/min or in patients with GFR≥30 ml/min. The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples differed significantly from that obtained with the mono-exponential method because of the great difference observed in patients with GFR≥30 ml/min. It is concluded that the Russell two-sample method after injection of99mTc-DTPA is accurate enough for routine clinical use.
Claudio Bonada - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid using chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1995Co-Authors: Alberto Biggi, A. L. Viglietti, Maria Chiara Farinelli, Claudio Bonada, Gian Franco CamuzziniAbstract:Simultaneous measurements of the clearance rate of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in 54 patients with a Range of Function between 9 and 176 ml/min. Using multiple blood samples the two clearance values correlated well (r = 0.97, SEE 8.6 ml/min) and DTPA clearance was higher by 2.9%. For each radiopharmaceutical the plasma clearance rates obtained using multiple blood samples were compared with those obtained with simplified methods, i.e., the 60–180 min two-sample method of Russell and the mono-exponential method with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. For both radiopharmaceuticals the clearance values correlated well with the Russell method (r = 0.99, SEE = 4.1 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 4.9 ml/min for DTPA) and the mono-exponential method (r = 0.99, SEE 3.6 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 3.9 ml/min for DTPA). The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples did not differ significantly from that obtained with the Russell method, either in patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
-
estimation of glomerular filtration rate and technetium 99m diethylene triamine penta acetic acid using chromium 51 ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1995Co-Authors: Alberto Biggi, A. L. Viglietti, Maria Chiara Farinelli, Claudio Bonada, Gian Franco CamuzziniAbstract:Simultaneous measurements of the clearance rate of chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) were performed in 54 patients with a Range of Function between 9 and 176 ml/min. Using multiple blood samples the two clearance values correlated well (r = 0.97, SEE 8.6 ml/min) and DTPA clearance was higher by 2.9%. For each radiopharmaceutical the plasma clearance rates obtained using multiple blood samples were compared with those obtained with simplified methods, i.e., the 60–180 min two-sample method of Russell and the mono-exponential method with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. For both radiopharmaceuticals the clearance values correlated well with the Russell method (r = 0.99, SEE = 4.1 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 4.9 ml/min for DTPA) and the mono-exponential method (r = 0.99, SEE 3.6 ml/min for EDTA;r = 0.99, SEE 3.9 ml/min for DTPA). The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples did not differ significantly from that obtained with the Russell method, either in patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)<30 ml/min or in patients with GFR≥30 ml/min. The mean plasma clearance obtained using multiple blood samples differed significantly from that obtained with the mono-exponential method because of the great difference observed in patients with GFR≥30 ml/min. It is concluded that the Russell two-sample method after injection of99mTc-DTPA is accurate enough for routine clinical use.
