The Experts below are selected from a list of 318 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
D I Rowley - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
surgeons non technical skills in the opeRating room reliability testing of the notss behavior Rating System
World Journal of Surgery, 2008Co-Authors: Steven Yule, Rhona Flin, Nikki Maran, D I Rowley, George Youngson, Simon PatersonbrownAbstract:Background Previous research has shown that surgeons’ intraoperative non-technical skills are related to surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the NOTSS (Non-technical Skills for Surgeons) behavior Rating System. Based on task analysis, the System incorporates five categories of skills for safe surgical practice (Situation Awareness, Decision Making, Task Management, Communication & Teamwork, and Leadership).
-
development of a Rating System for surgeons non technical skills
Medical Education, 2006Co-Authors: Steven Yule, Rhona Flin, Simon Patersonbrown, Nikki Maran, D I RowleyAbstract:Background Analyses of adverse events in surgery reveal that many underlying causes are behavioural, such as communication failure, rather than technical. Non-technical (i.e. cognitive and interpersonal) skills are not addressed explicitly in surgical training. However, surgeons need to demonstrate these skills, which underpin their technical excellence, to maximise patient safety in the opeRating theatre. This paper describes the method used to identify surgeons' non-technical skills, and the development of a skills taxonomy and behavioural Rating System to structure observation and feedback in surgical training. Methods Cognitive task analyses (critical incident interviews) were conducted with 27 consultant surgeons in general, cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. The interviews were coded and a multidisciplinary group of surgeons and psychologists used an iterative process to develop a skills taxonomy. This was supported by data gathered from an attitude survey, literature review, analysis of surgical mortality reports and observations in theatre. Results Five categories of non-technical skills were identified, including situation awareness, decision making, task management, leadership and communication and teamwork. This provided a structure for a prototype skill taxonomy (v1.1), which comprised 14 non-technical skill elements. Observable behaviours (markers) indicative of good and poor performance were developed for each element by 16 consultant surgeons to form a prototype behaviour Rating System. Conclusions The prototype skills taxonomy and behaviour Rating System are grounded empirically in surgery. The reliability of the System is currently being tested using standardised scenarios. If this evaluation proves successful, the System could be used to structure feedback and guide non-technical skills training.
Simon Patersonbrown - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
surgeons non technical skills in the opeRating room reliability testing of the notss behavior Rating System
World Journal of Surgery, 2008Co-Authors: Steven Yule, Rhona Flin, Nikki Maran, D I Rowley, George Youngson, Simon PatersonbrownAbstract:Background Previous research has shown that surgeons’ intraoperative non-technical skills are related to surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the NOTSS (Non-technical Skills for Surgeons) behavior Rating System. Based on task analysis, the System incorporates five categories of skills for safe surgical practice (Situation Awareness, Decision Making, Task Management, Communication & Teamwork, and Leadership).
-
development of a Rating System for surgeons non technical skills
Medical Education, 2006Co-Authors: Steven Yule, Rhona Flin, Simon Patersonbrown, Nikki Maran, D I RowleyAbstract:Background Analyses of adverse events in surgery reveal that many underlying causes are behavioural, such as communication failure, rather than technical. Non-technical (i.e. cognitive and interpersonal) skills are not addressed explicitly in surgical training. However, surgeons need to demonstrate these skills, which underpin their technical excellence, to maximise patient safety in the opeRating theatre. This paper describes the method used to identify surgeons' non-technical skills, and the development of a skills taxonomy and behavioural Rating System to structure observation and feedback in surgical training. Methods Cognitive task analyses (critical incident interviews) were conducted with 27 consultant surgeons in general, cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. The interviews were coded and a multidisciplinary group of surgeons and psychologists used an iterative process to develop a skills taxonomy. This was supported by data gathered from an attitude survey, literature review, analysis of surgical mortality reports and observations in theatre. Results Five categories of non-technical skills were identified, including situation awareness, decision making, task management, leadership and communication and teamwork. This provided a structure for a prototype skill taxonomy (v1.1), which comprised 14 non-technical skill elements. Observable behaviours (markers) indicative of good and poor performance were developed for each element by 16 consultant surgeons to form a prototype behaviour Rating System. Conclusions The prototype skills taxonomy and behaviour Rating System are grounded empirically in surgery. The reliability of the System is currently being tested using standardised scenarios. If this evaluation proves successful, the System could be used to structure feedback and guide non-technical skills training.
Steven Yule - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
surgeons non technical skills in the opeRating room reliability testing of the notss behavior Rating System
World Journal of Surgery, 2008Co-Authors: Steven Yule, Rhona Flin, Nikki Maran, D I Rowley, George Youngson, Simon PatersonbrownAbstract:Background Previous research has shown that surgeons’ intraoperative non-technical skills are related to surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the NOTSS (Non-technical Skills for Surgeons) behavior Rating System. Based on task analysis, the System incorporates five categories of skills for safe surgical practice (Situation Awareness, Decision Making, Task Management, Communication & Teamwork, and Leadership).
-
development of a Rating System for surgeons non technical skills
Medical Education, 2006Co-Authors: Steven Yule, Rhona Flin, Simon Patersonbrown, Nikki Maran, D I RowleyAbstract:Background Analyses of adverse events in surgery reveal that many underlying causes are behavioural, such as communication failure, rather than technical. Non-technical (i.e. cognitive and interpersonal) skills are not addressed explicitly in surgical training. However, surgeons need to demonstrate these skills, which underpin their technical excellence, to maximise patient safety in the opeRating theatre. This paper describes the method used to identify surgeons' non-technical skills, and the development of a skills taxonomy and behavioural Rating System to structure observation and feedback in surgical training. Methods Cognitive task analyses (critical incident interviews) were conducted with 27 consultant surgeons in general, cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. The interviews were coded and a multidisciplinary group of surgeons and psychologists used an iterative process to develop a skills taxonomy. This was supported by data gathered from an attitude survey, literature review, analysis of surgical mortality reports and observations in theatre. Results Five categories of non-technical skills were identified, including situation awareness, decision making, task management, leadership and communication and teamwork. This provided a structure for a prototype skill taxonomy (v1.1), which comprised 14 non-technical skill elements. Observable behaviours (markers) indicative of good and poor performance were developed for each element by 16 consultant surgeons to form a prototype behaviour Rating System. Conclusions The prototype skills taxonomy and behaviour Rating System are grounded empirically in surgery. The reliability of the System is currently being tested using standardised scenarios. If this evaluation proves successful, the System could be used to structure feedback and guide non-technical skills training.
Chingchow Yang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
customer focused Rating System of supplier quality performance
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2004Co-Authors: Cheecheng Chen, Tsuming Yeh, Chingchow YangAbstract:This paper establishes an objective‐orientation driven supplier customer satisfaction performance Rating System. The purpose is to provide a methodology for “integRating supplier and manufacturer capabilities and applying different strategies for quality improvement”. This study was undertaken to specify the interaction and mutual movement among three groups in the supply chain “Supplier‐Manufacturer‐Customer” and integrate the results from four factors: incoming inspection, line reject performance, supplier service quality and product reliability. These factors are transformed into measurable, quantitative, Just‐in‐time (JIT) parameters, utilized in planning and establishing a supplier performance Rating System focused on satisfying both internal and external customers.
-
Customer‐focused Rating System of supplier quality performance
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2004Co-Authors: Chee‐cheng Chen, Tsuming Yeh, Chingchow YangAbstract:This paper establishes an objective‐orientation driven supplier customer satisfaction performance Rating System. The purpose is to provide a methodology for “integRating supplier and manufacturer capabilities and applying different strategies for quality improvement”. This study was undertaken to specify the interaction and mutual movement among three groups in the supply chain “Supplier‐Manufacturer‐Customer” and integrate the results from four factors: incoming inspection, line reject performance, supplier service quality and product reliability. These factors are transformed into measurable, quantitative, Just‐in‐time (JIT) parameters, utilized in planning and establishing a supplier performance Rating System focused on satisfying both internal and external customers.
-
An Objective-Oriented Rating System of Vendor Quality Performance
Quality Engineering, 2002Co-Authors: Cheecheng Chen, Chingchow YangAbstract:This article establishes a Rating System for vendor's performance from the orientation of customer satisfaction by objective-orientation driving. Its purpose is to provide a methodology of “how to integrate the capability between vendor and manufacturer and to apply different strategies under the needs of quality improvement.” The study is undertaken to specify the interaction and the mutual movement among the three groups in the supply chain “Vendor–Manufacturer–Customer” and to integrate the results of four factors: incoming inspection, performance of line reject, service quality of vendor, and product reliability. It tries to transform these factors into measurable, quantitative, just-in-time (JIT) parameters that are utilized in the planning and establishment of this Rating System of vendor's performance. The concept of objective orientation is adopted in the “performance” calculations. We obtain a very satisfactory completeness, flexibility, effectiveness, and sensitivity of parameters-to-model from ...
Nikki Maran - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
surgeons non technical skills in the opeRating room reliability testing of the notss behavior Rating System
World Journal of Surgery, 2008Co-Authors: Steven Yule, Rhona Flin, Nikki Maran, D I Rowley, George Youngson, Simon PatersonbrownAbstract:Background Previous research has shown that surgeons’ intraoperative non-technical skills are related to surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the NOTSS (Non-technical Skills for Surgeons) behavior Rating System. Based on task analysis, the System incorporates five categories of skills for safe surgical practice (Situation Awareness, Decision Making, Task Management, Communication & Teamwork, and Leadership).
-
development of a Rating System for surgeons non technical skills
Medical Education, 2006Co-Authors: Steven Yule, Rhona Flin, Simon Patersonbrown, Nikki Maran, D I RowleyAbstract:Background Analyses of adverse events in surgery reveal that many underlying causes are behavioural, such as communication failure, rather than technical. Non-technical (i.e. cognitive and interpersonal) skills are not addressed explicitly in surgical training. However, surgeons need to demonstrate these skills, which underpin their technical excellence, to maximise patient safety in the opeRating theatre. This paper describes the method used to identify surgeons' non-technical skills, and the development of a skills taxonomy and behavioural Rating System to structure observation and feedback in surgical training. Methods Cognitive task analyses (critical incident interviews) were conducted with 27 consultant surgeons in general, cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. The interviews were coded and a multidisciplinary group of surgeons and psychologists used an iterative process to develop a skills taxonomy. This was supported by data gathered from an attitude survey, literature review, analysis of surgical mortality reports and observations in theatre. Results Five categories of non-technical skills were identified, including situation awareness, decision making, task management, leadership and communication and teamwork. This provided a structure for a prototype skill taxonomy (v1.1), which comprised 14 non-technical skill elements. Observable behaviours (markers) indicative of good and poor performance were developed for each element by 16 consultant surgeons to form a prototype behaviour Rating System. Conclusions The prototype skills taxonomy and behaviour Rating System are grounded empirically in surgery. The reliability of the System is currently being tested using standardised scenarios. If this evaluation proves successful, the System could be used to structure feedback and guide non-technical skills training.
