The Experts below are selected from a list of 2187 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Reind P. Van De Riet - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the future Refereeing Process in cyberspace of the data knowledge engineering journal an attempt in guaranteeing security and privacy on three levels
Data and Knowledge Engineering, 2004Co-Authors: Reind P. Van De RietAbstract:The Refereeing Process for the Data & Knowledge Engineering Journal as it is and will be executed in Cyberspace is the subject of this paper, in particular security and privacy aspects. This Process can be defined and implemented in the Mokum system; we will show that it complies to the security and privacy rules on three levels: 1. Highest: at the conceptual level. 2. Middle: at the implementational level. 3. Lowest: at the communicational level.
-
The future Refereeing Process in Cyberspace of the Data & Knowledge Engineering Journal: an attempt in guaranteeing security and privacy on three levels
Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2004Co-Authors: Reind P. Van De RietAbstract:The Refereeing Process for the Data & Knowledge Engineering Journal as it is and will be executed in Cyberspace is the subject of this paper, in particular security and privacy aspects. This Process can be defined and implemented in the Mokum system; we will show that it complies to the security and privacy rules on three levels: 1. Highest: at the conceptual level. 2. Middle: at the implementational level. 3. Lowest: at the communicational level.
Gabriel Istrate - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Threshold properties of random boolean constraint satisfaction problems
2005Co-Authors: Gabriel IstrateAbstract:We study threshold properties of random constraint satisfaction problems under a probabilistic model due to Molloy [Models for random constraint satisfaction problems, in: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2002]. We give a sufficient condition for the existence of a sharp threshold. In the boolean case, it gives an independent proof for the more difficult half of a classification result conjectured by Creignou and Daude [Generalized satisfiability problems: minimal elements and phase transitions. Theor. Comput. Sci. 302(1-3)(2003) 417-430], proved in a restricted case by the same authors [Combinatorial sharpness criterion and phase transition classification for random CSPs, Inform. Comput. 190(2) (2004) 220-238], and established by them [Coarse and sharp thresholds for random generalized satisfiability problems, in: M. Drmota, P. Flajolet, D. Gardy, B. Gittenberger (Eds.), Mathematics and Computer Science III: Algorithms, Trees, Combinatorics and Probabilities, Birkhauser, Basel, September 2004, pp. 507-517] while this paper was in the Refereeing Process.
-
Threshold properties of random boolean constraint satisfaction problems
Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2005Co-Authors: Gabriel IstrateAbstract:AbstractWe study threshold properties of random constraint satisfaction problems under a probabilistic model due to Molloy [Models for random constraint satisfaction problems, in: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2002]. We give a sufficient condition for the existence of a sharp threshold. In the boolean case, it gives an independent proof for the more difficult half of a classification result conjectured by Creignou and Daudé [Generalized satisfiability problems: minimal elements and phase transitions. Theor. Comput. Sci. 302(1–3) (2003) 417–430], proved in a restricted case by the same authors [Combinatorial sharpness criterion and phase transition classification for random CSPs, Inform. Comput. 190(2) (2004) 220–238], and established by them [Coarse and sharp thresholds for random generalized satisfiability problems, in: M. Drmota, P. Flajolet, D. Gardy, B. Gittenberger (Eds.), Mathematics and Computer Science III: Algorithms, Trees, Combinatorics and Probabilities, Birkhauser, Basel, September 2004, pp. 507–517] while this paper was in the Refereeing Process
Nathalie Sauer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Editorial: Feature cluster: Planning and Scheduling in Industrial and Logistic Systems
European Journal of Operational Research, 2009Co-Authors: Stéphane Dauzère-pérès, Nathalie SauerAbstract:The goal of this Feature Issue was to present new operational research results on ''Planning and Scheduling in Industrial and Logistic Systems". Fifteen papers were submitted to the issue and, after a long and tedious Refereeing Process, only four papers were finally accepted. Three of the papers are on scheduling, but in rather different settings, and the last one proposes a novel algorithm for calculating safety stocks.
-
Feature cluster: Planning and scheduling in industrial and logistic systems
European Journal of Operational Research, 2009Co-Authors: Stéphane Dauzère-pérès, Nathalie SauerAbstract:The goal of this Feature Issue was to present new operational research results on ''Planning and Scheduling in Industrial and Logistic Systems". Fifteen papers were submitted to the issue and, after a long and tedious Refereeing Process, only four papers were finally accepted. Three of the papers are on scheduling, but in rather different settings, and the last one proposes a novel algorithm for calculating safety stocks.
Tom Tregenza - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
gender bias in the Refereeing Process
Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2002Co-Authors: Tom TregenzaAbstract:Scientists are measured by their publications. Yet anonymous peer review is far from transparent. Does bias lurk within the Refereeing Process? Investigating the outcomes of manuscript submissions suggests that the overall Process is not sexist, but differences in acceptance rates across journals according to gender of the first author give grounds for caution. Manuscripts with more authors and by native English speakers are more successful; whether this is due to bias remains to be seen.
Mariana Venter - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Publikasiegereed? Oor die aanbiedingswyse, keuringsprosedure en teksversorging van navorsingsartikels
In die Skriflig In Luce Verbi, 2001Co-Authors: Mariana VenterAbstract:Ready to publish? On the presentation, Refereeing Process and text editing of scholarly articles This article is an attempt to present authors planning to write a scholarly article with practical guidelines before submitting the article to a specific journal. The following aspects are also focused on: typical points of criticism usually raised in referees’ reports, and the necessity for clarity of expression and lucid scholarly style. Specific examples of how to enhance the technical and language finish of an article are also included. This article is the outcome of many years of practical work within the Bureau for Scholarly Journals; hence the publication of it in In die Skriflig, one of the journals Processed by the Bureau.
-
Publikasiegereed? Oor die aanbiedingswyse, keuringsprosedure en teksversorging van navorsingsartikels
Literator, 2001Co-Authors: Mariana VenterAbstract:Ready to publish? On the presentation, Refereeing Process and text editing of scholarly articles This article is an attempt to present authors planning to write a scholarly article with practical guidelines for submitting the article to a specific journal. The following aspects are also discussed: typical points of criticism usually raised in referees’ reports, and the necessity for clarity of expression and lucid scholarly style. Specific examples of how to enhance the technical and language finish of an article are included. This article is the outcome of many years of practical work within the Bureau for Scholarly Journals; hence the publication of it in Literator , one of the journals Processed by the Bureau.