The Experts below are selected from a list of 73113 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Kyu Joo Park - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of early mobilization and diet Rehabilitation Program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery a prospective randomized controlled trial
2011Co-Authors: Sungbum Kang, Samin Hong, Kyu Joo ParkAbstract:PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic surgery may permit earlier recovery compared with open surgery, no published randomized controlled trial has investigated the benefit of a multimodal Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colonic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colon surgery in the context of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Between September 2007 and October 2009, 100 patients who had received laparoscopic colon surgery were selected for the study and randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to a Rehabilitation Program group with early mobilization and diet (n = 46) or conventional care group (n = 54). The Rehabilitation Program group received early oral feeding, early ambulation, and regular laxative. The primary outcome was recovery time, measured with criteria of tolerable diet for 24 hours, safe ambulation, analgesic-free, and afebrile status without major complications. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, complications, quality of life by Short Form 36, pain by visual analog scale, and readmission. This study was registered (ID number NCT00606944, http://register.clinicaltrials.gov). RESULTS: Recovery time was shorter in the Rehabilitation Program group than in the conventional care group (median (interquartile range), 4 (3-5) d vs 6 (5-7) d, respectively; P < .0001). There was no difference in postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups (Rehabilitation Program group, 7 (6-8) d vs conventional care group, 8 (7-9) d; P = .065). There was no difference in complication rates between the Rehabilitation Program group and conventional care group (10.9% vs 20.4%, respectively; P = .136). Quality of life and pain were similar in both groups. There were no readmissions or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A Rehabilitation Program with early mobilization and diet after laparoscopic colon surgery results in reduced recovery time without increased complications. These results suggest that a multimodal Rehabilitation Program may increase the short-term benefits after laparoscopic colon surgery.
-
comparison of early mobilization and diet Rehabilitation Program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery a prospective randomized controlled trial
2011Co-Authors: Sungbum Kang, Samin Hong, Kyu Joo ParkAbstract:PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic surgery may permit earlier recovery compared with open surgery, no published randomized controlled trial has investigated the benefit of a multimodal Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colonic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colon surgery in the context of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Between September 2007 and October 2009, 100 patients who had received laparoscopic colon surgery were selected for the study and randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to a Rehabilitation Program group with early mobilization and diet (n = 46) or conventional care group (n = 54). The Rehabilitation Program group received early oral feeding, early ambulation, and regular laxative. The primary outcome was recovery time, measured with criteria of tolerable diet for 24 hours, safe ambulation, analgesic-free, and afebrile status without major complications. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, complications, quality of life by Short Form 36, pain by visual analog scale, and readmission. This study was registered (ID number NCT00606944, http://register.clinicaltrials.gov). RESULTS: Recovery time was shorter in the Rehabilitation Program group than in the conventional care group (median (interquartile range), 4 (3-5) d vs 6 (5-7) d, respectively; P < .0001). There was no difference in postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups (Rehabilitation Program group, 7 (6-8) d vs conventional care group, 8 (7-9) d; P = .065). There was no difference in complication rates between the Rehabilitation Program group and conventional care group (10.9% vs 20.4%, respectively; P = .136). Quality of life and pain were similar in both groups. There were no readmissions or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A Rehabilitation Program with early mobilization and diet after laparoscopic colon surgery results in reduced recovery time without increased complications. These results suggest that a multimodal Rehabilitation Program may increase the short-term benefits after laparoscopic colon surgery.
-
comparison of early mobilization and diet Rehabilitation Program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery a prospective randomized controlled trial
2011Co-Authors: Taekgu Lee, Sungbum Kang, Samin Hong, Duckwoo Kim, Seung Chul Heo, Kyu Joo ParkAbstract:PURPOSE:Although laparoscopic surgery may permit earlier recovery compared with open surgery, no published randomized controlled trial has investigated the benefit of a multimodal Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colonic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a rehabilitati
Sungbum Kang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of early mobilization and diet Rehabilitation Program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery a prospective randomized controlled trial
2011Co-Authors: Sungbum Kang, Samin Hong, Kyu Joo ParkAbstract:PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic surgery may permit earlier recovery compared with open surgery, no published randomized controlled trial has investigated the benefit of a multimodal Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colonic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colon surgery in the context of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Between September 2007 and October 2009, 100 patients who had received laparoscopic colon surgery were selected for the study and randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to a Rehabilitation Program group with early mobilization and diet (n = 46) or conventional care group (n = 54). The Rehabilitation Program group received early oral feeding, early ambulation, and regular laxative. The primary outcome was recovery time, measured with criteria of tolerable diet for 24 hours, safe ambulation, analgesic-free, and afebrile status without major complications. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, complications, quality of life by Short Form 36, pain by visual analog scale, and readmission. This study was registered (ID number NCT00606944, http://register.clinicaltrials.gov). RESULTS: Recovery time was shorter in the Rehabilitation Program group than in the conventional care group (median (interquartile range), 4 (3-5) d vs 6 (5-7) d, respectively; P < .0001). There was no difference in postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups (Rehabilitation Program group, 7 (6-8) d vs conventional care group, 8 (7-9) d; P = .065). There was no difference in complication rates between the Rehabilitation Program group and conventional care group (10.9% vs 20.4%, respectively; P = .136). Quality of life and pain were similar in both groups. There were no readmissions or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A Rehabilitation Program with early mobilization and diet after laparoscopic colon surgery results in reduced recovery time without increased complications. These results suggest that a multimodal Rehabilitation Program may increase the short-term benefits after laparoscopic colon surgery.
-
comparison of early mobilization and diet Rehabilitation Program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery a prospective randomized controlled trial
2011Co-Authors: Sungbum Kang, Samin Hong, Kyu Joo ParkAbstract:PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic surgery may permit earlier recovery compared with open surgery, no published randomized controlled trial has investigated the benefit of a multimodal Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colonic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colon surgery in the context of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Between September 2007 and October 2009, 100 patients who had received laparoscopic colon surgery were selected for the study and randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to a Rehabilitation Program group with early mobilization and diet (n = 46) or conventional care group (n = 54). The Rehabilitation Program group received early oral feeding, early ambulation, and regular laxative. The primary outcome was recovery time, measured with criteria of tolerable diet for 24 hours, safe ambulation, analgesic-free, and afebrile status without major complications. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, complications, quality of life by Short Form 36, pain by visual analog scale, and readmission. This study was registered (ID number NCT00606944, http://register.clinicaltrials.gov). RESULTS: Recovery time was shorter in the Rehabilitation Program group than in the conventional care group (median (interquartile range), 4 (3-5) d vs 6 (5-7) d, respectively; P < .0001). There was no difference in postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups (Rehabilitation Program group, 7 (6-8) d vs conventional care group, 8 (7-9) d; P = .065). There was no difference in complication rates between the Rehabilitation Program group and conventional care group (10.9% vs 20.4%, respectively; P = .136). Quality of life and pain were similar in both groups. There were no readmissions or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A Rehabilitation Program with early mobilization and diet after laparoscopic colon surgery results in reduced recovery time without increased complications. These results suggest that a multimodal Rehabilitation Program may increase the short-term benefits after laparoscopic colon surgery.
-
comparison of early mobilization and diet Rehabilitation Program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery a prospective randomized controlled trial
2011Co-Authors: Taekgu Lee, Sungbum Kang, Samin Hong, Duckwoo Kim, Seung Chul Heo, Kyu Joo ParkAbstract:PURPOSE:Although laparoscopic surgery may permit earlier recovery compared with open surgery, no published randomized controlled trial has investigated the benefit of a multimodal Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colonic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a rehabilitati
Samin Hong - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of early mobilization and diet Rehabilitation Program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery a prospective randomized controlled trial
2011Co-Authors: Sungbum Kang, Samin Hong, Kyu Joo ParkAbstract:PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic surgery may permit earlier recovery compared with open surgery, no published randomized controlled trial has investigated the benefit of a multimodal Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colonic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colon surgery in the context of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Between September 2007 and October 2009, 100 patients who had received laparoscopic colon surgery were selected for the study and randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to a Rehabilitation Program group with early mobilization and diet (n = 46) or conventional care group (n = 54). The Rehabilitation Program group received early oral feeding, early ambulation, and regular laxative. The primary outcome was recovery time, measured with criteria of tolerable diet for 24 hours, safe ambulation, analgesic-free, and afebrile status without major complications. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, complications, quality of life by Short Form 36, pain by visual analog scale, and readmission. This study was registered (ID number NCT00606944, http://register.clinicaltrials.gov). RESULTS: Recovery time was shorter in the Rehabilitation Program group than in the conventional care group (median (interquartile range), 4 (3-5) d vs 6 (5-7) d, respectively; P < .0001). There was no difference in postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups (Rehabilitation Program group, 7 (6-8) d vs conventional care group, 8 (7-9) d; P = .065). There was no difference in complication rates between the Rehabilitation Program group and conventional care group (10.9% vs 20.4%, respectively; P = .136). Quality of life and pain were similar in both groups. There were no readmissions or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A Rehabilitation Program with early mobilization and diet after laparoscopic colon surgery results in reduced recovery time without increased complications. These results suggest that a multimodal Rehabilitation Program may increase the short-term benefits after laparoscopic colon surgery.
-
comparison of early mobilization and diet Rehabilitation Program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery a prospective randomized controlled trial
2011Co-Authors: Sungbum Kang, Samin Hong, Kyu Joo ParkAbstract:PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic surgery may permit earlier recovery compared with open surgery, no published randomized controlled trial has investigated the benefit of a multimodal Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colonic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colon surgery in the context of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Between September 2007 and October 2009, 100 patients who had received laparoscopic colon surgery were selected for the study and randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to a Rehabilitation Program group with early mobilization and diet (n = 46) or conventional care group (n = 54). The Rehabilitation Program group received early oral feeding, early ambulation, and regular laxative. The primary outcome was recovery time, measured with criteria of tolerable diet for 24 hours, safe ambulation, analgesic-free, and afebrile status without major complications. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, complications, quality of life by Short Form 36, pain by visual analog scale, and readmission. This study was registered (ID number NCT00606944, http://register.clinicaltrials.gov). RESULTS: Recovery time was shorter in the Rehabilitation Program group than in the conventional care group (median (interquartile range), 4 (3-5) d vs 6 (5-7) d, respectively; P < .0001). There was no difference in postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups (Rehabilitation Program group, 7 (6-8) d vs conventional care group, 8 (7-9) d; P = .065). There was no difference in complication rates between the Rehabilitation Program group and conventional care group (10.9% vs 20.4%, respectively; P = .136). Quality of life and pain were similar in both groups. There were no readmissions or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A Rehabilitation Program with early mobilization and diet after laparoscopic colon surgery results in reduced recovery time without increased complications. These results suggest that a multimodal Rehabilitation Program may increase the short-term benefits after laparoscopic colon surgery.
-
comparison of early mobilization and diet Rehabilitation Program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery a prospective randomized controlled trial
2011Co-Authors: Taekgu Lee, Sungbum Kang, Samin Hong, Duckwoo Kim, Seung Chul Heo, Kyu Joo ParkAbstract:PURPOSE:Although laparoscopic surgery may permit earlier recovery compared with open surgery, no published randomized controlled trial has investigated the benefit of a multimodal Rehabilitation Program after laparoscopic colonic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a rehabilitati
Nola Cecins - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
state of the art how to set up a pulmonary Rehabilitation Program
2010Co-Authors: Sue Jenkins, Kylie Hill, Nola CecinsAbstract:Pulmonary Rehabilitation plays an essential role in the management of symptomatic patients with COPD. The benefits of Rehabilitation include a decrease in dyspnoea and fatigue, and improvements in exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life. Importantly, Rehabilitation reduces hospitalization for acute exacerbations and is cost-effective. Although most of the evidence for pulmonary Rehabilitation has been obtained in patients with COPD, symptomatic individuals with other respiratory diseases have been shown to benefit. In this review we outline a stepwise approach to establish, deliver and evaluate a pulmonary Rehabilitation Program (PRP) that would be feasible in most settings. Throughout the review we have specified the minimum requirements for a PRP to facilitate the establishment of Programs using limited resources. Recommendations for staffing and other resources required for a PRP are presented in the first section. Exercise training is a focus of the section on Program delivery as this is the component of Rehabilitation that has the strongest level of evidence for benefit. Program considerations for patients with respiratory conditions other than COPD are described. Different approaches for delivering the education component of a PRP are outlined and recommendations are made regarding topics for group and individual sessions. The problems commonly encountered in pulmonary Rehabilitation, together with recommendations to avoid these problems and strategies to assist in their resolution, are discussed. The review concludes with recommendations for evaluating a PRP.
Patricia M Davidson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
can a heart failure specific cardiac Rehabilitation Program decrease hospitalizations and improve outcomes in high risk patients
2010Co-Authors: Patricia M Davidson, Jill Cockburn, Phillip J Newton, Julie K Webster, Vasiliki Betihavas, Laurie Howes, Dwain O OwensbyeAbstract:Background Heart failure is a common and costly condition, particularly in the elderly. A range of models of interventions have shown the capacity to decrease hospitalizations and improve health-related outcomes. Potentially, cardiac Rehabilitation models can also improve outcomes.Aim To assess the impact of a nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, cardiac Rehabilitation Program to decrease hospitalizations, increase functional capacity, and meet the needs of patients with heart failure.Method In a randomized control trial, a total of 105 patients were recruited to the study. Patients in the intervention group received an individualized, multidisciplinary 12-week cardiac Rehabilitation Program, including an individualized exercise component tailored to functional ability and social circumstances. The control group received an information session provided by the cardiac Rehabilitation coordinator and then follow-up care by either their cardiologist or general practitioner. This trial was stopped prematurely ...
-
a cardiac Rehabilitation Program to improve psychosocial outcomes of women with heart disease
2008Co-Authors: Patricia M Davidson, Michelle Digiacomo, R Zecchin, Mary E Clarke, Glenn E Paul, Kathleen M Lamb, Karen Hancock, Esther Chang, John DalyAbstract:ABSTRACT Background and aims: Heart disease in women is characterised by greater disability and a higher rate of morbidity and early death after an acute coronary event compared with men. Women also have lower participation rates than men in cardiac Rehabilitation. This study sought to describe development of a nurse-directed cardiac Rehabilitation Program tailored to the needs of women following an acute cardiac event to address their psychological and social needs. Methods: The Heart Awareness for Women Program (HAFW) commenced in 2003 with phase I involving development of Program elements and seeking validation through consumers and clinical experts. The Program was then trialed in an 8-week Program in a convenience sample of 6 women. Phase II applied the revised Program using action research principles focusing on enabling clinical staff to implement the ongoing Program. A total of 54 women participated in this phase, 48 of whom completed baseline questionnaires. A mixed-method evaluation, using quest...
