The Experts below are selected from a list of 41175 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Roy M Kimble - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
virtual reality for acute pain reduction in adolescents undergoing burn wound care a prospective randomized controlled trial
Burns, 2012Co-Authors: Belinda Kipping, Sylvia Rodger, Kate Miller, Roy M KimbleAbstract:Abstract Background Effective pain management remains a challenge for adolescents during conscious burn wound care procedures. Virtual reality (VR) shows promise as a non-pharmacological adjunct in reducing pain. Aims This study assessed off-the-shelf VR for (1) its effect on reducing acute pain intensity during adolescent burn wound care, and (2) its clinical utility in a busy hospital setting. Methods Forty-one adolescents (11–17 years) participated in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Acute pain outcomes including adolescent self-Report, Nursing staff behavioral observation, caregiver observation and physiological measures were collected. Length of procedure times and adolescent reactions were also recorded to inform clinical utility. Results Nursing staff Reported a statistically significant reduction in pain scores during dressing removal, and significantly less rescue doses of Entonox given to those receiving VR, compared to those receiving standard distraction. For all other pain outcomes and length of treatment, there was a trend for lower pain scores and treatment times for those receiving VR, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion Despite only minimal pain reduction achieved using off-the-shelf VR, other results from this trial and previous research on younger children with burns suggest a customized, adolescent and hospital friendly device may be more effective in pain reduction.
Belinda Kipping - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
virtual reality for acute pain reduction in adolescents undergoing burn wound care a prospective randomized controlled trial
Burns, 2012Co-Authors: Belinda Kipping, Sylvia Rodger, Kate Miller, Roy M KimbleAbstract:Abstract Background Effective pain management remains a challenge for adolescents during conscious burn wound care procedures. Virtual reality (VR) shows promise as a non-pharmacological adjunct in reducing pain. Aims This study assessed off-the-shelf VR for (1) its effect on reducing acute pain intensity during adolescent burn wound care, and (2) its clinical utility in a busy hospital setting. Methods Forty-one adolescents (11–17 years) participated in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Acute pain outcomes including adolescent self-Report, Nursing staff behavioral observation, caregiver observation and physiological measures were collected. Length of procedure times and adolescent reactions were also recorded to inform clinical utility. Results Nursing staff Reported a statistically significant reduction in pain scores during dressing removal, and significantly less rescue doses of Entonox given to those receiving VR, compared to those receiving standard distraction. For all other pain outcomes and length of treatment, there was a trend for lower pain scores and treatment times for those receiving VR, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion Despite only minimal pain reduction achieved using off-the-shelf VR, other results from this trial and previous research on younger children with burns suggest a customized, adolescent and hospital friendly device may be more effective in pain reduction.
Ellie Brown - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A review of prospective registration of trials published in Nursing science journals in 2017
Journal of advanced nursing, 2019Co-Authors: Richard Gray, George Gray, Ellie BrownAbstract:AIM: To determine the proportion of trials published in Nursing science journals in 2017 that were prospectively registered. DESIGN: A review of randomized controlled trials published in a Journal Citation Report Nursing science journal in 2017. DATA SOURCE: Table of contents of included journals. REVIEW METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were identified by manually reviewing the title of all papers published in included journals. Included trials were classified as: (a) Prospectively registered; (b) Retrospectively registered; (c) Registered but registration not Reported in the manuscript; (d) Indeterminate registration; and (e) Not registered. Additionally, we recorded if the trial registration number was Reported in the manuscript abstract. RESULTS: Of 151 randomized controlled trials published in Nursing science journals in 2017, 17 (11%) were prospectively registered. Thirty-six (24%) trials were retrospectively and 93 (62%) not registered. We could not determine the registration status of five (3%) trials. The registration number was included in the abstract of two prospectively and eight retrospectively registered studies. Compared with the rest of the world, trial registration rates were significantly lower in Asian countries. CONCLUSION: Two included trials were prospectively registered and Reported a registration number in the abstract. Compared with other disciplines, rates of prospective trial registration are low. Nurse trialists must ensure that they prospectively register all trials. IMPACT: We intended to replicate this review in subsequent years with a view to Reporting improvements in prospective registration rates over time.
Kate Miller - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
virtual reality for acute pain reduction in adolescents undergoing burn wound care a prospective randomized controlled trial
Burns, 2012Co-Authors: Belinda Kipping, Sylvia Rodger, Kate Miller, Roy M KimbleAbstract:Abstract Background Effective pain management remains a challenge for adolescents during conscious burn wound care procedures. Virtual reality (VR) shows promise as a non-pharmacological adjunct in reducing pain. Aims This study assessed off-the-shelf VR for (1) its effect on reducing acute pain intensity during adolescent burn wound care, and (2) its clinical utility in a busy hospital setting. Methods Forty-one adolescents (11–17 years) participated in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Acute pain outcomes including adolescent self-Report, Nursing staff behavioral observation, caregiver observation and physiological measures were collected. Length of procedure times and adolescent reactions were also recorded to inform clinical utility. Results Nursing staff Reported a statistically significant reduction in pain scores during dressing removal, and significantly less rescue doses of Entonox given to those receiving VR, compared to those receiving standard distraction. For all other pain outcomes and length of treatment, there was a trend for lower pain scores and treatment times for those receiving VR, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion Despite only minimal pain reduction achieved using off-the-shelf VR, other results from this trial and previous research on younger children with burns suggest a customized, adolescent and hospital friendly device may be more effective in pain reduction.
Sylvia Rodger - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
virtual reality for acute pain reduction in adolescents undergoing burn wound care a prospective randomized controlled trial
Burns, 2012Co-Authors: Belinda Kipping, Sylvia Rodger, Kate Miller, Roy M KimbleAbstract:Abstract Background Effective pain management remains a challenge for adolescents during conscious burn wound care procedures. Virtual reality (VR) shows promise as a non-pharmacological adjunct in reducing pain. Aims This study assessed off-the-shelf VR for (1) its effect on reducing acute pain intensity during adolescent burn wound care, and (2) its clinical utility in a busy hospital setting. Methods Forty-one adolescents (11–17 years) participated in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Acute pain outcomes including adolescent self-Report, Nursing staff behavioral observation, caregiver observation and physiological measures were collected. Length of procedure times and adolescent reactions were also recorded to inform clinical utility. Results Nursing staff Reported a statistically significant reduction in pain scores during dressing removal, and significantly less rescue doses of Entonox given to those receiving VR, compared to those receiving standard distraction. For all other pain outcomes and length of treatment, there was a trend for lower pain scores and treatment times for those receiving VR, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion Despite only minimal pain reduction achieved using off-the-shelf VR, other results from this trial and previous research on younger children with burns suggest a customized, adolescent and hospital friendly device may be more effective in pain reduction.