Research Infrastructure

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 20865 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

M. Ocke - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Concepts and procedures for mapping food and health Research Infrastructure: New insights from the EuroDISH project
    Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2017
    Co-Authors: K. A. Brown, L. Timotijevic, M. Geurts, J. L. Arentoft, R. A. M. Dhonukshe-rutten, L. Fezeu, P. Finglas, M. Laville, G. Perozzi, M. Ocke
    Abstract:

    Background: Recent initiatives in Europe have encouraged the formalisation of Research Infrastructure to unify fragmented facilities, resources and services; and to facilitate world-class Research of complex public health challenges, such as those related to non-communicable disease. How this can be achieved in the area of food and health has, to date, been unclear. Scope and approach: This commentary paper presents examples of the types of food and health Research facilities, resources and services available in Europe. Insights are provided on the challenge of identifying and classifying Research Infrastructure. In addition, suggestions are made for the future direction of food and health Research Infrastructure in Europe. These views are informed by the EuroDISH project, which mapped Research Infrastructure in four areas of food and health Research: Determinants of dietary behaviour; Intake of foods/nutrients; Status and functional markers of nutritional health; Health and disease risk of foods/nutrients. Key findings and conclusion: There is no objective measure to identify or classify Research Infrastructure. It is therefore, difficult to operationalise this term. EuroDISH demonstrated specific challenges with identifying the degree an organisation, project, network or national Infrastructure could be considered a Research Infrastructure; and establishing the boundary of a Research Infrastructure (integral hard or soft facilities/resources/services). Nevertheless, there are opportunities to create dedicated food and health Research Infrastructures in Europe. These would need to be flexible and adaptable to keep pace with an ever-changing Research environment and bring together the multi-disciplinary needs of the food and health Research community. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

  • Concepts and procedures for mapping food and health Research Infrastructure : New insights from the EuroDISH project
    Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2017
    Co-Authors: K. A. Brown, L. Timotijevic, M. Geurts, J. L. Arentoft, R. A. M. Dhonukshe-rutten, L. Fezeu, P. Finglas, M. Laville, G. Perozzi, M. Ocke
    Abstract:

    Abstract Background Recent initiatives in Europe have encouraged the formalisation of Research Infrastructure to unify fragmented facilities, resources and services; and to facilitate world-class Research of complex public health challenges, such as those related to non-communicable disease. How this can be achieved in the area of food and health has, to date, been unclear. Scope and approach This commentary paper presents examples of the types of food and health Research facilities, resources and services available in Europe. Insights are provided on the challenge of identifying and classifying Research Infrastructure. In addition, suggestions are made for the future direction of food and health Research Infrastructure in Europe. These views are informed by the EuroDISH project, which mapped Research Infrastructure in four areas of food and health Research: Determinants of dietary behaviour; Intake of foods/nutrients; Status and functional markers of nutritional health; Health and disease risk of foods/nutrients. Key findings and conclusion There is no objective measure to identify or classify Research Infrastructure. It is therefore, difficult to operationalise this term. EuroDISH demonstrated specific challenges with identifying the degree an organisation, project, network or national Infrastructure could be considered a Research Infrastructure; and establishing the boundary of a Research Infrastructure (integral hard or soft facilities/resources/services). Nevertheless, there are opportunities to create dedicated food and health Research Infrastructures in Europe. These would need to be flexible and adaptable to keep pace with an ever-changing Research environment and bring together the multi-disciplinary needs of the food and health Research community.

  • Research Infrastructure in the European food, nutrition and public health area: Current Initiatives from EuroDISH.
    Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2013
    Co-Authors: R. A. M. Dhonukshe-rutten, K. A. Brown, P. Finglas, G. Perozzi, M. Ocke, H.m. Snoek, Nadia Slimani, B. Van Ommen, Inge Tetens, M. Laville
    Abstract:

    Successful food and health Research Infrastructure is necessary to conduct high quality Research and design effective public health strategies to improve population health through lifestyle, food and nutrition. Objectives: EuroDISH will provide recommendations to stakeholders such as the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI), the Joint Programming Initiative-Healthy Diet Healthy Life (JPI-HDHL) and future European funding programmes (e.g. Horizon 2020) on the needs and best-practice for food and health Research Infrastructures. Methods/results: Research has been organised using the “DISH” model which represents four areas of food and health Research: Determinants of dietary behaviour; Intake of foods and nutrients; Status and functional markers of nutritional health; Health and disease risks of foods and nutrients. The project consists of three phases: - Phase one (completed July 2013): Desk Research, interviews (N=30) and stakeholder workshop conducted to map existing Research Infrastructure and identify gaps and needs. Initial findings suggested that Research Infrastructure was developed to different degrees across the four “DISH” Research areas. - Phase two: Synthesis of Research Infrastructures and or different areas of Research and explore the governance of Research Infrastructure. - Phase three: Feasible designs and roadmaps for the future development of Research Infrastructure. Conclusions: The EuroDISH vision is to encourage the development of Infrastructures that bring together resources and knowledge from different scientific fields. This will enable state-of-the-art, pioneering and innovative Research to be conducted across Europe serving to provide a competitive advantage at a global level and tackle today’s food related social, economic and health challenges.

Sigve Haug - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Towards a Swiss National Research Infrastructure
    arXiv: Computers and Society, 2014
    Co-Authors: Peter Kunszt, Sergio Maffioletti, Dean Flanders, Markus Eurich, Thomas Michael Bohnert, Andrew Edmonds, Heinz Stockinger, Sigve Haug, Almerina Jamakovic-kapic, Placi Flury
    Abstract:

    In this position paper we describe the current status and plans for a Swiss National Research Infrastructure. Swiss academic and Research institutions are very autonomous. While being loosely coupled, they do not rely on any centralized management entities. Therefore, a coordinated national Research Infrastructure can only be established by federating the various resources available locally at the individual institutions. The Swiss Multi-Science Computing Grid and the Swiss Academic Compute Cloud projects serve already a large number of diverse user communities. These projects also allow us to test the operational setup of such a heterogeneous federated Infrastructure.

  • Euro-Par Workshops - Towards a Swiss National Research Infrastructure
    Euro-Par 2013: Parallel Processing Workshops, 2013
    Co-Authors: Peter Kunszt, Sergio Maffioletti, Dean Flanders, Markus Eurich, Thomas Michael Bohnert, Andrew Edmonds, Heinz Stockinger, Almerina Jamakovic-kapic, Eryk Schiller, Sigve Haug
    Abstract:

    In this position paper, we describe the current status and plans for a Swiss National Research Infrastructure. Swiss academic and Research institutions are very autonomous. While being loosely coupled, they do not rely on any centralized management entities. A coordinated national Research Infrastructure can only be established by federating the local resources of the individual institutions. We discuss current efforts and business models for a federated Infrastructure.

Peter Kunszt - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Towards a Swiss National Research Infrastructure
    arXiv: Computers and Society, 2014
    Co-Authors: Peter Kunszt, Sergio Maffioletti, Dean Flanders, Markus Eurich, Thomas Michael Bohnert, Andrew Edmonds, Heinz Stockinger, Sigve Haug, Almerina Jamakovic-kapic, Placi Flury
    Abstract:

    In this position paper we describe the current status and plans for a Swiss National Research Infrastructure. Swiss academic and Research institutions are very autonomous. While being loosely coupled, they do not rely on any centralized management entities. Therefore, a coordinated national Research Infrastructure can only be established by federating the various resources available locally at the individual institutions. The Swiss Multi-Science Computing Grid and the Swiss Academic Compute Cloud projects serve already a large number of diverse user communities. These projects also allow us to test the operational setup of such a heterogeneous federated Infrastructure.

  • Euro-Par Workshops - Towards a Swiss National Research Infrastructure
    Euro-Par 2013: Parallel Processing Workshops, 2013
    Co-Authors: Peter Kunszt, Sergio Maffioletti, Dean Flanders, Markus Eurich, Thomas Michael Bohnert, Andrew Edmonds, Heinz Stockinger, Almerina Jamakovic-kapic, Eryk Schiller, Sigve Haug
    Abstract:

    In this position paper, we describe the current status and plans for a Swiss National Research Infrastructure. Swiss academic and Research institutions are very autonomous. While being loosely coupled, they do not rely on any centralized management entities. A coordinated national Research Infrastructure can only be established by federating the local resources of the individual institutions. We discuss current efforts and business models for a federated Infrastructure.

M. Laville - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Concepts and procedures for mapping food and health Research Infrastructure: New insights from the EuroDISH project
    Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2017
    Co-Authors: K. A. Brown, L. Timotijevic, M. Geurts, J. L. Arentoft, R. A. M. Dhonukshe-rutten, L. Fezeu, P. Finglas, M. Laville, G. Perozzi, M. Ocke
    Abstract:

    Background: Recent initiatives in Europe have encouraged the formalisation of Research Infrastructure to unify fragmented facilities, resources and services; and to facilitate world-class Research of complex public health challenges, such as those related to non-communicable disease. How this can be achieved in the area of food and health has, to date, been unclear. Scope and approach: This commentary paper presents examples of the types of food and health Research facilities, resources and services available in Europe. Insights are provided on the challenge of identifying and classifying Research Infrastructure. In addition, suggestions are made for the future direction of food and health Research Infrastructure in Europe. These views are informed by the EuroDISH project, which mapped Research Infrastructure in four areas of food and health Research: Determinants of dietary behaviour; Intake of foods/nutrients; Status and functional markers of nutritional health; Health and disease risk of foods/nutrients. Key findings and conclusion: There is no objective measure to identify or classify Research Infrastructure. It is therefore, difficult to operationalise this term. EuroDISH demonstrated specific challenges with identifying the degree an organisation, project, network or national Infrastructure could be considered a Research Infrastructure; and establishing the boundary of a Research Infrastructure (integral hard or soft facilities/resources/services). Nevertheless, there are opportunities to create dedicated food and health Research Infrastructures in Europe. These would need to be flexible and adaptable to keep pace with an ever-changing Research environment and bring together the multi-disciplinary needs of the food and health Research community. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

  • Concepts and procedures for mapping food and health Research Infrastructure : New insights from the EuroDISH project
    Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2017
    Co-Authors: K. A. Brown, L. Timotijevic, M. Geurts, J. L. Arentoft, R. A. M. Dhonukshe-rutten, L. Fezeu, P. Finglas, M. Laville, G. Perozzi, M. Ocke
    Abstract:

    Abstract Background Recent initiatives in Europe have encouraged the formalisation of Research Infrastructure to unify fragmented facilities, resources and services; and to facilitate world-class Research of complex public health challenges, such as those related to non-communicable disease. How this can be achieved in the area of food and health has, to date, been unclear. Scope and approach This commentary paper presents examples of the types of food and health Research facilities, resources and services available in Europe. Insights are provided on the challenge of identifying and classifying Research Infrastructure. In addition, suggestions are made for the future direction of food and health Research Infrastructure in Europe. These views are informed by the EuroDISH project, which mapped Research Infrastructure in four areas of food and health Research: Determinants of dietary behaviour; Intake of foods/nutrients; Status and functional markers of nutritional health; Health and disease risk of foods/nutrients. Key findings and conclusion There is no objective measure to identify or classify Research Infrastructure. It is therefore, difficult to operationalise this term. EuroDISH demonstrated specific challenges with identifying the degree an organisation, project, network or national Infrastructure could be considered a Research Infrastructure; and establishing the boundary of a Research Infrastructure (integral hard or soft facilities/resources/services). Nevertheless, there are opportunities to create dedicated food and health Research Infrastructures in Europe. These would need to be flexible and adaptable to keep pace with an ever-changing Research environment and bring together the multi-disciplinary needs of the food and health Research community.

  • Research Infrastructure in the European food, nutrition and public health area: Current Initiatives from EuroDISH.
    Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2013
    Co-Authors: R. A. M. Dhonukshe-rutten, K. A. Brown, P. Finglas, G. Perozzi, M. Ocke, H.m. Snoek, Nadia Slimani, B. Van Ommen, Inge Tetens, M. Laville
    Abstract:

    Successful food and health Research Infrastructure is necessary to conduct high quality Research and design effective public health strategies to improve population health through lifestyle, food and nutrition. Objectives: EuroDISH will provide recommendations to stakeholders such as the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI), the Joint Programming Initiative-Healthy Diet Healthy Life (JPI-HDHL) and future European funding programmes (e.g. Horizon 2020) on the needs and best-practice for food and health Research Infrastructures. Methods/results: Research has been organised using the “DISH” model which represents four areas of food and health Research: Determinants of dietary behaviour; Intake of foods and nutrients; Status and functional markers of nutritional health; Health and disease risks of foods and nutrients. The project consists of three phases: - Phase one (completed July 2013): Desk Research, interviews (N=30) and stakeholder workshop conducted to map existing Research Infrastructure and identify gaps and needs. Initial findings suggested that Research Infrastructure was developed to different degrees across the four “DISH” Research areas. - Phase two: Synthesis of Research Infrastructures and or different areas of Research and explore the governance of Research Infrastructure. - Phase three: Feasible designs and roadmaps for the future development of Research Infrastructure. Conclusions: The EuroDISH vision is to encourage the development of Infrastructures that bring together resources and knowledge from different scientific fields. This will enable state-of-the-art, pioneering and innovative Research to be conducted across Europe serving to provide a competitive advantage at a global level and tackle today’s food related social, economic and health challenges.

K. A. Brown - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Concepts and procedures for mapping food and health Research Infrastructure: New insights from the EuroDISH project
    Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2017
    Co-Authors: K. A. Brown, L. Timotijevic, M. Geurts, J. L. Arentoft, R. A. M. Dhonukshe-rutten, L. Fezeu, P. Finglas, M. Laville, G. Perozzi, M. Ocke
    Abstract:

    Background: Recent initiatives in Europe have encouraged the formalisation of Research Infrastructure to unify fragmented facilities, resources and services; and to facilitate world-class Research of complex public health challenges, such as those related to non-communicable disease. How this can be achieved in the area of food and health has, to date, been unclear. Scope and approach: This commentary paper presents examples of the types of food and health Research facilities, resources and services available in Europe. Insights are provided on the challenge of identifying and classifying Research Infrastructure. In addition, suggestions are made for the future direction of food and health Research Infrastructure in Europe. These views are informed by the EuroDISH project, which mapped Research Infrastructure in four areas of food and health Research: Determinants of dietary behaviour; Intake of foods/nutrients; Status and functional markers of nutritional health; Health and disease risk of foods/nutrients. Key findings and conclusion: There is no objective measure to identify or classify Research Infrastructure. It is therefore, difficult to operationalise this term. EuroDISH demonstrated specific challenges with identifying the degree an organisation, project, network or national Infrastructure could be considered a Research Infrastructure; and establishing the boundary of a Research Infrastructure (integral hard or soft facilities/resources/services). Nevertheless, there are opportunities to create dedicated food and health Research Infrastructures in Europe. These would need to be flexible and adaptable to keep pace with an ever-changing Research environment and bring together the multi-disciplinary needs of the food and health Research community. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

  • Concepts and procedures for mapping food and health Research Infrastructure : New insights from the EuroDISH project
    Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2017
    Co-Authors: K. A. Brown, L. Timotijevic, M. Geurts, J. L. Arentoft, R. A. M. Dhonukshe-rutten, L. Fezeu, P. Finglas, M. Laville, G. Perozzi, M. Ocke
    Abstract:

    Abstract Background Recent initiatives in Europe have encouraged the formalisation of Research Infrastructure to unify fragmented facilities, resources and services; and to facilitate world-class Research of complex public health challenges, such as those related to non-communicable disease. How this can be achieved in the area of food and health has, to date, been unclear. Scope and approach This commentary paper presents examples of the types of food and health Research facilities, resources and services available in Europe. Insights are provided on the challenge of identifying and classifying Research Infrastructure. In addition, suggestions are made for the future direction of food and health Research Infrastructure in Europe. These views are informed by the EuroDISH project, which mapped Research Infrastructure in four areas of food and health Research: Determinants of dietary behaviour; Intake of foods/nutrients; Status and functional markers of nutritional health; Health and disease risk of foods/nutrients. Key findings and conclusion There is no objective measure to identify or classify Research Infrastructure. It is therefore, difficult to operationalise this term. EuroDISH demonstrated specific challenges with identifying the degree an organisation, project, network or national Infrastructure could be considered a Research Infrastructure; and establishing the boundary of a Research Infrastructure (integral hard or soft facilities/resources/services). Nevertheless, there are opportunities to create dedicated food and health Research Infrastructures in Europe. These would need to be flexible and adaptable to keep pace with an ever-changing Research environment and bring together the multi-disciplinary needs of the food and health Research community.

  • Research Infrastructure in the European food, nutrition and public health area: Current Initiatives from EuroDISH.
    Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2013
    Co-Authors: R. A. M. Dhonukshe-rutten, K. A. Brown, P. Finglas, G. Perozzi, M. Ocke, H.m. Snoek, Nadia Slimani, B. Van Ommen, Inge Tetens, M. Laville
    Abstract:

    Successful food and health Research Infrastructure is necessary to conduct high quality Research and design effective public health strategies to improve population health through lifestyle, food and nutrition. Objectives: EuroDISH will provide recommendations to stakeholders such as the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI), the Joint Programming Initiative-Healthy Diet Healthy Life (JPI-HDHL) and future European funding programmes (e.g. Horizon 2020) on the needs and best-practice for food and health Research Infrastructures. Methods/results: Research has been organised using the “DISH” model which represents four areas of food and health Research: Determinants of dietary behaviour; Intake of foods and nutrients; Status and functional markers of nutritional health; Health and disease risks of foods and nutrients. The project consists of three phases: - Phase one (completed July 2013): Desk Research, interviews (N=30) and stakeholder workshop conducted to map existing Research Infrastructure and identify gaps and needs. Initial findings suggested that Research Infrastructure was developed to different degrees across the four “DISH” Research areas. - Phase two: Synthesis of Research Infrastructures and or different areas of Research and explore the governance of Research Infrastructure. - Phase three: Feasible designs and roadmaps for the future development of Research Infrastructure. Conclusions: The EuroDISH vision is to encourage the development of Infrastructures that bring together resources and knowledge from different scientific fields. This will enable state-of-the-art, pioneering and innovative Research to be conducted across Europe serving to provide a competitive advantage at a global level and tackle today’s food related social, economic and health challenges.