The Experts below are selected from a list of 858909 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
M. Shawe-taylor - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Promoting positive Risk Management: evaluation of a Risk Management panel
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2008Co-Authors: H. Kaliniecka, M. Shawe-taylorAbstract:The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a National Health Service Trust Risk Management panel (RMP) service was effective in promoting positive Risk Management by supporting mental health clinicians/teams in their Management of people with mental health problems who presented with high Risk of harm to themselves or to others. Fifteen mental health workers completed a questionnaire regarding their experience of the RMP. Content analysis revealed several themes. The majority of participants found the RMP helpful because of the support provided by shared case discussion and collective responsibility for Risk Management offered by the RMP. Medical records of the 23 individuals referred into the RMP were also examined. Trends in diagnoses, Risks and RMP recommendations were identified. This study points to the importance of the organization's role alongside the individual clinician's in positive Risk Management and in supporting people with mental health problems using the recovery model. Improvements in developing a RMP are suggested. Language: en
-
Promoting positive Risk Management: evaluation of a Risk Management panel
Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2008Co-Authors: H. Kaliniecka, M. Shawe-taylorAbstract:The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a National Health Service Trust Risk Management panel (RMP) service was effective in promoting positive Risk Management by supporting mental health clinicians/teams in their Management of people with mental health problems who presented with high Risk of harm to themselves or to others. Fifteen mental health workers completed a questionnaire regarding their experience of the RMP. Content analysis revealed several themes. The majority of participants found the RMP helpful because of the support provided by shared case discussion and collective responsibility for Risk Management offered by the RMP. Medical records of the 23 individuals referred into the RMP were also examined. Trends in diagnoses, Risks and RMP recommendations were identified. This study points to the importance of the organization's role alongside the individual clinician's in positive Risk Management and in supporting people with mental health problems using the recovery model. Improvements in developing a RMP are suggested.
H. Kaliniecka - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Promoting positive Risk Management: evaluation of a Risk Management panel
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2008Co-Authors: H. Kaliniecka, M. Shawe-taylorAbstract:The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a National Health Service Trust Risk Management panel (RMP) service was effective in promoting positive Risk Management by supporting mental health clinicians/teams in their Management of people with mental health problems who presented with high Risk of harm to themselves or to others. Fifteen mental health workers completed a questionnaire regarding their experience of the RMP. Content analysis revealed several themes. The majority of participants found the RMP helpful because of the support provided by shared case discussion and collective responsibility for Risk Management offered by the RMP. Medical records of the 23 individuals referred into the RMP were also examined. Trends in diagnoses, Risks and RMP recommendations were identified. This study points to the importance of the organization's role alongside the individual clinician's in positive Risk Management and in supporting people with mental health problems using the recovery model. Improvements in developing a RMP are suggested. Language: en
-
Promoting positive Risk Management: evaluation of a Risk Management panel
Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2008Co-Authors: H. Kaliniecka, M. Shawe-taylorAbstract:The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a National Health Service Trust Risk Management panel (RMP) service was effective in promoting positive Risk Management by supporting mental health clinicians/teams in their Management of people with mental health problems who presented with high Risk of harm to themselves or to others. Fifteen mental health workers completed a questionnaire regarding their experience of the RMP. Content analysis revealed several themes. The majority of participants found the RMP helpful because of the support provided by shared case discussion and collective responsibility for Risk Management offered by the RMP. Medical records of the 23 individuals referred into the RMP were also examined. Trends in diagnoses, Risks and RMP recommendations were identified. This study points to the importance of the organization's role alongside the individual clinician's in positive Risk Management and in supporting people with mental health problems using the recovery model. Improvements in developing a RMP are suggested.
Simone Perret - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Risk Management Cone (RMC) A three dimensional Risk Management concept
2006Co-Authors: Andy Kipfer, Hans Kienholz, Simone PerretAbstract:Activities in Risk Management systems are often visualized by means of a two-dimensional Risk Management cycle. In this concept, the ideal procedure starts with a comprehensive Risk assessment, including Risk analysis and Risk valuation. Based on this assessment, preventive and mitigative measures can be prepared or realized. The emergence of a dangerous process then leads to the stage of event Management and finally, the cycle is completed with the regeneration stage. However, activities — or non-activities — in the field of Risk Management can also lead to an improvement or worsening of the level of Risk prevention at a certain point in time. This process can be considered by the further development of the Risk Management cycle to a three-dimensional Risk Management cone (RMC). This allows on the one hand the visualization of changes in the level of protection over time. On the other hand, the residual Risk can also be illustrated with the RMC. In this study the concept of the RMC will be presented and the implementation in practice will be exemplified by means of three case studies of flood events performed in Switzerland for the villages of Ermatingen and Schwarzenburg and the city of Thun.
-
Risk Management Cone (RMC) — A Three Dimensional Risk Management Concept
2006Co-Authors: Andy Kipfer, Hans Kienholz, Simone PerretAbstract:Activities in Risk Management systems are often visualized by means of a two-dimensional Risk Management cycle. In this concept, the ideal procedure starts with a comprehensive Risk assessment, including Risk analysis and Risk valuation. Based on this assessment, preventive and mitigative measures can be prepared or realized. The emergence of a dangerous process then leads to the stage of event Management and finally, the cycle is completed with the regeneration stage. However, activities — or non-activities — in the field of Risk Management can also lead to an improvement or worsening of the level of Risk prevention at a certain point in time. This process can be considered by the further development of the Risk Management cycle to a three-dimensional Risk Management cone (RMC). This allows on the one hand the visualization of changes in the level of protection over time. On the other hand, the residual Risk can also be illustrated with the RMC. In this study the concept of the RMC will be presented and the implementation in practice will be exemplified by means of three case studies of flood events performed in Switzerland for the villages of Ermatingen and Schwarzenburg and the city of Thun.
Vaishali P. Bhosale - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Software Project Risk Management
2011Co-Authors: Shailesh S. Limkar, Vaishali P. BhosaleAbstract:The aim of this research paper is to find some tools and techniques for software project Risk Management recommended by different journals and articles. We have gone through different approaches in context of Risk Management. The literature review explains top ten software Risk items and Risk Management techniques for the same enlisted by Dr. Barry Boehm. Conceptualization of Risk Management process is elaborated with two major phases. Then we have taken Risk Management paradigm introduced by Software Engineering Institute as our standard to analyze different techniques and tools available for Risk Management. Finally the discussion ends with the condluding remark that coolective approach is needed to deal with software project Risk.
-
Software Project Risk Management
2011Co-Authors: Shailesh S. Limkar, Vaishali P. BhosaleAbstract:The aim of this research paper is to find some tools and techniques for software project Risk Management recommended by different journals and articles. We have gone through different approaches in context of Risk Management. The literature review explains top ten software Risk items and Risk Management techniques for the same enlisted by Dr. Barry Boehm. Conceptualization of Risk Management process is elaborated with two major phases. Then we have taken Risk Management paradigm introduced by Software Engineering Institute as our standard to analyze different techniques and tools available for Risk Management. Finally the discussion ends with the condluding remark that coolective approach is needed to deal with software project Risk.
Andy Kipfer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Risk Management Cone (RMC) A three dimensional Risk Management concept
2006Co-Authors: Andy Kipfer, Hans Kienholz, Simone PerretAbstract:Activities in Risk Management systems are often visualized by means of a two-dimensional Risk Management cycle. In this concept, the ideal procedure starts with a comprehensive Risk assessment, including Risk analysis and Risk valuation. Based on this assessment, preventive and mitigative measures can be prepared or realized. The emergence of a dangerous process then leads to the stage of event Management and finally, the cycle is completed with the regeneration stage. However, activities — or non-activities — in the field of Risk Management can also lead to an improvement or worsening of the level of Risk prevention at a certain point in time. This process can be considered by the further development of the Risk Management cycle to a three-dimensional Risk Management cone (RMC). This allows on the one hand the visualization of changes in the level of protection over time. On the other hand, the residual Risk can also be illustrated with the RMC. In this study the concept of the RMC will be presented and the implementation in practice will be exemplified by means of three case studies of flood events performed in Switzerland for the villages of Ermatingen and Schwarzenburg and the city of Thun.
-
Risk Management Cone (RMC) — A Three Dimensional Risk Management Concept
2006Co-Authors: Andy Kipfer, Hans Kienholz, Simone PerretAbstract:Activities in Risk Management systems are often visualized by means of a two-dimensional Risk Management cycle. In this concept, the ideal procedure starts with a comprehensive Risk assessment, including Risk analysis and Risk valuation. Based on this assessment, preventive and mitigative measures can be prepared or realized. The emergence of a dangerous process then leads to the stage of event Management and finally, the cycle is completed with the regeneration stage. However, activities — or non-activities — in the field of Risk Management can also lead to an improvement or worsening of the level of Risk prevention at a certain point in time. This process can be considered by the further development of the Risk Management cycle to a three-dimensional Risk Management cone (RMC). This allows on the one hand the visualization of changes in the level of protection over time. On the other hand, the residual Risk can also be illustrated with the RMC. In this study the concept of the RMC will be presented and the implementation in practice will be exemplified by means of three case studies of flood events performed in Switzerland for the villages of Ermatingen and Schwarzenburg and the city of Thun.
