The Experts below are selected from a list of 4167 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Sergio Sousa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A collaborative Risk management framework for enterprise architecture
2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2014Co-Authors: Diana Marosin, Dirk Van Der Linden, Sergio SousaAbstract:The occurrence of Risks in an enterprise can result in differences between business goals and their realization. Risk management is a central activity in the design of an enterprise: Risk assessments supports the identifications of problems that expose the enterprise to Risk, while Risk Treatment plans are drivers for enterprise engineering. Risk Treatment plans are typically created in isolation, and often informal. We deal with this problem by developing a collaborative Risk management framework, that involves all levels of an organization in conducting Risk assessments and formalizing the Treatment plans. We propose procedures to perform an integrated Risk analysis, as well as metrics to deal with the collaborative aspect of Risk management.
-
RCIS - A collaborative Risk management framework for enterprise architecture
2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2014Co-Authors: Diana Marosin, Dirk Van Der Linden, Sergio SousaAbstract:The occurrence of Risks in an enterprise can result in differences between business goals and their realization. Risk management is a central activity in the design of an enterprise: Risk assessments supports the identifications of problems that expose the enterprise to Risk, while Risk Treatment plans are drivers for enterprise engineering. Risk Treatment plans are typically created in isolation, and often informal. We deal with this problem by developing a collaborative Risk management framework, that involves all levels of an organization in conducting Risk assessments and formalizing the Treatment plans. We propose procedures to perform an integrated Risk analysis, as well as metrics to deal with the collaborative aspect of Risk management.
Diana Marosin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A collaborative Risk management framework for enterprise architecture
2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2014Co-Authors: Diana Marosin, Dirk Van Der Linden, Sergio SousaAbstract:The occurrence of Risks in an enterprise can result in differences between business goals and their realization. Risk management is a central activity in the design of an enterprise: Risk assessments supports the identifications of problems that expose the enterprise to Risk, while Risk Treatment plans are drivers for enterprise engineering. Risk Treatment plans are typically created in isolation, and often informal. We deal with this problem by developing a collaborative Risk management framework, that involves all levels of an organization in conducting Risk assessments and formalizing the Treatment plans. We propose procedures to perform an integrated Risk analysis, as well as metrics to deal with the collaborative aspect of Risk management.
-
RCIS - A collaborative Risk management framework for enterprise architecture
2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2014Co-Authors: Diana Marosin, Dirk Van Der Linden, Sergio SousaAbstract:The occurrence of Risks in an enterprise can result in differences between business goals and their realization. Risk management is a central activity in the design of an enterprise: Risk assessments supports the identifications of problems that expose the enterprise to Risk, while Risk Treatment plans are drivers for enterprise engineering. Risk Treatment plans are typically created in isolation, and often informal. We deal with this problem by developing a collaborative Risk management framework, that involves all levels of an organization in conducting Risk assessments and formalizing the Treatment plans. We propose procedures to perform an integrated Risk analysis, as well as metrics to deal with the collaborative aspect of Risk management.
Andreas Oberweis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
EUROMICRO-SEAA - Risk Management in Global Software Development Process Planning
2011 37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 2011Co-Authors: Stefanie Betz, Susan Hickl, Andreas OberweisAbstract:We present a methodology for effective Risk management in global software development process planning. The proposed methodology starts with a detailed process model which is used for identifying Risks based on a Risk factor list. By linking the relevant Risk factors to the process we seek to ease and improve the planning of the global software development process. Additionally, we built sub-processes for Risk Treatment. These Risk Treatments can be used to evaluate process improvements by simulation. Our tool-based methodology includes the following four steps: initial modeling of the original process, discovering the process Risks by applying selected Risk identification techniques, simulation and evaluation of process improvements, systematic selection and transformation of the original process model into an improved process model.
-
Risk Management in Global Software Development Process Planning
2011 37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 2011Co-Authors: Stefanie Betz, Susan Hickl, Andreas OberweisAbstract:We present a methodology for effective Risk management in global software development process planning. The proposed methodology starts with a detailed process model which is used for identifying Risks based on a Risk factor list. By linking the relevant Risk factors to the process we seek to ease and improve the planning of the global software development process. Additionally, we built sub-processes for Risk Treatment. These Risk Treatments can be used to evaluate process improvements by simulation. Our tool-based methodology includes the following four steps: initial modeling of the original process, discovering the process Risks by applying selected Risk identification techniques, simulation and evaluation of process improvements, systematic selection and transformation of the original process model into an improved process model.
Janine L. Spears - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
HICSS - The Effects of Notice versus Awareness: An Empirical Examination of an Online Consumer's Privacy Risk Treatment
2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2013Co-Authors: Janine L. SpearsAbstract:Notice of an entity's personal information collection and usage practices is considered to be a prerequisite to an online user being able to make informed decisions on personal information disclosure. Notice is typically provided in privacy policies that are often characterized as vague, lengthy, and misleading. As such, notice typically does not equate to awareness of privacy threats. This study evaluates the effects of notice and threat awareness on an online user's decision to treat Risk through mitigation, avoidance, or acceptance. Study findings indicate opposite effects of notice versus threat awareness on Risk Treatment. Whereas notice had a positive effect on acceptance, threat awareness had a negative effect on acceptance and a positive effect on avoidance. Thus, notice appears to invoke a false sense of assurance that encourages online users to adopt acceptance as a Risk Treatment, while awareness of privacy threats discourages online users from passive acceptance.
-
The Effects of Notice versus Awareness: An Empirical Examination of an Online Consumer's Privacy Risk Treatment
2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2013Co-Authors: Janine L. SpearsAbstract:Notice of an entity's personal information collection and usage practices is considered to be a prerequisite to an online user being able to make informed decisions on personal information disclosure. Notice is typically provided in privacy policies that are often characterized as vague, lengthy, and misleading. As such, notice typically does not equate to awareness of privacy threats. This study evaluates the effects of notice and threat awareness on an online user's decision to treat Risk through mitigation, avoidance, or acceptance. Study findings indicate opposite effects of notice versus threat awareness on Risk Treatment. Whereas notice had a positive effect on acceptance, threat awareness had a negative effect on acceptance and a positive effect on avoidance. Thus, notice appears to invoke a false sense of assurance that encourages online users to adopt acceptance as a Risk Treatment, while awareness of privacy threats discourages online users from passive acceptance.
Martin Pexa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Reliability and Risk Treatment centered maintenance
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2014Co-Authors: Martin Pexa, Tomáš Hladík, Zdeněk Aleš, Václav Legát, Vít Havlů, Miroslav Müller, Petr ValášekAbstract:We propose a new methodology for application of well-known tools — RCM, RBI and SIFpro — with the aim to treat Risks by means of suitable maintenance. The basis of the new methodology is the complex application of all three methods at the same time and not separately as is typical today. The proposed methodology suggests having just one managing team for reliability and Risk Treatment centred maintenance (RRTCM), employing existing RCM, RBI, and SIFpro tools concurrently. This approach allows for significant reduction of engineering activities’ duration. In the proposed methodology these activities are staged into five phases and structured to eliminate all duplication resulting from separate application of the three tools. The newly proposed methodology saves 45% to 50% of the engineering workload and adequate significant financial savings.
-
Notice of Retraction: Reliability and Risk Treatment centred maintenance
2013 International Conference on Quality Reliability Risk Maintenance and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE), 2013Co-Authors: Martin Pexa, Tomáš Hladík, Zdeněk Aleš, Václav Legát, Miroslav Müller, Petr Valášek, Vít HavlůAbstract:This article has been retracted by the publisher.
-
Notice of Retraction Reliability and Risk Treatment centred maintenance
2013 International Conference on Quality Reliability Risk Maintenance and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE), 2013Co-Authors: Martin Pexa, Tomáš Hladík, Zdeněk Aleš, Václav Legát, Miroslav Müller, Petr Valášek, Vit HavluAbstract:The paper brings a proposal of new methodology for application of well-known tools - RCM, RBI and SIFpro - with the aim to treat Risks by means of suitable maintenance. The basis of the new methodology is the proposal of complex application of all three methods at the same time and not separately as typical today. The proposed methodology suggests having just one managing team for Reliability and Risk Treatment Centred Maintenance (RRTCM) employing existing RCM, RBI, and SIFpro tools concurrently. This approach allows for significant reduction of engineering activities' duration. In the proposed methodology these activities are staged into 5 phases and structured in order to eliminate all duplicities resulting from separate application of the three tools. The newly proposed methodology saves 45% to 50% of the engineering workload and adequate significant financial savings.
