The Experts below are selected from a list of 133872 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
M Antonelli - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
nasal high flow versus venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation effects on oxygenation comfort and clinical outcome
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Luca Montini, Federica Antonicelli, A Cataldo, Rossano Festa, Francesco Idone, Rosanna Vaschetto, Andrea De Gaetano, Paolo Navalesi, M AntonelliAbstract:Rationale Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce. Objectives To compare the effects of the Venturi mask and the nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy on PaO2/FiO2SET ratio after extubation. Secondary endpoints were to assess effects on patient discomfort, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. Methods Randomized, controlled, open-label trial on 105 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 300 immediately before extubation. The Venturi mask (n = 52) or NHF (n = 53) were applied for 48 hours postextubation. Measurements and main results PaO2/FiO2SET, patient discomfort caused by the Interface and by symptoms of airways dryness (on a 10-point numerical rating Scale), Interface displacements, oxygen desaturations, need for ventilator support, and reintubation were assessed up to 48 hours after extubation. From the 24th hour, PaO2/FiO2SET was higher with the NHF (287 ± 74 vs. 247 ± 81 at 24 h; P = 0.03). Discomfort related both to the Interface and to airways dryness was better with NHF (respectively, 2.6 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 at 24 h, P = 0.006; 2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.4 at 24 h, P = 0.002). Fewer patients had Interface displacements (32% vs. 56%; P = 0.01), oxygen desaturations (40% vs. 75%; P Conclusions Compared with the Venturi mask, NHF results in better oxygenation for the same set FiO2 after extubation. Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and Interface displacements, and a lower reintubation rate. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01575353).
-
nasal high flow versus venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation effects on oxygenation comfort and clinical outcome
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Luca Montini, Federica Antonicelli, A Cataldo, Rossano Festa, Francesco Idone, Rosanna Vaschetto, Andrea De Gaetano, Paolo Navalesi, M AntonelliAbstract:RATIONALE: Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of the Venturi mask and the nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy on PaO2/FiO2SET ratio after extubation. Secondary endpoints were to assess effects on patient discomfort, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Randomized, controlled, open-label trial on 105 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 300 immediately before extubation. The Venturi mask (n = 52) or NHF (n = 53) were applied for 48 hours postextubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PaO2/FiO2SET, patient discomfort caused by the Interface and by symptoms of airways dryness (on a 10-point numerical rating Scale), Interface displacements, oxygen desaturations, need for ventilator support, and reintubation were assessed up to 48 hours after extubation. From the 24th hour, PaO2/FiO2SET was higher with the NHF (287 ± 74 vs. 247 ± 81 at 24 h; P = 0.03). Discomfort related both to the Interface and to airways dryness was better with NHF (respectively, 2.6 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 at 24 h, P = 0.006; 2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.4 at 24 h, P = 0.002). Fewer patients had Interface displacements (32% vs. 56%; P = 0.01), oxygen desaturations (40% vs. 75%; P < 0.001), required reintubation (4% vs. 21%; P = 0.01), or any form of ventilator support (7% vs. 35%; P < 0.001) in the NHF group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Venturi mask, NHF results in better oxygenation for the same set FiO2 after extubation. Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and Interface displacements, and a lower reintubation rate. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01575353).
Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
nasal high flow versus venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation effects on oxygenation comfort and clinical outcome
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Luca Montini, Federica Antonicelli, A Cataldo, Rossano Festa, Francesco Idone, Rosanna Vaschetto, Andrea De Gaetano, Paolo Navalesi, M AntonelliAbstract:Rationale Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce. Objectives To compare the effects of the Venturi mask and the nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy on PaO2/FiO2SET ratio after extubation. Secondary endpoints were to assess effects on patient discomfort, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. Methods Randomized, controlled, open-label trial on 105 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 300 immediately before extubation. The Venturi mask (n = 52) or NHF (n = 53) were applied for 48 hours postextubation. Measurements and main results PaO2/FiO2SET, patient discomfort caused by the Interface and by symptoms of airways dryness (on a 10-point numerical rating Scale), Interface displacements, oxygen desaturations, need for ventilator support, and reintubation were assessed up to 48 hours after extubation. From the 24th hour, PaO2/FiO2SET was higher with the NHF (287 ± 74 vs. 247 ± 81 at 24 h; P = 0.03). Discomfort related both to the Interface and to airways dryness was better with NHF (respectively, 2.6 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 at 24 h, P = 0.006; 2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.4 at 24 h, P = 0.002). Fewer patients had Interface displacements (32% vs. 56%; P = 0.01), oxygen desaturations (40% vs. 75%; P Conclusions Compared with the Venturi mask, NHF results in better oxygenation for the same set FiO2 after extubation. Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and Interface displacements, and a lower reintubation rate. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01575353).
-
nasal high flow versus venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation effects on oxygenation comfort and clinical outcome
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Luca Montini, Federica Antonicelli, A Cataldo, Rossano Festa, Francesco Idone, Rosanna Vaschetto, Andrea De Gaetano, Paolo Navalesi, M AntonelliAbstract:RATIONALE: Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of the Venturi mask and the nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy on PaO2/FiO2SET ratio after extubation. Secondary endpoints were to assess effects on patient discomfort, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Randomized, controlled, open-label trial on 105 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 300 immediately before extubation. The Venturi mask (n = 52) or NHF (n = 53) were applied for 48 hours postextubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PaO2/FiO2SET, patient discomfort caused by the Interface and by symptoms of airways dryness (on a 10-point numerical rating Scale), Interface displacements, oxygen desaturations, need for ventilator support, and reintubation were assessed up to 48 hours after extubation. From the 24th hour, PaO2/FiO2SET was higher with the NHF (287 ± 74 vs. 247 ± 81 at 24 h; P = 0.03). Discomfort related both to the Interface and to airways dryness was better with NHF (respectively, 2.6 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 at 24 h, P = 0.006; 2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.4 at 24 h, P = 0.002). Fewer patients had Interface displacements (32% vs. 56%; P = 0.01), oxygen desaturations (40% vs. 75%; P < 0.001), required reintubation (4% vs. 21%; P = 0.01), or any form of ventilator support (7% vs. 35%; P < 0.001) in the NHF group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Venturi mask, NHF results in better oxygenation for the same set FiO2 after extubation. Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and Interface displacements, and a lower reintubation rate. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01575353).
Federica Antonicelli - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
nasal high flow versus venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation effects on oxygenation comfort and clinical outcome
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Luca Montini, Federica Antonicelli, A Cataldo, Rossano Festa, Francesco Idone, Rosanna Vaschetto, Andrea De Gaetano, Paolo Navalesi, M AntonelliAbstract:Rationale Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce. Objectives To compare the effects of the Venturi mask and the nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy on PaO2/FiO2SET ratio after extubation. Secondary endpoints were to assess effects on patient discomfort, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. Methods Randomized, controlled, open-label trial on 105 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 300 immediately before extubation. The Venturi mask (n = 52) or NHF (n = 53) were applied for 48 hours postextubation. Measurements and main results PaO2/FiO2SET, patient discomfort caused by the Interface and by symptoms of airways dryness (on a 10-point numerical rating Scale), Interface displacements, oxygen desaturations, need for ventilator support, and reintubation were assessed up to 48 hours after extubation. From the 24th hour, PaO2/FiO2SET was higher with the NHF (287 ± 74 vs. 247 ± 81 at 24 h; P = 0.03). Discomfort related both to the Interface and to airways dryness was better with NHF (respectively, 2.6 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 at 24 h, P = 0.006; 2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.4 at 24 h, P = 0.002). Fewer patients had Interface displacements (32% vs. 56%; P = 0.01), oxygen desaturations (40% vs. 75%; P Conclusions Compared with the Venturi mask, NHF results in better oxygenation for the same set FiO2 after extubation. Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and Interface displacements, and a lower reintubation rate. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01575353).
-
nasal high flow versus venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation effects on oxygenation comfort and clinical outcome
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Luca Montini, Federica Antonicelli, A Cataldo, Rossano Festa, Francesco Idone, Rosanna Vaschetto, Andrea De Gaetano, Paolo Navalesi, M AntonelliAbstract:RATIONALE: Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of the Venturi mask and the nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy on PaO2/FiO2SET ratio after extubation. Secondary endpoints were to assess effects on patient discomfort, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Randomized, controlled, open-label trial on 105 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 300 immediately before extubation. The Venturi mask (n = 52) or NHF (n = 53) were applied for 48 hours postextubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PaO2/FiO2SET, patient discomfort caused by the Interface and by symptoms of airways dryness (on a 10-point numerical rating Scale), Interface displacements, oxygen desaturations, need for ventilator support, and reintubation were assessed up to 48 hours after extubation. From the 24th hour, PaO2/FiO2SET was higher with the NHF (287 ± 74 vs. 247 ± 81 at 24 h; P = 0.03). Discomfort related both to the Interface and to airways dryness was better with NHF (respectively, 2.6 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 at 24 h, P = 0.006; 2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.4 at 24 h, P = 0.002). Fewer patients had Interface displacements (32% vs. 56%; P = 0.01), oxygen desaturations (40% vs. 75%; P < 0.001), required reintubation (4% vs. 21%; P = 0.01), or any form of ventilator support (7% vs. 35%; P < 0.001) in the NHF group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Venturi mask, NHF results in better oxygenation for the same set FiO2 after extubation. Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and Interface displacements, and a lower reintubation rate. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01575353).
Luca Montini - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
nasal high flow versus venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation effects on oxygenation comfort and clinical outcome
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Luca Montini, Federica Antonicelli, A Cataldo, Rossano Festa, Francesco Idone, Rosanna Vaschetto, Andrea De Gaetano, Paolo Navalesi, M AntonelliAbstract:Rationale Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce. Objectives To compare the effects of the Venturi mask and the nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy on PaO2/FiO2SET ratio after extubation. Secondary endpoints were to assess effects on patient discomfort, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. Methods Randomized, controlled, open-label trial on 105 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 300 immediately before extubation. The Venturi mask (n = 52) or NHF (n = 53) were applied for 48 hours postextubation. Measurements and main results PaO2/FiO2SET, patient discomfort caused by the Interface and by symptoms of airways dryness (on a 10-point numerical rating Scale), Interface displacements, oxygen desaturations, need for ventilator support, and reintubation were assessed up to 48 hours after extubation. From the 24th hour, PaO2/FiO2SET was higher with the NHF (287 ± 74 vs. 247 ± 81 at 24 h; P = 0.03). Discomfort related both to the Interface and to airways dryness was better with NHF (respectively, 2.6 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 at 24 h, P = 0.006; 2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.4 at 24 h, P = 0.002). Fewer patients had Interface displacements (32% vs. 56%; P = 0.01), oxygen desaturations (40% vs. 75%; P Conclusions Compared with the Venturi mask, NHF results in better oxygenation for the same set FiO2 after extubation. Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and Interface displacements, and a lower reintubation rate. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01575353).
-
nasal high flow versus venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation effects on oxygenation comfort and clinical outcome
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Luca Montini, Federica Antonicelli, A Cataldo, Rossano Festa, Francesco Idone, Rosanna Vaschetto, Andrea De Gaetano, Paolo Navalesi, M AntonelliAbstract:RATIONALE: Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of the Venturi mask and the nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy on PaO2/FiO2SET ratio after extubation. Secondary endpoints were to assess effects on patient discomfort, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Randomized, controlled, open-label trial on 105 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 300 immediately before extubation. The Venturi mask (n = 52) or NHF (n = 53) were applied for 48 hours postextubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PaO2/FiO2SET, patient discomfort caused by the Interface and by symptoms of airways dryness (on a 10-point numerical rating Scale), Interface displacements, oxygen desaturations, need for ventilator support, and reintubation were assessed up to 48 hours after extubation. From the 24th hour, PaO2/FiO2SET was higher with the NHF (287 ± 74 vs. 247 ± 81 at 24 h; P = 0.03). Discomfort related both to the Interface and to airways dryness was better with NHF (respectively, 2.6 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 at 24 h, P = 0.006; 2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.4 at 24 h, P = 0.002). Fewer patients had Interface displacements (32% vs. 56%; P = 0.01), oxygen desaturations (40% vs. 75%; P < 0.001), required reintubation (4% vs. 21%; P = 0.01), or any form of ventilator support (7% vs. 35%; P < 0.001) in the NHF group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Venturi mask, NHF results in better oxygenation for the same set FiO2 after extubation. Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and Interface displacements, and a lower reintubation rate. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01575353).
Paolo Navalesi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
nasal high flow versus venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation effects on oxygenation comfort and clinical outcome
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Luca Montini, Federica Antonicelli, A Cataldo, Rossano Festa, Francesco Idone, Rosanna Vaschetto, Andrea De Gaetano, Paolo Navalesi, M AntonelliAbstract:Rationale Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce. Objectives To compare the effects of the Venturi mask and the nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy on PaO2/FiO2SET ratio after extubation. Secondary endpoints were to assess effects on patient discomfort, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. Methods Randomized, controlled, open-label trial on 105 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 300 immediately before extubation. The Venturi mask (n = 52) or NHF (n = 53) were applied for 48 hours postextubation. Measurements and main results PaO2/FiO2SET, patient discomfort caused by the Interface and by symptoms of airways dryness (on a 10-point numerical rating Scale), Interface displacements, oxygen desaturations, need for ventilator support, and reintubation were assessed up to 48 hours after extubation. From the 24th hour, PaO2/FiO2SET was higher with the NHF (287 ± 74 vs. 247 ± 81 at 24 h; P = 0.03). Discomfort related both to the Interface and to airways dryness was better with NHF (respectively, 2.6 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 at 24 h, P = 0.006; 2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.4 at 24 h, P = 0.002). Fewer patients had Interface displacements (32% vs. 56%; P = 0.01), oxygen desaturations (40% vs. 75%; P Conclusions Compared with the Venturi mask, NHF results in better oxygenation for the same set FiO2 after extubation. Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and Interface displacements, and a lower reintubation rate. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01575353).
-
nasal high flow versus venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation effects on oxygenation comfort and clinical outcome
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Luca Montini, Federica Antonicelli, A Cataldo, Rossano Festa, Francesco Idone, Rosanna Vaschetto, Andrea De Gaetano, Paolo Navalesi, M AntonelliAbstract:RATIONALE: Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of the Venturi mask and the nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy on PaO2/FiO2SET ratio after extubation. Secondary endpoints were to assess effects on patient discomfort, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Randomized, controlled, open-label trial on 105 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 300 immediately before extubation. The Venturi mask (n = 52) or NHF (n = 53) were applied for 48 hours postextubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PaO2/FiO2SET, patient discomfort caused by the Interface and by symptoms of airways dryness (on a 10-point numerical rating Scale), Interface displacements, oxygen desaturations, need for ventilator support, and reintubation were assessed up to 48 hours after extubation. From the 24th hour, PaO2/FiO2SET was higher with the NHF (287 ± 74 vs. 247 ± 81 at 24 h; P = 0.03). Discomfort related both to the Interface and to airways dryness was better with NHF (respectively, 2.6 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 at 24 h, P = 0.006; 2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.4 at 24 h, P = 0.002). Fewer patients had Interface displacements (32% vs. 56%; P = 0.01), oxygen desaturations (40% vs. 75%; P < 0.001), required reintubation (4% vs. 21%; P = 0.01), or any form of ventilator support (7% vs. 35%; P < 0.001) in the NHF group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Venturi mask, NHF results in better oxygenation for the same set FiO2 after extubation. Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and Interface displacements, and a lower reintubation rate. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01575353).
