The Experts below are selected from a list of 4536546 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Michal Kokowski - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the working session polish scientific journals from the disciplines history and philosophy of Science and Science of Science current challenges krakow 25 june 2019
Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 2019Co-Authors: Michal KokowskiAbstract:The article describes the course of the Working Session „Polish scientific journals from the disciplines: «history and philosophy of Science» and «Science of Science» – current challenges” (Krakow, 25 June 2019), organized by the Commission of the History of Science of the Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences.
-
an introduction to the topic of the working session polish scientific journals from disciplines history and philosophy of Science and Science of Science current challenges krakow 25 june 2019 and specific proposals for organizational
Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 2019Co-Authors: Michal KokowskiAbstract:The article presents an introduction to the topic of the Working Session “Polish scientific journals from disciplines: «history and philosophy of Science» and «Science of Science» – current challenges” organized by the PAU Commission on the History of Science in Krakow on 25 June 25 2019, along with specific proposals of organizational and editorial solutions for journals and publishing houses, as well as of legislative solutions regarding the principles of journal evaluation.
-
lists of journals of the ministry of Science and higher education in poland 2017 2019 ici journal master list 2014 2017 and the polish journals on the history of Science history philosophy of Science and Science of Science
Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 2019Co-Authors: Michal KokowskiAbstract:The article presents the results of the evaluation of the Polish journals from the history of Science, history, philosophy of Science, and Science of Science, based on the “List of journals of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland 2017 & 2019” and “ICI Journal Master List 2014–2017”. A comment has also been added to these results. The following facts were noted: a) the fact that there is a negative correlation between the journal’s rating in the “List of journals MNiSW 2019” and the journal’s ratings in the “ICI Journal Master List 2014–2017” for journals from the history and history of Science; b) the fact that the presence of the journal in the DOAJ does not raise the ministerial rating of the journal; c) the fact that the evaluation of the journal in the Scopus database has not significantly affected the increase in the ministerial rating: the rating depends on the discipline and sub-discipline; d) the fact that journals from the ministerial program “Support for scientific journals 2019–2020” (WCN 2019–2020) and ERIH+ received 20 to 70 points; their ministerial ratings depend on discipline and sub-discipline. In addition, it was hoped that for the good of Polish Science, some errors of the “List of journals of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Polish Republic 2019” would be removed in a short time, as some magazines received too low marks (this statement results from a comparison of journals’ achievements, including bibliometric indicators).
Declan Kirrane - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
eu u s roadmap to measuring the results of investments in Science the bellagio statement a report following the eu us Science of Science policy rockefeller foundation bellagio center workshop 27 june 30 june 2011
2011Co-Authors: Stefano Bertuzzi, Thomas Brandtner, Lisa Cook, Patrick Cunningham, Ian Foster, Richard Freeman, Cristina Gutierrezcortines, Michael Holland, Cynthia Hope, Declan KirraneAbstract:Public and private investments in Science and technology (ST providing better access to food, water, and shelter; improving health care; combating environmental degradation and climate change; and helping to inform policies to promote social and economic security. It is essential that these investments continue to create value for the public. Indeed, national governments are increasingly asking complex and probing questions regarding the effects of their investments; they want transparency and accountability for the spending of taxpayers’ money; and they want their decisions regarding investments in Science to be informed by data-driven analyses. Now more than ever before, the Science community must explain and justify the spending on publicly-funded research. While it is clear that research pays off in general, there is great skepticism about both the marginal value of spending, and the chosen investment targets. There is a clear requirement to ensure greater effectiveness and efficiency in the use of public research funding; reduce the reporting burden on scientists; and to exploit the enormous analytical power generated by advances in information technology. Experts from the European Union and the United States met at the Rockefeller Foundation in Bellagio, Italy, to examine these issues. The task at hand should not be underestimated. Although the potential return from this work is enormous, the scale of the challenge of developing these new ideas into workable solutions for policy makers is also very significant. Despite the major strides already made in the U.S. through the National Science Foundation’s Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program and the interagency STAR METRICS program, a shared approach with other nations would certainly both accelerate progress and implementation. The purpose of the Bellagio conference was to explore the formation of a mutually beneficial multi-national collaboration in documenting the results of investments in Science. The group believes Science today is a global activity. Scientists and engineers collaborate across borders, move across borders and the benefits of their research know no borders. Expansion beyond current measurement systems could both broaden and deepen participation in Science.
-
eu u s roadmap to measuring the results of investments in Science the bellagio statement a report following the eu us Science of Science policy rockefeller foundation bellagio center workshop 27 june 30 june 2011
2011Co-Authors: Stefano Bertuzzi, Thomas Brandtner, Lisa Cook, Patrick Cunningham, Ian Foster, Richard Freeman, Cristina Gutierrezcortines, Michael Holland, Cynthia Hope, Declan KirraneAbstract:Public and private investments in Science and technology (ST providing better access to food, water, and shelter; improving health care; combating environmental degradation and climate change; and helping to inform policies to promote social and economic security. It is essential that these investments continue to create value for the public. Indeed, national governments are increasingly asking complex and probing questions regarding the effects of their investments; they want transparency and accountability for the spending of taxpayers’ money; and they want their decisions regarding investments in Science to be informed by data-driven analyses. Now more than ever before, the Science community must explain and justify the spending on publicly-funded research. While it is clear that research pays off in general, there is great skepticism about both the marginal value of spending, and the chosen investment targets. There is a clear requirement to ensure greater effectiveness and efficiency in the use of public research funding; reduce the reporting burden on scientists; and to exploit the enormous analytical power generated by advances in information technology. Experts from the European Union and the United States met at the Rockefeller Foundation in Bellagio, Italy, to examine these issues. The task at hand should not be underestimated. Although the potential return from this work is enormous, the scale of the challenge of developing these new ideas into workable solutions for policy makers is also very significant. Despite the major strides already made in the U.S. through the National Science Foundation’s Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program and the interagency STAR METRICS program, a shared approach with other nations would certainly both accelerate progress and implementation. The purpose of the Bellagio conference was to explore the formation of a mutually beneficial multi-national collaboration in documenting the results of investments in Science. The group believes Science today is a global activity. Scientists and engineers collaborate across borders, move across borders and the benefits of their research know no borders. Expansion beyond current measurement systems could both broaden and deepen participation in Science.
Stefano Bertuzzi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
eu u s roadmap to measuring the results of investments in Science the bellagio statement a report following the eu us Science of Science policy rockefeller foundation bellagio center workshop 27 june 30 june 2011
2011Co-Authors: Stefano Bertuzzi, Thomas Brandtner, Lisa Cook, Patrick Cunningham, Ian Foster, Richard Freeman, Cristina Gutierrezcortines, Michael Holland, Cynthia Hope, Declan KirraneAbstract:Public and private investments in Science and technology (ST providing better access to food, water, and shelter; improving health care; combating environmental degradation and climate change; and helping to inform policies to promote social and economic security. It is essential that these investments continue to create value for the public. Indeed, national governments are increasingly asking complex and probing questions regarding the effects of their investments; they want transparency and accountability for the spending of taxpayers’ money; and they want their decisions regarding investments in Science to be informed by data-driven analyses. Now more than ever before, the Science community must explain and justify the spending on publicly-funded research. While it is clear that research pays off in general, there is great skepticism about both the marginal value of spending, and the chosen investment targets. There is a clear requirement to ensure greater effectiveness and efficiency in the use of public research funding; reduce the reporting burden on scientists; and to exploit the enormous analytical power generated by advances in information technology. Experts from the European Union and the United States met at the Rockefeller Foundation in Bellagio, Italy, to examine these issues. The task at hand should not be underestimated. Although the potential return from this work is enormous, the scale of the challenge of developing these new ideas into workable solutions for policy makers is also very significant. Despite the major strides already made in the U.S. through the National Science Foundation’s Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program and the interagency STAR METRICS program, a shared approach with other nations would certainly both accelerate progress and implementation. The purpose of the Bellagio conference was to explore the formation of a mutually beneficial multi-national collaboration in documenting the results of investments in Science. The group believes Science today is a global activity. Scientists and engineers collaborate across borders, move across borders and the benefits of their research know no borders. Expansion beyond current measurement systems could both broaden and deepen participation in Science.
-
eu u s roadmap to measuring the results of investments in Science the bellagio statement a report following the eu us Science of Science policy rockefeller foundation bellagio center workshop 27 june 30 june 2011
2011Co-Authors: Stefano Bertuzzi, Thomas Brandtner, Lisa Cook, Patrick Cunningham, Ian Foster, Richard Freeman, Cristina Gutierrezcortines, Michael Holland, Cynthia Hope, Declan KirraneAbstract:Public and private investments in Science and technology (ST providing better access to food, water, and shelter; improving health care; combating environmental degradation and climate change; and helping to inform policies to promote social and economic security. It is essential that these investments continue to create value for the public. Indeed, national governments are increasingly asking complex and probing questions regarding the effects of their investments; they want transparency and accountability for the spending of taxpayers’ money; and they want their decisions regarding investments in Science to be informed by data-driven analyses. Now more than ever before, the Science community must explain and justify the spending on publicly-funded research. While it is clear that research pays off in general, there is great skepticism about both the marginal value of spending, and the chosen investment targets. There is a clear requirement to ensure greater effectiveness and efficiency in the use of public research funding; reduce the reporting burden on scientists; and to exploit the enormous analytical power generated by advances in information technology. Experts from the European Union and the United States met at the Rockefeller Foundation in Bellagio, Italy, to examine these issues. The task at hand should not be underestimated. Although the potential return from this work is enormous, the scale of the challenge of developing these new ideas into workable solutions for policy makers is also very significant. Despite the major strides already made in the U.S. through the National Science Foundation’s Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program and the interagency STAR METRICS program, a shared approach with other nations would certainly both accelerate progress and implementation. The purpose of the Bellagio conference was to explore the formation of a mutually beneficial multi-national collaboration in documenting the results of investments in Science. The group believes Science today is a global activity. Scientists and engineers collaborate across borders, move across borders and the benefits of their research know no borders. Expansion beyond current measurement systems could both broaden and deepen participation in Science.
Richard Freeman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
eu u s roadmap to measuring the results of investments in Science the bellagio statement a report following the eu us Science of Science policy rockefeller foundation bellagio center workshop 27 june 30 june 2011
2011Co-Authors: Stefano Bertuzzi, Thomas Brandtner, Lisa Cook, Patrick Cunningham, Ian Foster, Richard Freeman, Cristina Gutierrezcortines, Michael Holland, Cynthia Hope, Declan KirraneAbstract:Public and private investments in Science and technology (ST providing better access to food, water, and shelter; improving health care; combating environmental degradation and climate change; and helping to inform policies to promote social and economic security. It is essential that these investments continue to create value for the public. Indeed, national governments are increasingly asking complex and probing questions regarding the effects of their investments; they want transparency and accountability for the spending of taxpayers’ money; and they want their decisions regarding investments in Science to be informed by data-driven analyses. Now more than ever before, the Science community must explain and justify the spending on publicly-funded research. While it is clear that research pays off in general, there is great skepticism about both the marginal value of spending, and the chosen investment targets. There is a clear requirement to ensure greater effectiveness and efficiency in the use of public research funding; reduce the reporting burden on scientists; and to exploit the enormous analytical power generated by advances in information technology. Experts from the European Union and the United States met at the Rockefeller Foundation in Bellagio, Italy, to examine these issues. The task at hand should not be underestimated. Although the potential return from this work is enormous, the scale of the challenge of developing these new ideas into workable solutions for policy makers is also very significant. Despite the major strides already made in the U.S. through the National Science Foundation’s Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program and the interagency STAR METRICS program, a shared approach with other nations would certainly both accelerate progress and implementation. The purpose of the Bellagio conference was to explore the formation of a mutually beneficial multi-national collaboration in documenting the results of investments in Science. The group believes Science today is a global activity. Scientists and engineers collaborate across borders, move across borders and the benefits of their research know no borders. Expansion beyond current measurement systems could both broaden and deepen participation in Science.
-
eu u s roadmap to measuring the results of investments in Science the bellagio statement a report following the eu us Science of Science policy rockefeller foundation bellagio center workshop 27 june 30 june 2011
2011Co-Authors: Stefano Bertuzzi, Thomas Brandtner, Lisa Cook, Patrick Cunningham, Ian Foster, Richard Freeman, Cristina Gutierrezcortines, Michael Holland, Cynthia Hope, Declan KirraneAbstract:Public and private investments in Science and technology (ST providing better access to food, water, and shelter; improving health care; combating environmental degradation and climate change; and helping to inform policies to promote social and economic security. It is essential that these investments continue to create value for the public. Indeed, national governments are increasingly asking complex and probing questions regarding the effects of their investments; they want transparency and accountability for the spending of taxpayers’ money; and they want their decisions regarding investments in Science to be informed by data-driven analyses. Now more than ever before, the Science community must explain and justify the spending on publicly-funded research. While it is clear that research pays off in general, there is great skepticism about both the marginal value of spending, and the chosen investment targets. There is a clear requirement to ensure greater effectiveness and efficiency in the use of public research funding; reduce the reporting burden on scientists; and to exploit the enormous analytical power generated by advances in information technology. Experts from the European Union and the United States met at the Rockefeller Foundation in Bellagio, Italy, to examine these issues. The task at hand should not be underestimated. Although the potential return from this work is enormous, the scale of the challenge of developing these new ideas into workable solutions for policy makers is also very significant. Despite the major strides already made in the U.S. through the National Science Foundation’s Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program and the interagency STAR METRICS program, a shared approach with other nations would certainly both accelerate progress and implementation. The purpose of the Bellagio conference was to explore the formation of a mutually beneficial multi-national collaboration in documenting the results of investments in Science. The group believes Science today is a global activity. Scientists and engineers collaborate across borders, move across borders and the benefits of their research know no borders. Expansion beyond current measurement systems could both broaden and deepen participation in Science.
Thomas Brandtner - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
eu u s roadmap to measuring the results of investments in Science the bellagio statement a report following the eu us Science of Science policy rockefeller foundation bellagio center workshop 27 june 30 june 2011
2011Co-Authors: Stefano Bertuzzi, Thomas Brandtner, Lisa Cook, Patrick Cunningham, Ian Foster, Richard Freeman, Cristina Gutierrezcortines, Michael Holland, Cynthia Hope, Declan KirraneAbstract:Public and private investments in Science and technology (ST providing better access to food, water, and shelter; improving health care; combating environmental degradation and climate change; and helping to inform policies to promote social and economic security. It is essential that these investments continue to create value for the public. Indeed, national governments are increasingly asking complex and probing questions regarding the effects of their investments; they want transparency and accountability for the spending of taxpayers’ money; and they want their decisions regarding investments in Science to be informed by data-driven analyses. Now more than ever before, the Science community must explain and justify the spending on publicly-funded research. While it is clear that research pays off in general, there is great skepticism about both the marginal value of spending, and the chosen investment targets. There is a clear requirement to ensure greater effectiveness and efficiency in the use of public research funding; reduce the reporting burden on scientists; and to exploit the enormous analytical power generated by advances in information technology. Experts from the European Union and the United States met at the Rockefeller Foundation in Bellagio, Italy, to examine these issues. The task at hand should not be underestimated. Although the potential return from this work is enormous, the scale of the challenge of developing these new ideas into workable solutions for policy makers is also very significant. Despite the major strides already made in the U.S. through the National Science Foundation’s Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program and the interagency STAR METRICS program, a shared approach with other nations would certainly both accelerate progress and implementation. The purpose of the Bellagio conference was to explore the formation of a mutually beneficial multi-national collaboration in documenting the results of investments in Science. The group believes Science today is a global activity. Scientists and engineers collaborate across borders, move across borders and the benefits of their research know no borders. Expansion beyond current measurement systems could both broaden and deepen participation in Science.
-
eu u s roadmap to measuring the results of investments in Science the bellagio statement a report following the eu us Science of Science policy rockefeller foundation bellagio center workshop 27 june 30 june 2011
2011Co-Authors: Stefano Bertuzzi, Thomas Brandtner, Lisa Cook, Patrick Cunningham, Ian Foster, Richard Freeman, Cristina Gutierrezcortines, Michael Holland, Cynthia Hope, Declan KirraneAbstract:Public and private investments in Science and technology (ST providing better access to food, water, and shelter; improving health care; combating environmental degradation and climate change; and helping to inform policies to promote social and economic security. It is essential that these investments continue to create value for the public. Indeed, national governments are increasingly asking complex and probing questions regarding the effects of their investments; they want transparency and accountability for the spending of taxpayers’ money; and they want their decisions regarding investments in Science to be informed by data-driven analyses. Now more than ever before, the Science community must explain and justify the spending on publicly-funded research. While it is clear that research pays off in general, there is great skepticism about both the marginal value of spending, and the chosen investment targets. There is a clear requirement to ensure greater effectiveness and efficiency in the use of public research funding; reduce the reporting burden on scientists; and to exploit the enormous analytical power generated by advances in information technology. Experts from the European Union and the United States met at the Rockefeller Foundation in Bellagio, Italy, to examine these issues. The task at hand should not be underestimated. Although the potential return from this work is enormous, the scale of the challenge of developing these new ideas into workable solutions for policy makers is also very significant. Despite the major strides already made in the U.S. through the National Science Foundation’s Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program and the interagency STAR METRICS program, a shared approach with other nations would certainly both accelerate progress and implementation. The purpose of the Bellagio conference was to explore the formation of a mutually beneficial multi-national collaboration in documenting the results of investments in Science. The group believes Science today is a global activity. Scientists and engineers collaborate across borders, move across borders and the benefits of their research know no borders. Expansion beyond current measurement systems could both broaden and deepen participation in Science.
