The Experts below are selected from a list of 67059 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Jürgen-friedrich Hake - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • integrated governance for the food energy water nexus the Scope of Action for institutional change
    Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018
    Co-Authors: Carolin Märker, Sandra Venghaus, Jürgen-friedrich Hake
    Abstract:

    Abstract Despite a major, policy-driven increase in research on the food–energy–water (FEW) nexus in recent years, research addressing the required changes in policy structures and processes for an effective, integrated governance of FEW nexus resources is still in its infancy. This paper adapts the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework to the requirements and challenges of FEW nexus governance and sets a special focus on Action situations, actors, and institutions. The analysis thus contributes to the debate about the practicality and benefits of a comprehensive FEW nexus policy approach. Two different conceptual FEW nexus frameworks are developed, which span the spectrum of possible integration options. The first one describes a holistic integration framework that defines the FEW nexus as a single, fully integrated system. The second one represents vertical policy integration and is largely based on existing structures and a reframing of the present institutional setting. After their theoretical derivation, the two hypothetical frameworks are analyzed with respect to their strengths and weaknesses in governing the FEW nexus using two sample cases of integrated FEW nexus governance in Germany. The results show that effective FEW nexus governance requires a combination of both integration options.

  • Integrated governance for the food–energy–water nexus – The Scope of Action for institutional change
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018
    Co-Authors: Carolin Märker, Sandra Venghaus, Jürgen-friedrich Hake
    Abstract:

    Abstract Despite a major, policy-driven increase in research on the food–energy–water (FEW) nexus in recent years, research addressing the required changes in policy structures and processes for an effective, integrated governance of FEW nexus resources is still in its infancy. This paper adapts the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework to the requirements and challenges of FEW nexus governance and sets a special focus on Action situations, actors, and institutions. The analysis thus contributes to the debate about the practicality and benefits of a comprehensive FEW nexus policy approach. Two different conceptual FEW nexus frameworks are developed, which span the spectrum of possible integration options. The first one describes a holistic integration framework that defines the FEW nexus as a single, fully integrated system. The second one represents vertical policy integration and is largely based on existing structures and a reframing of the present institutional setting. After their theoretical derivation, the two hypothetical frameworks are analyzed with respect to their strengths and weaknesses in governing the FEW nexus using two sample cases of integrated FEW nexus governance in Germany. The results show that effective FEW nexus governance requires a combination of both integration options.

Carolin Märker - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • integrated governance for the food energy water nexus the Scope of Action for institutional change
    Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018
    Co-Authors: Carolin Märker, Sandra Venghaus, Jürgen-friedrich Hake
    Abstract:

    Abstract Despite a major, policy-driven increase in research on the food–energy–water (FEW) nexus in recent years, research addressing the required changes in policy structures and processes for an effective, integrated governance of FEW nexus resources is still in its infancy. This paper adapts the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework to the requirements and challenges of FEW nexus governance and sets a special focus on Action situations, actors, and institutions. The analysis thus contributes to the debate about the practicality and benefits of a comprehensive FEW nexus policy approach. Two different conceptual FEW nexus frameworks are developed, which span the spectrum of possible integration options. The first one describes a holistic integration framework that defines the FEW nexus as a single, fully integrated system. The second one represents vertical policy integration and is largely based on existing structures and a reframing of the present institutional setting. After their theoretical derivation, the two hypothetical frameworks are analyzed with respect to their strengths and weaknesses in governing the FEW nexus using two sample cases of integrated FEW nexus governance in Germany. The results show that effective FEW nexus governance requires a combination of both integration options.

  • Integrated governance for the food–energy–water nexus – The Scope of Action for institutional change
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018
    Co-Authors: Carolin Märker, Sandra Venghaus, Jürgen-friedrich Hake
    Abstract:

    Abstract Despite a major, policy-driven increase in research on the food–energy–water (FEW) nexus in recent years, research addressing the required changes in policy structures and processes for an effective, integrated governance of FEW nexus resources is still in its infancy. This paper adapts the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework to the requirements and challenges of FEW nexus governance and sets a special focus on Action situations, actors, and institutions. The analysis thus contributes to the debate about the practicality and benefits of a comprehensive FEW nexus policy approach. Two different conceptual FEW nexus frameworks are developed, which span the spectrum of possible integration options. The first one describes a holistic integration framework that defines the FEW nexus as a single, fully integrated system. The second one represents vertical policy integration and is largely based on existing structures and a reframing of the present institutional setting. After their theoretical derivation, the two hypothetical frameworks are analyzed with respect to their strengths and weaknesses in governing the FEW nexus using two sample cases of integrated FEW nexus governance in Germany. The results show that effective FEW nexus governance requires a combination of both integration options.

G Fleckensteingrun - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • gallopamil cardiovascular Scope of Action of a highly specific calcium antagonist
    Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1992
    Co-Authors: G Fleckensteingrun
    Abstract:

    According to Fleckenstein's original classification, gallopamil represents a prototype of highly specific calcium antagonists of Group A. Its large Scope of cardiovascular effects is lastly based on one and the same mechanism of Action: inhibition of transmembrane calcium influx into myocardial, cardiac pacemaker, and vascular smooth muscle cells. Thereby, in experimental studies that use eletrophysiological, biochemical, isotopic, and histological techniques, gallopamil reduced calcium dependent myocardial contractility and oxygen consumption; dampened nomotopic and ectopic cardiac pacemaker activity; exerted pronounced vasodilator effects; and protected myocardial cells from calcium overload-induced necrotization

Gisa Fleckenstein-grün - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Gallopamil: cardiovascular Scope of Action of a highly specific calcium antagonist.
    Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 1992
    Co-Authors: Gisa Fleckenstein-grün
    Abstract:

    According to Fleckenstein's original classification, gallopamil represents a prototype of highly specific calcium antagonists of Group A. Its large Scope of cardiovascular effects is lastly based on one and the same mechanism of Action: inhibition of transmembrane calcium influx into myocardial, cardiac pacemaker, and vascular smooth muscle cells. Thereby, in experimental studies that use electrophysiological, biochemical, isotopic, and histological techniques, gallopamil reduced calcium-dependent myocardial contractility and oxygen consumption; dampened nomotopic and ectopic cardiac pacemaker activity; exerted pronounced vasodilator effects; and protected myocardial cells from calcium overload-induced necrotization. The effects of gallopamil on myocardium, cardiac pacemakers, and vasculature are quantitatively comparable, surpassing those of verapamil by approximately one order of magnitude. Further clinical studies must demonstrate to what extent humans will benefit from the experimentally proven cardiovascular potential of gallopamil.

Sandra Venghaus - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • integrated governance for the food energy water nexus the Scope of Action for institutional change
    Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018
    Co-Authors: Carolin Märker, Sandra Venghaus, Jürgen-friedrich Hake
    Abstract:

    Abstract Despite a major, policy-driven increase in research on the food–energy–water (FEW) nexus in recent years, research addressing the required changes in policy structures and processes for an effective, integrated governance of FEW nexus resources is still in its infancy. This paper adapts the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework to the requirements and challenges of FEW nexus governance and sets a special focus on Action situations, actors, and institutions. The analysis thus contributes to the debate about the practicality and benefits of a comprehensive FEW nexus policy approach. Two different conceptual FEW nexus frameworks are developed, which span the spectrum of possible integration options. The first one describes a holistic integration framework that defines the FEW nexus as a single, fully integrated system. The second one represents vertical policy integration and is largely based on existing structures and a reframing of the present institutional setting. After their theoretical derivation, the two hypothetical frameworks are analyzed with respect to their strengths and weaknesses in governing the FEW nexus using two sample cases of integrated FEW nexus governance in Germany. The results show that effective FEW nexus governance requires a combination of both integration options.

  • Integrated governance for the food–energy–water nexus – The Scope of Action for institutional change
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018
    Co-Authors: Carolin Märker, Sandra Venghaus, Jürgen-friedrich Hake
    Abstract:

    Abstract Despite a major, policy-driven increase in research on the food–energy–water (FEW) nexus in recent years, research addressing the required changes in policy structures and processes for an effective, integrated governance of FEW nexus resources is still in its infancy. This paper adapts the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework to the requirements and challenges of FEW nexus governance and sets a special focus on Action situations, actors, and institutions. The analysis thus contributes to the debate about the practicality and benefits of a comprehensive FEW nexus policy approach. Two different conceptual FEW nexus frameworks are developed, which span the spectrum of possible integration options. The first one describes a holistic integration framework that defines the FEW nexus as a single, fully integrated system. The second one represents vertical policy integration and is largely based on existing structures and a reframing of the present institutional setting. After their theoretical derivation, the two hypothetical frameworks are analyzed with respect to their strengths and weaknesses in governing the FEW nexus using two sample cases of integrated FEW nexus governance in Germany. The results show that effective FEW nexus governance requires a combination of both integration options.