The Experts below are selected from a list of 45 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Christine Mccullum - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Mechanisms of Power Within a Community-Based Food Security Planning Process
Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2004Co-Authors: Christine Mccullum, David L. Pelletier, Donald Barr, Jennifer L. Wilkins, Jean-pierre HabichtAbstract:A community food Security movement has begun to address problems of hunger and food inSecurity by utilizing a community-based approach. Although various models have been implemented, little empirical research has assessed how power operates within community-based food Security initiatives. The purpose of this research was to determine how power influenced participation in decision-making, agenda setting, and the shaping of perceived needs within a community-based food Security Planning Process, with particular reference to disenfranchised stakeholders. Power influenced participation in decision-making, agenda setting, and the shaping of perceived needs through managing 1) problem framing, 2) trust, 3) knowledge, and 4) consent. To overcome these mechanisms of power, practitioners need to address individual-, community-, and institutional-level barriers to participation in community-based food Security Planning Processes. Practitioners and researchers can work with disenfranchised groups to determine which agents have the power to create desired changes by utilizing theory-based methods and strategies that focus on changing external determinants at multiple levels.
-
Agenda setting within a community-based food Security Planning Process: the influence of power.
Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2003Co-Authors: Christine Mccullum, David L. Pelletier, Donald Barr, Jennifer L. WilkinsAbstract:Abstract Objective To determine the effectiveness of using citizen politics as a framework for empowering citizens to build a community food Security agenda. Design A critical perspective, case study design, and multiple qualitative methods were used. Participants/Setting Forty-four participants were purposefully recruited to participate in a community-based Planning Process called a search conference (SC). Seven additional disenfranchised stakeholders who did not attend the SC were also recruited to participate. Phenomenon of Interest To assess how power influenced agenda setting and to determine the extent to which disenfranchised stakeholders' most salient interests were incorporated into the final SC action agendas. Analysis The constant comparison method, content analysis, and consensus were used to produce the final analysis. Results Power influenced agenda setting by managing knowledge, problem framing, trust, and consent. Two of seven of disenfranchised stakeholders' most salient interests, including need for adequate food preparation skills and increased availability of locally produced foods, were incorporated into the final SC action agendas. Conclusions and Implications Citizen politics can be used to build a community food Security agenda on issues that are not at odds with stakeholders in positions of power. To bring about change on issues in which power differences between groups are substantial, additional theoretical frameworks and public policy-making models are needed.
Jennifer L. Wilkins - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Mechanisms of Power Within a Community-Based Food Security Planning Process
Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2004Co-Authors: Christine Mccullum, David L. Pelletier, Donald Barr, Jennifer L. Wilkins, Jean-pierre HabichtAbstract:A community food Security movement has begun to address problems of hunger and food inSecurity by utilizing a community-based approach. Although various models have been implemented, little empirical research has assessed how power operates within community-based food Security initiatives. The purpose of this research was to determine how power influenced participation in decision-making, agenda setting, and the shaping of perceived needs within a community-based food Security Planning Process, with particular reference to disenfranchised stakeholders. Power influenced participation in decision-making, agenda setting, and the shaping of perceived needs through managing 1) problem framing, 2) trust, 3) knowledge, and 4) consent. To overcome these mechanisms of power, practitioners need to address individual-, community-, and institutional-level barriers to participation in community-based food Security Planning Processes. Practitioners and researchers can work with disenfranchised groups to determine which agents have the power to create desired changes by utilizing theory-based methods and strategies that focus on changing external determinants at multiple levels.
-
Agenda setting within a community-based food Security Planning Process: the influence of power.
Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2003Co-Authors: Christine Mccullum, David L. Pelletier, Donald Barr, Jennifer L. WilkinsAbstract:Abstract Objective To determine the effectiveness of using citizen politics as a framework for empowering citizens to build a community food Security agenda. Design A critical perspective, case study design, and multiple qualitative methods were used. Participants/Setting Forty-four participants were purposefully recruited to participate in a community-based Planning Process called a search conference (SC). Seven additional disenfranchised stakeholders who did not attend the SC were also recruited to participate. Phenomenon of Interest To assess how power influenced agenda setting and to determine the extent to which disenfranchised stakeholders' most salient interests were incorporated into the final SC action agendas. Analysis The constant comparison method, content analysis, and consensus were used to produce the final analysis. Results Power influenced agenda setting by managing knowledge, problem framing, trust, and consent. Two of seven of disenfranchised stakeholders' most salient interests, including need for adequate food preparation skills and increased availability of locally produced foods, were incorporated into the final SC action agendas. Conclusions and Implications Citizen politics can be used to build a community food Security agenda on issues that are not at odds with stakeholders in positions of power. To bring about change on issues in which power differences between groups are substantial, additional theoretical frameworks and public policy-making models are needed.
Jean-pierre Habicht - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Mechanisms of Power Within a Community-Based Food Security Planning Process
Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2004Co-Authors: Christine Mccullum, David L. Pelletier, Donald Barr, Jennifer L. Wilkins, Jean-pierre HabichtAbstract:A community food Security movement has begun to address problems of hunger and food inSecurity by utilizing a community-based approach. Although various models have been implemented, little empirical research has assessed how power operates within community-based food Security initiatives. The purpose of this research was to determine how power influenced participation in decision-making, agenda setting, and the shaping of perceived needs within a community-based food Security Planning Process, with particular reference to disenfranchised stakeholders. Power influenced participation in decision-making, agenda setting, and the shaping of perceived needs through managing 1) problem framing, 2) trust, 3) knowledge, and 4) consent. To overcome these mechanisms of power, practitioners need to address individual-, community-, and institutional-level barriers to participation in community-based food Security Planning Processes. Practitioners and researchers can work with disenfranchised groups to determine which agents have the power to create desired changes by utilizing theory-based methods and strategies that focus on changing external determinants at multiple levels.
Donald Barr - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Mechanisms of Power Within a Community-Based Food Security Planning Process
Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2004Co-Authors: Christine Mccullum, David L. Pelletier, Donald Barr, Jennifer L. Wilkins, Jean-pierre HabichtAbstract:A community food Security movement has begun to address problems of hunger and food inSecurity by utilizing a community-based approach. Although various models have been implemented, little empirical research has assessed how power operates within community-based food Security initiatives. The purpose of this research was to determine how power influenced participation in decision-making, agenda setting, and the shaping of perceived needs within a community-based food Security Planning Process, with particular reference to disenfranchised stakeholders. Power influenced participation in decision-making, agenda setting, and the shaping of perceived needs through managing 1) problem framing, 2) trust, 3) knowledge, and 4) consent. To overcome these mechanisms of power, practitioners need to address individual-, community-, and institutional-level barriers to participation in community-based food Security Planning Processes. Practitioners and researchers can work with disenfranchised groups to determine which agents have the power to create desired changes by utilizing theory-based methods and strategies that focus on changing external determinants at multiple levels.
-
Agenda setting within a community-based food Security Planning Process: the influence of power.
Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2003Co-Authors: Christine Mccullum, David L. Pelletier, Donald Barr, Jennifer L. WilkinsAbstract:Abstract Objective To determine the effectiveness of using citizen politics as a framework for empowering citizens to build a community food Security agenda. Design A critical perspective, case study design, and multiple qualitative methods were used. Participants/Setting Forty-four participants were purposefully recruited to participate in a community-based Planning Process called a search conference (SC). Seven additional disenfranchised stakeholders who did not attend the SC were also recruited to participate. Phenomenon of Interest To assess how power influenced agenda setting and to determine the extent to which disenfranchised stakeholders' most salient interests were incorporated into the final SC action agendas. Analysis The constant comparison method, content analysis, and consensus were used to produce the final analysis. Results Power influenced agenda setting by managing knowledge, problem framing, trust, and consent. Two of seven of disenfranchised stakeholders' most salient interests, including need for adequate food preparation skills and increased availability of locally produced foods, were incorporated into the final SC action agendas. Conclusions and Implications Citizen politics can be used to build a community food Security agenda on issues that are not at odds with stakeholders in positions of power. To bring about change on issues in which power differences between groups are substantial, additional theoretical frameworks and public policy-making models are needed.
David L. Pelletier - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Mechanisms of Power Within a Community-Based Food Security Planning Process
Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2004Co-Authors: Christine Mccullum, David L. Pelletier, Donald Barr, Jennifer L. Wilkins, Jean-pierre HabichtAbstract:A community food Security movement has begun to address problems of hunger and food inSecurity by utilizing a community-based approach. Although various models have been implemented, little empirical research has assessed how power operates within community-based food Security initiatives. The purpose of this research was to determine how power influenced participation in decision-making, agenda setting, and the shaping of perceived needs within a community-based food Security Planning Process, with particular reference to disenfranchised stakeholders. Power influenced participation in decision-making, agenda setting, and the shaping of perceived needs through managing 1) problem framing, 2) trust, 3) knowledge, and 4) consent. To overcome these mechanisms of power, practitioners need to address individual-, community-, and institutional-level barriers to participation in community-based food Security Planning Processes. Practitioners and researchers can work with disenfranchised groups to determine which agents have the power to create desired changes by utilizing theory-based methods and strategies that focus on changing external determinants at multiple levels.
-
Agenda setting within a community-based food Security Planning Process: the influence of power.
Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2003Co-Authors: Christine Mccullum, David L. Pelletier, Donald Barr, Jennifer L. WilkinsAbstract:Abstract Objective To determine the effectiveness of using citizen politics as a framework for empowering citizens to build a community food Security agenda. Design A critical perspective, case study design, and multiple qualitative methods were used. Participants/Setting Forty-four participants were purposefully recruited to participate in a community-based Planning Process called a search conference (SC). Seven additional disenfranchised stakeholders who did not attend the SC were also recruited to participate. Phenomenon of Interest To assess how power influenced agenda setting and to determine the extent to which disenfranchised stakeholders' most salient interests were incorporated into the final SC action agendas. Analysis The constant comparison method, content analysis, and consensus were used to produce the final analysis. Results Power influenced agenda setting by managing knowledge, problem framing, trust, and consent. Two of seven of disenfranchised stakeholders' most salient interests, including need for adequate food preparation skills and increased availability of locally produced foods, were incorporated into the final SC action agendas. Conclusions and Implications Citizen politics can be used to build a community food Security agenda on issues that are not at odds with stakeholders in positions of power. To bring about change on issues in which power differences between groups are substantial, additional theoretical frameworks and public policy-making models are needed.