The Experts below are selected from a list of 7365 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Kenneth Van Surksum - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
gartner releases its 2014 magic quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization infrastructure
www.virtualizationpractice.info, 2014Co-Authors: Kenneth Van SurksumAbstract:Gartner has released its annual Magic Quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization Infrastructure, again positioning VMware and Microsoft in the leaders Quadrant. Leaders in this market ...
-
Parallels announces it will certify its Hypervisor under the Microsoft Server Virtualization Validation Program
2013Co-Authors: Kenneth Van SurksumAbstract:In June 2008 Microsoft launched their Server Virtualization Validation Program (SVVP). The SVVP allows any vendor which offers hosted or bare-metal Virtualization platforms to certify ...
-
Gartner releases its 2013 Magic Quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization Infrastructure
2013Co-Authors: Kenneth Van SurksumAbstract:Gartner has released its annual Magic Quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization Infrastructure, positioning VMware and Microsoft in the leaders Quadrant. Leaders in this market have ...
-
IDC: Worldwide Market for Enterprise Server Virtualization will reach $19.3 Billion by 2014
2010Co-Authors: Kenneth Van SurksumAbstract:Analyst firm International Data Corporation (IDC) has released details about its forthcoming forecast on the Server Virtualization market called: Server Virtualization Market Forecast and Analysis, ...
-
Gartner details the six misconceptions about Server Virtualization
2010Co-Authors: Kenneth Van SurksumAbstract:Thomas Bittman, analyst at Gartner published an article in CIO UK Magazine covering six misconceptions about Server Virtualization. He states that there will be more ...
Dale Lindskog - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Performance Evaluation of Oracle VM Server Virtualization Software 64 Bit Linux Environment
2011 Third International Workshop on Security Measurements and Metrics, 2011Co-Authors: Ibidokun Emmanuel Tope, Pavol Zavarsky, Ron Ruhl, Dale LindskogAbstract:Server Virtualization has created some growing problems and disorder, such as unresponsive virtualized system, crashed virtualized Server, misconfigured virtual hosting platforms, performance tuning and erratic performance metrics with some benchmark tools. This research analyzed the performance of Oracle VM Server Virtualization software against that of bare-metal Server environment. It also examined scalability offered by Oracle VM and its operation for supporting high volume transactions. Two open suite benchmark tools Swingbench and LMbench were used to measure performance. The Swingbench was also used to measure scalability. 30 and 50 active users were used for the performance evaluation. We discovered from our Swingbench results that Oracle database performance in a single Oracle VM resulted in 4% and 8% overhead for 30 and 50 active users respectively. Performance metrics of 75% and 87% were obtained with 30 and 50 active users correspondingly in dual Oracle VM Server; an indication of performance scalability improvement with two virtual machines. Our results also revealed Oracle VM Server achieved significant percentages in latency and bandwidth that cannot be neglected, despite some adrift results obtained from LMbench measurement.
-
Metrisec@ESEM - Performance Evaluation of Oracle VM Server Virtualization Software 64 Bit Linux Environment
2011 Third International Workshop on Security Measurements and Metrics, 2011Co-Authors: Ibidokun Emmanuel Tope, Pavol Zavarsky, Ron Ruhl, Dale LindskogAbstract:Server Virtualization has created some growing problems and disorder, such as unresponsive virtualized system, crashed virtualized Server, misconfigured virtual hosting platforms, performance tuning and erratic performance metrics with some benchmark tools. This research analyzed the performance of Oracle VM Server Virtualization software against that of bare-metal Server environment. It also examined scalability offered by Oracle VM and its operation for supporting high volume transactions. Two open suite benchmark tools Swingbench and LMbench were used to measure performance. The Swingbench was also used to measure scalability. 30 and 50 active users were used for the performance evaluation. We discovered from our Swingbench results that Oracle database performance in a single Oracle VM resulted in 4% and 8% overhead for 30 and 50 active users respectively. Performance metrics of 75% and 87% were obtained with 30 and 50 active users correspondingly in dual Oracle VM Server; an indication of performance scalability improvement with two virtual machines. Our results also revealed Oracle VM Server achieved significant percentages in latency and bandwidth that cannot be neglected, despite some adrift results obtained from LMbench measurement.
Ibidokun Emmanuel Tope - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Performance Evaluation of Oracle VM Server Virtualization Software 64 Bit Linux Environment
2011 Third International Workshop on Security Measurements and Metrics, 2011Co-Authors: Ibidokun Emmanuel Tope, Pavol Zavarsky, Ron Ruhl, Dale LindskogAbstract:Server Virtualization has created some growing problems and disorder, such as unresponsive virtualized system, crashed virtualized Server, misconfigured virtual hosting platforms, performance tuning and erratic performance metrics with some benchmark tools. This research analyzed the performance of Oracle VM Server Virtualization software against that of bare-metal Server environment. It also examined scalability offered by Oracle VM and its operation for supporting high volume transactions. Two open suite benchmark tools Swingbench and LMbench were used to measure performance. The Swingbench was also used to measure scalability. 30 and 50 active users were used for the performance evaluation. We discovered from our Swingbench results that Oracle database performance in a single Oracle VM resulted in 4% and 8% overhead for 30 and 50 active users respectively. Performance metrics of 75% and 87% were obtained with 30 and 50 active users correspondingly in dual Oracle VM Server; an indication of performance scalability improvement with two virtual machines. Our results also revealed Oracle VM Server achieved significant percentages in latency and bandwidth that cannot be neglected, despite some adrift results obtained from LMbench measurement.
-
Metrisec@ESEM - Performance Evaluation of Oracle VM Server Virtualization Software 64 Bit Linux Environment
2011 Third International Workshop on Security Measurements and Metrics, 2011Co-Authors: Ibidokun Emmanuel Tope, Pavol Zavarsky, Ron Ruhl, Dale LindskogAbstract:Server Virtualization has created some growing problems and disorder, such as unresponsive virtualized system, crashed virtualized Server, misconfigured virtual hosting platforms, performance tuning and erratic performance metrics with some benchmark tools. This research analyzed the performance of Oracle VM Server Virtualization software against that of bare-metal Server environment. It also examined scalability offered by Oracle VM and its operation for supporting high volume transactions. Two open suite benchmark tools Swingbench and LMbench were used to measure performance. The Swingbench was also used to measure scalability. 30 and 50 active users were used for the performance evaluation. We discovered from our Swingbench results that Oracle database performance in a single Oracle VM resulted in 4% and 8% overhead for 30 and 50 active users respectively. Performance metrics of 75% and 87% were obtained with 30 and 50 active users correspondingly in dual Oracle VM Server; an indication of performance scalability improvement with two virtual machines. Our results also revealed Oracle VM Server achieved significant percentages in latency and bandwidth that cannot be neglected, despite some adrift results obtained from LMbench measurement.
Massimo Ferrari - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
VMware becomes a Leader in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization Infrastructure
2012Co-Authors: Massimo FerrariAbstract:Last week VMware announced that it has been positioned at the top of Leaders Quadrant of 2012 Gartner's Magic Quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization Infrastructure. ...
-
vmware becomes a leader in gartner s magic quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization infrastructure
www.virtualization.info, 2012Co-Authors: Massimo FerrariAbstract:Last week VMware announced that it has been positioned at the top of Leaders Quadrant of 2012 Gartner's Magic Quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization Infrastructure. ...
Paulo Maciel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
performability analysis of i o bound application on container based Server Virtualization cluster
International Symposium on Computers and Communications, 2014Co-Authors: Erico Guedes, Luis E T Silva, Paulo MacielAbstract:Use of Server Virtualization for providing applications produces overloads that degrade the performance of provided systems. The use of container-based Virtualization enabled a narrowing of this overload. On this work, we go a step forward and demonstrate how a broad tuning combination of several performance factors concerning to web cache Server - the I/O bound application analysed - to file system and to operating system, led to a higher performance of proposed cluster, when it is executed on a container-based operating system Virtualization environment. Availability and performance similarity of web cache service, under non-virtualized and virtualized systems, were evaluated when submitted to proposed web workload. Results reveal that web cache service provided under virtual environment, without unresponsiveness fails due to overload, i. e., with high availability, presents a 6% higher hit ratio and a 21.4% lower response time than those observed on non-virtualized environments.
-
ISCC - Performability analysis of I/O bound application on container-based Server Virtualization cluster
2014 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 2014Co-Authors: Erico A. C. Guedes, Luis E T Silva, Paulo MacielAbstract:Use of Server Virtualization for providing applications produces overloads that degrade the performance of provided systems. The use of container-based Virtualization enabled a narrowing of this overload. On this work, we go a step forward and demonstrate how a broad tuning combination of several performance factors concerning to web cache Server - the I/O bound application analysed - to file system and to operating system, led to a higher performance of proposed cluster, when it is executed on a container-based operating system Virtualization environment. Availability and performance similarity of web cache service, under non-virtualized and virtualized systems, were evaluated when submitted to proposed web workload. Results reveal that web cache service provided under virtual environment, without unresponsiveness fails due to overload, i. e., with high availability, presents a 6% higher hit ratio and a 21.4% lower response time than those observed on non-virtualized environments.