The Experts below are selected from a list of 54 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Hilary Jenkinson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Sir Hilary Jenkinson, C.B.E., LL.D., F.S.A. (President of the Jewish Historical Society of England, 1953—55)
    2016
    Co-Authors: Norman Bentwich, Hilary Jenkinson
    Abstract:

    Hilary Jenkinson and I were at Cambridge together and were close friends, and we remained friends thereafter. I knew, too, his uncle who was Librarian of the University Library, and a friend of Solomon Schechter who spoke of him with reverence for his devotion to the study of manuscripts. Hilary must have inherited that love of ancient documents. For from his Cambridge days he was concentrated on one purpose, to reveal the treasures of history and knowledge hidden in ancient records and archives. From Cambridge he went straight to the Records Office, and made his way up in the hierarchy to be Deputy-Keeper?which means the Director of the office. He records that it was the reading of Joseph Jacobs' book, The Jews of Angevin England, that gave him the idea of what might be done by patient gleaning in the astonishing series of English records about the Jewish Exchequer of the Middle Ages. He records, too, that his predecessor at the Record Office was a famous Jewish scholar, Sir Francis Palgrave. By fortunate coincidence?one of his first official tasks of importance in the Record Office led him to the study of exclusively Jewish records of the community in England in the thirteenth century. He discovered that the Plea Rolls were largely records, not of legal suits, but of all kinds of transactions. And they contained memoranda which throw a flood of light on the Jewish social conditions. He wrote an article on his research, which appeared in the Transactions of our Society in 1912; and he was elected a member of the Council of the Society. Continuing his studies of the Plea Rolls, under the guidance of Dr. Israel Abrahams, then the Hon. Editor of the Society, he prepared for the Society a volume, the Calendar of the Plea Rolls of the Exchequer of the Jews preserved in the Record Office, Edward I 1275-1277. That was the third volume in the series, the first two having been edited by J. M. Rigg. It was published in 1929, and, sad to say, no further volume has been published since. With his abundant knowledge of records of all kinds his introduction is a mine of information on aspects of the life of medieval Jewish and Christian communities. He was elected a Vice-President of the Society, and then in 1955 President. In his presidential address he called on the Society to continue the work of scholarship, and urged that it would be a fitting memorial of the tercentenary of the Jewish resettle? ment in England to complete the series. Anglo-Jewry had a unique heritage of historical documents about the community. It was a privilege, but also a challenge. He reckoned that three more volumes of the Plea Rolls would be required, and for their publication a special fund, estimated then at ?6,000, should be raised. He suggested how the work should be done and offered generously to be the general editor. Unfortunately the work could not be put in hand at once, but his prodding did stimulate the Society after a few years to undertake it. We shall miss, however, his guiding hand. In his presidential address also he described his function as an archivist, "That office has the primary concern for the conservation and accessibility of documents

  • Sir Hilary Jenkinson c b e ll d f s a president of the jewish historical society of england 1953 55
    2016
    Co-Authors: Norman Bentwich, Hilary Jenkinson
    Abstract:

    Hilary Jenkinson and I were at Cambridge together and were close friends, and we remained friends thereafter. I knew, too, his uncle who was Librarian of the University Library, and a friend of Solomon Schechter who spoke of him with reverence for his devotion to the study of manuscripts. Hilary must have inherited that love of ancient documents. For from his Cambridge days he was concentrated on one purpose, to reveal the treasures of history and knowledge hidden in ancient records and archives. From Cambridge he went straight to the Records Office, and made his way up in the hierarchy to be Deputy-Keeper?which means the Director of the office. He records that it was the reading of Joseph Jacobs' book, The Jews of Angevin England, that gave him the idea of what might be done by patient gleaning in the astonishing series of English records about the Jewish Exchequer of the Middle Ages. He records, too, that his predecessor at the Record Office was a famous Jewish scholar, Sir Francis Palgrave. By fortunate coincidence?one of his first official tasks of importance in the Record Office led him to the study of exclusively Jewish records of the community in England in the thirteenth century. He discovered that the Plea Rolls were largely records, not of legal suits, but of all kinds of transactions. And they contained memoranda which throw a flood of light on the Jewish social conditions. He wrote an article on his research, which appeared in the Transactions of our Society in 1912; and he was elected a member of the Council of the Society. Continuing his studies of the Plea Rolls, under the guidance of Dr. Israel Abrahams, then the Hon. Editor of the Society, he prepared for the Society a volume, the Calendar of the Plea Rolls of the Exchequer of the Jews preserved in the Record Office, Edward I 1275-1277. That was the third volume in the series, the first two having been edited by J. M. Rigg. It was published in 1929, and, sad to say, no further volume has been published since. With his abundant knowledge of records of all kinds his introduction is a mine of information on aspects of the life of medieval Jewish and Christian communities. He was elected a Vice-President of the Society, and then in 1955 President. In his presidential address he called on the Society to continue the work of scholarship, and urged that it would be a fitting memorial of the tercentenary of the Jewish resettle? ment in England to complete the series. Anglo-Jewry had a unique heritage of historical documents about the community. It was a privilege, but also a challenge. He reckoned that three more volumes of the Plea Rolls would be required, and for their publication a special fund, estimated then at ?6,000, should be raised. He suggested how the work should be done and offered generously to be the general editor. Unfortunately the work could not be put in hand at once, but his prodding did stimulate the Society after a few years to undertake it. We shall miss, however, his guiding hand. In his presidential address also he described his function as an archivist, "That office has the primary concern for the conservation and accessibility of documents

  • THE ARCHIVAL EXPERIENCE IN ENGLAND AND CANADA
    2016
    Co-Authors: Hugh A. Taylor, Hilary Jenkinson
    Abstract:

    The English archival tradition evolved for the most part from the record keepers of the courts, where the continuity of documentation since the twelfth and thirteenth centuries is unique in Europe. With no violent invasion since the Norman Conquest to contend with, bureaucratic organisms large and small laid down their great beds of parchment and paper in a society that is profoundly "oral" by tradition (in contrast to the United States). England, with its tradition of common law and an unwritten constitution, set great store by customary rights and precedents that were accorded to individuals and duly recorded down the ages. This kind of record, which the Normans virtually initiated with the Doomsday Book in 1086, has provided a remarkable "oral history" from that day to this. In time, these records evolved from a vital record of legal decisions, financial accountability, and disposition of land and property, maintained by various institutional Keepers, to become the raw material for historical writing. It was quite natural, therefore, that the Public Record Office should become the repository for this material, drawn from a wide range of national courts and departments of government to be serviced by a Keeper or Assistant Keeper in the same tradition. Organic continuity of custody was continually stressed as being evidence of legal integrity and, as defined by Sir Hilary Jenkinson, became a characteristic of the authentic "public record." Historians,

Norman Bentwich - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Sir Hilary Jenkinson, C.B.E., LL.D., F.S.A. (President of the Jewish Historical Society of England, 1953—55)
    2016
    Co-Authors: Norman Bentwich, Hilary Jenkinson
    Abstract:

    Hilary Jenkinson and I were at Cambridge together and were close friends, and we remained friends thereafter. I knew, too, his uncle who was Librarian of the University Library, and a friend of Solomon Schechter who spoke of him with reverence for his devotion to the study of manuscripts. Hilary must have inherited that love of ancient documents. For from his Cambridge days he was concentrated on one purpose, to reveal the treasures of history and knowledge hidden in ancient records and archives. From Cambridge he went straight to the Records Office, and made his way up in the hierarchy to be Deputy-Keeper?which means the Director of the office. He records that it was the reading of Joseph Jacobs' book, The Jews of Angevin England, that gave him the idea of what might be done by patient gleaning in the astonishing series of English records about the Jewish Exchequer of the Middle Ages. He records, too, that his predecessor at the Record Office was a famous Jewish scholar, Sir Francis Palgrave. By fortunate coincidence?one of his first official tasks of importance in the Record Office led him to the study of exclusively Jewish records of the community in England in the thirteenth century. He discovered that the Plea Rolls were largely records, not of legal suits, but of all kinds of transactions. And they contained memoranda which throw a flood of light on the Jewish social conditions. He wrote an article on his research, which appeared in the Transactions of our Society in 1912; and he was elected a member of the Council of the Society. Continuing his studies of the Plea Rolls, under the guidance of Dr. Israel Abrahams, then the Hon. Editor of the Society, he prepared for the Society a volume, the Calendar of the Plea Rolls of the Exchequer of the Jews preserved in the Record Office, Edward I 1275-1277. That was the third volume in the series, the first two having been edited by J. M. Rigg. It was published in 1929, and, sad to say, no further volume has been published since. With his abundant knowledge of records of all kinds his introduction is a mine of information on aspects of the life of medieval Jewish and Christian communities. He was elected a Vice-President of the Society, and then in 1955 President. In his presidential address he called on the Society to continue the work of scholarship, and urged that it would be a fitting memorial of the tercentenary of the Jewish resettle? ment in England to complete the series. Anglo-Jewry had a unique heritage of historical documents about the community. It was a privilege, but also a challenge. He reckoned that three more volumes of the Plea Rolls would be required, and for their publication a special fund, estimated then at ?6,000, should be raised. He suggested how the work should be done and offered generously to be the general editor. Unfortunately the work could not be put in hand at once, but his prodding did stimulate the Society after a few years to undertake it. We shall miss, however, his guiding hand. In his presidential address also he described his function as an archivist, "That office has the primary concern for the conservation and accessibility of documents

  • Sir Hilary Jenkinson c b e ll d f s a president of the jewish historical society of england 1953 55
    2016
    Co-Authors: Norman Bentwich, Hilary Jenkinson
    Abstract:

    Hilary Jenkinson and I were at Cambridge together and were close friends, and we remained friends thereafter. I knew, too, his uncle who was Librarian of the University Library, and a friend of Solomon Schechter who spoke of him with reverence for his devotion to the study of manuscripts. Hilary must have inherited that love of ancient documents. For from his Cambridge days he was concentrated on one purpose, to reveal the treasures of history and knowledge hidden in ancient records and archives. From Cambridge he went straight to the Records Office, and made his way up in the hierarchy to be Deputy-Keeper?which means the Director of the office. He records that it was the reading of Joseph Jacobs' book, The Jews of Angevin England, that gave him the idea of what might be done by patient gleaning in the astonishing series of English records about the Jewish Exchequer of the Middle Ages. He records, too, that his predecessor at the Record Office was a famous Jewish scholar, Sir Francis Palgrave. By fortunate coincidence?one of his first official tasks of importance in the Record Office led him to the study of exclusively Jewish records of the community in England in the thirteenth century. He discovered that the Plea Rolls were largely records, not of legal suits, but of all kinds of transactions. And they contained memoranda which throw a flood of light on the Jewish social conditions. He wrote an article on his research, which appeared in the Transactions of our Society in 1912; and he was elected a member of the Council of the Society. Continuing his studies of the Plea Rolls, under the guidance of Dr. Israel Abrahams, then the Hon. Editor of the Society, he prepared for the Society a volume, the Calendar of the Plea Rolls of the Exchequer of the Jews preserved in the Record Office, Edward I 1275-1277. That was the third volume in the series, the first two having been edited by J. M. Rigg. It was published in 1929, and, sad to say, no further volume has been published since. With his abundant knowledge of records of all kinds his introduction is a mine of information on aspects of the life of medieval Jewish and Christian communities. He was elected a Vice-President of the Society, and then in 1955 President. In his presidential address he called on the Society to continue the work of scholarship, and urged that it would be a fitting memorial of the tercentenary of the Jewish resettle? ment in England to complete the series. Anglo-Jewry had a unique heritage of historical documents about the community. It was a privilege, but also a challenge. He reckoned that three more volumes of the Plea Rolls would be required, and for their publication a special fund, estimated then at ?6,000, should be raised. He suggested how the work should be done and offered generously to be the general editor. Unfortunately the work could not be put in hand at once, but his prodding did stimulate the Society after a few years to undertake it. We shall miss, however, his guiding hand. In his presidential address also he described his function as an archivist, "That office has the primary concern for the conservation and accessibility of documents

Vuković Bernard - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Selected writings of Sir Hilary Jenkinson
    2018
    Co-Authors: Vuković Bernard
    Abstract:

    Sir Hilary Jenkinson bio je čovjek koji je u skoro pedeset godina pisanja i objavljivanja u području arhivske administracije i srodnih predmeta, ostavio dubok i značajan utjecaj na arhivsku profesiju kakva ona trenutno jest. Njegovi spisi jedni su od najutjecajnijih u engleskom govornome području. Sir Hilary bavio se širokim rasponom tema, kao što su tallies, diplomacijom, paleografijom, uređivanjem zapisa, pečatima, ratnim mjerama, i tako dalje. S druge strane, Sir Hilary Jenkinson i Theodore R. Schellenberg, nisu dijelili mišljenja u vezi vrednovanja arhivskih zapisa. U radu se preispituju njihovi pogledi na samu prirodu arhivskih zapisa, razlozima njihova zadržavanja, te uloga arhivista u procesu vrednovanja. Zatim, prati napredak njihovih ideja kroz kasniji arhivski diskurs o vrednovanju kako bi se utvrdila njihova relevantnost i trajan doprinos.Sir Hilary Jenkinson, was the one man who, in almost fifty years of writing and publishing in the field of archive administration and allied subjects, left a deep and significant influence on the archive profession as it now is. His writings are one of the most influential in the English-speaking world. Sir Hilary dealing with a wide range of topics, such as tallies, diplomatic, palaeography, arranging records, seals, wartime measures and so on. At the other hand, Sir Hilary Jenkinson and Theodore R. Schellenberg, held different opinions on the subject of the appraisal of archival records. This paper examines their views on the nature of archival records, the reasons for their retention, and the role of the archivist in the appraisal process. It then traces the progrss of their ideas through the subsequent archival discourse on appraisal in order to identify their continued relevance and lasting contribution

Hans C. Rasmussen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Records Management and the Decline of the English Archival Establishment, 1949–1956
    Libraries & the Cultural Record, 2010
    Co-Authors: Hans C. Rasmussen
    Abstract:

    Sir Hilary Jenkinson and the assistant keepers of England's Public Record Office (PRO) lost their position of international leadership in public archives management between 1949 and 1956 because of a failure to appreciate progress in modern records management pioneered in the United States. Conversely, archivists of the British Commonwealth, the Committee on Departmental Records in Britain, and some younger assistant keepers and senior executive officers in the PRO all welcomed these developments as a challenge to the established order.

Rasmussen, Hans C. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Records Management and the Decline of the English Archival Establishment, 1949-1956
    The Aquila Digital Community, 2010
    Co-Authors: Rasmussen, Hans C.
    Abstract:

    Sir Hilary Jenkinson and the assistant keepers of England\u27s Public Record Office (PRO) lost their position of international leadership in public archives management between 1949 and 1956 because of a failure to appreciate progress in modern records management pioneered in the United States. Conversely, archivists of the British Commonwealth, the Committee on Departmental Records in Britain, and some younger assistant keepers and senior executive officers in the PRO all welcomed these developments as a challenge to the established order