Social Entrepreneurship

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 65124 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Ans Kolk - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Social Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Academy of Management Perspectives, 2015
    Co-Authors: Miguel Rivera-santos, Diane Holt, David Littlewood, Ans Kolk
    Abstract:

    Responding to calls for a better understanding of the relationship between Social enterprises and their environments, this article focuses on contextual influences on Social Entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa. We identify four predominantly African contextual dimensions (acute poverty, informality, colonial history, and ethnic group identity) and explore their influence on the way Social ventures perceive themselves and on their choice of activities. Our empirical study of 384 Social enterprises from 19 sub-Saharan African countries suggests that ethnic group identity and acute poverty levels influence both self-perception and activity choices, the country's colonial history influences only self-perception, and informality has no significant influence on either. These findings point to the need to consider both self-perception and the choice of activities in defining Social Entrepreneurship. Our study also highlights the importance of African contextual dimensions for understanding Social Entrepreneurship, and underlines the added value of incorporating insights from African data into management research more broadly.

  • Social Entrepreneurship in sub saharan africa
    Social Science Research Network, 2014
    Co-Authors: Miguel Riverasantos, Diane Holt, David Littlewood, Ans Kolk
    Abstract:

    Responding to calls for a better understanding of the relationship between Social enterprises and their environments, this article focuses on contextual influences on Social Entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa. We identify four predominantly African contextual dimensions, i.e., acute poverty, informality, colonial history, and ethnic group identity, and explore their influence on the way Social ventures perceive themselves and on their choice of activities. Our empirical study of 384 Social enterprises from 19 sub-Saharan African countries suggests that ethnic group identity and high poverty levels influence both self-perception and activity choices, while the country’s colonial history only influences self-perception and informality has no significant influence on either. These findings point to the need to consider both self-perception and the choice of activities in defining Social Entrepreneurship. Our study also highlights the importance of African contextual dimensions for understanding Social Entrepreneurship, and underlines the added value of incorporating insights from African data into management research more broadly.

Scott L Newbert - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Hans Rawhouser - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Timothy J Vogus - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Toyah Miller - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • studying the origins of Social Entrepreneurship compassion and the role of embedded agency
    Social Science Research Network, 2013
    Co-Authors: Matthew G Grimes, Jeffery S Mcmullen, Timothy J Vogus, Toyah Miller
    Abstract:

    Arend's response to our paper furthers the discussion on the origins of Social Entrepreneurship by suggesting that our focus on the motivational origins of Social Entrepreneurship is misplaced. We address his critiques by highlighting the fact that the Social entrepreneur in our model is an embedded agent. While societal forces may shape the role of Social entrepreneur and the scripts associated with Social Entrepreneurship, our model recognizes that individuals must be motivated to assume that role. In clarifying our approach, we offer an agenda for future research that recognizes the need for a more, not less, comprehensive approach essential to understanding a phenomenon as complex as Social Entrepreneurship.

  • studying the origins of Social Entrepreneurship compassion and the role of embedded agency
    Academy of Management Review, 2013
    Co-Authors: Matthew G Grimes, Jeffery S Mcmullen, Timothy J Vogus, Toyah Miller
    Abstract:

    The article presents the authors' comments on critiques of their research on the process of Social Entrepreneurship in which economic theories are applied to Social problems. Topics include the role of compassion in the origins of Social Entrepreneurship; Social entrepreneurs as an embedded agent with individual motivations; and the combination of a Social mission with the methodology of a business venture.

  • Social Entrepreneurship key issues and concepts
    Business Horizons, 2008
    Co-Authors: Trevis S Certo, Toyah Miller
    Abstract:

    Entrepreneurship involves the identification, evaluation, and exploitation of opportunities (Shane & Venkataraman, 2000). In this sense, opportunities represent occasions to bring new products or services into existence such that individuals or organizations are able to sell new outputs at prices higher than their cost of production. (For an excellent review of opportunities and Entrepreneurship, see Eckhardt & Shane, 2003.) The implication, of course, in this definition is that the fundamental mission of entrepreneurial activities involves profit generation, and these profits help entrepreneurs to build personal wealth. In recent years Social Entrepreneurship, a subdiscipline within the field of Entrepreneurship, has gained increasing attention from Entrepreneurship scholars. Social Entrepreneurship involves the recognition, evaluation, and exploitation of opportunities that result in Social value — the basic and long-standing needs of society — as opposed to personal or shareholder wealth (Austin, Stevenson, & Wei-Skillern, 2006). Social value has little to do with profits but instead involves the fulfillment of basic and long-standing needs such as providing food, water, shelter, education, and medical services to those members of society who are in need.