The Experts below are selected from a list of 870 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Igor Braga Ribeiro - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Efficacy and Patient Tolerability of Split-Dose Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Oral Solution Compared to the Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Solution for Bowel Preparation in Outpatient Colonoscopy: An Evidence-Based Review.
    Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2020
    Co-Authors: Antonio Afonso De Miranda Neto, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura, Kelly Hathorn, Francisco Tustumi, Igor Braga Ribeiro
    Abstract:

    Background Colonoscopy is the gold standard exam for evaluation of colonic abnormalities and for screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer. However, the efficacy of colonoscopy is dependent on the quality of the pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) and Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) have emerged as two of the most commonly used bowel preparation agents. We conducted an evidence-based review of current evidence to further investigate the efficacy and patient tolerability of split-dose SPMC oral solution compared to PEG solution for colonoscopy bowel preparation. Methods A systematic search was performed using Pubmed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochran Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. All studies on split-dose bowel preparation with SPMC and PEG were reviewed. Relevant studies regarding colonoscopy and bowel preparations were also included. Randomized controlled trials were prioritized due to the high quality of evidence. Results Eight randomized controlled trials were included. Split-dose SPMC and PEG were associated with similar results for adequacy of bowel preparation. Split-dose SPMC was associated with increased patient tolerability and compliance. Conclusion Split-dose SPMC and PEG are both adequate and safe for bowel preparation for outpatient colonoscopy, with split-dose SPMC being more tolerable for patients. Additional RCTs comparing these and other bowel preparation solutions are necessary to further investigate quality of bowel preparation, patient preference, and cost-effectiveness of the various options.

  • efficacy and patient tolerability of split dose Sodium Picosulfate magnesium citrate spmc oral solution compared to the polyethylene glycol peg solution for bowel preparation in outpatient colonoscopy an evidence based review
    Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, 2020
    Co-Authors: Antonio Afonso De Miranda Neto, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura, Kelly Hathorn, Francisco Tustumi, Igor Braga Ribeiro
    Abstract:

    Background Colonoscopy is the gold standard exam for evaluation of colonic abnormalities and for screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer. However, the efficacy of colonoscopy is dependent on the quality of the pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) and Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) have emerged as two of the most commonly used bowel preparation agents. We conducted an evidence-based review of current evidence to further investigate the efficacy and patient tolerability of split-dose SPMC oral solution compared to PEG solution for colonoscopy bowel preparation. Methods A systematic search was performed using Pubmed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochran Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. All studies on split-dose bowel preparation with SPMC and PEG were reviewed. Relevant studies regarding colonoscopy and bowel preparations were also included. Randomized controlled trials were prioritized due to the high quality of evidence. Results Eight randomized controlled trials were included. Split-dose SPMC and PEG were associated with similar results for adequacy of bowel preparation. Split-dose SPMC was associated with increased patient tolerability and compliance. Conclusion Split-dose SPMC and PEG are both adequate and safe for bowel preparation for outpatient colonoscopy, with split-dose SPMC being more tolerable for patients. Additional RCTs comparing these and other bowel preparation solutions are necessary to further investigate quality of bowel preparation, patient preference, and cost-effectiveness of the various options.

Yeon Kwon Jeong - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Upper airway obstruction resulting from acute mucosal injury induced by direct ingestion of Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate powder.
    Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2016
    Co-Authors: Gyeong Bo Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Tae Rim Lee, Won Chul Cha, Min Seob Sim, Keun Jeong Song, Joong Eui Rhee, Yeon Kwon Jeong
    Abstract:

    A 59-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of sore throat after swallowing Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate powder for bowel preparation, without first dissolving it in water. The initial evaluation showed significant mucosal injury involving the oral cavity, pharynx, and epiglottis. Endotracheal intubation was performed for airway protection in the emergency department, because the mucosal swelling resulted in upper airway compromise. After conservative treatment in the intensive care unit, he underwent tracheostomy because stenosis of the supraglottic and subglottic areas was not relieved. The tracheostomy tube was successfully removed after confirming recovery, and he was discharged 3 weeks after admission.

  • upper airway obstruction resulting from acute mucosal injury induced by direct ingestion of Sodium Picosulfate magnesium citrate powder
    Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2016
    Co-Authors: Gyeong Bo Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Tae Rim Lee, Won Chul Cha, Min Seob Sim, Keun Jeong Song, Joong Eui Rhee, Yeon Kwon Jeong
    Abstract:

    A 59-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of sore throat after swallowing Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate powder for bowel preparation, without first dissolving it in water. The initial evaluation showed significant mucosal injury involving the oral cavity, pharynx, and epiglottis. Endotracheal intubation was performed for airway protection in the emergency department, because the mucosal swelling resulted in upper airway compromise. After conservative treatment in the intensive care unit, he underwent tracheostomy because stenosis of the supraglottic and subglottic areas was not relieved. The tracheostomy tube was successfully removed after confirming recovery, and he was discharged 3 weeks after admission.

Jeong Wook Kim - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • acute gastric injury caused by undissolved Sodium Picosulfate magnesium citrate powder
    Clinical Endoscopy, 2017
    Co-Authors: Chang Hwan Choi, Jeong Wook Kim
    Abstract:

    Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) is a widely used oral bowel cleansing agent considered to be relatively safe. However, partially dissolved or undissolved SPMC powder may cause severe injuries of the esophagus and stomach. We report a very rare case of acute gastric injury without esophageal damage caused by the ingestion of undissolved SPMC powder. A 69-year-old man experienced epigastric pain after swallowing SPMC powder without dissolving it in water in preparation for a screening colonoscopy. He realized his mistake immediately and subsequently drank 2 L of water. The esophagogastroduodenoscopy conducted after 12 hours indicated an acute gastric ulceration without injury of the esophagus or duodenum. The endoscopy conducted after 6 weeks of oral proton pump inhibitor treatment showed healing of the gastric injury. This suggested that drinking large amounts of water after ingesting partially dissolved or undissolved SPMC powder can prevent serious esophageal injury, but offers no preventive benefit for acute gastric injury.

  • Acute Gastric Injury Caused by Undissolved Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate Powder.
    Clinical Endoscopy, 2016
    Co-Authors: Chang Hwan Choi, Jeong Wook Kim
    Abstract:

    Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) is a widely used oral bowel cleansing agent considered to be relatively safe. However, partially dissolved or undissolved SPMC powder may cause severe injuries of the esophagus and stomach. We report a very rare case of acute gastric injury without esophageal damage caused by the ingestion of undissolved SPMC powder. A 69-year-old man experienced epigastric pain after swallowing SPMC powder without dissolving it in water in preparation for a screening colonoscopy. He realized his mistake immediately and subsequently drank 2 L of water. The esophagogastroduodenoscopy conducted after 12 hours indicated an acute gastric ulceration without injury of the esophagus or duodenum. The endoscopy conducted after 6 weeks of oral proton pump inhibitor treatment showed healing of the gastric injury. This suggested that drinking large amounts of water after ingesting partially dissolved or undissolved SPMC powder can prevent serious esophageal injury, but offers no preventive benefit for acute gastric injury.

Antonio Afonso De Miranda Neto - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Efficacy and Patient Tolerability of Split-Dose Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Oral Solution Compared to the Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Solution for Bowel Preparation in Outpatient Colonoscopy: An Evidence-Based Review.
    Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2020
    Co-Authors: Antonio Afonso De Miranda Neto, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura, Kelly Hathorn, Francisco Tustumi, Igor Braga Ribeiro
    Abstract:

    Background Colonoscopy is the gold standard exam for evaluation of colonic abnormalities and for screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer. However, the efficacy of colonoscopy is dependent on the quality of the pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) and Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) have emerged as two of the most commonly used bowel preparation agents. We conducted an evidence-based review of current evidence to further investigate the efficacy and patient tolerability of split-dose SPMC oral solution compared to PEG solution for colonoscopy bowel preparation. Methods A systematic search was performed using Pubmed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochran Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. All studies on split-dose bowel preparation with SPMC and PEG were reviewed. Relevant studies regarding colonoscopy and bowel preparations were also included. Randomized controlled trials were prioritized due to the high quality of evidence. Results Eight randomized controlled trials were included. Split-dose SPMC and PEG were associated with similar results for adequacy of bowel preparation. Split-dose SPMC was associated with increased patient tolerability and compliance. Conclusion Split-dose SPMC and PEG are both adequate and safe for bowel preparation for outpatient colonoscopy, with split-dose SPMC being more tolerable for patients. Additional RCTs comparing these and other bowel preparation solutions are necessary to further investigate quality of bowel preparation, patient preference, and cost-effectiveness of the various options.

  • efficacy and patient tolerability of split dose Sodium Picosulfate magnesium citrate spmc oral solution compared to the polyethylene glycol peg solution for bowel preparation in outpatient colonoscopy an evidence based review
    Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, 2020
    Co-Authors: Antonio Afonso De Miranda Neto, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura, Kelly Hathorn, Francisco Tustumi, Igor Braga Ribeiro
    Abstract:

    Background Colonoscopy is the gold standard exam for evaluation of colonic abnormalities and for screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer. However, the efficacy of colonoscopy is dependent on the quality of the pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) and Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) have emerged as two of the most commonly used bowel preparation agents. We conducted an evidence-based review of current evidence to further investigate the efficacy and patient tolerability of split-dose SPMC oral solution compared to PEG solution for colonoscopy bowel preparation. Methods A systematic search was performed using Pubmed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochran Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. All studies on split-dose bowel preparation with SPMC and PEG were reviewed. Relevant studies regarding colonoscopy and bowel preparations were also included. Randomized controlled trials were prioritized due to the high quality of evidence. Results Eight randomized controlled trials were included. Split-dose SPMC and PEG were associated with similar results for adequacy of bowel preparation. Split-dose SPMC was associated with increased patient tolerability and compliance. Conclusion Split-dose SPMC and PEG are both adequate and safe for bowel preparation for outpatient colonoscopy, with split-dose SPMC being more tolerable for patients. Additional RCTs comparing these and other bowel preparation solutions are necessary to further investigate quality of bowel preparation, patient preference, and cost-effectiveness of the various options.

Gyeong Bo Kim - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Upper airway obstruction resulting from acute mucosal injury induced by direct ingestion of Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate powder.
    Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2016
    Co-Authors: Gyeong Bo Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Tae Rim Lee, Won Chul Cha, Min Seob Sim, Keun Jeong Song, Joong Eui Rhee, Yeon Kwon Jeong
    Abstract:

    A 59-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of sore throat after swallowing Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate powder for bowel preparation, without first dissolving it in water. The initial evaluation showed significant mucosal injury involving the oral cavity, pharynx, and epiglottis. Endotracheal intubation was performed for airway protection in the emergency department, because the mucosal swelling resulted in upper airway compromise. After conservative treatment in the intensive care unit, he underwent tracheostomy because stenosis of the supraglottic and subglottic areas was not relieved. The tracheostomy tube was successfully removed after confirming recovery, and he was discharged 3 weeks after admission.

  • upper airway obstruction resulting from acute mucosal injury induced by direct ingestion of Sodium Picosulfate magnesium citrate powder
    Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2016
    Co-Authors: Gyeong Bo Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Tae Rim Lee, Won Chul Cha, Min Seob Sim, Keun Jeong Song, Joong Eui Rhee, Yeon Kwon Jeong
    Abstract:

    A 59-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of sore throat after swallowing Sodium Picosulfate/magnesium citrate powder for bowel preparation, without first dissolving it in water. The initial evaluation showed significant mucosal injury involving the oral cavity, pharynx, and epiglottis. Endotracheal intubation was performed for airway protection in the emergency department, because the mucosal swelling resulted in upper airway compromise. After conservative treatment in the intensive care unit, he underwent tracheostomy because stenosis of the supraglottic and subglottic areas was not relieved. The tracheostomy tube was successfully removed after confirming recovery, and he was discharged 3 weeks after admission.