The Experts below are selected from a list of 1482 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Marcus J J Wang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • sino vatican negotiations problems in Sovereign Right and national security
    Journal of Contemporary China, 2016
    Co-Authors: Beatrice Leung, Marcus J J Wang
    Abstract:

    AbstractThis article, in the context of Sovereignty, discusses problems put to China and the Vatican in their long course of negotiations (1987–) which aim at a reconciliation. China’s past experience in negotiating with major powers (US and Great Britain) are reviewed while the Vatican’s aim of negotiating a concordat is also explained. The societal factors from the current Chinese political landscape, including social unrest as well as the Taiwan factor, are reviewed to identify problems in the ‘Sino–Vatican negotiations’.

  • Sino–Vatican Negotiations: problems in Sovereign Right and national security
    Journal of Contemporary China, 2016
    Co-Authors: Beatrice Leung, Marcus J J Wang
    Abstract:

    AbstractThis article, in the context of Sovereignty, discusses problems put to China and the Vatican in their long course of negotiations (1987–) which aim at a reconciliation. China’s past experience in negotiating with major powers (US and Great Britain) are reviewed while the Vatican’s aim of negotiating a concordat is also explained. The societal factors from the current Chinese political landscape, including social unrest as well as the Taiwan factor, are reviewed to identify problems in the ‘Sino–Vatican negotiations’.

Beatrice Leung - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • sino vatican negotiations problems in Sovereign Right and national security
    Journal of Contemporary China, 2016
    Co-Authors: Beatrice Leung, Marcus J J Wang
    Abstract:

    AbstractThis article, in the context of Sovereignty, discusses problems put to China and the Vatican in their long course of negotiations (1987–) which aim at a reconciliation. China’s past experience in negotiating with major powers (US and Great Britain) are reviewed while the Vatican’s aim of negotiating a concordat is also explained. The societal factors from the current Chinese political landscape, including social unrest as well as the Taiwan factor, are reviewed to identify problems in the ‘Sino–Vatican negotiations’.

  • Sino–Vatican Negotiations: problems in Sovereign Right and national security
    Journal of Contemporary China, 2016
    Co-Authors: Beatrice Leung, Marcus J J Wang
    Abstract:

    AbstractThis article, in the context of Sovereignty, discusses problems put to China and the Vatican in their long course of negotiations (1987–) which aim at a reconciliation. China’s past experience in negotiating with major powers (US and Great Britain) are reviewed while the Vatican’s aim of negotiating a concordat is also explained. The societal factors from the current Chinese political landscape, including social unrest as well as the Taiwan factor, are reviewed to identify problems in the ‘Sino–Vatican negotiations’.

Yang Yong - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Nurul Barizah - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • STATE OBLIGATION ON VIRUS SAMPLE SHARING;FROM COMMON HERITAGE OF MANKIND TO STATE’S Sovereign Right
    2015
    Co-Authors: Nurul Barizah
    Abstract:

    The tradition of free international exchange of viruses have been developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) probably based on the principle of “Common Heritage of Mankind”.  This tradition lead to legal uncertainty and unfairness in the movement of resources among states and provides an opportunity for developed countries to obtain easy access to viruses of developing countries. Then, International Law has introduced a new regime of “State’s Sovereign Right.” This research focuses on whether Member States have an obligation to share pathogen materials, including viruses for preventing global public health emergency, and whether WHO Collaborating Centers has a Right to  share viruses to private sectors. It examines the reason why States should apply that principle. This research is normative legal research by using conceptual approach and  statute approach. This research finds that viruses are part of genetic resources under the meaning of CBD Convention. Accordingly, there is no state obligation under International Law to share it. However, if there is an international human Rights obligation to share virus, there should also be an international human Rights obligation to assure the access of affordability of drugs and vaccines. Thus, each state will have an equal obligation to enhance the global public health. Key Words : Intellectual Property, Virus Sample Sharing, Common Heritage of Mankind, and State ’s Sovereign Right

  • state obligation on virus sample sharing from common heritage of mankind to state s Sovereign Right
    Jurnal Media Hukum, 2015
    Co-Authors: Nurul Barizah
    Abstract:

    The tradition of free international exchange of viruses have been developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) probably based on the principle of “Common Heritage of Mankind”.  This tradition lead to legal uncertainty and unfairness in the movement of resources among states and provides an opportunity for developed countries to obtain easy access to viruses of developing countries. Then, International Law has introduced a new regime of “State’s Sovereign Right.” This research focuses on whether Member States have an obligation to share pathogen materials, including viruses for preventing global public health emergency, and whether WHO Collaborating Centers has a Right to  share viruses to private sectors. It examines the reason why States should apply that principle. This research is normative legal research by using conceptual approach and  statute approach. This research finds that viruses are part of genetic resources under the meaning of CBD Convention. Accordingly, there is no state obligation under International Law to share it. However, if there is an international human Rights obligation to share virus, there should also be an international human Rights obligation to assure the access of affordability of drugs and vaccines. Thus, each state will have an equal obligation to enhance the global public health. Key Words : Intellectual Property, Virus Sample Sharing, Common Heritage of Mankind, and State ’s Sovereign Right

Abdelhamid El Ouali - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the state s Sovereign Right to existence
    2012
    Co-Authors: Abdelhamid El Ouali
    Abstract:

    Modern International Law doctrine has a reified approach to territorial integrity. This has led to the perception that territorial integrity is the completeness/unity of state territory. Such an approach has proven to be irrelevant in understanding the real nature, content and legal consequences of territorial integrity. Amazingly International legal and political scholars as well as political geography specialists have never enquired about the link between territorial integrity and territoriality. In fact, territorial integrity is in essence the elaborated and sophisticated legal expression of territoriality. It is intimately linked to the state as a legal entity the main objective of which is to ensure its perennial existence within a specific territory whose borders have been established in accordance with International Law. Therefore, a new approach is needed in order to better understand territorial integrity, a principle that can be considered as the cornerstone of International Law.

  • The State’s Sovereign Right to Existence
    Territorial Integrity in a Globalizing World, 2011
    Co-Authors: Abdelhamid El Ouali
    Abstract:

    Modern International Law doctrine has a reified approach to territorial integrity. This has led to the perception that territorial integrity is the completeness/unity of state territory. Such an approach has proven to be irrelevant in understanding the real nature, content and legal consequences of territorial integrity. Amazingly International legal and political scholars as well as political geography specialists have never enquired about the link between territorial integrity and territoriality. In fact, territorial integrity is in essence the elaborated and sophisticated legal expression of territoriality. It is intimately linked to the state as a legal entity the main objective of which is to ensure its perennial existence within a specific territory whose borders have been established in accordance with International Law. Therefore, a new approach is needed in order to better understand territorial integrity, a principle that can be considered as the cornerstone of International Law.

  • territorial integrity rethinking the territorial Sovereign Right of the existence of the states
    Geopolitics, 2006
    Co-Authors: Abdelhamid El Ouali
    Abstract:

    Legal contemporary doctrine has a reified approach to the state. This has led to the perception that territorial integrity is the completeness/unity of the state territory. Amazingly international relations and political geography scholars have not enquired about the link between territoriality and territorial integrity. In essence the principle of territorial integrity is the elaborated and sophisticated legal expression of territoriality. It is intimately linked to the state as a legal entity the main objective of which is to ensure its perennial existence within a specific territory whose borders have been established in accordance with international law. I think that the life of an institution implies that we are able to criticize, to transform, to open the institution to its own future. So the law as such can be deconstructed and has to be deconstructed. That is the condition of historicity, revolution, morals, ethics, and progress. (J. Derrida)