The Experts below are selected from a list of 18060 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

John C Mazziotta - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • automated image registration ii intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear Models
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Roger P. Woods, Nancy L Sicotte, Scott T Grafton, John D G Watson, John C Mazziotta
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Our goal was to validate linear and nonlinear intersubject image registration using an automated method (AIR 3.0) based on voxel intensity. Method: PET and MRI data from 22 normal subjects were registered to corresponding averaged PET or MRI brain atlases using several specific linear and nonlinear Spatial Transformation Models with an automated algorithm. Validation was based on anatomically defined landmarks. Results: Automated registration produced results that were superior to a manual nine parameter variant of the Talairach registration method. Increasing the degrees of freedom in the Spatial Transformation Model improved the accuracy of automated intersubject registration. Conclusion: Linear or nonlinear automated intersubject registration based on voxel intensities is computationally practical and produces more accurate alignment of homologous landmarks than manual nine parameter Talairach registration. Nonlinear Models provide better registration than linear Models but are slower.

  • automated image registration ii intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear Models
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Roger P. Woods, Nancy L Sicotte, Scott T Grafton, John D G Watson, John C Mazziotta
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Our goal was to validate linear and nonlinear intersubject image registration using an automated method (AIR 3.0) based on voxel intensity. Method: PET and MRI data from 22 normal subjects were registered to corresponding averaged PET or MRI brain atlases using several specific linear and nonlinear Spatial Transformation Models with an automated algorithm. Validation was based on anatomically defined landmarks. Results: Automated registration produced results that were superior to a manual nine parameter variant of the Talairach registration method. Increasing the degrees of freedom in the Spatial Transformation Model improved the accuracy of automated intersubject registration. Conclusion: Linear or nonlinear automated intersubject registration based on voxel intensities is computationally practical and produces more accurate alignment of homologous landmarks than manual nine parameter Talairach registration. Nonlinear Models provide better registration than linear Models but are slower.

Roger P. Woods - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • automated image registration ii intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear Models
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Roger P. Woods, Nancy L Sicotte, Scott T Grafton, John D G Watson, John C Mazziotta
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Our goal was to validate linear and nonlinear intersubject image registration using an automated method (AIR 3.0) based on voxel intensity. Method: PET and MRI data from 22 normal subjects were registered to corresponding averaged PET or MRI brain atlases using several specific linear and nonlinear Spatial Transformation Models with an automated algorithm. Validation was based on anatomically defined landmarks. Results: Automated registration produced results that were superior to a manual nine parameter variant of the Talairach registration method. Increasing the degrees of freedom in the Spatial Transformation Model improved the accuracy of automated intersubject registration. Conclusion: Linear or nonlinear automated intersubject registration based on voxel intensities is computationally practical and produces more accurate alignment of homologous landmarks than manual nine parameter Talairach registration. Nonlinear Models provide better registration than linear Models but are slower.

  • automated image registration ii intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear Models
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Roger P. Woods, Nancy L Sicotte, Scott T Grafton, John D G Watson, John C Mazziotta
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Our goal was to validate linear and nonlinear intersubject image registration using an automated method (AIR 3.0) based on voxel intensity. Method: PET and MRI data from 22 normal subjects were registered to corresponding averaged PET or MRI brain atlases using several specific linear and nonlinear Spatial Transformation Models with an automated algorithm. Validation was based on anatomically defined landmarks. Results: Automated registration produced results that were superior to a manual nine parameter variant of the Talairach registration method. Increasing the degrees of freedom in the Spatial Transformation Model improved the accuracy of automated intersubject registration. Conclusion: Linear or nonlinear automated intersubject registration based on voxel intensities is computationally practical and produces more accurate alignment of homologous landmarks than manual nine parameter Talairach registration. Nonlinear Models provide better registration than linear Models but are slower.

Nancy L Sicotte - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • automated image registration ii intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear Models
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Roger P. Woods, Nancy L Sicotte, Scott T Grafton, John D G Watson, John C Mazziotta
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Our goal was to validate linear and nonlinear intersubject image registration using an automated method (AIR 3.0) based on voxel intensity. Method: PET and MRI data from 22 normal subjects were registered to corresponding averaged PET or MRI brain atlases using several specific linear and nonlinear Spatial Transformation Models with an automated algorithm. Validation was based on anatomically defined landmarks. Results: Automated registration produced results that were superior to a manual nine parameter variant of the Talairach registration method. Increasing the degrees of freedom in the Spatial Transformation Model improved the accuracy of automated intersubject registration. Conclusion: Linear or nonlinear automated intersubject registration based on voxel intensities is computationally practical and produces more accurate alignment of homologous landmarks than manual nine parameter Talairach registration. Nonlinear Models provide better registration than linear Models but are slower.

  • automated image registration ii intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear Models
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Roger P. Woods, Nancy L Sicotte, Scott T Grafton, John D G Watson, John C Mazziotta
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Our goal was to validate linear and nonlinear intersubject image registration using an automated method (AIR 3.0) based on voxel intensity. Method: PET and MRI data from 22 normal subjects were registered to corresponding averaged PET or MRI brain atlases using several specific linear and nonlinear Spatial Transformation Models with an automated algorithm. Validation was based on anatomically defined landmarks. Results: Automated registration produced results that were superior to a manual nine parameter variant of the Talairach registration method. Increasing the degrees of freedom in the Spatial Transformation Model improved the accuracy of automated intersubject registration. Conclusion: Linear or nonlinear automated intersubject registration based on voxel intensities is computationally practical and produces more accurate alignment of homologous landmarks than manual nine parameter Talairach registration. Nonlinear Models provide better registration than linear Models but are slower.

Scott T Grafton - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • automated image registration ii intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear Models
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Roger P. Woods, Nancy L Sicotte, Scott T Grafton, John D G Watson, John C Mazziotta
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Our goal was to validate linear and nonlinear intersubject image registration using an automated method (AIR 3.0) based on voxel intensity. Method: PET and MRI data from 22 normal subjects were registered to corresponding averaged PET or MRI brain atlases using several specific linear and nonlinear Spatial Transformation Models with an automated algorithm. Validation was based on anatomically defined landmarks. Results: Automated registration produced results that were superior to a manual nine parameter variant of the Talairach registration method. Increasing the degrees of freedom in the Spatial Transformation Model improved the accuracy of automated intersubject registration. Conclusion: Linear or nonlinear automated intersubject registration based on voxel intensities is computationally practical and produces more accurate alignment of homologous landmarks than manual nine parameter Talairach registration. Nonlinear Models provide better registration than linear Models but are slower.

  • automated image registration ii intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear Models
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Roger P. Woods, Nancy L Sicotte, Scott T Grafton, John D G Watson, John C Mazziotta
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Our goal was to validate linear and nonlinear intersubject image registration using an automated method (AIR 3.0) based on voxel intensity. Method: PET and MRI data from 22 normal subjects were registered to corresponding averaged PET or MRI brain atlases using several specific linear and nonlinear Spatial Transformation Models with an automated algorithm. Validation was based on anatomically defined landmarks. Results: Automated registration produced results that were superior to a manual nine parameter variant of the Talairach registration method. Increasing the degrees of freedom in the Spatial Transformation Model improved the accuracy of automated intersubject registration. Conclusion: Linear or nonlinear automated intersubject registration based on voxel intensities is computationally practical and produces more accurate alignment of homologous landmarks than manual nine parameter Talairach registration. Nonlinear Models provide better registration than linear Models but are slower.

John D G Watson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • automated image registration ii intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear Models
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Roger P. Woods, Nancy L Sicotte, Scott T Grafton, John D G Watson, John C Mazziotta
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Our goal was to validate linear and nonlinear intersubject image registration using an automated method (AIR 3.0) based on voxel intensity. Method: PET and MRI data from 22 normal subjects were registered to corresponding averaged PET or MRI brain atlases using several specific linear and nonlinear Spatial Transformation Models with an automated algorithm. Validation was based on anatomically defined landmarks. Results: Automated registration produced results that were superior to a manual nine parameter variant of the Talairach registration method. Increasing the degrees of freedom in the Spatial Transformation Model improved the accuracy of automated intersubject registration. Conclusion: Linear or nonlinear automated intersubject registration based on voxel intensities is computationally practical and produces more accurate alignment of homologous landmarks than manual nine parameter Talairach registration. Nonlinear Models provide better registration than linear Models but are slower.

  • automated image registration ii intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear Models
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998
    Co-Authors: Roger P. Woods, Nancy L Sicotte, Scott T Grafton, John D G Watson, John C Mazziotta
    Abstract:

    Purpose: Our goal was to validate linear and nonlinear intersubject image registration using an automated method (AIR 3.0) based on voxel intensity. Method: PET and MRI data from 22 normal subjects were registered to corresponding averaged PET or MRI brain atlases using several specific linear and nonlinear Spatial Transformation Models with an automated algorithm. Validation was based on anatomically defined landmarks. Results: Automated registration produced results that were superior to a manual nine parameter variant of the Talairach registration method. Increasing the degrees of freedom in the Spatial Transformation Model improved the accuracy of automated intersubject registration. Conclusion: Linear or nonlinear automated intersubject registration based on voxel intensities is computationally practical and produces more accurate alignment of homologous landmarks than manual nine parameter Talairach registration. Nonlinear Models provide better registration than linear Models but are slower.