The Experts below are selected from a list of 174 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Daniel Canet - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • nmr relaxometry spin lattice Relaxation times in the laboratory frame versus spin lattice Relaxation times in the rotating frame
    Chemical Physics Letters, 2010
    Co-Authors: Emilie Steiner, Mehdi Yemloul, Laoues Guendouz, Sebastien Leclerc, Anthony Robert, Daniel Canet
    Abstract:

    Relaxometry dispersion curves display the spin lattice Relaxation rate as a function of the measurement frequency. However, as far as proton NMR is considered, dispersion curves usually start around 5 kHz and thus miss the very low frequency region. This gap can be filled by the measurement of the spin–lattice Relaxation rate in the rotating frame. The issue of connecting both Relaxation rates is considered for two Relaxation mechanisms: (i) randomly varying magnetic fields, (ii) dipolar interaction within a system of two equivalent spins. Appropriate data processing is presented and the random field mechanism turns out to be adequate.

  • NMR relaxometry: Spin lattice Relaxation times in the laboratory frame versus spin lattice Relaxation times in the rotating frame
    Chemical Physics Letters, 2010
    Co-Authors: Emilie Steiner, Mehdi Yemloul, Laoues Guendouz, Sebastien Leclerc, Anthony Robert, Daniel Canet
    Abstract:

    International audienceRelaxometry dispersion curves display the spin lattice Relaxation rate as a function of the measurement frequency. However, as far as proton NMR is considered, dispersion curves usually start around 5 kHz and thus miss the very low frequency region. This gap can be filled by the measurement of the Spin-Lattice Relaxation rate in the rotating frame. The issue of connecting both Relaxation rates is considered for two Relaxation mechanisms: i) randomly varying magnetic fields, ii) dipolar interaction within a system of two equivalent spins. Appropriate data processing is presented and the random field mechanism turns out to be adequate

Emilie Steiner - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • nmr relaxometry spin lattice Relaxation times in the laboratory frame versus spin lattice Relaxation times in the rotating frame
    Chemical Physics Letters, 2010
    Co-Authors: Emilie Steiner, Mehdi Yemloul, Laoues Guendouz, Sebastien Leclerc, Anthony Robert, Daniel Canet
    Abstract:

    Relaxometry dispersion curves display the spin lattice Relaxation rate as a function of the measurement frequency. However, as far as proton NMR is considered, dispersion curves usually start around 5 kHz and thus miss the very low frequency region. This gap can be filled by the measurement of the spin–lattice Relaxation rate in the rotating frame. The issue of connecting both Relaxation rates is considered for two Relaxation mechanisms: (i) randomly varying magnetic fields, (ii) dipolar interaction within a system of two equivalent spins. Appropriate data processing is presented and the random field mechanism turns out to be adequate.

  • NMR relaxometry: Spin lattice Relaxation times in the laboratory frame versus spin lattice Relaxation times in the rotating frame
    Chemical Physics Letters, 2010
    Co-Authors: Emilie Steiner, Mehdi Yemloul, Laoues Guendouz, Sebastien Leclerc, Anthony Robert, Daniel Canet
    Abstract:

    International audienceRelaxometry dispersion curves display the spin lattice Relaxation rate as a function of the measurement frequency. However, as far as proton NMR is considered, dispersion curves usually start around 5 kHz and thus miss the very low frequency region. This gap can be filled by the measurement of the Spin-Lattice Relaxation rate in the rotating frame. The issue of connecting both Relaxation rates is considered for two Relaxation mechanisms: i) randomly varying magnetic fields, ii) dipolar interaction within a system of two equivalent spins. Appropriate data processing is presented and the random field mechanism turns out to be adequate

Anthony Robert - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • nmr relaxometry spin lattice Relaxation times in the laboratory frame versus spin lattice Relaxation times in the rotating frame
    Chemical Physics Letters, 2010
    Co-Authors: Emilie Steiner, Mehdi Yemloul, Laoues Guendouz, Sebastien Leclerc, Anthony Robert, Daniel Canet
    Abstract:

    Relaxometry dispersion curves display the spin lattice Relaxation rate as a function of the measurement frequency. However, as far as proton NMR is considered, dispersion curves usually start around 5 kHz and thus miss the very low frequency region. This gap can be filled by the measurement of the spin–lattice Relaxation rate in the rotating frame. The issue of connecting both Relaxation rates is considered for two Relaxation mechanisms: (i) randomly varying magnetic fields, (ii) dipolar interaction within a system of two equivalent spins. Appropriate data processing is presented and the random field mechanism turns out to be adequate.

  • NMR relaxometry: Spin lattice Relaxation times in the laboratory frame versus spin lattice Relaxation times in the rotating frame
    Chemical Physics Letters, 2010
    Co-Authors: Emilie Steiner, Mehdi Yemloul, Laoues Guendouz, Sebastien Leclerc, Anthony Robert, Daniel Canet
    Abstract:

    International audienceRelaxometry dispersion curves display the spin lattice Relaxation rate as a function of the measurement frequency. However, as far as proton NMR is considered, dispersion curves usually start around 5 kHz and thus miss the very low frequency region. This gap can be filled by the measurement of the Spin-Lattice Relaxation rate in the rotating frame. The issue of connecting both Relaxation rates is considered for two Relaxation mechanisms: i) randomly varying magnetic fields, ii) dipolar interaction within a system of two equivalent spins. Appropriate data processing is presented and the random field mechanism turns out to be adequate

Sebastien Leclerc - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • nmr relaxometry spin lattice Relaxation times in the laboratory frame versus spin lattice Relaxation times in the rotating frame
    Chemical Physics Letters, 2010
    Co-Authors: Emilie Steiner, Mehdi Yemloul, Laoues Guendouz, Sebastien Leclerc, Anthony Robert, Daniel Canet
    Abstract:

    Relaxometry dispersion curves display the spin lattice Relaxation rate as a function of the measurement frequency. However, as far as proton NMR is considered, dispersion curves usually start around 5 kHz and thus miss the very low frequency region. This gap can be filled by the measurement of the spin–lattice Relaxation rate in the rotating frame. The issue of connecting both Relaxation rates is considered for two Relaxation mechanisms: (i) randomly varying magnetic fields, (ii) dipolar interaction within a system of two equivalent spins. Appropriate data processing is presented and the random field mechanism turns out to be adequate.

  • NMR relaxometry: Spin lattice Relaxation times in the laboratory frame versus spin lattice Relaxation times in the rotating frame
    Chemical Physics Letters, 2010
    Co-Authors: Emilie Steiner, Mehdi Yemloul, Laoues Guendouz, Sebastien Leclerc, Anthony Robert, Daniel Canet
    Abstract:

    International audienceRelaxometry dispersion curves display the spin lattice Relaxation rate as a function of the measurement frequency. However, as far as proton NMR is considered, dispersion curves usually start around 5 kHz and thus miss the very low frequency region. This gap can be filled by the measurement of the Spin-Lattice Relaxation rate in the rotating frame. The issue of connecting both Relaxation rates is considered for two Relaxation mechanisms: i) randomly varying magnetic fields, ii) dipolar interaction within a system of two equivalent spins. Appropriate data processing is presented and the random field mechanism turns out to be adequate

Laoues Guendouz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • nmr relaxometry spin lattice Relaxation times in the laboratory frame versus spin lattice Relaxation times in the rotating frame
    Chemical Physics Letters, 2010
    Co-Authors: Emilie Steiner, Mehdi Yemloul, Laoues Guendouz, Sebastien Leclerc, Anthony Robert, Daniel Canet
    Abstract:

    Relaxometry dispersion curves display the spin lattice Relaxation rate as a function of the measurement frequency. However, as far as proton NMR is considered, dispersion curves usually start around 5 kHz and thus miss the very low frequency region. This gap can be filled by the measurement of the spin–lattice Relaxation rate in the rotating frame. The issue of connecting both Relaxation rates is considered for two Relaxation mechanisms: (i) randomly varying magnetic fields, (ii) dipolar interaction within a system of two equivalent spins. Appropriate data processing is presented and the random field mechanism turns out to be adequate.

  • NMR relaxometry: Spin lattice Relaxation times in the laboratory frame versus spin lattice Relaxation times in the rotating frame
    Chemical Physics Letters, 2010
    Co-Authors: Emilie Steiner, Mehdi Yemloul, Laoues Guendouz, Sebastien Leclerc, Anthony Robert, Daniel Canet
    Abstract:

    International audienceRelaxometry dispersion curves display the spin lattice Relaxation rate as a function of the measurement frequency. However, as far as proton NMR is considered, dispersion curves usually start around 5 kHz and thus miss the very low frequency region. This gap can be filled by the measurement of the Spin-Lattice Relaxation rate in the rotating frame. The issue of connecting both Relaxation rates is considered for two Relaxation mechanisms: i) randomly varying magnetic fields, ii) dipolar interaction within a system of two equivalent spins. Appropriate data processing is presented and the random field mechanism turns out to be adequate