The Experts below are selected from a list of 1995 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Rachael Anne Frank - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Mobilization and manipulation of the cervical spine in patients with cervicogenic headache any scientific evidence
    Frontiers in Neurology, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jodan D Garcia, Stephen Arnold, Kylie Tetley, Kiel Voight, Rachael Anne Frank
    Abstract:

    Cervical Mobilization and manipulation are frequently used to treat patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache (CEH); however, there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of these manual therapy techniques. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effects of cervical Mobilization and manipulation on pain intensity and headache frequency, compared to traditional physical therapy interventions in patients diagnosed with CEH. A total of 66 relevant studies were originally identified through a review of the literature, and the 25 most suitable articles were fully evaluated via a careful review of the text. Ultimately, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) or open RCT; the study contained at least two separate groups of subjects that were randomly assigned either to a cervical spine Mobilization or manipulation or a group that served as a comparison; (2) subjects must have had a diagnosis of CEH; (3) the treatment group received either Spinal Mobilization or Spinal manipulation, while the control group received another physical therapy intervention or placebo control; and (4) the study included headache pain and frequency as outcome measurements. Seven of the 10 studies had statistically significant findings that subjects who received Mobilization or manipulation interventions experienced improved outcomes or reported fewer symptoms than control subjects. These results suggest that Mobilization or manipulation of the cervical spine may be beneficial for individuals who suffer from CEH, although heterogeneity of the studies makes it difficult to generalize the findings.

  • Mobilization and manipulation of the cervical spine in patients with cervicogenic headache any scientific evidence
    Frontiers in Neurology, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jodan D Garcia, Stephen Arnold, Kylie Tetley, Kiel Voight, Rachael Anne Frank
    Abstract:

    Cervical Mobilization and manipulation are frequently used to treat patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache (CEH), however there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of these manual therapy techniques. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effects of cervical Mobilization and manipulation on pain intensity and headache frequency, compared to traditional physical therapy interventions in patients diagnosed with CEH. A total of 66 relevant studies were originally identified through a review of the literature, and the 25 most suitable articles were fully evaluated via a careful review of the text. Ultimately, ten studies met the inclusion criteria: 1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) or open randomized controlled trial; the study contained at least two separate groups of subjects that were randomly assigned either to a cervical spine Mobilization or manipulation or a group that served as a comparison, 2) subjects must have had a diagnosis of CEH; 3) the treatment group received either Spinal Mobilization or Spinal manipulation, while the control group received another physical therapy intervention or placebo control; and 4) the study included headache pain and frequency as outcome measurements. Seven of the ten studies had statistically significant findings that subjects who received Mobilization or manipulation interventions experienced improved outcomes or reported fewer symptoms than control subjects. These results suggest that Mobilization or manipulation of the cervical spine may be beneficial for individuals who suffer from CEH, although heterogeneity of the studies makes it difficult to generalize the findings.

Jodan D Garcia - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Mobilization and manipulation of the cervical spine in patients with cervicogenic headache any scientific evidence
    Frontiers in Neurology, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jodan D Garcia, Stephen Arnold, Kylie Tetley, Kiel Voight, Rachael Anne Frank
    Abstract:

    Cervical Mobilization and manipulation are frequently used to treat patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache (CEH); however, there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of these manual therapy techniques. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effects of cervical Mobilization and manipulation on pain intensity and headache frequency, compared to traditional physical therapy interventions in patients diagnosed with CEH. A total of 66 relevant studies were originally identified through a review of the literature, and the 25 most suitable articles were fully evaluated via a careful review of the text. Ultimately, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) or open RCT; the study contained at least two separate groups of subjects that were randomly assigned either to a cervical spine Mobilization or manipulation or a group that served as a comparison; (2) subjects must have had a diagnosis of CEH; (3) the treatment group received either Spinal Mobilization or Spinal manipulation, while the control group received another physical therapy intervention or placebo control; and (4) the study included headache pain and frequency as outcome measurements. Seven of the 10 studies had statistically significant findings that subjects who received Mobilization or manipulation interventions experienced improved outcomes or reported fewer symptoms than control subjects. These results suggest that Mobilization or manipulation of the cervical spine may be beneficial for individuals who suffer from CEH, although heterogeneity of the studies makes it difficult to generalize the findings.

  • Mobilization and manipulation of the cervical spine in patients with cervicogenic headache any scientific evidence
    Frontiers in Neurology, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jodan D Garcia, Stephen Arnold, Kylie Tetley, Kiel Voight, Rachael Anne Frank
    Abstract:

    Cervical Mobilization and manipulation are frequently used to treat patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache (CEH), however there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of these manual therapy techniques. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effects of cervical Mobilization and manipulation on pain intensity and headache frequency, compared to traditional physical therapy interventions in patients diagnosed with CEH. A total of 66 relevant studies were originally identified through a review of the literature, and the 25 most suitable articles were fully evaluated via a careful review of the text. Ultimately, ten studies met the inclusion criteria: 1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) or open randomized controlled trial; the study contained at least two separate groups of subjects that were randomly assigned either to a cervical spine Mobilization or manipulation or a group that served as a comparison, 2) subjects must have had a diagnosis of CEH; 3) the treatment group received either Spinal Mobilization or Spinal manipulation, while the control group received another physical therapy intervention or placebo control; and 4) the study included headache pain and frequency as outcome measurements. Seven of the ten studies had statistically significant findings that subjects who received Mobilization or manipulation interventions experienced improved outcomes or reported fewer symptoms than control subjects. These results suggest that Mobilization or manipulation of the cervical spine may be beneficial for individuals who suffer from CEH, although heterogeneity of the studies makes it difficult to generalize the findings.

Barry Kim Humphreys - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • chronic mechanical neck pain in adults treated by manual therapy a systematic review of change scores in randomized controlled trials of a single session
    Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 2008
    Co-Authors: Howard Vernon, Barry Kim Humphreys
    Abstract:

    AbstractWe report a systematic analysis of group change scores of subjects with chronic neck pain not due to whiplash and without headache or arm pain, in randomized clinical trials of a single session of manual therapy. A comprehensive literature search of clinical trials of chronic neck pain treated with manual therapies up to December 2006 was conducted. Trials that scored above 60% on the PEDro Scale were included. Change scores that scored above 60% on the PEDro Scale were included. Change scores were analyzed for absolute, percentage change and e ect size (ES) whenever possible. Nine trials were identi ed: 6 for Spinal manipulation, 4 for Spinal Mobilization or non-manipulative manual therapy (2 overlapping trials), and 1 trial using ischemic compression. No trials were identi ed for massage therapy or manual traction. Four manipulation trials (Five groups) reported mean immediate changes in 100-mm VAS of –18.94 (9.28) mm. ES for these changes ranged from .33 to 2.3. Two Mobilization trials reported...

Kiel Voight - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Mobilization and manipulation of the cervical spine in patients with cervicogenic headache any scientific evidence
    Frontiers in Neurology, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jodan D Garcia, Stephen Arnold, Kylie Tetley, Kiel Voight, Rachael Anne Frank
    Abstract:

    Cervical Mobilization and manipulation are frequently used to treat patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache (CEH); however, there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of these manual therapy techniques. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effects of cervical Mobilization and manipulation on pain intensity and headache frequency, compared to traditional physical therapy interventions in patients diagnosed with CEH. A total of 66 relevant studies were originally identified through a review of the literature, and the 25 most suitable articles were fully evaluated via a careful review of the text. Ultimately, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) or open RCT; the study contained at least two separate groups of subjects that were randomly assigned either to a cervical spine Mobilization or manipulation or a group that served as a comparison; (2) subjects must have had a diagnosis of CEH; (3) the treatment group received either Spinal Mobilization or Spinal manipulation, while the control group received another physical therapy intervention or placebo control; and (4) the study included headache pain and frequency as outcome measurements. Seven of the 10 studies had statistically significant findings that subjects who received Mobilization or manipulation interventions experienced improved outcomes or reported fewer symptoms than control subjects. These results suggest that Mobilization or manipulation of the cervical spine may be beneficial for individuals who suffer from CEH, although heterogeneity of the studies makes it difficult to generalize the findings.

  • Mobilization and manipulation of the cervical spine in patients with cervicogenic headache any scientific evidence
    Frontiers in Neurology, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jodan D Garcia, Stephen Arnold, Kylie Tetley, Kiel Voight, Rachael Anne Frank
    Abstract:

    Cervical Mobilization and manipulation are frequently used to treat patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache (CEH), however there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of these manual therapy techniques. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effects of cervical Mobilization and manipulation on pain intensity and headache frequency, compared to traditional physical therapy interventions in patients diagnosed with CEH. A total of 66 relevant studies were originally identified through a review of the literature, and the 25 most suitable articles were fully evaluated via a careful review of the text. Ultimately, ten studies met the inclusion criteria: 1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) or open randomized controlled trial; the study contained at least two separate groups of subjects that were randomly assigned either to a cervical spine Mobilization or manipulation or a group that served as a comparison, 2) subjects must have had a diagnosis of CEH; 3) the treatment group received either Spinal Mobilization or Spinal manipulation, while the control group received another physical therapy intervention or placebo control; and 4) the study included headache pain and frequency as outcome measurements. Seven of the ten studies had statistically significant findings that subjects who received Mobilization or manipulation interventions experienced improved outcomes or reported fewer symptoms than control subjects. These results suggest that Mobilization or manipulation of the cervical spine may be beneficial for individuals who suffer from CEH, although heterogeneity of the studies makes it difficult to generalize the findings.

Kylie Tetley - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Mobilization and manipulation of the cervical spine in patients with cervicogenic headache any scientific evidence
    Frontiers in Neurology, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jodan D Garcia, Stephen Arnold, Kylie Tetley, Kiel Voight, Rachael Anne Frank
    Abstract:

    Cervical Mobilization and manipulation are frequently used to treat patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache (CEH); however, there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of these manual therapy techniques. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effects of cervical Mobilization and manipulation on pain intensity and headache frequency, compared to traditional physical therapy interventions in patients diagnosed with CEH. A total of 66 relevant studies were originally identified through a review of the literature, and the 25 most suitable articles were fully evaluated via a careful review of the text. Ultimately, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) or open RCT; the study contained at least two separate groups of subjects that were randomly assigned either to a cervical spine Mobilization or manipulation or a group that served as a comparison; (2) subjects must have had a diagnosis of CEH; (3) the treatment group received either Spinal Mobilization or Spinal manipulation, while the control group received another physical therapy intervention or placebo control; and (4) the study included headache pain and frequency as outcome measurements. Seven of the 10 studies had statistically significant findings that subjects who received Mobilization or manipulation interventions experienced improved outcomes or reported fewer symptoms than control subjects. These results suggest that Mobilization or manipulation of the cervical spine may be beneficial for individuals who suffer from CEH, although heterogeneity of the studies makes it difficult to generalize the findings.

  • Mobilization and manipulation of the cervical spine in patients with cervicogenic headache any scientific evidence
    Frontiers in Neurology, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jodan D Garcia, Stephen Arnold, Kylie Tetley, Kiel Voight, Rachael Anne Frank
    Abstract:

    Cervical Mobilization and manipulation are frequently used to treat patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache (CEH), however there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of these manual therapy techniques. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effects of cervical Mobilization and manipulation on pain intensity and headache frequency, compared to traditional physical therapy interventions in patients diagnosed with CEH. A total of 66 relevant studies were originally identified through a review of the literature, and the 25 most suitable articles were fully evaluated via a careful review of the text. Ultimately, ten studies met the inclusion criteria: 1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) or open randomized controlled trial; the study contained at least two separate groups of subjects that were randomly assigned either to a cervical spine Mobilization or manipulation or a group that served as a comparison, 2) subjects must have had a diagnosis of CEH; 3) the treatment group received either Spinal Mobilization or Spinal manipulation, while the control group received another physical therapy intervention or placebo control; and 4) the study included headache pain and frequency as outcome measurements. Seven of the ten studies had statistically significant findings that subjects who received Mobilization or manipulation interventions experienced improved outcomes or reported fewer symptoms than control subjects. These results suggest that Mobilization or manipulation of the cervical spine may be beneficial for individuals who suffer from CEH, although heterogeneity of the studies makes it difficult to generalize the findings.