The Experts below are selected from a list of 15987 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Yuxing Han - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle uav Sprayer effect of Spray Volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat
Pest Management Science, 2019Co-Authors: Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan, Pengchao Chen, Andrew J. Hewitt, Yuxing HanAbstract:BACKGROUND Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a recently developed aerial Spraying technology. However, the effect of Spray Volume variation on deposition and pesticide control efficacy is unknown. The effect of three UAV Spray Volumes (9.0, 16.8 and 28.1 L ha-1 ) using three different nozzle sizes on droplet deposition and wheat aphid and powdery mildew control efficacy was assessed. An electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) Sprayer was used as a comparison. RESULTS Different Spray Volumes significantly influenced the deposition and control efficacy of the UAV and EAP. For the UAV, a low Spray Volume of 9.0 L ha-1 with a fine nozzle (nozzle LU120-01) resulted in lower deposition and control efficacy. Optimal control efficacy was achieved with coarser nozzles (nozzles LU120-02, -03) at > 16.8 L ha-1 Volume with systemic insecticide, and at 28.1 L ha-1 with contact insecticide and fungicide. For EAP, a high Spray Volume led to run-off, and a Spray Volume of 225 L ha-1 achieved better deposition and control efficacy. CONCLUSION The UAV had comparable deposition and efficacy control to the EAP at a higher Spray Volume (> 16.8 L ha-1 ) with coarse nozzles, but exhibited inferior deposition and efficacy control at a lower Spray Volume (<9.0 L ha-1 ) with fine nozzles. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
-
Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Sprayer: effect of Spray Volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat.
Pest management science, 2019Co-Authors: Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan, Qi Haixia, Pengchao Chen, Andrew J. Hewitt, Yuxing HanAbstract:BACKGROUND Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a recently developed aerial Spraying technology. However, the effect of Spray Volume variation on deposition and pesticide control efficacy is unknown. The effect of three UAV Spray Volumes (9.0, 16.8 and 28.1 L ha-1 ) using three different nozzle sizes on droplet deposition and wheat aphid and powdery mildew control efficacy was assessed. An electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) Sprayer was used as a comparison. RESULTS Different Spray Volumes significantly influenced the deposition and control efficacy of the UAV and EAP. For the UAV, a low Spray Volume of 9.0 L ha-1 with a fine nozzle (nozzle LU120-01) resulted in lower deposition and control efficacy. Optimal control efficacy was achieved with coarser nozzles (nozzles LU120-02, -03) at > 16.8 L ha-1 Volume with systemic insecticide, and at 28.1 L ha-1 with contact insecticide and fungicide. For EAP, a high Spray Volume led to run-off, and a Spray Volume of 225 L ha-1 achieved better deposition and control efficacy. CONCLUSION The UAV had comparable deposition and efficacy control to the EAP at a higher Spray Volume (> 16.8 L ha-1 ) with coarse nozzles, but exhibited inferior deposition and efficacy control at a lower Spray Volume (
Yubin Lan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle uav Sprayer effect of Spray Volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat
Pest Management Science, 2019Co-Authors: Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan, Pengchao Chen, Andrew J. Hewitt, Yuxing HanAbstract:BACKGROUND Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a recently developed aerial Spraying technology. However, the effect of Spray Volume variation on deposition and pesticide control efficacy is unknown. The effect of three UAV Spray Volumes (9.0, 16.8 and 28.1 L ha-1 ) using three different nozzle sizes on droplet deposition and wheat aphid and powdery mildew control efficacy was assessed. An electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) Sprayer was used as a comparison. RESULTS Different Spray Volumes significantly influenced the deposition and control efficacy of the UAV and EAP. For the UAV, a low Spray Volume of 9.0 L ha-1 with a fine nozzle (nozzle LU120-01) resulted in lower deposition and control efficacy. Optimal control efficacy was achieved with coarser nozzles (nozzles LU120-02, -03) at > 16.8 L ha-1 Volume with systemic insecticide, and at 28.1 L ha-1 with contact insecticide and fungicide. For EAP, a high Spray Volume led to run-off, and a Spray Volume of 225 L ha-1 achieved better deposition and control efficacy. CONCLUSION The UAV had comparable deposition and efficacy control to the EAP at a higher Spray Volume (> 16.8 L ha-1 ) with coarse nozzles, but exhibited inferior deposition and efficacy control at a lower Spray Volume (<9.0 L ha-1 ) with fine nozzles. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
-
Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Sprayer: effect of Spray Volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat.
Pest management science, 2019Co-Authors: Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan, Qi Haixia, Pengchao Chen, Andrew J. Hewitt, Yuxing HanAbstract:BACKGROUND Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a recently developed aerial Spraying technology. However, the effect of Spray Volume variation on deposition and pesticide control efficacy is unknown. The effect of three UAV Spray Volumes (9.0, 16.8 and 28.1 L ha-1 ) using three different nozzle sizes on droplet deposition and wheat aphid and powdery mildew control efficacy was assessed. An electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) Sprayer was used as a comparison. RESULTS Different Spray Volumes significantly influenced the deposition and control efficacy of the UAV and EAP. For the UAV, a low Spray Volume of 9.0 L ha-1 with a fine nozzle (nozzle LU120-01) resulted in lower deposition and control efficacy. Optimal control efficacy was achieved with coarser nozzles (nozzles LU120-02, -03) at > 16.8 L ha-1 Volume with systemic insecticide, and at 28.1 L ha-1 with contact insecticide and fungicide. For EAP, a high Spray Volume led to run-off, and a Spray Volume of 225 L ha-1 achieved better deposition and control efficacy. CONCLUSION The UAV had comparable deposition and efficacy control to the EAP at a higher Spray Volume (> 16.8 L ha-1 ) with coarse nozzles, but exhibited inferior deposition and efficacy control at a lower Spray Volume (
Guobin Wang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle uav Sprayer effect of Spray Volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat
Pest Management Science, 2019Co-Authors: Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan, Pengchao Chen, Andrew J. Hewitt, Yuxing HanAbstract:BACKGROUND Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a recently developed aerial Spraying technology. However, the effect of Spray Volume variation on deposition and pesticide control efficacy is unknown. The effect of three UAV Spray Volumes (9.0, 16.8 and 28.1 L ha-1 ) using three different nozzle sizes on droplet deposition and wheat aphid and powdery mildew control efficacy was assessed. An electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) Sprayer was used as a comparison. RESULTS Different Spray Volumes significantly influenced the deposition and control efficacy of the UAV and EAP. For the UAV, a low Spray Volume of 9.0 L ha-1 with a fine nozzle (nozzle LU120-01) resulted in lower deposition and control efficacy. Optimal control efficacy was achieved with coarser nozzles (nozzles LU120-02, -03) at > 16.8 L ha-1 Volume with systemic insecticide, and at 28.1 L ha-1 with contact insecticide and fungicide. For EAP, a high Spray Volume led to run-off, and a Spray Volume of 225 L ha-1 achieved better deposition and control efficacy. CONCLUSION The UAV had comparable deposition and efficacy control to the EAP at a higher Spray Volume (> 16.8 L ha-1 ) with coarse nozzles, but exhibited inferior deposition and efficacy control at a lower Spray Volume (<9.0 L ha-1 ) with fine nozzles. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
-
Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Sprayer: effect of Spray Volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat.
Pest management science, 2019Co-Authors: Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan, Qi Haixia, Pengchao Chen, Andrew J. Hewitt, Yuxing HanAbstract:BACKGROUND Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a recently developed aerial Spraying technology. However, the effect of Spray Volume variation on deposition and pesticide control efficacy is unknown. The effect of three UAV Spray Volumes (9.0, 16.8 and 28.1 L ha-1 ) using three different nozzle sizes on droplet deposition and wheat aphid and powdery mildew control efficacy was assessed. An electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) Sprayer was used as a comparison. RESULTS Different Spray Volumes significantly influenced the deposition and control efficacy of the UAV and EAP. For the UAV, a low Spray Volume of 9.0 L ha-1 with a fine nozzle (nozzle LU120-01) resulted in lower deposition and control efficacy. Optimal control efficacy was achieved with coarser nozzles (nozzles LU120-02, -03) at > 16.8 L ha-1 Volume with systemic insecticide, and at 28.1 L ha-1 with contact insecticide and fungicide. For EAP, a high Spray Volume led to run-off, and a Spray Volume of 225 L ha-1 achieved better deposition and control efficacy. CONCLUSION The UAV had comparable deposition and efficacy control to the EAP at a higher Spray Volume (> 16.8 L ha-1 ) with coarse nozzles, but exhibited inferior deposition and efficacy control at a lower Spray Volume (
Andrew J. Hewitt - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle uav Sprayer effect of Spray Volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat
Pest Management Science, 2019Co-Authors: Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan, Pengchao Chen, Andrew J. Hewitt, Yuxing HanAbstract:BACKGROUND Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a recently developed aerial Spraying technology. However, the effect of Spray Volume variation on deposition and pesticide control efficacy is unknown. The effect of three UAV Spray Volumes (9.0, 16.8 and 28.1 L ha-1 ) using three different nozzle sizes on droplet deposition and wheat aphid and powdery mildew control efficacy was assessed. An electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) Sprayer was used as a comparison. RESULTS Different Spray Volumes significantly influenced the deposition and control efficacy of the UAV and EAP. For the UAV, a low Spray Volume of 9.0 L ha-1 with a fine nozzle (nozzle LU120-01) resulted in lower deposition and control efficacy. Optimal control efficacy was achieved with coarser nozzles (nozzles LU120-02, -03) at > 16.8 L ha-1 Volume with systemic insecticide, and at 28.1 L ha-1 with contact insecticide and fungicide. For EAP, a high Spray Volume led to run-off, and a Spray Volume of 225 L ha-1 achieved better deposition and control efficacy. CONCLUSION The UAV had comparable deposition and efficacy control to the EAP at a higher Spray Volume (> 16.8 L ha-1 ) with coarse nozzles, but exhibited inferior deposition and efficacy control at a lower Spray Volume (<9.0 L ha-1 ) with fine nozzles. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
-
Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Sprayer: effect of Spray Volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat.
Pest management science, 2019Co-Authors: Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan, Qi Haixia, Pengchao Chen, Andrew J. Hewitt, Yuxing HanAbstract:BACKGROUND Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a recently developed aerial Spraying technology. However, the effect of Spray Volume variation on deposition and pesticide control efficacy is unknown. The effect of three UAV Spray Volumes (9.0, 16.8 and 28.1 L ha-1 ) using three different nozzle sizes on droplet deposition and wheat aphid and powdery mildew control efficacy was assessed. An electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) Sprayer was used as a comparison. RESULTS Different Spray Volumes significantly influenced the deposition and control efficacy of the UAV and EAP. For the UAV, a low Spray Volume of 9.0 L ha-1 with a fine nozzle (nozzle LU120-01) resulted in lower deposition and control efficacy. Optimal control efficacy was achieved with coarser nozzles (nozzles LU120-02, -03) at > 16.8 L ha-1 Volume with systemic insecticide, and at 28.1 L ha-1 with contact insecticide and fungicide. For EAP, a high Spray Volume led to run-off, and a Spray Volume of 225 L ha-1 achieved better deposition and control efficacy. CONCLUSION The UAV had comparable deposition and efficacy control to the EAP at a higher Spray Volume (> 16.8 L ha-1 ) with coarse nozzles, but exhibited inferior deposition and efficacy control at a lower Spray Volume (
Pengchao Chen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle uav Sprayer effect of Spray Volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat
Pest Management Science, 2019Co-Authors: Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan, Pengchao Chen, Andrew J. Hewitt, Yuxing HanAbstract:BACKGROUND Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a recently developed aerial Spraying technology. However, the effect of Spray Volume variation on deposition and pesticide control efficacy is unknown. The effect of three UAV Spray Volumes (9.0, 16.8 and 28.1 L ha-1 ) using three different nozzle sizes on droplet deposition and wheat aphid and powdery mildew control efficacy was assessed. An electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) Sprayer was used as a comparison. RESULTS Different Spray Volumes significantly influenced the deposition and control efficacy of the UAV and EAP. For the UAV, a low Spray Volume of 9.0 L ha-1 with a fine nozzle (nozzle LU120-01) resulted in lower deposition and control efficacy. Optimal control efficacy was achieved with coarser nozzles (nozzles LU120-02, -03) at > 16.8 L ha-1 Volume with systemic insecticide, and at 28.1 L ha-1 with contact insecticide and fungicide. For EAP, a high Spray Volume led to run-off, and a Spray Volume of 225 L ha-1 achieved better deposition and control efficacy. CONCLUSION The UAV had comparable deposition and efficacy control to the EAP at a higher Spray Volume (> 16.8 L ha-1 ) with coarse nozzles, but exhibited inferior deposition and efficacy control at a lower Spray Volume (<9.0 L ha-1 ) with fine nozzles. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
-
Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Sprayer: effect of Spray Volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat.
Pest management science, 2019Co-Authors: Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan, Qi Haixia, Pengchao Chen, Andrew J. Hewitt, Yuxing HanAbstract:BACKGROUND Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are a recently developed aerial Spraying technology. However, the effect of Spray Volume variation on deposition and pesticide control efficacy is unknown. The effect of three UAV Spray Volumes (9.0, 16.8 and 28.1 L ha-1 ) using three different nozzle sizes on droplet deposition and wheat aphid and powdery mildew control efficacy was assessed. An electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) Sprayer was used as a comparison. RESULTS Different Spray Volumes significantly influenced the deposition and control efficacy of the UAV and EAP. For the UAV, a low Spray Volume of 9.0 L ha-1 with a fine nozzle (nozzle LU120-01) resulted in lower deposition and control efficacy. Optimal control efficacy was achieved with coarser nozzles (nozzles LU120-02, -03) at > 16.8 L ha-1 Volume with systemic insecticide, and at 28.1 L ha-1 with contact insecticide and fungicide. For EAP, a high Spray Volume led to run-off, and a Spray Volume of 225 L ha-1 achieved better deposition and control efficacy. CONCLUSION The UAV had comparable deposition and efficacy control to the EAP at a higher Spray Volume (> 16.8 L ha-1 ) with coarse nozzles, but exhibited inferior deposition and efficacy control at a lower Spray Volume (
