The Experts below are selected from a list of 29514 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Ae Russell - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Prioritising targets for school-based ADHD interventions: a Delphi survey Running header: Prioritising ADHD intervention targets in school settings
Springer Verlag, 2021Co-Authors: Rc Perry, Tj Ford, O'mahen H, Ae RussellAbstract:This is the author accepted manuscript.Many studies have investigated the effectiveness of school-based ADHD interventions at modifying different social, emotional and behavioural target outcomes. However, there is a lack of evidence about which targets Stakeholders perceive to be most important. This study sought to obtain consensus on which outcomes are perceived to be most important. 114 people with ADHD, educational professionals, parents of children with ADHD, clinicians and researchers participated in a Delphi survey with 3 rounds. The importance of 52 intervention targets were rated on a scale from 0-8 (8 being extremely important). Consensus was reached if >70% of a Stakeholder Group rated a target as between 6-8 and
-
Prioritising targets for school-based ADHD interventions: a Delphi survey
'Springer Science and Business Media LLC', 2021Co-Authors: Rc Perry, Tj Ford, O'mahen H, Ae RussellAbstract:This is the final version. Available on open access from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this recordThe dataset associated with this article is located in ORE at: https://doi.org/10.24378/exe.2483Many studies have investigated the effectiveness of school-based ADHD interventions at modifying different social, emotional and behavioural target outcomes. However, there is a lack of evidence about which targets Stakeholders perceive to be most important. This study sought to obtain consensus on which outcomes are perceived to be most important. 114 people with ADHD, educational professionals, parents of children with ADHD, clinicians and researchers participated in a Delphi survey with 3 rounds. The importance of 52 intervention targets were rated on a scale from 0-8 (8 being extremely important). Consensus was reached if >70% of a Stakeholder Group rated a target as between 6-8 and
Andrew K L Johnson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
integrating research results into decision making about natural resource management at a catchment scale
Agricultural Systems, 2001Co-Authors: Daniel Walker, Stuart Cowell, Andrew K L JohnsonAbstract:Abstract The operational reality behind the rhetoric of integrated natural resource management poses significant challenges for resource managers, resource use planners and researchers. A variety of frameworks for integrated resource planning and use have been espoused. These tend to reflect the bias of the discipline or Stakeholder Group fostering the approach and may therefore be unpalatable to, and ignored by, other Groups. In this paper, we are concerned with improving the integration of research outcomes into decision making. Rather than propose a framework, we take a pragmatic view of the roles of managers, planners and scientists. In doing so, we draw principally on practical experience derived from an initiative in a rural catchment in tropical Australia. On this basis, we propose a particular and emerging role in designing approaches to adaptive decision support that provide opportunities for integrating research outcomes into decision making.
Amy A Abbott - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
2228 pub utilizing a diverse Stakeholder Group to build a patient centered type 1 diabetes research agenda
Diabetes, 2020Co-Authors: Vanessa D Jewell, Amy A AbbottAbstract:Engaging patient’s in the research process is essential as it creates self-awareness, increases a collective understanding of needs and views, and allows for active participation in healthcare decisions. This Stakeholder driven project aimed to develop a patient-centered research model to identify Stakeholders of type 1 diabetes (T1D) for addressing the needs of patients and families in rural communities. From project inception, investigators used an innovative approach of incorporating Stakeholders in the entire research process. A four-step engagement plan using the Methods in Community-Based Participatory Research for Health guided the project. In the first strategy, assessment of both personal and institutional capacities for active collaboration was completed. Specifically, the project lead (researcher, healthcare provider, and mother of a child with type 1 diabetes), caregiver, and advocacy organization executive met to discuss strengths and weaknesses and how to effectively collaborate. Next, identification of potential partners ensued with new and established networks, associations, and community leaders. We completed this step through years of networking and becoming involved within the community. Reframing the ultimate health issue for research was the third strategy. This was a dynamic, interactive process guided by a diverse Group of Stakeholder perspectives across two states in the development of a patient-centered research plan. Finally, developing and nurturing the sustained partnerships established between researchers and community partners was accomplished in strategy four. Specifically, the team developed a Group process contract that allowed for fluctuation to meet individual and Group needs. These relationships were built through sustained T1D community presence and networking. This shared decision-making process resulted in trust, accountability, and Stakeholder empowerment while ensuring that individual’s voices were heard. Disclosure V.D. Jewell: None. A.A. Abbott: None. Funding Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (10443-CU)
David Scanlon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
High School Experiences and Support Recommendations of Autistic Youth
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2019Co-Authors: Kristen Bottema-beutel, Josephine Cuda, Shannon Crowley, David ScanlonAbstract:We used an online survey to gather perspectives of autistic youth ( n = 248) on the impacts of autism, school professionals, family members, and peers on their high school experiences; what each Stakeholder Group could have done better; and what future high school professionals and autistic youth should know. Two-thirds of participants viewed autism as negatively impacting their school experience, and this was more prevalent in women. The majority viewed impacts of school professionals, family, and peers as positive. Women were more likely to view school professional contributions as positive than men, and LGBT youth were more likely to view school professional and peer contributions as negative than non-LGBT youth. Suggestions for Stakeholders included providing more help, care, and quality time.
Rc Perry - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Prioritising targets for school-based ADHD interventions: a Delphi survey Running header: Prioritising ADHD intervention targets in school settings
Springer Verlag, 2021Co-Authors: Rc Perry, Tj Ford, O'mahen H, Ae RussellAbstract:This is the author accepted manuscript.Many studies have investigated the effectiveness of school-based ADHD interventions at modifying different social, emotional and behavioural target outcomes. However, there is a lack of evidence about which targets Stakeholders perceive to be most important. This study sought to obtain consensus on which outcomes are perceived to be most important. 114 people with ADHD, educational professionals, parents of children with ADHD, clinicians and researchers participated in a Delphi survey with 3 rounds. The importance of 52 intervention targets were rated on a scale from 0-8 (8 being extremely important). Consensus was reached if >70% of a Stakeholder Group rated a target as between 6-8 and
-
Prioritising targets for school-based ADHD interventions: a Delphi survey
'Springer Science and Business Media LLC', 2021Co-Authors: Rc Perry, Tj Ford, O'mahen H, Ae RussellAbstract:This is the final version. Available on open access from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this recordThe dataset associated with this article is located in ORE at: https://doi.org/10.24378/exe.2483Many studies have investigated the effectiveness of school-based ADHD interventions at modifying different social, emotional and behavioural target outcomes. However, there is a lack of evidence about which targets Stakeholders perceive to be most important. This study sought to obtain consensus on which outcomes are perceived to be most important. 114 people with ADHD, educational professionals, parents of children with ADHD, clinicians and researchers participated in a Delphi survey with 3 rounds. The importance of 52 intervention targets were rated on a scale from 0-8 (8 being extremely important). Consensus was reached if >70% of a Stakeholder Group rated a target as between 6-8 and
