The Experts below are selected from a list of 1167 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Michael J. Lenox - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Firm responses to secondary Stakeholder action
Strategic Management Journal, 2006Co-Authors: Charles E. Eesley, Michael J. LenoxAbstract:In this paper, we explore the conditions under which secondary Stakeholder groups are likely to elicit positive firm responses. To this end, we build upon and advance Mitchell, Agle, and Wood's (1997) Stakeholder saliency and identification framework by defining saliency in terms of actions, not perceptions, and by proposing that power, legitimacy, and urgency arise out of the nature of Stakeholder–Request–firm triplets. To test this framework, we build a unique dataset of over 600 secondary Stakeholder actions within the United States, all concerning environmental issues over the period 1971–2003. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
-
FIRM RESPONSES TO SECONDARY Stakeholder ACTION.
Academy of Management Proceedings, 2005Co-Authors: Charles E. Eesley, Michael J. LenoxAbstract:In this paper, we explore the conditions under which secondary Stakeholder groups are likely to elicit positive firm responses. To this end, we build upon and advance Mitchell, Agle, and Wood’s (1997) Stakeholder saliency and identification framework by defining saliency in terms of actions, not perceptions, and by proposing that power, legitimacy, and urgency arise out of the nature of Stakeholder - Request - firm triplets. To test this framework, we build a unique dataset of over 600 secondary Stakeholder actions within the United States, all concerning environmentalissues over the period 1971-2003.
Charles E. Eesley - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Firm responses to secondary Stakeholder action
Strategic Management Journal, 2006Co-Authors: Charles E. Eesley, Michael J. LenoxAbstract:In this paper, we explore the conditions under which secondary Stakeholder groups are likely to elicit positive firm responses. To this end, we build upon and advance Mitchell, Agle, and Wood's (1997) Stakeholder saliency and identification framework by defining saliency in terms of actions, not perceptions, and by proposing that power, legitimacy, and urgency arise out of the nature of Stakeholder–Request–firm triplets. To test this framework, we build a unique dataset of over 600 secondary Stakeholder actions within the United States, all concerning environmental issues over the period 1971–2003. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
-
FIRM RESPONSES TO SECONDARY Stakeholder ACTION.
Academy of Management Proceedings, 2005Co-Authors: Charles E. Eesley, Michael J. LenoxAbstract:In this paper, we explore the conditions under which secondary Stakeholder groups are likely to elicit positive firm responses. To this end, we build upon and advance Mitchell, Agle, and Wood’s (1997) Stakeholder saliency and identification framework by defining saliency in terms of actions, not perceptions, and by proposing that power, legitimacy, and urgency arise out of the nature of Stakeholder - Request - firm triplets. To test this framework, we build a unique dataset of over 600 secondary Stakeholder actions within the United States, all concerning environmentalissues over the period 1971-2003.
Amy Polaczyk - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Expected-value aggregated land cover over time for the Idlewild marsh system.
2018Co-Authors: Marco Propato, Jonathan S. Clough, Amy PolaczykAbstract:(these figures are provided in acres at Stakeholder Request, 1.0 acres = 0.4047 ha).
-
Acres of “persistent marsh” per million dollars spent.
2018Co-Authors: Marco Propato, Jonathan S. Clough, Amy PolaczykAbstract:(These figures were provided in acres at Stakeholder Request; 1.0 acres = 0.4047 ha).
Marco Propato - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Expected-value aggregated land cover over time for the Idlewild marsh system.
2018Co-Authors: Marco Propato, Jonathan S. Clough, Amy PolaczykAbstract:(these figures are provided in acres at Stakeholder Request, 1.0 acres = 0.4047 ha).
-
Acres of “persistent marsh” per million dollars spent.
2018Co-Authors: Marco Propato, Jonathan S. Clough, Amy PolaczykAbstract:(These figures were provided in acres at Stakeholder Request; 1.0 acres = 0.4047 ha).
Jonathan S. Clough - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Expected-value aggregated land cover over time for the Idlewild marsh system.
2018Co-Authors: Marco Propato, Jonathan S. Clough, Amy PolaczykAbstract:(these figures are provided in acres at Stakeholder Request, 1.0 acres = 0.4047 ha).
-
Acres of “persistent marsh” per million dollars spent.
2018Co-Authors: Marco Propato, Jonathan S. Clough, Amy PolaczykAbstract:(These figures were provided in acres at Stakeholder Request; 1.0 acres = 0.4047 ha).