The Experts below are selected from a list of 5706 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Hatlebakk, Jan Gunnar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Gastroparesis symptoms associated with intestinal hypomotility: An explorative study using wireless motility capsule
'Dove Medical Press Ltd.', 2021Co-Authors: Bekkelund Mattis, Sangnes, Dag André, Biermann Martin, Søfteland, Eirik Wigtil, Aabakken Lars, Steinsvik, Elisabeth K., Hausken Trygve, Dimcevski Georg, Hatlebakk, Jan GunnarAbstract:Objective: Gastric emptying measurements are mandatory in gastroparesis diagnostics, but the association between delayed emptying and symptoms is questionable. It is imperative to find biomarkers better correlated to symptom generation. Hence, we examined the association between symptom severity and gastrointestinal motility measured by wireless motility capsule. Patients and Methods: In this prospective single-centre study, patients with gastroparesis symptoms were simultaneously investigated with gastric emptying scintigraphy and wireless motility capsule, measuring regional transit times and contractility parameters. Symptom severity was assessed with the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM), including the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI). Results: We included 107 patients (70% women). In the whole patient group, nausea correlated with the gastric (rs = − 0.31, p = 0.007), small bowel (rs = − 0.41, p < 0.001) and colonic (rs = − 0.33, p = 0.012) motility indices. In patients with idiopathic etiology, nausea correlated with small bowel motility index (rs = − 0.81, p < 0.001) and mean Stomach Pressure (rs = − 0.64, p = 0.013). We also found negative correlations between total GCSI score and maximum Pressure of the small bowel (rs = − 0.77, p < 0.001) and colon (rs = − 0.74, p = 0.002). In diabetes patients, total PAGI-SYM score correlated with colonic motility index (rs = − 0.34, p = 0.012), and mean Pressure of the colon correlated with upper abdominal pain (rs = − 0.37, p = 0.007). We found no association between symptoms, gastric emptying nor any other transit times. Conclusion: In patients with gastroparesis symptoms, we found that symptom severity was associated with intestinal hypomotility. Based on these results, gastroparesis diagnostics should also include an evaluation of the small bowel and colon
-
Gastroparesis Symptoms Associated with Intestinal Hypomotility: An Explorative Study Using Wireless Motility Capsule
'Dove Medical Press Ltd.', 2021Co-Authors: Bekkelund Mattis, Sangnes, Dag André, Biermann Martin, Søfteland, Eirik Wigtil, Aabakken Lars, Steinsvik, Elisabeth K., Hausken Trygve, Dimcevski Georg, Hatlebakk, Jan GunnarAbstract:Objective: Gastric emptying measurements are mandatory in gastroparesis diagnostics, but the association between delayed emptying and symptoms is questionable. It is imperative to find biomarkers better correlated to symptom generation. Hence, we examined the association between symptom severity and gastrointestinal motility measured by wireless motility capsule. Patients and Methods: In this prospective single-centre study, patients with gastroparesis symptoms were simultaneously investigated with gastric emptying scintigraphy and wireless motility capsule, measuring regional transit times and contractility parameters. Symptom severity was assessed with the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM), including the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI). Results: We included 107 patients (70% women). In the whole patient group, nausea correlated with the gastric (rs = − 0.31, p = 0.007), small bowel (rs = − 0.41, p < 0.001) and colonic (rs = − 0.33, p = 0.012) motility indices. In patients with idiopathic etiology, nausea correlated with small bowel motility index (rs = − 0.81, p < 0.001) and mean Stomach Pressure (rs = − 0.64, p = 0.013). We also found negative correlations between total GCSI score and maximum Pressure of the small bowel (rs = − 0.77, p < 0.001) and colon (rs = − 0.74, p = 0.002). In diabetes patients, total PAGI-SYM score correlated with colonic motility index (rs = − 0.34, p = 0.012), and mean Pressure of the colon correlated with upper abdominal pain (rs = − 0.37, p = 0.007). We found no association between symptoms, gastric emptying nor any other transit times. Conclusion: In patients with gastroparesis symptoms, we found that symptom severity was associated with intestinal hypomotility. Based on these results, gastroparesis diagnostics should also include an evaluation of the small bowel and colon.publishedVersio
J Janssens - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Differences in the sensorimotor response to distension between the proximal and distal Stomach in humans
Gut, 2004Co-Authors: K-j Lee, Robin Vos, J JanssensAbstract:Background: It is not known which region of the Stomach is responsible for symptom generation or whether symptoms induced by gastric distension are region specific. Also, it is unclear whether low level gastric distension has a modulatory role on gastric tone and mechanosensitivity. Aims: To define differences in the sensorimotor response to distension between proximal and distal gastric distension, and to determine the effects of low level gastric distension on gastric tone and mechanosensitivity. Methods: In 14 healthy volunteers, a double barostat assembly incorporating a distal (antral) and proximal (fundic) bag was introduced into the Stomach. Pressure sensitivity tests with either bag were performed with and without simultaneous background distension of the other bag in a randomised manner. Proximal gastric accommodation to a meal was measured with and without simultaneous distal gastric distension. Results: The distal Stomach was less compliant than the proximal Stomach to low level distension. Thresholds for first perception and discomfort, and symptom profiles did not differ between distal and proximal gastric distension. Simultaneously applied low level gastric distension of one segment did not affect gastric mechanosensitivity of the other segment. Both the proximal and distal Stomach relax after ingestion of a meal. Simultaneous low level antral distension decreases proximal gastric accommodation to a meal. Conclusions: Compared with the proximal Stomach, the distal Stomach is less compliant but its mechanosensitivity is not different. Symptoms induced by gastric distension are not region specific and no spatial summation occurred. Meal induced relaxation occurs both in the proximal and distal Stomach.
Bekkelund Mattis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Gastroparesis symptoms associated with intestinal hypomotility: An explorative study using wireless motility capsule
'Dove Medical Press Ltd.', 2021Co-Authors: Bekkelund Mattis, Sangnes, Dag André, Biermann Martin, Søfteland, Eirik Wigtil, Aabakken Lars, Steinsvik, Elisabeth K., Hausken Trygve, Dimcevski Georg, Hatlebakk, Jan GunnarAbstract:Objective: Gastric emptying measurements are mandatory in gastroparesis diagnostics, but the association between delayed emptying and symptoms is questionable. It is imperative to find biomarkers better correlated to symptom generation. Hence, we examined the association between symptom severity and gastrointestinal motility measured by wireless motility capsule. Patients and Methods: In this prospective single-centre study, patients with gastroparesis symptoms were simultaneously investigated with gastric emptying scintigraphy and wireless motility capsule, measuring regional transit times and contractility parameters. Symptom severity was assessed with the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM), including the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI). Results: We included 107 patients (70% women). In the whole patient group, nausea correlated with the gastric (rs = − 0.31, p = 0.007), small bowel (rs = − 0.41, p < 0.001) and colonic (rs = − 0.33, p = 0.012) motility indices. In patients with idiopathic etiology, nausea correlated with small bowel motility index (rs = − 0.81, p < 0.001) and mean Stomach Pressure (rs = − 0.64, p = 0.013). We also found negative correlations between total GCSI score and maximum Pressure of the small bowel (rs = − 0.77, p < 0.001) and colon (rs = − 0.74, p = 0.002). In diabetes patients, total PAGI-SYM score correlated with colonic motility index (rs = − 0.34, p = 0.012), and mean Pressure of the colon correlated with upper abdominal pain (rs = − 0.37, p = 0.007). We found no association between symptoms, gastric emptying nor any other transit times. Conclusion: In patients with gastroparesis symptoms, we found that symptom severity was associated with intestinal hypomotility. Based on these results, gastroparesis diagnostics should also include an evaluation of the small bowel and colon
-
Gastroparesis Symptoms Associated with Intestinal Hypomotility: An Explorative Study Using Wireless Motility Capsule
'Dove Medical Press Ltd.', 2021Co-Authors: Bekkelund Mattis, Sangnes, Dag André, Biermann Martin, Søfteland, Eirik Wigtil, Aabakken Lars, Steinsvik, Elisabeth K., Hausken Trygve, Dimcevski Georg, Hatlebakk, Jan GunnarAbstract:Objective: Gastric emptying measurements are mandatory in gastroparesis diagnostics, but the association between delayed emptying and symptoms is questionable. It is imperative to find biomarkers better correlated to symptom generation. Hence, we examined the association between symptom severity and gastrointestinal motility measured by wireless motility capsule. Patients and Methods: In this prospective single-centre study, patients with gastroparesis symptoms were simultaneously investigated with gastric emptying scintigraphy and wireless motility capsule, measuring regional transit times and contractility parameters. Symptom severity was assessed with the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM), including the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI). Results: We included 107 patients (70% women). In the whole patient group, nausea correlated with the gastric (rs = − 0.31, p = 0.007), small bowel (rs = − 0.41, p < 0.001) and colonic (rs = − 0.33, p = 0.012) motility indices. In patients with idiopathic etiology, nausea correlated with small bowel motility index (rs = − 0.81, p < 0.001) and mean Stomach Pressure (rs = − 0.64, p = 0.013). We also found negative correlations between total GCSI score and maximum Pressure of the small bowel (rs = − 0.77, p < 0.001) and colon (rs = − 0.74, p = 0.002). In diabetes patients, total PAGI-SYM score correlated with colonic motility index (rs = − 0.34, p = 0.012), and mean Pressure of the colon correlated with upper abdominal pain (rs = − 0.37, p = 0.007). We found no association between symptoms, gastric emptying nor any other transit times. Conclusion: In patients with gastroparesis symptoms, we found that symptom severity was associated with intestinal hypomotility. Based on these results, gastroparesis diagnostics should also include an evaluation of the small bowel and colon.publishedVersio
Oliver Goetze - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
effects of clonidine and sumatriptan on postprandial gastric volume response antral contraction waves and emptying an mri study
Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 2009Co-Authors: Monika A Kwiatek, Mark Fox, Andreas Steingoetter, Dieter Menne, Anupam Pal, Heiko Fruehauf, Elad Kaufman, Zsofia Forraskaufman, James G Brasseur, Oliver GoetzeAbstract:Gastric emptying (GE) may be driven by tonic contraction of the Stomach ('Pressure pump') or antral contraction waves (ACW) ('peristaltic pump'). The mechanism underlying GE was studied by contrasting the effects of clonidine (alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist) and sumatriptan (5-HT(1) agonist) on gastric function. Magnetic resonance imaging provided non-invasive assessment of gastric volume responses, ACW and GE in nine healthy volunteers. Investigations were performed in the right decubitus position after ingestion of 500 mL of 10% glucose (200 kcal) under placebo [0.9% NaCl intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC)], clonidine [0.01 mg min(-1) IV, max 0.1 mg (placebo SC)] or sumatriptan [6 mg SC (placebo IV)]. Total gastric volume (TGV) and gastric content volume (GCV) were assessed every 5 min for 90 min, interspersed with dynamic scan sequences to measure ACW activity. During gastric filling, TGV increased with GCV indicating that meal volume dictates initial relaxation. Gastric contents volume continued to increase over the early postprandial period due to gastric secretion surpassing initial gastric emptying. Clonidine diminished this early increase in GCV, reduced gastric relaxation, decreased ACW frequency compared with placebo. Gastric emptying (GE) rate increased. Sumatriptan had no effect on initial GCV, but prolonged gastric relaxation and disrupted ACW activity. Gastric emptying was delayed. There was a negative correlation between gastric relaxation and GE rate (r(2 )=49%, P < 0.001), whereas the association between ACW frequency and GE rate was inconsistent and weak (r2=15%, P = 0.05). These findings support the hypothesis that nutrient liquid emptying is primarily driven by the 'Pressure pump' mechanism.
K-j Lee - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Differences in the sensorimotor response to distension between the proximal and distal Stomach in humans
Gut, 2004Co-Authors: K-j Lee, Robin Vos, J JanssensAbstract:Background: It is not known which region of the Stomach is responsible for symptom generation or whether symptoms induced by gastric distension are region specific. Also, it is unclear whether low level gastric distension has a modulatory role on gastric tone and mechanosensitivity. Aims: To define differences in the sensorimotor response to distension between proximal and distal gastric distension, and to determine the effects of low level gastric distension on gastric tone and mechanosensitivity. Methods: In 14 healthy volunteers, a double barostat assembly incorporating a distal (antral) and proximal (fundic) bag was introduced into the Stomach. Pressure sensitivity tests with either bag were performed with and without simultaneous background distension of the other bag in a randomised manner. Proximal gastric accommodation to a meal was measured with and without simultaneous distal gastric distension. Results: The distal Stomach was less compliant than the proximal Stomach to low level distension. Thresholds for first perception and discomfort, and symptom profiles did not differ between distal and proximal gastric distension. Simultaneously applied low level gastric distension of one segment did not affect gastric mechanosensitivity of the other segment. Both the proximal and distal Stomach relax after ingestion of a meal. Simultaneous low level antral distension decreases proximal gastric accommodation to a meal. Conclusions: Compared with the proximal Stomach, the distal Stomach is less compliant but its mechanosensitivity is not different. Symptoms induced by gastric distension are not region specific and no spatial summation occurred. Meal induced relaxation occurs both in the proximal and distal Stomach.