The Experts below are selected from a list of 14805 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Roger J. Smales - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
effects of surface treatments on shear Bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000Co-Authors: Mehdi Madani, Ailbhe V Mcdonald, Roger J. SmalesAbstract:STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although Bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials. PURPOSE: This study attempted to determine the shear Bond strength values between Panavia 21 resin cement (Kuraray) and an alumina core material (In-Ceram) after 3 surface treatments and the application of a silane coupling agent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five In-Ceram cylindrical rods were fabricated and assigned to 3 groups. Group I specimens were treated with a 9.5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid, group II with a 5% HF acid, and group III were sandblasted. All specimens were coated with a silane coupling agent (Cavex Clearfil PhotoBond and Activator) before cementation with Panavia 21 to sandblasted nickel-chromium rods. As a control, group IV consisted of 8 porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) rods treated with a 5% HF acid and silane. All specimens were subjected to a load of 1.2 kg during cementation, then stored under water for 36 hours. A jig mounted on a Hounsfield Universal Testing machine was used at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to test the shear Bond strengths. RESULTS: The results were 14.65 +/- 4.64 MPa for group I, 18.03 +/- 6.13 MPa for group II, and 22.35 +/- 5.98 MPa for group III In-Ceram specimens; and 18.05 +/- 8.46 MPa for control (group IV). CONCLUSION: The use of Panavia 21 resin cement and a silane coupling agent can achieve a Successful Bond between either sandblasted or 5% HF acid-etched In-Ceram core material.
-
effects of surface treatments on shear Bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000Co-Authors: Mehdi Madani, Ailbhe V Mcdonald, Frederick C S Chu, Roger J. SmalesAbstract:Abstract Statement of Problem: Although Bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials. Purpose: This study attempted to determine the shear Bond strength values between Panavia 21 resin cement (Kuraray) and an alumina core material (In-Ceram) after 3 surface treatments and the application of a silane coupling agent. Material and Methods: Forty-five In-Ceram cylindrical rods were fabricated and assigned to 3 groups. Group I specimens were treated with a 9.5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid, group II with a 5% HF acid, and group III were sandblasted. All specimens were coated with a silane coupling agent (Cavex Clearfil PhotoBond and Activator) before cementation with Panavia 21 to sandblasted nickel-chromium rods. As a control, group IV consisted of 8 porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) rods treated with a 5% HF acid and silane. All specimens were subjected to a load of 1.2 kg during cementation, then stored under water for 36 hours. A jig mounted on a Hounsfield Universal Testing machine was used at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to test the shear Bond strengths. Results: The results were 14.65 ± 4.64 MPa for group I, 18.03 ± 6.13 MPa for group II, and 22.35 ± 5.98 MPa for group III In-Ceram specimens; and 18.05 ± 8.46 MPa for control (group IV). Conclusion: The use of Panavia 21 resin cement and a silane coupling agent can achieve a Successful Bond between either sandblasted or 5% HF acid-etched In-Ceram core material. (J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:644-7.)
Mehdi Madani - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
effects of surface treatments on shear Bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000Co-Authors: Mehdi Madani, Ailbhe V Mcdonald, Roger J. SmalesAbstract:STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although Bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials. PURPOSE: This study attempted to determine the shear Bond strength values between Panavia 21 resin cement (Kuraray) and an alumina core material (In-Ceram) after 3 surface treatments and the application of a silane coupling agent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five In-Ceram cylindrical rods were fabricated and assigned to 3 groups. Group I specimens were treated with a 9.5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid, group II with a 5% HF acid, and group III were sandblasted. All specimens were coated with a silane coupling agent (Cavex Clearfil PhotoBond and Activator) before cementation with Panavia 21 to sandblasted nickel-chromium rods. As a control, group IV consisted of 8 porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) rods treated with a 5% HF acid and silane. All specimens were subjected to a load of 1.2 kg during cementation, then stored under water for 36 hours. A jig mounted on a Hounsfield Universal Testing machine was used at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to test the shear Bond strengths. RESULTS: The results were 14.65 +/- 4.64 MPa for group I, 18.03 +/- 6.13 MPa for group II, and 22.35 +/- 5.98 MPa for group III In-Ceram specimens; and 18.05 +/- 8.46 MPa for control (group IV). CONCLUSION: The use of Panavia 21 resin cement and a silane coupling agent can achieve a Successful Bond between either sandblasted or 5% HF acid-etched In-Ceram core material.
-
effects of surface treatments on shear Bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000Co-Authors: Mehdi Madani, Ailbhe V Mcdonald, Frederick C S Chu, Roger J. SmalesAbstract:Abstract Statement of Problem: Although Bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials. Purpose: This study attempted to determine the shear Bond strength values between Panavia 21 resin cement (Kuraray) and an alumina core material (In-Ceram) after 3 surface treatments and the application of a silane coupling agent. Material and Methods: Forty-five In-Ceram cylindrical rods were fabricated and assigned to 3 groups. Group I specimens were treated with a 9.5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid, group II with a 5% HF acid, and group III were sandblasted. All specimens were coated with a silane coupling agent (Cavex Clearfil PhotoBond and Activator) before cementation with Panavia 21 to sandblasted nickel-chromium rods. As a control, group IV consisted of 8 porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) rods treated with a 5% HF acid and silane. All specimens were subjected to a load of 1.2 kg during cementation, then stored under water for 36 hours. A jig mounted on a Hounsfield Universal Testing machine was used at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to test the shear Bond strengths. Results: The results were 14.65 ± 4.64 MPa for group I, 18.03 ± 6.13 MPa for group II, and 22.35 ± 5.98 MPa for group III In-Ceram specimens; and 18.05 ± 8.46 MPa for control (group IV). Conclusion: The use of Panavia 21 resin cement and a silane coupling agent can achieve a Successful Bond between either sandblasted or 5% HF acid-etched In-Ceram core material. (J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:644-7.)
Ailbhe V Mcdonald - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
effects of surface treatments on shear Bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000Co-Authors: Mehdi Madani, Ailbhe V Mcdonald, Roger J. SmalesAbstract:STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although Bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials. PURPOSE: This study attempted to determine the shear Bond strength values between Panavia 21 resin cement (Kuraray) and an alumina core material (In-Ceram) after 3 surface treatments and the application of a silane coupling agent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five In-Ceram cylindrical rods were fabricated and assigned to 3 groups. Group I specimens were treated with a 9.5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid, group II with a 5% HF acid, and group III were sandblasted. All specimens were coated with a silane coupling agent (Cavex Clearfil PhotoBond and Activator) before cementation with Panavia 21 to sandblasted nickel-chromium rods. As a control, group IV consisted of 8 porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) rods treated with a 5% HF acid and silane. All specimens were subjected to a load of 1.2 kg during cementation, then stored under water for 36 hours. A jig mounted on a Hounsfield Universal Testing machine was used at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to test the shear Bond strengths. RESULTS: The results were 14.65 +/- 4.64 MPa for group I, 18.03 +/- 6.13 MPa for group II, and 22.35 +/- 5.98 MPa for group III In-Ceram specimens; and 18.05 +/- 8.46 MPa for control (group IV). CONCLUSION: The use of Panavia 21 resin cement and a silane coupling agent can achieve a Successful Bond between either sandblasted or 5% HF acid-etched In-Ceram core material.
-
effects of surface treatments on shear Bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000Co-Authors: Mehdi Madani, Ailbhe V Mcdonald, Frederick C S Chu, Roger J. SmalesAbstract:Abstract Statement of Problem: Although Bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials. Purpose: This study attempted to determine the shear Bond strength values between Panavia 21 resin cement (Kuraray) and an alumina core material (In-Ceram) after 3 surface treatments and the application of a silane coupling agent. Material and Methods: Forty-five In-Ceram cylindrical rods were fabricated and assigned to 3 groups. Group I specimens were treated with a 9.5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid, group II with a 5% HF acid, and group III were sandblasted. All specimens were coated with a silane coupling agent (Cavex Clearfil PhotoBond and Activator) before cementation with Panavia 21 to sandblasted nickel-chromium rods. As a control, group IV consisted of 8 porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) rods treated with a 5% HF acid and silane. All specimens were subjected to a load of 1.2 kg during cementation, then stored under water for 36 hours. A jig mounted on a Hounsfield Universal Testing machine was used at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to test the shear Bond strengths. Results: The results were 14.65 ± 4.64 MPa for group I, 18.03 ± 6.13 MPa for group II, and 22.35 ± 5.98 MPa for group III In-Ceram specimens; and 18.05 ± 8.46 MPa for control (group IV). Conclusion: The use of Panavia 21 resin cement and a silane coupling agent can achieve a Successful Bond between either sandblasted or 5% HF acid-etched In-Ceram core material. (J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:644-7.)
Sam Halabo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
how to ensure a Successful Bond with futuraBond dc
Dental Products Report, 2015Co-Authors: Sam HalaboAbstract:One of the most important aspects in the success of a restoration is the Bond between the tooth and the restoration. There are many luting agents currently on the market with differing formats of adhesion and techniques for use.
Frederick C S Chu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
effects of surface treatments on shear Bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000Co-Authors: Mehdi Madani, Ailbhe V Mcdonald, Frederick C S Chu, Roger J. SmalesAbstract:Abstract Statement of Problem: Although Bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials. Purpose: This study attempted to determine the shear Bond strength values between Panavia 21 resin cement (Kuraray) and an alumina core material (In-Ceram) after 3 surface treatments and the application of a silane coupling agent. Material and Methods: Forty-five In-Ceram cylindrical rods were fabricated and assigned to 3 groups. Group I specimens were treated with a 9.5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid, group II with a 5% HF acid, and group III were sandblasted. All specimens were coated with a silane coupling agent (Cavex Clearfil PhotoBond and Activator) before cementation with Panavia 21 to sandblasted nickel-chromium rods. As a control, group IV consisted of 8 porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) rods treated with a 5% HF acid and silane. All specimens were subjected to a load of 1.2 kg during cementation, then stored under water for 36 hours. A jig mounted on a Hounsfield Universal Testing machine was used at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to test the shear Bond strengths. Results: The results were 14.65 ± 4.64 MPa for group I, 18.03 ± 6.13 MPa for group II, and 22.35 ± 5.98 MPa for group III In-Ceram specimens; and 18.05 ± 8.46 MPa for control (group IV). Conclusion: The use of Panavia 21 resin cement and a silane coupling agent can achieve a Successful Bond between either sandblasted or 5% HF acid-etched In-Ceram core material. (J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:644-7.)
