The Experts below are selected from a list of 33609 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Cees M.p.m. Hertogh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with Surveillance technologies in residential care
Nursing ethics, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Background:Surveillance Technology such as tag and tracking systems and video Surveillance could increase the freedom of movement and consequently autonomy of clients in long-term residential care settings, but is also perceived as an intrusion on autonomy including privacy.Objective:To explore how clients in residential care experience Surveillance Technology in order to assess how Surveillance Technology might influence autonomy.Setting:Two long-term residential care facilities: a nursing home for people with dementia and a care facility for people with intellectual disabilities.Methods:Ethnographic field study.Ethical considerations:The boards representing clients and relatives/proxies of the clients were informed of the study and gave their written consent. The clients’ assent was sought through a special information leaflet. At any time clients and/or proxy were given the option to withdraw from the study. The research protocol was also reviewed by a medical ethics committee.Findings:Our findings sho...
-
The use of Surveillance Technology in residential facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities : A study among nurses and support staff
American Journal of Nursing, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Background: The use of Surveillance Technology in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities is often promoted both as a solution to understaffing and as a means to increasing clients' autonomy. But there are fears that such use might attenuate the care relationship. Objective: To investigate how Surveillance Technology is actually being used by nurses and support staff in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities, in order to explore the possible benefits and drawbacks of this Technology in practice. Methods: An ethnographic field study was carried out in two residential care facilities: a nursing home for people with dementia and a facility for people with intellectual disabilities. Data were collected through field observations and informal conversations as well as through formal interviews. Results: Five overarching themes on the use of Surveillance Technology emerged from the data: continuing to do rounds, alarm fatigue, keeping clients in close proximity, locking the doors, and forgetting to take certain devices off. Despite the presence of Surveillance Technology, participants still continued their rounds. Alarm fatigue sometimes led participants to turn devices off. Though the Technology allowed wandering clients to be tracked more easily, participants often preferred keeping clients nearby, and preferably behind locked doors at night. At times participants forgot to remove less visible devices (such as electronic bracelets) when the original reason for use expired. Conclusions: A more nuanced view of the benefits and drawbacks of Surveillance Technology is called for. Study participants tended to incorporate Surveillance Technology into existing care routines and to do so with some reluctance and reservation. They also tended to favor certain technologies, for example, making intensive use of certain devices (such as digital enhanced cordless telecommunications phones) while demonstrating ambivalence about others (such as the tagging and tracking systems). Client safety and physical proximity seemed to be dominant values, suggesting that the fear that Surveillance Technology will cause attenuation of the care relationship is unfounded. On the other hand, the values of client freedom and autonomy seemed less influential; participants often appeared unwilling to take risks with the Technology. Care facilities wishing to implement Surveillance Technology should encourage ongoing dialogue on how staff members view and understand the concepts of autonomy and risk. A clear and well-formulated vision for the use of Surveillance Technology-one understood and supported by all stakeholders-seems imperative to successful implementation. (aut. ref.)
-
CE: Original research: the use of Surveillance Technology in residential facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: a study among nurses and support staff
The American journal of nursing, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:BackgroundThe use of Surveillance Technology in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities is often promoted both as a solution to understaffing and as a means to increasing clients’ autonomy. But there are fears that such use might attenuate the care relations
-
Quality of life of nursing-home residents with dementia subject to Surveillance Technology versus physical restraints: an explorative study
International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2012Co-Authors: S. Te Boekhorst, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Sandra A. Zwijsen, Anneke L. Francke, Jos W. R. Twisk, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Objective: As physical restraints should only be used in exceptional cases, there is an urgent need for alternatives to restraint use. Surveillance Technology could be such an alternative. This study explored whether nursing-home residents with dementia subjected to Surveillance Technology had better quality of life scores for mood, behavioral and societal dimensions than residents with physical restraints. Methods: Quality of life was assessed longitudinally, with three measurements in six psychogeriatric nursing homes of residents with Surveillance Technology (n = 170) and residents with physical restraints (n = 22). QUALIDEM subscales were used to measure five dimensions of quality of life. Multilevel longitudinal univariate and multivariate regression techniques were used to analyze the data. Results: Because physical restraints were almost exclusively used in residents with low activities of daily living (ADL) independency (18 of the 22), we restricted the regression analyses to residents with a Barthel Index score ≤ 5 (overall n = 53). Univariate results showed that highly ADL-dependent residents with Surveillance Technology had significantly more positive affect than highly ADL-dependent residents with physical restraints. However, this difference proved to be no longer significant after adjustment for the confounders: age, sex and stage of dementia. Conclusions: Quality of life of highly ADL-dependent nursing-home residents with dementia seems to be unrelated to the use of Surveillance Technology as opposed to physical restraints. (aut. ref.)
-
Surveillance Technology: An alternative to physical restraints? A qualitative study among professionals working in nursing homes for people with dementia
International journal of nursing studies, 2011Co-Authors: Sandra A. Zwijsen, A.r. Niemeijer, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Abstract Background Working with Surveillance Technology as an alternative to traditional restraints creates obvious differences in the way care is organised. It is not clear whether professional caregivers find working with Surveillance Technology useful and workable and whether Surveillance Technology is indeed used to diminish restraint use. Objectives The aim of this study was to obtain an insight into the view of Dutch dementia care professionals on the feasibility of Surveillance Technology as an alternative to physical restraints. Design Qualitative study. Setting The study was carried out in seven nursing homes for people with dementia in The Netherlands. Participants and methods Semi-structured interviews were held with nine key persons from seven nursing homes for people with dementia. Also, six focus group discussions were held with groups of nurses and two focus group discussions were held with multidisciplinary teams. Results The dementia care professionals named three different ways in which Surveillance Technology can be used: to provide safety in general, to provide additional safety, and to provide more freedom for the residents. In addition to this, the dementia care professionals mentioned four limitations in the use of Surveillance Technology: it is unable to prevent falling, it cannot guarantee quick help, it does not always work properly, and it could violate privacy. Conclusion Dementia care professionals consider Surveillance Technology supplemental to physical restraints, rather than as an alternative. Improvement of devices and education of care professionals might increase the support for using Surveillance Technology as an alternative to physical restraints.
Marja F. I. A. Depla - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with Surveillance technologies in residential care
Nursing ethics, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Background:Surveillance Technology such as tag and tracking systems and video Surveillance could increase the freedom of movement and consequently autonomy of clients in long-term residential care settings, but is also perceived as an intrusion on autonomy including privacy.Objective:To explore how clients in residential care experience Surveillance Technology in order to assess how Surveillance Technology might influence autonomy.Setting:Two long-term residential care facilities: a nursing home for people with dementia and a care facility for people with intellectual disabilities.Methods:Ethnographic field study.Ethical considerations:The boards representing clients and relatives/proxies of the clients were informed of the study and gave their written consent. The clients’ assent was sought through a special information leaflet. At any time clients and/or proxy were given the option to withdraw from the study. The research protocol was also reviewed by a medical ethics committee.Findings:Our findings sho...
-
The use of Surveillance Technology in residential facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities : A study among nurses and support staff
American Journal of Nursing, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Background: The use of Surveillance Technology in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities is often promoted both as a solution to understaffing and as a means to increasing clients' autonomy. But there are fears that such use might attenuate the care relationship. Objective: To investigate how Surveillance Technology is actually being used by nurses and support staff in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities, in order to explore the possible benefits and drawbacks of this Technology in practice. Methods: An ethnographic field study was carried out in two residential care facilities: a nursing home for people with dementia and a facility for people with intellectual disabilities. Data were collected through field observations and informal conversations as well as through formal interviews. Results: Five overarching themes on the use of Surveillance Technology emerged from the data: continuing to do rounds, alarm fatigue, keeping clients in close proximity, locking the doors, and forgetting to take certain devices off. Despite the presence of Surveillance Technology, participants still continued their rounds. Alarm fatigue sometimes led participants to turn devices off. Though the Technology allowed wandering clients to be tracked more easily, participants often preferred keeping clients nearby, and preferably behind locked doors at night. At times participants forgot to remove less visible devices (such as electronic bracelets) when the original reason for use expired. Conclusions: A more nuanced view of the benefits and drawbacks of Surveillance Technology is called for. Study participants tended to incorporate Surveillance Technology into existing care routines and to do so with some reluctance and reservation. They also tended to favor certain technologies, for example, making intensive use of certain devices (such as digital enhanced cordless telecommunications phones) while demonstrating ambivalence about others (such as the tagging and tracking systems). Client safety and physical proximity seemed to be dominant values, suggesting that the fear that Surveillance Technology will cause attenuation of the care relationship is unfounded. On the other hand, the values of client freedom and autonomy seemed less influential; participants often appeared unwilling to take risks with the Technology. Care facilities wishing to implement Surveillance Technology should encourage ongoing dialogue on how staff members view and understand the concepts of autonomy and risk. A clear and well-formulated vision for the use of Surveillance Technology-one understood and supported by all stakeholders-seems imperative to successful implementation. (aut. ref.)
-
CE: Original research: the use of Surveillance Technology in residential facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: a study among nurses and support staff
The American journal of nursing, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:BackgroundThe use of Surveillance Technology in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities is often promoted both as a solution to understaffing and as a means to increasing clients’ autonomy. But there are fears that such use might attenuate the care relations
-
Quality of life of nursing-home residents with dementia subject to Surveillance Technology versus physical restraints: an explorative study
International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2012Co-Authors: S. Te Boekhorst, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Sandra A. Zwijsen, Anneke L. Francke, Jos W. R. Twisk, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Objective: As physical restraints should only be used in exceptional cases, there is an urgent need for alternatives to restraint use. Surveillance Technology could be such an alternative. This study explored whether nursing-home residents with dementia subjected to Surveillance Technology had better quality of life scores for mood, behavioral and societal dimensions than residents with physical restraints. Methods: Quality of life was assessed longitudinally, with three measurements in six psychogeriatric nursing homes of residents with Surveillance Technology (n = 170) and residents with physical restraints (n = 22). QUALIDEM subscales were used to measure five dimensions of quality of life. Multilevel longitudinal univariate and multivariate regression techniques were used to analyze the data. Results: Because physical restraints were almost exclusively used in residents with low activities of daily living (ADL) independency (18 of the 22), we restricted the regression analyses to residents with a Barthel Index score ≤ 5 (overall n = 53). Univariate results showed that highly ADL-dependent residents with Surveillance Technology had significantly more positive affect than highly ADL-dependent residents with physical restraints. However, this difference proved to be no longer significant after adjustment for the confounders: age, sex and stage of dementia. Conclusions: Quality of life of highly ADL-dependent nursing-home residents with dementia seems to be unrelated to the use of Surveillance Technology as opposed to physical restraints. (aut. ref.)
-
Surveillance Technology: An alternative to physical restraints? A qualitative study among professionals working in nursing homes for people with dementia
International journal of nursing studies, 2011Co-Authors: Sandra A. Zwijsen, A.r. Niemeijer, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Abstract Background Working with Surveillance Technology as an alternative to traditional restraints creates obvious differences in the way care is organised. It is not clear whether professional caregivers find working with Surveillance Technology useful and workable and whether Surveillance Technology is indeed used to diminish restraint use. Objectives The aim of this study was to obtain an insight into the view of Dutch dementia care professionals on the feasibility of Surveillance Technology as an alternative to physical restraints. Design Qualitative study. Setting The study was carried out in seven nursing homes for people with dementia in The Netherlands. Participants and methods Semi-structured interviews were held with nine key persons from seven nursing homes for people with dementia. Also, six focus group discussions were held with groups of nurses and two focus group discussions were held with multidisciplinary teams. Results The dementia care professionals named three different ways in which Surveillance Technology can be used: to provide safety in general, to provide additional safety, and to provide more freedom for the residents. In addition to this, the dementia care professionals mentioned four limitations in the use of Surveillance Technology: it is unable to prevent falling, it cannot guarantee quick help, it does not always work properly, and it could violate privacy. Conclusion Dementia care professionals consider Surveillance Technology supplemental to physical restraints, rather than as an alternative. Improvement of devices and education of care professionals might increase the support for using Surveillance Technology as an alternative to physical restraints.
A.r. Niemeijer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with Surveillance technologies in residential care
Nursing ethics, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Background:Surveillance Technology such as tag and tracking systems and video Surveillance could increase the freedom of movement and consequently autonomy of clients in long-term residential care settings, but is also perceived as an intrusion on autonomy including privacy.Objective:To explore how clients in residential care experience Surveillance Technology in order to assess how Surveillance Technology might influence autonomy.Setting:Two long-term residential care facilities: a nursing home for people with dementia and a care facility for people with intellectual disabilities.Methods:Ethnographic field study.Ethical considerations:The boards representing clients and relatives/proxies of the clients were informed of the study and gave their written consent. The clients’ assent was sought through a special information leaflet. At any time clients and/or proxy were given the option to withdraw from the study. The research protocol was also reviewed by a medical ethics committee.Findings:Our findings sho...
-
The use of Surveillance Technology in residential facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities : A study among nurses and support staff
American Journal of Nursing, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Background: The use of Surveillance Technology in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities is often promoted both as a solution to understaffing and as a means to increasing clients' autonomy. But there are fears that such use might attenuate the care relationship. Objective: To investigate how Surveillance Technology is actually being used by nurses and support staff in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities, in order to explore the possible benefits and drawbacks of this Technology in practice. Methods: An ethnographic field study was carried out in two residential care facilities: a nursing home for people with dementia and a facility for people with intellectual disabilities. Data were collected through field observations and informal conversations as well as through formal interviews. Results: Five overarching themes on the use of Surveillance Technology emerged from the data: continuing to do rounds, alarm fatigue, keeping clients in close proximity, locking the doors, and forgetting to take certain devices off. Despite the presence of Surveillance Technology, participants still continued their rounds. Alarm fatigue sometimes led participants to turn devices off. Though the Technology allowed wandering clients to be tracked more easily, participants often preferred keeping clients nearby, and preferably behind locked doors at night. At times participants forgot to remove less visible devices (such as electronic bracelets) when the original reason for use expired. Conclusions: A more nuanced view of the benefits and drawbacks of Surveillance Technology is called for. Study participants tended to incorporate Surveillance Technology into existing care routines and to do so with some reluctance and reservation. They also tended to favor certain technologies, for example, making intensive use of certain devices (such as digital enhanced cordless telecommunications phones) while demonstrating ambivalence about others (such as the tagging and tracking systems). Client safety and physical proximity seemed to be dominant values, suggesting that the fear that Surveillance Technology will cause attenuation of the care relationship is unfounded. On the other hand, the values of client freedom and autonomy seemed less influential; participants often appeared unwilling to take risks with the Technology. Care facilities wishing to implement Surveillance Technology should encourage ongoing dialogue on how staff members view and understand the concepts of autonomy and risk. A clear and well-formulated vision for the use of Surveillance Technology-one understood and supported by all stakeholders-seems imperative to successful implementation. (aut. ref.)
-
CE: Original research: the use of Surveillance Technology in residential facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: a study among nurses and support staff
The American journal of nursing, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:BackgroundThe use of Surveillance Technology in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities is often promoted both as a solution to understaffing and as a means to increasing clients’ autonomy. But there are fears that such use might attenuate the care relations
-
Surveillance Technology: An alternative to physical restraints? A qualitative study among professionals working in nursing homes for people with dementia
International journal of nursing studies, 2011Co-Authors: Sandra A. Zwijsen, A.r. Niemeijer, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Abstract Background Working with Surveillance Technology as an alternative to traditional restraints creates obvious differences in the way care is organised. It is not clear whether professional caregivers find working with Surveillance Technology useful and workable and whether Surveillance Technology is indeed used to diminish restraint use. Objectives The aim of this study was to obtain an insight into the view of Dutch dementia care professionals on the feasibility of Surveillance Technology as an alternative to physical restraints. Design Qualitative study. Setting The study was carried out in seven nursing homes for people with dementia in The Netherlands. Participants and methods Semi-structured interviews were held with nine key persons from seven nursing homes for people with dementia. Also, six focus group discussions were held with groups of nurses and two focus group discussions were held with multidisciplinary teams. Results The dementia care professionals named three different ways in which Surveillance Technology can be used: to provide safety in general, to provide additional safety, and to provide more freedom for the residents. In addition to this, the dementia care professionals mentioned four limitations in the use of Surveillance Technology: it is unable to prevent falling, it cannot guarantee quick help, it does not always work properly, and it could violate privacy. Conclusion Dementia care professionals consider Surveillance Technology supplemental to physical restraints, rather than as an alternative. Improvement of devices and education of care professionals might increase the support for using Surveillance Technology as an alternative to physical restraints.
-
The ideal application of Surveillance Technology in residential care for people with dementia
Journal of medical ethics, 2011Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, J. Legemaate, Jan A. Eefsting, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Background As our society is ageing, nursing homes are finding it increasingly difficult to deal with an expanding population of patients with dementia and a decreasing workforce. A potential answer to this problem might lie in the use of Technology. However, the use and application of Surveillance Technology in dementia care has led to considerable ethical debate among healthcare professionals and ethicists, with no clear consensus to date. Aim To explore how Surveillance Technology is viewed by care professionals and ethicists working in the field, by investigating the ideal application of Surveillance Technology in the residential care of people with dementia. Methods Use was made of the concept mapping method, a computer-assisted procedure consisting of five steps: brainstorming, prioritising, clustering, processing by the computer and analysis. Various participants (ranging from ethicists to physicians and nurses) were invited on the basis of their professional background. Results The views generated are grouped into six categories ranging from the need for a right balance between freedom and security, to be beneficial and tailored to the resident, and clearly defined procedures to competent and caring personnel, active monitoring and clear normative guidance. The results are presented in the form of a graphic chart. Conclusions There appears to be an inherent duality in the views on using Surveillance Technology which is rooted in the moral conflict between safety and freedom. Elaboration of this ethical issue has proved to be very difficult.
Anneke L. Francke - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The use of Surveillance Technology in residential facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities : A study among nurses and support staff
American Journal of Nursing, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Background: The use of Surveillance Technology in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities is often promoted both as a solution to understaffing and as a means to increasing clients' autonomy. But there are fears that such use might attenuate the care relationship. Objective: To investigate how Surveillance Technology is actually being used by nurses and support staff in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities, in order to explore the possible benefits and drawbacks of this Technology in practice. Methods: An ethnographic field study was carried out in two residential care facilities: a nursing home for people with dementia and a facility for people with intellectual disabilities. Data were collected through field observations and informal conversations as well as through formal interviews. Results: Five overarching themes on the use of Surveillance Technology emerged from the data: continuing to do rounds, alarm fatigue, keeping clients in close proximity, locking the doors, and forgetting to take certain devices off. Despite the presence of Surveillance Technology, participants still continued their rounds. Alarm fatigue sometimes led participants to turn devices off. Though the Technology allowed wandering clients to be tracked more easily, participants often preferred keeping clients nearby, and preferably behind locked doors at night. At times participants forgot to remove less visible devices (such as electronic bracelets) when the original reason for use expired. Conclusions: A more nuanced view of the benefits and drawbacks of Surveillance Technology is called for. Study participants tended to incorporate Surveillance Technology into existing care routines and to do so with some reluctance and reservation. They also tended to favor certain technologies, for example, making intensive use of certain devices (such as digital enhanced cordless telecommunications phones) while demonstrating ambivalence about others (such as the tagging and tracking systems). Client safety and physical proximity seemed to be dominant values, suggesting that the fear that Surveillance Technology will cause attenuation of the care relationship is unfounded. On the other hand, the values of client freedom and autonomy seemed less influential; participants often appeared unwilling to take risks with the Technology. Care facilities wishing to implement Surveillance Technology should encourage ongoing dialogue on how staff members view and understand the concepts of autonomy and risk. A clear and well-formulated vision for the use of Surveillance Technology-one understood and supported by all stakeholders-seems imperative to successful implementation. (aut. ref.)
-
CE: Original research: the use of Surveillance Technology in residential facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: a study among nurses and support staff
The American journal of nursing, 2014Co-Authors: A.r. Niemeijer, Brenda J. M. Frederiks, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:BackgroundThe use of Surveillance Technology in residential care facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities is often promoted both as a solution to understaffing and as a means to increasing clients’ autonomy. But there are fears that such use might attenuate the care relations
-
Quality of life of nursing-home residents with dementia subject to Surveillance Technology versus physical restraints: an explorative study
International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2012Co-Authors: S. Te Boekhorst, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Sandra A. Zwijsen, Anneke L. Francke, Jos W. R. Twisk, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Objective: As physical restraints should only be used in exceptional cases, there is an urgent need for alternatives to restraint use. Surveillance Technology could be such an alternative. This study explored whether nursing-home residents with dementia subjected to Surveillance Technology had better quality of life scores for mood, behavioral and societal dimensions than residents with physical restraints. Methods: Quality of life was assessed longitudinally, with three measurements in six psychogeriatric nursing homes of residents with Surveillance Technology (n = 170) and residents with physical restraints (n = 22). QUALIDEM subscales were used to measure five dimensions of quality of life. Multilevel longitudinal univariate and multivariate regression techniques were used to analyze the data. Results: Because physical restraints were almost exclusively used in residents with low activities of daily living (ADL) independency (18 of the 22), we restricted the regression analyses to residents with a Barthel Index score ≤ 5 (overall n = 53). Univariate results showed that highly ADL-dependent residents with Surveillance Technology had significantly more positive affect than highly ADL-dependent residents with physical restraints. However, this difference proved to be no longer significant after adjustment for the confounders: age, sex and stage of dementia. Conclusions: Quality of life of highly ADL-dependent nursing-home residents with dementia seems to be unrelated to the use of Surveillance Technology as opposed to physical restraints. (aut. ref.)
-
Surveillance Technology: An alternative to physical restraints? A qualitative study among professionals working in nursing homes for people with dementia
International journal of nursing studies, 2011Co-Authors: Sandra A. Zwijsen, A.r. Niemeijer, Marja F. I. A. Depla, Anneke L. Francke, Cees M.p.m. HertoghAbstract:Abstract Background Working with Surveillance Technology as an alternative to traditional restraints creates obvious differences in the way care is organised. It is not clear whether professional caregivers find working with Surveillance Technology useful and workable and whether Surveillance Technology is indeed used to diminish restraint use. Objectives The aim of this study was to obtain an insight into the view of Dutch dementia care professionals on the feasibility of Surveillance Technology as an alternative to physical restraints. Design Qualitative study. Setting The study was carried out in seven nursing homes for people with dementia in The Netherlands. Participants and methods Semi-structured interviews were held with nine key persons from seven nursing homes for people with dementia. Also, six focus group discussions were held with groups of nurses and two focus group discussions were held with multidisciplinary teams. Results The dementia care professionals named three different ways in which Surveillance Technology can be used: to provide safety in general, to provide additional safety, and to provide more freedom for the residents. In addition to this, the dementia care professionals mentioned four limitations in the use of Surveillance Technology: it is unable to prevent falling, it cannot guarantee quick help, it does not always work properly, and it could violate privacy. Conclusion Dementia care professionals consider Surveillance Technology supplemental to physical restraints, rather than as an alternative. Improvement of devices and education of care professionals might increase the support for using Surveillance Technology as an alternative to physical restraints.
Eric Feron - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Valuating Surface Surveillance Technology for Collaborative Multiple-Spot Control of Airport Departure Operations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014Co-Authors: Pierrick Burgain, Sang Hyun Kim, Eric FeronAbstract:Airport departure operations are a source of airline delays and passenger frustration. Excessive surface traffic is a cause of increased controller and pilot workload. It is also a source of increased emissions and delays, and it does not yield improved runway throughput. Leveraging the extensive past research on airport departure management, this paper explores the environmental and safety benefits that improved Surveillance technologies can bring in the context of gate- or spot-release strategies. This paper shows that improved Surveillance technologies can yield a 4%-6% reduction of the average number of aircraft on the taxiway system during congested operations, and therefore emissions, in addition to the savings currently observed by implementing threshold-based metering strategies under evaluation at Boston's Logan Airport and other busy airports during congested periods. These calculated benefits contrast sharply with our previous work, which relied on simplified airport ramp areas with a single departure spot and where fewer environmental and economic benefits of advanced surface Surveillance systems could be established. Our work is illustrated by its application to New York's LaGuardia and Seattle-Tacoma airports in Washington.
-
Valuating Surface Surveillance Technology for Collaborative Multiple-Spot Control of Airport Departure Operations
arXiv: Other Computer Science, 2013Co-Authors: Pierrick Burgain, Sang Hyun Kim, Eric FeronAbstract:Airport departure operations are a source of airline delays and passenger frustration. Excessive surface traffic is a cause of increased controller and pilot workload. It is also a source of increased emissions and delays, and does not yield improved runway throughput. Leveraging the extensive past research on airport departure management, this paper explores the environmental and safety benefits that improved Surveillance technologies can bring in the context of gate- or spot-release strategies. The paper shows that improved Surveillance technologies can yield 4% to 6% reduction of aircraft on taxiway, and therefore emissions, in addition to the savings currently observed by implementing threshold starategies under evaluation at Boston Logan Airport and other busy airports during congested periods. These calculated benefits contrast sharply with our previous work, which relied on simplified airport ramp areas with a single departure spot, and where fewer environmental and economic benefits of advanced surface Surveillance systems could be established. Our work is illustrated by its application to New-York LaGuardia and Seattle Tacoma airports.
-
Environmental benefits of enhanced Surveillance Technology on airport departure operations
arXiv: Systems and Control, 2011Co-Authors: Pierrick Burgain, Eric FeronAbstract:Airport departure operations constitute an important source of airline delays and passenger frustration. Excessive surface traffic is the cause of increased controller and pilot workload; It is also the source of increased emissions; It worsens traffic safety and often does not yield improved runway throughput. Acknowledging this fact, this paper explores some of the feedback mechanisms by which airport traffic can be optimized in real time according to its current degree of congestion. In particular, it examines the environmnetal benefits that improved Surveillance technologies can bring in the context of gate- or spot-release aircraft strategies. It is shown that improvements can lead yield 4% to 6% emission reductions for busy airports like New-York La Guardia or Seattle Tacoma. These benefits come on top of the benefits already obtained by adopting threshold strategies currently under evaluation.
-
Valuating surface Surveillance Technology for collaborative multiple-spot control of airport departure operations
2011 IEEE AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2011Co-Authors: Pierrick Burgain, Eric Feron, Sang Hyun KimAbstract:Airport departure operations constitute an important source of airline delays and passenger frustration. Excessive surface traffic is the cause of increased controller and pilot workload; It is also the source of increased emissions; It worsens traffic safety and often does not yield improved runway throughput. Acknowledging this fact, this paper explores some of the feedback mechanisms by which airport traffic can be optimized in real time according to its current degree of congestion. In particular, it examines the environmnetal benefits that improved Surveillance technologies can bring in the context of gate — or spot-release aircraft strategies. It is shown that improvements can lead yield 4% to 6% emission reductions for busy airports like New-York La Guardia or Seattle Tacoma. These benefits come on top of the benefits already obtained by adopting threshold strategies currently under evaluation.
