Sustainable Investment

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 65199 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Tobias Hahn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Roland W. Scholz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Environmental Impacts of Conventional and Sustainable Investment Funds Compared Using Input‐Output Life‐Cycle Assessment
    Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008
    Co-Authors: Thomas Koellner, Sangwon Suh, Olaf Weber, Corinne Moser, Roland W. Scholz
    Abstract:

    This study compares equity funds that are managed according to sustainability goals with conventionally managed funds with respect to their environmental impacts. Overlap in the portfolios of Sustainable equity funds and conventional equity funds can be very large. Further, the sector allocation of both types of funds is generally very similar, because portfolio managers follow a chosen benchmark to minimize risk. These two effects may result in no difference existing between the two types of funds in terms of their environmental impact and damage (null hypothesis of this research). This study comparatively assesses the environmental impact of portfolios of 26 Investment funds: 13 Sustainable Investment funds and 13 conventional funds, which are managed according to the benchmark MSCI World. The study applies input-output life-cycle assessment (IO-LCA) in combination with a simulation of company-specific environmental performance. The environmental impact is evaluated per functional unit for each fund, measured as the risk-adjusted financial performance. The statistical analysis showed that the analyzed Sustainable Investment funds performed better with respect to environmental impact assessment but worse in economic risk-adjusted performance (RAP) over the period 2000-2004. In 2004, however, the RAP of the selected Sustainable Investment funds showed better performance. Both samples considerably overlap for the environmental and economic parameters. The results suggest that the environmental impact of Sustainable Investment funds in the sample is slightly less than that of conventional funds.

  • environmental impacts of conventional and Sustainable Investment funds compared using input output life cycle assessment
    Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008
    Co-Authors: Thomas Koellner, Sangwon Suh, Olaf Weber, Corinne Moser, Roland W. Scholz
    Abstract:

    This study compares equity funds that are managed according to sustainability goals with conventionally managed funds with respect to their environmental impacts. Overlap in the portfolios of Sustainable equity funds and conventional equity funds can be very large. Further, the sector allocation of both types of funds is generally very similar, because portfolio managers follow a chosen benchmark to minimize risk. These two effects may result in no difference existing between the two types of funds in terms of their environmental impact and damage (null hypothesis of this research). This study comparatively assesses the environmental impact of portfolios of 26 Investment funds: 13 Sustainable Investment funds and 13 conventional funds, which are managed according to the benchmark MSCI World. The study applies input-output life-cycle assessment (IO-LCA) in combination with a simulation of company-specific environmental performance. The environmental impact is evaluated per functional unit for each fund, measured as the risk-adjusted financial performance. The statistical analysis showed that the analyzed Sustainable Investment funds performed better with respect to environmental impact assessment but worse in economic risk-adjusted performance (RAP) over the period 2000-2004. In 2004, however, the RAP of the selected Sustainable Investment funds showed better performance. Both samples considerably overlap for the environmental and economic parameters. The results suggest that the environmental impact of Sustainable Investment funds in the sample is slightly less than that of conventional funds.

Frank Figge - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Thomas Koellner - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Environmental Impacts of Conventional and Sustainable Investment Funds Compared Using Input‐Output Life‐Cycle Assessment
    Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008
    Co-Authors: Thomas Koellner, Sangwon Suh, Olaf Weber, Corinne Moser, Roland W. Scholz
    Abstract:

    This study compares equity funds that are managed according to sustainability goals with conventionally managed funds with respect to their environmental impacts. Overlap in the portfolios of Sustainable equity funds and conventional equity funds can be very large. Further, the sector allocation of both types of funds is generally very similar, because portfolio managers follow a chosen benchmark to minimize risk. These two effects may result in no difference existing between the two types of funds in terms of their environmental impact and damage (null hypothesis of this research). This study comparatively assesses the environmental impact of portfolios of 26 Investment funds: 13 Sustainable Investment funds and 13 conventional funds, which are managed according to the benchmark MSCI World. The study applies input-output life-cycle assessment (IO-LCA) in combination with a simulation of company-specific environmental performance. The environmental impact is evaluated per functional unit for each fund, measured as the risk-adjusted financial performance. The statistical analysis showed that the analyzed Sustainable Investment funds performed better with respect to environmental impact assessment but worse in economic risk-adjusted performance (RAP) over the period 2000-2004. In 2004, however, the RAP of the selected Sustainable Investment funds showed better performance. Both samples considerably overlap for the environmental and economic parameters. The results suggest that the environmental impact of Sustainable Investment funds in the sample is slightly less than that of conventional funds.

  • environmental impacts of conventional and Sustainable Investment funds compared using input output life cycle assessment
    Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008
    Co-Authors: Thomas Koellner, Sangwon Suh, Olaf Weber, Corinne Moser, Roland W. Scholz
    Abstract:

    This study compares equity funds that are managed according to sustainability goals with conventionally managed funds with respect to their environmental impacts. Overlap in the portfolios of Sustainable equity funds and conventional equity funds can be very large. Further, the sector allocation of both types of funds is generally very similar, because portfolio managers follow a chosen benchmark to minimize risk. These two effects may result in no difference existing between the two types of funds in terms of their environmental impact and damage (null hypothesis of this research). This study comparatively assesses the environmental impact of portfolios of 26 Investment funds: 13 Sustainable Investment funds and 13 conventional funds, which are managed according to the benchmark MSCI World. The study applies input-output life-cycle assessment (IO-LCA) in combination with a simulation of company-specific environmental performance. The environmental impact is evaluated per functional unit for each fund, measured as the risk-adjusted financial performance. The statistical analysis showed that the analyzed Sustainable Investment funds performed better with respect to environmental impact assessment but worse in economic risk-adjusted performance (RAP) over the period 2000-2004. In 2004, however, the RAP of the selected Sustainable Investment funds showed better performance. Both samples considerably overlap for the environmental and economic parameters. The results suggest that the environmental impact of Sustainable Investment funds in the sample is slightly less than that of conventional funds.

Melsa Ararat - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Sustainable Investment in Turkey: The Case in Context - An Update
    SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
    Co-Authors: Melsa Ararat, Esra Suel, Burçin B. Yurtoğlu
    Abstract:

    This paper is a sequel to the “Sustainable Investment in Turkey, 2010” report (IFC, 2011). The original report provided a review of the then current state of the Sustainable Investment (SI) in Turkey and analysed the institutional prerequisites and interventions that would encourage better allocation of financial capital to Sustainable firms. This update seeks to study Turkey as a case to analyse SI challenges and prospects in emerging markets with a focus on equity Investments through stock exchanges and sustainability indices.The focus on stock markets is motivated by the emerging emphasis on the role of stock exchanges in promoting SI as articulated in the objectives of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Stock Exchanges (SSE) Initiative. Although this paper provides an update to the relevant sections of the original report, its ultimate objective is to reflect on Turkey’s experience as a case study to assess the feasibility of sustainability indices in promoting SI in emerging markets.

  • The state of Sustainable Investment in key emerging markets : synthesis report
    2011
    Co-Authors: Melsa Ararat, Euan Marshall
    Abstract:

    Since 2009 International Finance Corporation (IFC) has produced a series of Sustainable Investment country reports covering major emerging capital markets attracting global portfolio investors: Brazil, India, China, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), and Turkey. This report provides a snapshot of the findings of these country reports and seeks to identify common themes and trends across and highlight crucial differences among these markets. To support the growth of Sustainable capital flows, IFC Advisory Services team seeks to influence, support, and enable capital allocation and portfolio management processes, using IFC's own Investment practices as a model. IFC is playing its part in supporting the growth of the market by funding the development of enhanced stock market indices and financial instruments and through targeted market research. While this report seeks to capture the findings from the individual reports it does not reflect specific input from the authors themselves. Equally the synthesis and analysis reflects the thoughts of the author of this report not of the individual country reports. The report also consider the supply of financial capital in various classes and forms to listed and privately held firms with a consideration of the Investment's impact on economic and social development or on investors' values.

  • Sustainable Investment in Turkey: issue brief
    2011
    Co-Authors: Melsa Ararat, Burçin B. Yurtoğlu, Esra Suel
    Abstract:

    IFC launched a series of Sustainable Investment country reports initially covering the largest emerging capital markets attracting global portfolio investors: Brazil, India, and China. Further reports have been added to the series covering Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and North Africa, and Turkey. This Issue Brief 's the summary version of the report, “Sustainable Investment in Turkey,”

  • The State of Sustainable Investment in Key Emerging Markets
    SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
    Co-Authors: Melsa Ararat, Esra Suel
    Abstract:

    IFC launched a series of Sustainable Investment country reports covering major emerging capital markets attracting global portfolio investors: Brazil, India, China, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), and Turkey. “The State of Sustainable Investment in Key Emerging Markets” provides a snapshot of the findings of these country reports and seeks to identify common themes and trends across and highlight crucial differences among these markets.

  • Sustainable Investments in Turkey 2010
    SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
    Co-Authors: Melsa Ararat, Esra Suel, B. Burcin Yurtoglu, Deniz Tura
    Abstract:

    The Turkish market is relatively small when compared with Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) countries; Turkey is growing and is the largest emerging market (EM) in the process of accession to the European Union (EU). With prospective EU membership as an anchor and support from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) standby agreement, Turkey has made significant improvements in overcoming macroeconomic instability since 2001. Turkey is now a functioning open market economy with an ongoing democratic consolidation process. With its solid banking system, robust public finances, and strong growth prospects, Turkey has become a market that investors can no longer ignore. The nation still faces structural problems. Low savings rates and a current account deficit contribute to a persistent reliance on external finance. Turkey's economy remains vulnerable to changes in external financing conditions. The main objectives of this report are 1) to understand and provide a review of the current state of the Sustainable Investment (SI) market in Turkey; 2) to identify the drivers and obstacles for Sustainable Investments and assess the commercial feasibility of different approaches and initiatives that may stimulate the SI market in Turkey; and 3) to analyze the institutional prerequisites and interventions that will fuel the development of Investments, which would, in turn, encourage a better allocation of local and international capital to Sustainable enterprises and hence support Sustainable development of the Turkish economy.