The Experts below are selected from a list of 22503 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

L I Baoxiang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • huang renyu s brief discussion on china s long Term Revolution
    Journal of Jiangnan University, 2010
    Co-Authors: L I Baoxiang
    Abstract:

    In his many writings,Huang Renyu elaborates the "long-Term Revolution" which is interpreted by him as China's social change and reform since Opium War.The occurrence of the "long-Term Revolution" is inevitable and its process is complicated.In the 20th century,the "long-Term Revolution" has undergoes a breakthrough which is demonstrated on the re-construction of KMT's high-level institution,the transformation of Communist Party's low-level organization and the redefining of the connection between the upper and the lower by Deng Xiaoping and the subsequent successors.Under the guidance of the "big history",Huang Renyu reexamines the major historical events and figures in China's modern history in his brief discussion on the "long-Term Revolution".His interpretation is fresh,which is closely related to his experiences.From the perspective of academic study,his "long-Term Revolution" theory is considerably valuable.

Michael Heylin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a long Term Revolution
    Chemical & Engineering News, 2007
    Co-Authors: Michael Heylin
    Abstract:

    WOMEN TODAY EARN 57% of the bachelor's degrees, 59% of the master's degrees, 45% of the doctoral degrees, 49% of the law degrees, and 46% of the M.D.s awarded in this country. And these levels could go higher as, today, 60% of graduate students and 50% of professional school students are women. When I joined the G&EN staff 44 years ago, there were no women on the American Chemical Society Board of Directors. Almost everything at ACS, except the Women Chemists Committee, was run by men. It took the society 96 years to elect its first woman board member, in 1972. This year, 10 of the 16 members of the ACS Board are women, including, for the first time, the society's president, board chairman, and chief executive. An influx of women to leadership roles is also evident in academia. Today, women head Princeton University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Michigan, Michigan State University ...

E G Bain - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a deconstruction of the Term Revolution
    Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship = Koers : Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap, 2015
    Co-Authors: J C M Venter, E G Bain
    Abstract:

    The precise meaning of the concept of (political) Revolution remains semantically contested. According to Arslanian (2013:127) this concept “is often used liberally, applied to everything from the ‘Social Media Revolution’ to the ‘Sexual Revolution’”. Brinton (1965:1-4) agrees, referring to Revolution as a concept that “troubles the semanticist not only because of its wide range in popular usage, but also because it is one of those words charged with emotional content”. In some instances Revolution even becomes a “holy word” with an a priori moral force which sets preconditions for moral righteousness. It seems that “the Revolution” can become just as important as a religion would be. This same Revolution/religion also provides the opportunity to gain material and immaterial goods for human-kind (Marcuse, 2001:123). Koselleck (as quoted by Marinelli; 2014:8) argues that the semantics of the concept Revolution is by no means unequivocal. The goal of this article therefore is to address the semantic vagueness of the political concept of Revolution through a literature analysis, subsequently listing observable characteristics of the phenomenon. As such, this article is a theoretical effort contributing to what Babbie and Mouton (2008:113) call the hermeneutic cycle of ever-deepening understanding in which the different observables of Revolution will be arrived at via the deconstruction of various definitions from wide-ranging schools of thought and ideas of Revolution. Key concepts : Revolution, deconstruction; characterisation.  Opsomming : Die presiese betekenis van die konsep (politieke) revolusie is semanties omstrede. Volgens Arslanian (2013:127) word die konsep algemeen gebruik om enigiets van die ‘Sosiale Media Revolusie’ tot die ‘Seksuele Revolusie’ te beskryf. Brinton (1965:1-4) stem hiermee saam en beskryf revolusie as ʼn konsep wat problematies is vir die semantikus omdat dit in die populere taal gebruik word en omdat dit met emosionele inhoud gelaai is. In sommige omstandighede word revolusie selfs ʼn “heilige woord” met ʼn a priori morele mag wat die voorvereistes bevat vir geregtigheid. Dit blyk dat “die revolusie” net so belangrik kan raak soos wat ʼn religie kan wees. Hierdie revolusie/religie voorsien dan die geleentheid om materiele en niemateriele goedere deur die mensdom te versamel (Marcuse, 2001:123). Koselleck (soos aangehaal deur Marinelli 2014:8) argumenteer dat die betekenis van revolusie allermins ondubbelsinnig is. Die doel van die artikel is dan om die semantiese vaagheid van die politieke Term rewolusie te ontleed deur ʼn literatuurstudie waarna die waarneembare kenmerke van die verskynsel gelys sal word. As sulks poog die artikel om ʼn teoretiese bydrae te maak tot wat Babbie and Mouton (2008:113) die hermeneutiese siklus van dieperwordende begrip noem en waarin verskillende waarneembare kenmerke van revolusie geidentifiseer sal word deur die dekonstruksie van verkillende definisies beskryf in verskillende denkskole.  Kernbegrippe: Revolusie, dekonstruksie; karakterisering. https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.80.4.2246

Angela De Benedictis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

J C M Venter - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a deconstruction of the Term Revolution
    Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship = Koers : Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap, 2015
    Co-Authors: J C M Venter, E G Bain
    Abstract:

    The precise meaning of the concept of (political) Revolution remains semantically contested. According to Arslanian (2013:127) this concept “is often used liberally, applied to everything from the ‘Social Media Revolution’ to the ‘Sexual Revolution’”. Brinton (1965:1-4) agrees, referring to Revolution as a concept that “troubles the semanticist not only because of its wide range in popular usage, but also because it is one of those words charged with emotional content”. In some instances Revolution even becomes a “holy word” with an a priori moral force which sets preconditions for moral righteousness. It seems that “the Revolution” can become just as important as a religion would be. This same Revolution/religion also provides the opportunity to gain material and immaterial goods for human-kind (Marcuse, 2001:123). Koselleck (as quoted by Marinelli; 2014:8) argues that the semantics of the concept Revolution is by no means unequivocal. The goal of this article therefore is to address the semantic vagueness of the political concept of Revolution through a literature analysis, subsequently listing observable characteristics of the phenomenon. As such, this article is a theoretical effort contributing to what Babbie and Mouton (2008:113) call the hermeneutic cycle of ever-deepening understanding in which the different observables of Revolution will be arrived at via the deconstruction of various definitions from wide-ranging schools of thought and ideas of Revolution. Key concepts : Revolution, deconstruction; characterisation.  Opsomming : Die presiese betekenis van die konsep (politieke) revolusie is semanties omstrede. Volgens Arslanian (2013:127) word die konsep algemeen gebruik om enigiets van die ‘Sosiale Media Revolusie’ tot die ‘Seksuele Revolusie’ te beskryf. Brinton (1965:1-4) stem hiermee saam en beskryf revolusie as ʼn konsep wat problematies is vir die semantikus omdat dit in die populere taal gebruik word en omdat dit met emosionele inhoud gelaai is. In sommige omstandighede word revolusie selfs ʼn “heilige woord” met ʼn a priori morele mag wat die voorvereistes bevat vir geregtigheid. Dit blyk dat “die revolusie” net so belangrik kan raak soos wat ʼn religie kan wees. Hierdie revolusie/religie voorsien dan die geleentheid om materiele en niemateriele goedere deur die mensdom te versamel (Marcuse, 2001:123). Koselleck (soos aangehaal deur Marinelli 2014:8) argumenteer dat die betekenis van revolusie allermins ondubbelsinnig is. Die doel van die artikel is dan om die semantiese vaagheid van die politieke Term rewolusie te ontleed deur ʼn literatuurstudie waarna die waarneembare kenmerke van die verskynsel gelys sal word. As sulks poog die artikel om ʼn teoretiese bydrae te maak tot wat Babbie and Mouton (2008:113) die hermeneutiese siklus van dieperwordende begrip noem en waarin verskillende waarneembare kenmerke van revolusie geidentifiseer sal word deur die dekonstruksie van verkillende definisies beskryf in verskillende denkskole.  Kernbegrippe: Revolusie, dekonstruksie; karakterisering. https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.80.4.2246