The Experts below are selected from a list of 7425 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Hideo Matsumura - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
fracture resistance of single Tooth implant supported zirconia based indirect composite layered molar restorations
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014Co-Authors: Kohei Taguchi, Futoshi Komine, Ryosuke Fushiki, Shingo Kamio, Markus B. Blatz, Hideo MatsumuraAbstract:Objectives This study evaluated the fracture resistance of single-Tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar restorations. Material and methods Forty-four titanium abutments (GingiHue Post) were placed on dental implants (Osseotite Implant). Standardized single-Tooth Cement-retained implant-supported mandibular molar restorations were fabricated for each of four test groups (n = 11) as follows: porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns (PFM), zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns (ZAC), zirconia-based indirect composite-layered crowns primed with Estenia Opaque Primer for zirconia frameworks (ZIC-E), and zirconia-based indirect composite-layered crowns (ZIC). The crowns were luted with a glass-ionomer Cement (Ketac Cem Easymix). Fracture resistance (N) was determined by force application of a perpendicular load to the crowns with a universal testing machine. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test were used to assess differences in fracture resistance values (α = 0.05). Results Mean fracture resistances (SD) were 3.09 (0.22) kN, 3.11 (0.34) kN, 2.84 (0.21) kN, and 2.50 (0.36) kN for the PFM, ZAC, ZIC-E, and ZIC groups, respectively. Fracture resistance in the ZIC specimens was significantly lower (P < 0.044) than that in the other groups, which did not significantly differ. Conclusions The fracture resistance of single-Tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar crowns primed with Estenia Opaque Primer for zirconia frameworks (ZIC-E) is comparable to that of porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) and zirconia-based all-ceramic (ZAC) restorations. Application of Estenia Opaque Primer to zirconia ceramic framework provides superior fracture resistance in implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar crowns.
Kohei Taguchi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
fracture resistance of single Tooth implant supported zirconia based indirect composite layered molar restorations
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014Co-Authors: Kohei Taguchi, Futoshi Komine, Ryosuke Fushiki, Shingo Kamio, Markus B. Blatz, Hideo MatsumuraAbstract:Objectives This study evaluated the fracture resistance of single-Tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar restorations. Material and methods Forty-four titanium abutments (GingiHue Post) were placed on dental implants (Osseotite Implant). Standardized single-Tooth Cement-retained implant-supported mandibular molar restorations were fabricated for each of four test groups (n = 11) as follows: porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns (PFM), zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns (ZAC), zirconia-based indirect composite-layered crowns primed with Estenia Opaque Primer for zirconia frameworks (ZIC-E), and zirconia-based indirect composite-layered crowns (ZIC). The crowns were luted with a glass-ionomer Cement (Ketac Cem Easymix). Fracture resistance (N) was determined by force application of a perpendicular load to the crowns with a universal testing machine. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test were used to assess differences in fracture resistance values (α = 0.05). Results Mean fracture resistances (SD) were 3.09 (0.22) kN, 3.11 (0.34) kN, 2.84 (0.21) kN, and 2.50 (0.36) kN for the PFM, ZAC, ZIC-E, and ZIC groups, respectively. Fracture resistance in the ZIC specimens was significantly lower (P < 0.044) than that in the other groups, which did not significantly differ. Conclusions The fracture resistance of single-Tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar crowns primed with Estenia Opaque Primer for zirconia frameworks (ZIC-E) is comparable to that of porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) and zirconia-based all-ceramic (ZAC) restorations. Application of Estenia Opaque Primer to zirconia ceramic framework provides superior fracture resistance in implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar crowns.
Futoshi Komine - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
fracture resistance of single Tooth implant supported zirconia based indirect composite layered molar restorations
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014Co-Authors: Kohei Taguchi, Futoshi Komine, Ryosuke Fushiki, Shingo Kamio, Markus B. Blatz, Hideo MatsumuraAbstract:Objectives This study evaluated the fracture resistance of single-Tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar restorations. Material and methods Forty-four titanium abutments (GingiHue Post) were placed on dental implants (Osseotite Implant). Standardized single-Tooth Cement-retained implant-supported mandibular molar restorations were fabricated for each of four test groups (n = 11) as follows: porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns (PFM), zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns (ZAC), zirconia-based indirect composite-layered crowns primed with Estenia Opaque Primer for zirconia frameworks (ZIC-E), and zirconia-based indirect composite-layered crowns (ZIC). The crowns were luted with a glass-ionomer Cement (Ketac Cem Easymix). Fracture resistance (N) was determined by force application of a perpendicular load to the crowns with a universal testing machine. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test were used to assess differences in fracture resistance values (α = 0.05). Results Mean fracture resistances (SD) were 3.09 (0.22) kN, 3.11 (0.34) kN, 2.84 (0.21) kN, and 2.50 (0.36) kN for the PFM, ZAC, ZIC-E, and ZIC groups, respectively. Fracture resistance in the ZIC specimens was significantly lower (P < 0.044) than that in the other groups, which did not significantly differ. Conclusions The fracture resistance of single-Tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar crowns primed with Estenia Opaque Primer for zirconia frameworks (ZIC-E) is comparable to that of porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) and zirconia-based all-ceramic (ZAC) restorations. Application of Estenia Opaque Primer to zirconia ceramic framework provides superior fracture resistance in implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar crowns.
Shingo Kamio - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
fracture resistance of single Tooth implant supported zirconia based indirect composite layered molar restorations
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014Co-Authors: Kohei Taguchi, Futoshi Komine, Ryosuke Fushiki, Shingo Kamio, Markus B. Blatz, Hideo MatsumuraAbstract:Objectives This study evaluated the fracture resistance of single-Tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar restorations. Material and methods Forty-four titanium abutments (GingiHue Post) were placed on dental implants (Osseotite Implant). Standardized single-Tooth Cement-retained implant-supported mandibular molar restorations were fabricated for each of four test groups (n = 11) as follows: porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns (PFM), zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns (ZAC), zirconia-based indirect composite-layered crowns primed with Estenia Opaque Primer for zirconia frameworks (ZIC-E), and zirconia-based indirect composite-layered crowns (ZIC). The crowns were luted with a glass-ionomer Cement (Ketac Cem Easymix). Fracture resistance (N) was determined by force application of a perpendicular load to the crowns with a universal testing machine. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test were used to assess differences in fracture resistance values (α = 0.05). Results Mean fracture resistances (SD) were 3.09 (0.22) kN, 3.11 (0.34) kN, 2.84 (0.21) kN, and 2.50 (0.36) kN for the PFM, ZAC, ZIC-E, and ZIC groups, respectively. Fracture resistance in the ZIC specimens was significantly lower (P < 0.044) than that in the other groups, which did not significantly differ. Conclusions The fracture resistance of single-Tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar crowns primed with Estenia Opaque Primer for zirconia frameworks (ZIC-E) is comparable to that of porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) and zirconia-based all-ceramic (ZAC) restorations. Application of Estenia Opaque Primer to zirconia ceramic framework provides superior fracture resistance in implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar crowns.
Markus B. Blatz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
fracture resistance of single Tooth implant supported zirconia based indirect composite layered molar restorations
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014Co-Authors: Kohei Taguchi, Futoshi Komine, Ryosuke Fushiki, Shingo Kamio, Markus B. Blatz, Hideo MatsumuraAbstract:Objectives This study evaluated the fracture resistance of single-Tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar restorations. Material and methods Forty-four titanium abutments (GingiHue Post) were placed on dental implants (Osseotite Implant). Standardized single-Tooth Cement-retained implant-supported mandibular molar restorations were fabricated for each of four test groups (n = 11) as follows: porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns (PFM), zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns (ZAC), zirconia-based indirect composite-layered crowns primed with Estenia Opaque Primer for zirconia frameworks (ZIC-E), and zirconia-based indirect composite-layered crowns (ZIC). The crowns were luted with a glass-ionomer Cement (Ketac Cem Easymix). Fracture resistance (N) was determined by force application of a perpendicular load to the crowns with a universal testing machine. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test were used to assess differences in fracture resistance values (α = 0.05). Results Mean fracture resistances (SD) were 3.09 (0.22) kN, 3.11 (0.34) kN, 2.84 (0.21) kN, and 2.50 (0.36) kN for the PFM, ZAC, ZIC-E, and ZIC groups, respectively. Fracture resistance in the ZIC specimens was significantly lower (P < 0.044) than that in the other groups, which did not significantly differ. Conclusions The fracture resistance of single-Tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar crowns primed with Estenia Opaque Primer for zirconia frameworks (ZIC-E) is comparable to that of porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) and zirconia-based all-ceramic (ZAC) restorations. Application of Estenia Opaque Primer to zirconia ceramic framework provides superior fracture resistance in implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar crowns.