Tracking Station

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 192 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

S. F. Likhachev - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Oliver Montenbruck - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Kalman-filter-based GPS clock estimation for near real-time positioning
    GPS Solutions, 2009
    Co-Authors: André Hauschild, Oliver Montenbruck
    Abstract:

    In this article, an algorithm for clock offset estimation of the GPS satellites is presented. The algorithm is based on a Kalman-filter and processes undifferenced code and carrier-phase measurements of a global Tracking network. The clock offset and drift of the satellite clocks are estimated along with Tracking Station clock offsets, tropospheric zenith path delay and carrier-phase ambiguities. The article provides a brief overview of already existing near-real-time and real-time clock products. The filter algorithm and data processing scheme is presented. Finally, the accuracy of the orbit and clock product is assessed with a precise orbit determination of the MetOp satellite and compared to results gained with other real-time products.

M. N. Andrianov - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Kwo-hwa Chen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The Impact on the Positioning Accuracy of the Frequency Reference of a GPS Receiver
    Surveys in Geophysics, 2013
    Co-Authors: Ta-kang Yeh, Chieh-hung Chen, Chuan-sheng Wang, Kwo-hwa Chen
    Abstract:

    Despite the pervasive use of the global positioning system (GPS) as a positioning technology for its high efficiency and accuracy, several factors reduce its performance. This study examines to which extent the frequency offset and the frequency stability of the internal quartz oscillator or of an externally supplied rubidium oscillator have an influence. Observations were made at the Taiwan Ching Yun University (TCYU) Tracking Station, where a quartz oscillator and a rubidium oscillator were applied alternatively on a monthly basis throughout a 16-month period. Moreover, the accuracy of the local oscillator used in this study was calibrated by the National Standard Time and Frequency Laboratory, Taiwan. The frequency offset and frequency stability calculated via the remote method at the TCYU Station were compared with values (uncertainty is 3.0E−13) measured directly at the National Standard Time and Frequency Laboratory, Taiwan. Analytical results show that the two methods vary by 1.4E−10 in terms of frequency offset and by 6.5E−12 in terms of frequency stability, demonstrating that the remote method can yield computational results almost as accurate as direct measurement. Positioning precision results also show that rubidium oscillator accuracy improved by 5, 11, and 15 % for short-, medium-, and long-baseline positioning, respectively, indicating that clock quality is more influential for long-baseline GPS relative positioning and that the frequency stability of a receiver clock is far more critical than the frequency offset. On the other hand, the positioning performance noted is essentially independent (max. 15 % change) of the reference frequency stability, which indeed differed by 4 orders of magnitude.

Hugo Palmarola - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.