The Experts below are selected from a list of 782769 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Peter J Kudenchuk - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:Abstract Study Objective: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of Conclusion: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge. [Meischke HW, Rea T, Eisenberg MS, Schaeffer SM, Kudenchuk P. Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator: A randomized trial comparing two Training Methods. Ann Emerg Med. September 2001;38:216-222.]
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. RESULTS: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of <20 seconds) between the AED performance of seniors trained with a video and seniors trained in a face-to-face setting at the initial Training or at the retention assessment. At the initial evaluation, overall performance was satisfactory, with greater than 98% trained with either method delivering a shock. However, at the 3-month follow-up, almost one fourth of trainees were not able to deliver a shock, and almost half were not able to correctly place the pads on the manikin. CONCLUSION: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge.
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:Abstract Study Objective: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of Conclusion: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge. [Meischke HW, Rea T, Eisenberg MS, Schaeffer SM, Kudenchuk P. Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator: A randomized trial comparing two Training Methods. Ann Emerg Med. September 2001;38:216-222.]
Hendrika Meischke - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:Abstract Study Objective: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of Conclusion: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge. [Meischke HW, Rea T, Eisenberg MS, Schaeffer SM, Kudenchuk P. Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator: A randomized trial comparing two Training Methods. Ann Emerg Med. September 2001;38:216-222.]
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. RESULTS: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of <20 seconds) between the AED performance of seniors trained with a video and seniors trained in a face-to-face setting at the initial Training or at the retention assessment. At the initial evaluation, overall performance was satisfactory, with greater than 98% trained with either method delivering a shock. However, at the 3-month follow-up, almost one fourth of trainees were not able to deliver a shock, and almost half were not able to correctly place the pads on the manikin. CONCLUSION: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge.
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:Abstract Study Objective: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of Conclusion: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge. [Meischke HW, Rea T, Eisenberg MS, Schaeffer SM, Kudenchuk P. Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator: A randomized trial comparing two Training Methods. Ann Emerg Med. September 2001;38:216-222.]
Mickey S Eisenberg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:Abstract Study Objective: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of Conclusion: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge. [Meischke HW, Rea T, Eisenberg MS, Schaeffer SM, Kudenchuk P. Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator: A randomized trial comparing two Training Methods. Ann Emerg Med. September 2001;38:216-222.]
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. RESULTS: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of <20 seconds) between the AED performance of seniors trained with a video and seniors trained in a face-to-face setting at the initial Training or at the retention assessment. At the initial evaluation, overall performance was satisfactory, with greater than 98% trained with either method delivering a shock. However, at the 3-month follow-up, almost one fourth of trainees were not able to deliver a shock, and almost half were not able to correctly place the pads on the manikin. CONCLUSION: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge.
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:Abstract Study Objective: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of Conclusion: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge. [Meischke HW, Rea T, Eisenberg MS, Schaeffer SM, Kudenchuk P. Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator: A randomized trial comparing two Training Methods. Ann Emerg Med. September 2001;38:216-222.]
Sheri Schaeffer - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:Abstract Study Objective: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of Conclusion: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge. [Meischke HW, Rea T, Eisenberg MS, Schaeffer SM, Kudenchuk P. Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator: A randomized trial comparing two Training Methods. Ann Emerg Med. September 2001;38:216-222.]
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. RESULTS: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of <20 seconds) between the AED performance of seniors trained with a video and seniors trained in a face-to-face setting at the initial Training or at the retention assessment. At the initial evaluation, overall performance was satisfactory, with greater than 98% trained with either method delivering a shock. However, at the 3-month follow-up, almost one fourth of trainees were not able to deliver a shock, and almost half were not able to correctly place the pads on the manikin. CONCLUSION: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge.
-
Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator a randomized trial comparing two Training Methods
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2001Co-Authors: Hendrika Meischke, Mickey S Eisenberg, Sheri Schaeffer, Peter J KudenchukAbstract:Abstract Study Objective: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 Methods for Training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each Training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. Methods: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial Training. Similar performance measures were assessed. Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 Training Methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of Conclusion: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge. [Meischke HW, Rea T, Eisenberg MS, Schaeffer SM, Kudenchuk P. Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator: A randomized trial comparing two Training Methods. Ann Emerg Med. September 2001;38:216-222.]
Gavin D Perkins - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
aed Training and its impact on skill acquisition retention and performance a systematic review of alternative Training Methods
Resuscitation, 2011Co-Authors: Joyce Yeung, Deems Okamoto, Jasmeet Soar, Gavin D PerkinsAbstract:Abstract Introduction The most popular method of Training in basic life support and AED use remains instructor-led Training courses. This systematic review examines the evidence for different Training Methods of basic life support providers (laypersons and healthcare providers) using standard instructor-led courses as comparators, to assess whether alternative method of Training can lead to effective skill acquisition, skill retention and actual performance whilst using the AED. Method OVID Medline (including Medline 1950-November 2010; EMBASE 1988-November 2010) was searched using “Training” OR “teaching” OR “education” as text words. Search was then combined by using AND “AED” OR “automatic external defibrillator” as MESH words. Additionally, the American Heart Association Endnote library was searched with the terms “AED” and “automatic external defibrillator”. Resuscitation journal was hand searched for relevant articles. Results 285 articles were identified. After duplicates were removed, 172 references were reviewed for relevance. From this 22 papers were scrutinized and 18 were included. All were manikin studies. Four LOE 1 studies, seven LOE 2 studies and three LOE 4 studies were supportive of alternative AED Training Methods. One LOE 2 study was neutral. Three LOE 1 studies provided opposing evidence. Conclusion There is good evidence to support alternative Methods of AED Training including lay instructors, self directed learning and brief Training. There is also evidence to support that no Training is needed but even brief Training can improve speed of shock delivery and electrode pad placement. Features of AED can have an impact on its use and further research should be directed to making devices user-friendly and robust to untrained layperson.
