The Experts below are selected from a list of 111 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Gary Sacks - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Systematic review of the impact of nutrition Claims related to fat, sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake
BMC Public Health, 2019Co-Authors: Laura H. Oostenbach, Esther Slits, Ella Robinson, Gary SacksAbstract:BackgroundAs part of efforts to address high levels of overweight and obesity, the provision of nutrition information (e.g., through nutrition labels and nutrition Claims) on food packages has increasingly become an important policy option. This study aimed to assess the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on product packaging on several aspects of food choices to understand how they contribute to the prevention of overweight and obesity.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted using the online databases EBSCOhost Global Health, EBSCOhost Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PsycINFO and Embase. Studies were included if they measured the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on outcomes related to body weight, and were published between January 2003 and April 2018.ResultsEleven studies were included in the review. Results showed that nutrition Claims can influence the knowledge of consumers with respect to perceived healthfulness of products, as well as expected and experienced tastiness of food products – making food products with nutrition Claims seem healthier and less tasty. Nutrition Claims can make the appropriate portion size appear to be larger and lead to an underestimation of the energy content of food products. Nutrition Claims can also influence food purchase intentions, moderated by the perceived healthfulness of the relevant food products and the health consciousness of individuals. Nutrition Claims were also found to have an impact on food purchases, to influence ‘consumption guilt’ (i.e., feeling of guilt associated with eating), and to increase consumption, moderated by the weight status of individuals. These influences were shown to vary depending on the Type of Claim and food carrying the Claim.ConclusionsThere is evidence that, while nutrition Claims may lead some consumers to improve their nutrition knowledge and select healthier options, it may also lead consumers to increase food consumption and overall energy intake. This may run counter to efforts to address overweight and obesity.
-
systematic review of the impact of nutrition Claims related to fat sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake
BMC Public Health, 2019Co-Authors: Laura H. Oostenbach, Esther Slits, Ella Robinson, Gary SacksAbstract:As part of efforts to address high levels of overweight and obesity, the provision of nutrition information (e.g., through nutrition labels and nutrition Claims) on food packages has increasingly become an important policy option. This study aimed to assess the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on product packaging on several aspects of food choices to understand how they contribute to the prevention of overweight and obesity. A systematic literature review was conducted using the online databases EBSCOhost Global Health, EBSCOhost Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PsycINFO and Embase. Studies were included if they measured the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on outcomes related to body weight, and were published between January 2003 and April 2018. Eleven studies were included in the review. Results showed that nutrition Claims can influence the knowledge of consumers with respect to perceived healthfulness of products, as well as expected and experienced tastiness of food products – making food products with nutrition Claims seem healthier and less tasty. Nutrition Claims can make the appropriate portion size appear to be larger and lead to an underestimation of the energy content of food products. Nutrition Claims can also influence food purchase intentions, moderated by the perceived healthfulness of the relevant food products and the health consciousness of individuals. Nutrition Claims were also found to have an impact on food purchases, to influence ‘consumption guilt’ (i.e., feeling of guilt associated with eating), and to increase consumption, moderated by the weight status of individuals. These influences were shown to vary depending on the Type of Claim and food carrying the Claim. There is evidence that, while nutrition Claims may lead some consumers to improve their nutrition knowledge and select healthier options, it may also lead consumers to increase food consumption and overall energy intake. This may run counter to efforts to address overweight and obesity.
Laura H. Oostenbach - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Systematic review of the impact of nutrition Claims related to fat, sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake
BMC Public Health, 2019Co-Authors: Laura H. Oostenbach, Esther Slits, Ella Robinson, Gary SacksAbstract:BackgroundAs part of efforts to address high levels of overweight and obesity, the provision of nutrition information (e.g., through nutrition labels and nutrition Claims) on food packages has increasingly become an important policy option. This study aimed to assess the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on product packaging on several aspects of food choices to understand how they contribute to the prevention of overweight and obesity.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted using the online databases EBSCOhost Global Health, EBSCOhost Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PsycINFO and Embase. Studies were included if they measured the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on outcomes related to body weight, and were published between January 2003 and April 2018.ResultsEleven studies were included in the review. Results showed that nutrition Claims can influence the knowledge of consumers with respect to perceived healthfulness of products, as well as expected and experienced tastiness of food products – making food products with nutrition Claims seem healthier and less tasty. Nutrition Claims can make the appropriate portion size appear to be larger and lead to an underestimation of the energy content of food products. Nutrition Claims can also influence food purchase intentions, moderated by the perceived healthfulness of the relevant food products and the health consciousness of individuals. Nutrition Claims were also found to have an impact on food purchases, to influence ‘consumption guilt’ (i.e., feeling of guilt associated with eating), and to increase consumption, moderated by the weight status of individuals. These influences were shown to vary depending on the Type of Claim and food carrying the Claim.ConclusionsThere is evidence that, while nutrition Claims may lead some consumers to improve their nutrition knowledge and select healthier options, it may also lead consumers to increase food consumption and overall energy intake. This may run counter to efforts to address overweight and obesity.
-
systematic review of the impact of nutrition Claims related to fat sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake
BMC Public Health, 2019Co-Authors: Laura H. Oostenbach, Esther Slits, Ella Robinson, Gary SacksAbstract:As part of efforts to address high levels of overweight and obesity, the provision of nutrition information (e.g., through nutrition labels and nutrition Claims) on food packages has increasingly become an important policy option. This study aimed to assess the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on product packaging on several aspects of food choices to understand how they contribute to the prevention of overweight and obesity. A systematic literature review was conducted using the online databases EBSCOhost Global Health, EBSCOhost Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PsycINFO and Embase. Studies were included if they measured the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on outcomes related to body weight, and were published between January 2003 and April 2018. Eleven studies were included in the review. Results showed that nutrition Claims can influence the knowledge of consumers with respect to perceived healthfulness of products, as well as expected and experienced tastiness of food products – making food products with nutrition Claims seem healthier and less tasty. Nutrition Claims can make the appropriate portion size appear to be larger and lead to an underestimation of the energy content of food products. Nutrition Claims can also influence food purchase intentions, moderated by the perceived healthfulness of the relevant food products and the health consciousness of individuals. Nutrition Claims were also found to have an impact on food purchases, to influence ‘consumption guilt’ (i.e., feeling of guilt associated with eating), and to increase consumption, moderated by the weight status of individuals. These influences were shown to vary depending on the Type of Claim and food carrying the Claim. There is evidence that, while nutrition Claims may lead some consumers to improve their nutrition knowledge and select healthier options, it may also lead consumers to increase food consumption and overall energy intake. This may run counter to efforts to address overweight and obesity.
Esther Slits - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Systematic review of the impact of nutrition Claims related to fat, sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake
BMC Public Health, 2019Co-Authors: Laura H. Oostenbach, Esther Slits, Ella Robinson, Gary SacksAbstract:BackgroundAs part of efforts to address high levels of overweight and obesity, the provision of nutrition information (e.g., through nutrition labels and nutrition Claims) on food packages has increasingly become an important policy option. This study aimed to assess the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on product packaging on several aspects of food choices to understand how they contribute to the prevention of overweight and obesity.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted using the online databases EBSCOhost Global Health, EBSCOhost Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PsycINFO and Embase. Studies were included if they measured the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on outcomes related to body weight, and were published between January 2003 and April 2018.ResultsEleven studies were included in the review. Results showed that nutrition Claims can influence the knowledge of consumers with respect to perceived healthfulness of products, as well as expected and experienced tastiness of food products – making food products with nutrition Claims seem healthier and less tasty. Nutrition Claims can make the appropriate portion size appear to be larger and lead to an underestimation of the energy content of food products. Nutrition Claims can also influence food purchase intentions, moderated by the perceived healthfulness of the relevant food products and the health consciousness of individuals. Nutrition Claims were also found to have an impact on food purchases, to influence ‘consumption guilt’ (i.e., feeling of guilt associated with eating), and to increase consumption, moderated by the weight status of individuals. These influences were shown to vary depending on the Type of Claim and food carrying the Claim.ConclusionsThere is evidence that, while nutrition Claims may lead some consumers to improve their nutrition knowledge and select healthier options, it may also lead consumers to increase food consumption and overall energy intake. This may run counter to efforts to address overweight and obesity.
-
systematic review of the impact of nutrition Claims related to fat sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake
BMC Public Health, 2019Co-Authors: Laura H. Oostenbach, Esther Slits, Ella Robinson, Gary SacksAbstract:As part of efforts to address high levels of overweight and obesity, the provision of nutrition information (e.g., through nutrition labels and nutrition Claims) on food packages has increasingly become an important policy option. This study aimed to assess the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on product packaging on several aspects of food choices to understand how they contribute to the prevention of overweight and obesity. A systematic literature review was conducted using the online databases EBSCOhost Global Health, EBSCOhost Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PsycINFO and Embase. Studies were included if they measured the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on outcomes related to body weight, and were published between January 2003 and April 2018. Eleven studies were included in the review. Results showed that nutrition Claims can influence the knowledge of consumers with respect to perceived healthfulness of products, as well as expected and experienced tastiness of food products – making food products with nutrition Claims seem healthier and less tasty. Nutrition Claims can make the appropriate portion size appear to be larger and lead to an underestimation of the energy content of food products. Nutrition Claims can also influence food purchase intentions, moderated by the perceived healthfulness of the relevant food products and the health consciousness of individuals. Nutrition Claims were also found to have an impact on food purchases, to influence ‘consumption guilt’ (i.e., feeling of guilt associated with eating), and to increase consumption, moderated by the weight status of individuals. These influences were shown to vary depending on the Type of Claim and food carrying the Claim. There is evidence that, while nutrition Claims may lead some consumers to improve their nutrition knowledge and select healthier options, it may also lead consumers to increase food consumption and overall energy intake. This may run counter to efforts to address overweight and obesity.
Ella Robinson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Systematic review of the impact of nutrition Claims related to fat, sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake
BMC Public Health, 2019Co-Authors: Laura H. Oostenbach, Esther Slits, Ella Robinson, Gary SacksAbstract:BackgroundAs part of efforts to address high levels of overweight and obesity, the provision of nutrition information (e.g., through nutrition labels and nutrition Claims) on food packages has increasingly become an important policy option. This study aimed to assess the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on product packaging on several aspects of food choices to understand how they contribute to the prevention of overweight and obesity.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted using the online databases EBSCOhost Global Health, EBSCOhost Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PsycINFO and Embase. Studies were included if they measured the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on outcomes related to body weight, and were published between January 2003 and April 2018.ResultsEleven studies were included in the review. Results showed that nutrition Claims can influence the knowledge of consumers with respect to perceived healthfulness of products, as well as expected and experienced tastiness of food products – making food products with nutrition Claims seem healthier and less tasty. Nutrition Claims can make the appropriate portion size appear to be larger and lead to an underestimation of the energy content of food products. Nutrition Claims can also influence food purchase intentions, moderated by the perceived healthfulness of the relevant food products and the health consciousness of individuals. Nutrition Claims were also found to have an impact on food purchases, to influence ‘consumption guilt’ (i.e., feeling of guilt associated with eating), and to increase consumption, moderated by the weight status of individuals. These influences were shown to vary depending on the Type of Claim and food carrying the Claim.ConclusionsThere is evidence that, while nutrition Claims may lead some consumers to improve their nutrition knowledge and select healthier options, it may also lead consumers to increase food consumption and overall energy intake. This may run counter to efforts to address overweight and obesity.
-
systematic review of the impact of nutrition Claims related to fat sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake
BMC Public Health, 2019Co-Authors: Laura H. Oostenbach, Esther Slits, Ella Robinson, Gary SacksAbstract:As part of efforts to address high levels of overweight and obesity, the provision of nutrition information (e.g., through nutrition labels and nutrition Claims) on food packages has increasingly become an important policy option. This study aimed to assess the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on product packaging on several aspects of food choices to understand how they contribute to the prevention of overweight and obesity. A systematic literature review was conducted using the online databases EBSCOhost Global Health, EBSCOhost Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PsycINFO and Embase. Studies were included if they measured the influence of nutrition Claims relating to fat, sugar, and energy content on outcomes related to body weight, and were published between January 2003 and April 2018. Eleven studies were included in the review. Results showed that nutrition Claims can influence the knowledge of consumers with respect to perceived healthfulness of products, as well as expected and experienced tastiness of food products – making food products with nutrition Claims seem healthier and less tasty. Nutrition Claims can make the appropriate portion size appear to be larger and lead to an underestimation of the energy content of food products. Nutrition Claims can also influence food purchase intentions, moderated by the perceived healthfulness of the relevant food products and the health consciousness of individuals. Nutrition Claims were also found to have an impact on food purchases, to influence ‘consumption guilt’ (i.e., feeling of guilt associated with eating), and to increase consumption, moderated by the weight status of individuals. These influences were shown to vary depending on the Type of Claim and food carrying the Claim. There is evidence that, while nutrition Claims may lead some consumers to improve their nutrition knowledge and select healthier options, it may also lead consumers to increase food consumption and overall energy intake. This may run counter to efforts to address overweight and obesity.
Piritta Lampila - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Perception of Health Claims Among Nordic Consumers
Journal of Consumer Policy, 2009Co-Authors: Klaus G. Grunert, Liisa Lähteenmäki, Yasemin Boztug, Emilia Martinsdóttir, Øydis Ueland, Annika Åström, Piritta LampilaAbstract:Health Claim perception was investigated by a web-based instrument with a sample of 4,612 respondents in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden). Respondents decided which of a pair of Claims sounded better, was easier to understand and was more convincing in their opinion. Claims were constructed from an underlying universe combining different active ingredients (familiar, unfamiliar), Type of Claim (combination of information about ingredient, physiological function and health benefit), framing (positive, negative), and use of qualifier (with, without “may”). Across pairs, the Claims differed in the health benefit addressed (cardiovascular health, dementia, bodyweight). Results showed that respondents could be grouped into two roughly equally sized classes that differed in the Type of Claim preferred: one class prefers “long” Claims that give the full story consisting of active ingredient, physiological function and health benefit, whereas the other prefers “short” Claims consisting of the health benefit only. Results also showed that the familiar ingredient is preferred to the unfamiliar one, whereas effects of positive versus negative framing depended on the Type of health benefit addressed.
